Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-20-2011, 05:45 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by aegsm76 View Post
AQP - I did not intend to repost on this thread, but I do have to correct you on one important fact.
I believe that I never stated that anything that I brought up was a "sin".
The one place that I did use "sin" it was in the general sense of a societal or cultural norm.
I will say that your train of thought is what I was trying to generate!
Your apology is accepted!

Thanks.
I didn't mean that you said they were sin, that last portion was a general "you".
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-20-2011, 05:50 PM
aegsm76 aegsm76 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,121
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Ah so! I apologize for asking for your apology!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-20-2011, 05:50 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Men were wearing makeup as far back as Egypt! I've read it was functional too, like football players wearing the dark patch under their eyes...baseball players too
Our founding fathers powdered their hair (faces too, I think), wore ruffles and pretty little knee britches with buckled shoes.

That's why I think it's wrong to base doctrine on culture. Culture is forever changing.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-20-2011, 05:51 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by aegsm76 View Post
Ah so! I apologize for asking for your apology!!!!


The conversation gave me a lot of food for thought today, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-20-2011, 05:59 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,774
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* View Post
Our founding fathers powdered their hair (faces too, I think), wore ruffles and pretty little knee britches with buckled shoes.

That's why I think it's wrong to base doctrine on culture. Culture is forever changing.
True but even then there was a gender distinction in clothes and style
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:04 PM
missourimary's Avatar
missourimary missourimary is offline
mary


 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,002
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
True but even then there was a gender distinction in clothes and style
There is today, too, except in some fringe groups.
__________________
What we make of the Bible will never be as great a thing as what the Bible will - if we let it - make of us.~Rich Mullins
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.~Galileo Galilei
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:22 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
True but even then there was a gender distinction in clothes and style
Always has been all throughout history, and always will be.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:22 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,774
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary View Post
There is today, too, except in some fringe groups.
You mean like this?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:23 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary View Post
There is today, too, except in some fringe groups.
Ironically, probably the one point in history when there was the least gender distinction in clothing was during the Bible times. When the Deuteronomy passage was written.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:24 PM
*AQuietPlace*'s Avatar
*AQuietPlace* *AQuietPlace* is offline
Love God, Love Your Neighbor


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
Re: Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
You mean like this?
Good GRAVY! That hurts my eyes!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question regarding women wearing pants... Sheltiedad Fellowship Hall 121 08-19-2012 10:42 PM
Woman who wouldn't wear pants wins settlement TRFrance The Tab 8 02-12-2009 11:18 AM
If UPC says women can't wear make-up, what about men? Chan Deep Waters 67 05-01-2007 09:39 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.