Is The Serpent Seed Doctrine A "Damnable Heresy"?

[Tiberius Pantera]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Dan hasn't said he did not carry his mother's DNA.

Don't put me in that category.

Elder Epley might have a similar view to Vaughn's.

I suspect Elder Epley meant what I just said.

I sure do hope you agree with me too.

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

If Mary were not his mother biologically, how could he claim to be a descendant of David? He would be fooling us.

Joseph's DNA wasn't a part of Jesus, but the Bible does put Jesus in the lineage of Joseph for some reason. It shows that Jesus is a descendant of David from both Mary's and Joseph's sides of the family.

[Tiberius Pantera]

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

I don't see any scriptural evidence for that, but like I said, I don't think it matters, as I don't see it as a salvation issue or anything.

H1, i think this is pretty important.

what made Jesus the sacrifice was that he shared humanity with humanity, only without spot or blemish.

had he not been the son of Mary, he would not have been a viable sacrifice for the sins of humanity.

Of course Mary was his mother.. and of course he could claim the Davidic throne from her lineage and or course he could be kinsman redeemer from his human birth... but God planted Jesus inside of her womb.. with no human interaction,, no way for the seed of sin to enter the body of Jesus.. he protected Jesus in a womb, an incubator....

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

Joseph's DNA wasn't a part of Jesus, but the Bible does put Jesus in the lineage of Joseph for some reason. It shows that Jesus is a descendant of David from both Mary's and Joseph's sides of the family.

Jesus is said to be the seed of David. He cannot be the seed of David if Mary were an incubator.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Tiberius Pantera

No. Mary was his actual real mother. Jesus' humanity comes from Mary.

period.

Idontcarewhatdanandthegooddoctorsay.

I think you've missed it ... I think he would say she conceived ...

However the doctrine that both he, Vaughn and Branahm proposed is that God had to provide a blood cell .... and use scripture to support this ...

It ain't possible when dealing w/ the human genome ... and there is no evidence of this ....

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Tiberius Pantera

H1, i think this is pretty important.

what made Jesus the sacrifice was that he shared humanity with humanity, only without spot or blemish.

had he not been the son of Mary, he would not have been a viable sacrifice for the sins of humanity.

How did Adam and Eve have humanity without parents? How did they obtain DNA?

If they had the same humanity we now have, isn't it possible that Jesus could be just as human without Mary's DNA?

God could have formed Jesus from the dust of the ground and He would have been just as human as we are, yet without parentage. But that wasn't God's plan. Regardless whether Jesus had Mary's DNA or not, He had to go through the trials of being human from birth. That was God's plan.

With God, all things are possible. It was absolutely possible for Jesus to be born of Mary without sharing her DNA, yet still be 100% human.

[MissBrattified]

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

Mary gave birth to Him. Of course Mary was His mother.

I don't believe that Mary was just a surrogate. I believe that Jesus inherited His humanity from His mother, biologically speaking.

[Tiberius Pantera]

The good doctor ignors the clear contridiction between the quote and the SS doctrine
LOL!

Brother... had he been the literal SEED of DAVID he could not have been the SEED OF GOD.... he was the seed of David in the fact that he was the OFFSRING of David through Marys lineage.......