Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Library
Facebook

Notices

The Library The Library for posting Articles and recommended reading.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-14-2009, 09:39 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,154
Re: The King James Version Defended

It is indeed possible to make an idol of the KJV. I know folks who will not sit so much as a piece of paper on their KJV bible!
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-14-2009, 09:53 AM
Timmy's Avatar
Timmy Timmy is offline
Don't ask.


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,212
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
It is indeed possible to make an idol of the KJV. I know folks who will not sit so much as a piece of paper on their KJV bible!
My folks were like that, probably still are, but I don't think it was just KJV. Had nothing to do with that.
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty

More New Stuff in Timmy Talk!
My Countdown Counting down to: Rapture. Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:28 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,154
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy View Post
My folks were like that, probably still are, but I don't think it was just KJV. Had nothing to do with that.
Yeah, it may not be the KJV, itself, but the Bible. A book. Yes, the bible holds truth, but it is not an idol, or object of reverence. I revere the message. Not the paper and ink and leather.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-14-2009, 12:03 PM
Timmy's Avatar
Timmy Timmy is offline
Don't ask.


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,212
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Yeah, it may not be the KJV, itself, but the Bible. A book. Yes, the bible holds truth, but it is not an idol, or object of reverence. I revere the message. Not the paper and ink and leather.
Oh, that reminds me of a time back in high school (around 1970). At an after-school Bible study, a guy was making that very point. He actually dropped his Bible on the floor to demonstrate it. Not everyone took kindly to that little demo!
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty

More New Stuff in Timmy Talk!
My Countdown Counting down to: Rapture. Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-14-2009, 01:40 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,154
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy View Post
Oh, that reminds me of a time back in high school (around 1970). At an after-school Bible study, a guy was making that very point. He actually dropped his Bible on the floor to demonstrate it. Not everyone took kindly to that little demo!
I can imagine. I know many people who would convulse at such a thing.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-14-2009, 10:52 PM
meBNme meBNme is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 697
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by rava61 View Post
I 'prophesied' many years ago that the UPC wold trade their KJV's in for more liberal translations - and I have lived to see that come to pass, how sad.

I also like the Tyndale version.
Why do people do this?????

Look, just cause some in the UPC may have, does not mean that "The UPC" has.

Every UPC I associate with primarily uses the KJV.

My cousin Bubba "profesied" that every male in Johnston county would be chewin SKOAL wintergreen by summer of 2005 too.
Well, half his highschool class was, as of last year and he is completely convinced the whole county has been converted. Funny thing though, the other 90% have stayed with chewin gum. But you can't tell Bubba that. To him, the whole world is hooked on SKOAL.

Sooo....

Why do people do this????
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:01 PM
meBNme meBNme is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 697
Re: The King James Version Defended

But back to the subject....

I'm interested in finding out what translation you all feel is the most accurate to the original text. (to be found in English)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-17-2009, 02:51 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: The King James Version Defended

Personally, I believe that the English Standard Version (ESV) is the most accurate translation and closest to the original text in modern English. I also like the ESV because it's translated to keep the melodic tempo of the King James Version.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-18-2009, 10:52 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,154
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Personally, I believe that the English Standard Version (ESV) is the most accurate translation and closest to the original text in modern English. I also like the ESV because it's translated to keep the melodic tempo of the King James Version.
Is it from the Textus Receptus?
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-18-2009, 11:37 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: The King James Version Defended

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Is it from the Textus Receptus?
Not entirely. It's based on various older manuscripts. As we all well know, the Textus Receptus has been modified various times throughout it's existance. The many of the older manuscripts haven't undergone these modifications and therefore reflect the original writings. For example the Textus Receptus John chapter 8 has an obvious insertion for clarification that isn't present in any of the older manuscripts. Not to mention Romans 8 (second clause of Romans 8:1 wasn't in the original manuscripts) and others.

Personally, I don't hold the Textus Receptus in any higher regard than I do most of the older manuscripts found to date.

What I find interesting is that Oneness Apostolics tend to favor the Textus Receptus which possesses a strong Trinitarian bent. Most older manuscripts actually present a better case for Apostolic Oneness Christology.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What version and Bible do you use, Why? U376977 Fellowship Hall 84 07-15-2008 10:09 PM
King James Version deacon blues Fellowship Hall 2 05-14-2008 12:31 PM
I Cor. 13 Christmas version Margies3 Fellowship Hall 0 12-18-2007 07:23 PM
the King James Version berkeley Fellowship Hall 106 06-27-2007 01:15 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.