Submission? Or Power and Control?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by ILG

If you are asking if I believe the hardline, you must 1. Repent and then 2. Be baptized with a preacher saying the name of Jesus over you while you are immersed and then 3. Speak in tongues and believe in the Oneness of God to be saved the answer is no.

Are you Hindu?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Is a woman in sin if she has a butch cut?

Society is literally going insane. And there are forces at work trying to get the church to fall down when the horn toots.

Thankfully I'm tone deaf.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Okay, so hair isn't salvational, but Acts 2:38 is. That is the Gospel the apostles tell us we must obey.

Sis, that's not what ILG posted.

She obviously believes there are other ways then having a MAN say the name of Jesus over an individual.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Society is literally going insane. And there are forces at work trying to get the church to fall down when the horn toots.

Thankfully I'm tone deaf.

Bro, cultural Marxism has swallowed Christianity whole in this country.

Some believe they are setting the captives free. When in reality they're stuffing them down the rabbit hole. All the while handing out blue pills for everyone.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I don't personally know anyone who doesn't believe in Acts 2:38 in the UPC.

I am with you on dat.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by ILG

It's not that they don't believe in it. It that there is a difference between the hardline message and what was once called the "Light Doctrine".

Not a lot of Light Doctrine guys out there. Jehovah Witnesses are big on New Light doctrine. Because during the turn of the century that was in vogue. But, sister, you always point towards minorities within the organization. New light isn't a teaching like it is within the Jay Hove Witnesses.

But, let me ask you this, do you believe the Word of God is infallible?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Not a lot of Light Doctrine guys out there. Jehovah Witnesses are big on New Light doctrine. Because during the turn of the century that was in vogue. But, sister, you always point towards minorities within the organization. New light isn't a teaching like it is within the Jay Hove Witnesses.

But, let me ask you this, do you believe the Word of God is infallible?

Old time "light doctrine" included bobbed hair as a cool thing? Somehow I'm a-doubting that.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by ILG

What I am here for, and many people don't understand, is to help those who are in a miserable mind prison find their way out. Fences aren't all bad. It's when people say "You need my fence or you are lost" and even more importantly, when someone believes they need someone else's fence or they are lost, that is an even bigger problem yet because it could be that that fence is keeping them from a closer walk with God for their own life because they are following a fence not create for them.

Originally Posted by n david

Not your job.

Originally Posted by ILG

That is not for you to determine.

There you go.

Look folks, you can follow ILG.

She promises you a better way, better than those mean men who told you XYZ. Now for free, you have ILG who has no checks and balances in her own life. No one who will tell her she is wrong up close and personal. But she wants to help you out of your MIND PRISON?

MIND PRISON?

Where is that in the Bible?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

It gets real old, and when you are giving book, chapter, and verse and they give you Brother Stoneking, Bunch and Breeze, you just shake your head.

Bunch and Breeze! I haven't heard of them in forever. Lol

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Old time "light doctrine" included bobbed hair as a cool thing? Somehow I'm a-doubting that.

ILG is here evangelizing to get her membership up over at her FB page.

She cringes when she sees a butch cut?

Boy, that's going to open a can O worms.