Voter Fraud? - Page 75

Steven Avery · #**741** 02-19-2021, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

After further reviewing Larry Johnson’s rebuttal, I don’t see his criticism with Mary Fanning as valid. For instance, the documentary puts out a list of foreign intrusions into the Dominion systems. They also extrapolated the IP addresses from raw data, physical location, computer IDs and the exact changes in vote counts made with each intrusion. Only a court could verify all of this. Not holding my breath.

You are actually saying his criticism was valid.

As a comment from nomark said:

Quote:

"No, you are missing it. Anyone could fabricate a spreadsheet. You need what is called foundation. How was this data collected? Who collected it? Was is done real time or by reading the logs? Where did you get the logs or real time data?

...

Anyone can make up an animated graphic showing lines.... where is the key? the legend? How do you link those lines to the spreadsheet data?

It's all in the details. What was shown would be laughed at in a courtroom unless the details and foundation can be established."

And how did you calculate vote changes?

Can you show the exact information of even one line?

Pressing-On · #**742** 02-20-2021, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Avery

He actually thinks the Melissa Carone (and various spellings and names) assertions "offer solid evidence". No way. She has been the worst witness to fraud. When she testified in Michigan, apparently a bit tipsy and belligerant, the guy and gal who were the next witness were far better.

Yes, I did see some claiming she was drunk. Lol! The media puts a little bug in the ear and that’s all it takes.

However, in subsequent interviews, she stands by her affidavit, hasn’t changed her testimony, and as of today, no charges have been pressed. She is also running for public office to work against voter fraud. We shall see.

Pressing-On · #**743** 02-20-2021, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Avery

You are actually saying his criticism was valid.

As a comment from nomark said:

And how did you calculate vote changes?

Can you show the exact information of even one line?

Mike Lindell has put out a shorter version update on his website. I understand it is because of Larry’s questioning of his first lengthy version. And that is fine. We do need to question it all. He apparently feels this is a hill he will die on.

The shorter version, at the bottom of the page is about 16 minutes. The question of the anomalies has always been front and center for many questioning the election outcome. The anomalies are why so many red flags were raised in the first place. The shorter video version addresses that issue.

https://michaeljlindell.com/

Steven Avery · #**744** 02-21-2021, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

However, in subsequent interviews, she stands by her affidavit, hasn’t changed her testimony, and as of today, no charges have been pressed.

The hearings were not sworn testimony. She pretended to be a techie high-level connected to Dominion exec, when she worked for a sub-contractor for a day, mostly on printer jams. Her testimony was essentially impossible. She was always a Trunpster.

And I first got suspicious when I heard her coaching session from a Trump lawyer, held before the hearings. It goes on and on.

Steven Avery Facebook wall
https://www.facebook.com/steven.aver...61402350562602

She is an embarrassment to the overall steal claims.

Pressing-On · #**745** 02-21-2021, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Avery

The hearings were not sworn testimony. She pretended to be a techie high-level connected to Dominion exec, when she worked for a sub-contractor for a day, mostly on printer jams. Her testimony was essentially impossible. She was always a Trunpster.

And I first got suspicious when I heard her coaching session from a Trump lawyer, held before the hearings. It goes on and on.

Steven Avery Facebook wall
https://www.facebook.com/steven.aver...61402350562602

She is an embarrassment to the overall steal claims.

‘I know what I saw, and I signed something that said if I’m wrong, I can go to prison… Did you?‘

I think I will stick with the blond chick until something more substantial can prove her wrong.

And, BTW, of course her attorney is going to coach her when the weirdo D-Rep Cynthia Johnson gets testy. Remember that woman? “soldiers, you know what to do.” Weirdo.

Pressing-On · #**746** 02-22-2021, 12:25 PM

READ: Justice Thomas’s Blazing Dissent in Pennsylvania Election Case is One for the Ages

The U.S. Supreme Court slapped American voters in the face with its decision not to hear the merits of a Pennsylvania election case. The lawsuit to hear about ballots unconstitutionally accepted after the Election Day deadline was rejected as “moot.”

Clarence Thomas speaks for millions with his blistering dissents. Read it and absorb it in full to recognize what a sham decision the court rendered today:

https://beckernews.com/read-justice-...he-ages-37016/

Originalist · #**747** 02-22-2021, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

READ: Justice Thomas’s Blazing Dissent in Pennsylvania Election Case is One for the Ages

The U.S. Supreme Court slapped American voters in the face with its decision not to hear the merits of a Pennsylvania election case. The lawsuit to hear about ballots unconstitutionally accepted after the Election Day deadline was rejected as “moot.”

Clarence Thomas speaks for millions with his blistering dissents. Read it and absorb it in full to recognize what a sham decision the court rendered today:

https://beckernews.com/read-justice-...he-ages-37016/

And we must keep this in context. The court again refused to proceed. No arguments were shot own.

Pressing-On · #**748** 07-31-2021, 10:34 AM

Gen. Flynn Exclusive: 10 INDISPUTABLE FACTS on the 2020 Election That Argue for Audits

It’s an oft-quoted saying: “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.”

https://www.westernjournal.com/gen-f...-argue-audits/

On every point:

: