Quote:
All leading to Trinitarianism and Twinitarianism. All these individuals like Mike separate the Word from God, because instead of taking into account the whole counsel of God, they get stuck on one verse.
|
Do I separate the Logos from God? No more than the Apostle John did.
John 1:1-2
In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God. The same was in the beginning with God.
There was something in the beginning that was distinct from God. Whatever the something was it was God himself.
Distinct from God and yet God.
Verse 3
All things were made by
HIM and without
HIM was not anything made that was made.
Whatever the something was that was
WITH GOD was
PERSONAL. All things were made by
HIM.
Whatever was with God was personal.
And the word
WAS GOD.
The literal Greek reads and
God was the word.
How can the something (that was personal) be distinct from God and yet is himself God?
God in his omnipresence, his essence is invisible to creation. How do we know this?
1 Kings 8:27
27But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?
The Heaven of heavens (think galaxies) is to small to contain him. How do you see that?
So remember the word that was
WITH GOD was God himself. Not another God. Not another person.
The word was God.
God was the word.
He formed an image from himself.
A PERSONAL IMAGE.
Distinct
FROM HIM in that it would be
VISIBLE while he in his essence would continue to be
INVISIBLE.
Since the form would be his image it would be
HIMSELF just in a reduced visible form.
Not 2 distinct
GOD PERSONS. One God in two modes of being simultaneously!
The two modes of being were visible and invisible.
Thats what Paul meant when he spoke of the image of the invisible God the firstborn of all creation.
Col. 1:13-17
13Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of
his dear Son: 14In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
15
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Paul says the same thing of the image of the invisible God the firstborn of every creature that John said of the Logos.
The Logos created all things.
The Son who is called the image of the invisible God created all things.
Are they different "things"?
No the Apostles speak of the same thing.
The Son was the image of
GODS PERSON......NOT ANOTHER GOD PERSON.
Paul taught the same thing to the Hebrews.
Heb. 1:1-3
1God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2Hath in these last days spoken unto us
by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things,
by whom also he made the worlds; 3Who being the brightness of his glory, and
the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;
See how smoothly
John 1,
Col. 1, and
Hebrews 1 fit together?
John has the Logos as a person,
he and him making all things.
Paul has the image of the invisible God creating all things.
Its the same thing.
Modern Oneness has made a mistake in boxing themselves into a concept that
SON only.......and.....always.....refers to
the man Christ Jesus.
Thats a good concept except for the fact Jesus, John and Paul all prove its to limiting.
We have shown that Paul twice says God made all things
BY HIS SON.
Modern Oneness must answer the question then did Jesus Christ create the Universe
AS A MAN? AS FLESH?
Or as the visible image God used as a form to work through? An image he would
SPEAK THROUGH?
And the logos was God,
or,
God was the logos.
Distinct not as God persons but visible and invisible.
The omnipresent Spirit himself dwelled in the form.
So yes.
The logos
WAS GOD. God working from a certain location, the image, as distinct from him working from his omnipresence.
We have already seen that Paul crashes the concept that SON can only be referring to man or flesh.
Now we will see how John recording Jesus words would not be teaching this concept.
John 3:13
12If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven,
even the Son of man which is in heaven.
Jesus Christ told Nicodemus the son of man is
STILL IN HEAVEN!
Let that sink in. If the son of man was here on the earth as a man, Jesus said to Nic he was
STILL IN HEAVEN.
Jesus knew he was the Son of man
BEFORE he came to Earth. Was the Son which Jesus said was
STILL IN HEAVEN flesh? A man?
Jesus did not deny he was the Son before he came to Earth.
No Trinitarian or Arian on earth teaches this doctrine. Only Oneness.
Part 1