Gospels of Matthew without Trinitarian ending

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Esaias

List them, please.

they are in our website http://www.apostolic-bible.com/Mt%20...t%20ending.pdf

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

they are in our website http://www.apostolic-bible.com/Mt%20...t%20ending.pdf

Cool. You have some 65 20th and 21st century Bible translations that omit the words of the Greek text. You have ZERO Greek manuscripts that actually omit the words in question.

Thanks for playing, though.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Cool. You have some 65 20th and 21st century Bible translations that omit the words of the Greek text. You have ZERO Greek manuscripts that actually omit the words in question.

Thanks for playing, though.

Furthermore, all the Bibles you mention, if they contain any footnotes, all refer to Eusebius' infamous quotaton/paraphrase. That is NOT how you establish the text.

[Scott Pitta]

Esaias is right. Since I usually enjoy disagreeing with him, I will repeat myself:

Esaias is right.

There are zero Greek manuscripts of Matthew that we now possess than omit or change Mt. 28:19.

Esaias is right.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

Esaias is right. Since I usually enjoy disagreeing with him, I will repeat myself:

Esaias is right.

There are zero Greek manuscripts of Matthew that we now possess than omit or change Mt. 28:19.

Esaias is right.

I am saving this post!

[LOVE JESUS]

Well, is the rest of the Word of God true or have more gospels been found that contradict what we have already believed?

[Steven Avery]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

they are in our website http://www.apostolic-bible.com/Mt%20...t%20ending.pdf

Thanks for the warning that textual apostates are active in apostolic circles.

#7
7. The Truth Bible: Complete Topical Study and Reference Edition, Marvin M. Arnold - Clinton Willis - William Conner, 2000:

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

Esaias is right. Since I usually enjoy disagreeing with him, I will repeat myself:

Esaias is right.

There are zero Greek manuscripts of Matthew that we now possess than omit or change Mt. 28:19.

Esaias is right.

We do not go by the Greek manuscripts because we are using quotations of the original Hebrew Matthew.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

We do not go by the Greek manuscripts because we are using quotations of the original Hebrew Matthew.

Well, there you go! FZ and his bunch go by a 14th century Rabbinical "version" of Matthew.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Steven Avery

Thanks for the warning that textual apostates are active in apostolic circles.

#7
7. The Truth Bible: Complete Topical Study and Reference Edition, Marvin M. Arnold - Clinton Willis - William Conner, 2000:

Hey we who baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ are always called apostates, please come up with a new insult.