PDA

View Full Version : WWOD vs Dan: Who would take the crown?


SDG
06-05-2008, 07:50 PM
I was contacted 48 hours ago ... about a possible online battle royale w/ WWOD ....

I am leaning towards not doing so ... but will ponder it for the next couple of weeks.

I will share my decision the week of July 22cd.

A year ago ... I would have jumped on it ... now ... ????

So who would take the crown?

Rico
06-05-2008, 07:51 PM
I take it this battle royale will not be held at AFF?

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:52 PM
DO IT!!!! DO IT !!! DO IT!!!

O what fun! lol can anyone come ????
make it with one stipulation: it has to take
place on the conservative Apostolic forum
and EVERYONE is allowed to go over there :bliss

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 07:52 PM
I need to know what topic[s] the battle royale would cover before I can vote. :)

SDG
06-05-2008, 07:53 PM
I take it this battle royale will not be held at AFF?

Probably a neutral setting.

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 07:53 PM
DO IT!!!! DO IT !!! DO IT!!!

O what fun! lol can anyone come ????
make it with one stipulation: it has to take
place on the conservative Apostolic forum
and EVERYONE is allowed to go over there :bliss

They are?

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 07:53 PM
WWOD would walk away with the crown,that fellow is good at online boxing.
BTW where would the duel take place ?

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 07:53 PM
I was contacted 48 hours ago ... about a possible online battle royale w/ WWOD ....

I am leaning towards not doing so ... but will ponder it for the next couple of weeks.

I will share my decision the week of July 22cd.

A year ago ... I would have jumped on it ... now ... ????

So who would take the crown?

It depends on what the topic of discussion is.

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:53 PM
They are?

Noooo!

I said that ought to be one of the criterias

SDG
06-05-2008, 07:54 PM
I need to know what topic[s] the battle royale would cover before I can vote. :)

Mainly doctrinal (salvation, standards) and other issues surrounding the Apostolic movement.

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:54 PM
DAN,

WHO asked you to do this ??????????????????????????????


I demand a public answer :happydance

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 07:54 PM
I think it would be entertaining.

I also think there would be nothing edifying come from it, so why do it.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 07:55 PM
Seriously these sorts of slugfests aren't very edifying to read.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 07:55 PM
DAN,

WHO asked you to do this ??????????????????????????????


I demand a public answer :happydance

You sure are a demanding person.

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 07:55 PM
Mainly doctrinal (salvation, standards) and other issues surrounding the Apostolic movement.


Hmmm. I really don't know who would win. I think both of you can talk in circles for hours, the clincher would probably be who lost their temper first. :drama

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 07:56 PM
Mark could argue, but when he got cornered he would usually go into belittling mode.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 07:56 PM
When I mentioned WWOD on another thread,I was clueless about this.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 07:56 PM
Hmmm. I really don't know who would win. I think both of you can talk in circles for hours, the clincher would probably be who lost their temper first. :drama

That is EXACTLY it!

revrandy
06-05-2008, 07:56 PM
I thought squirrels collected NUTS not crowns?

Who would be the top Squirrel would be a more fitting title....

IN other who would be the most nuts? ....

:)

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:56 PM
I think it would be entertaining.

I also think there would be nothing edifying come from it, so why do it.


O please!

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 07:57 PM
Seriously these sorts of slugfests aren't very edifying to read.

No, but they are HIGHLY entertaining. :D :drama :girlpopcorn

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:57 PM
You sure are a demanding person.


let's hear it for the AFF Libraian !

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 07:57 PM
That brother would get banned from FCF and NFCF and come back with a new identity everytime.

StillStanding
06-05-2008, 07:57 PM
It would be like sitting in the bleachers to watch a train wreck! Sparks would fly!

StMark
06-05-2008, 07:58 PM
Seriously these sorts of slugfests aren't very edifying to read.

no one would strong arm you or anyone to read or post.

the ones who cry fowl are often there lurking though

Nahum
06-05-2008, 07:58 PM
Daniel, as I told you on the phone, what would you have to gain?

You have a platform here at AFF.

He has no platform because he has been banned from NFCF, AFF, Wordshare and now JP - all lifetime bans!

I think it would be a no win situation.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:00 PM
I like WWOD I do,but he is something else online.

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:01 PM
Daniel, as I told you on the phone, what would you have to gain?

You have a platform here at AFF.

He has no platform because he has been banned from NFCF, AFF, Wordshare and now JP - all lifetime bans!

I think it would be a no win situation.

Hahaha the dude got banned from JP too! My Lord! Dan.. seriously it would be entertaining but it wouldnt do no good and would just make you angry. Some people just arent worth the breath ya know!?

StillStanding
06-05-2008, 08:01 PM
It should be pay-per-view! Have the money go to "Sheaves For Christ"! :happydance

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:02 PM
Hahaha the dude got banned from JP too! My Lord! Dan.. seriously it would be entertaining but it wouldnt do no good and would just make you angry. Some people just arent worth the breath ya know!?


OMG HOW in the world did you find that out????????????????????? :bliss

dizzyde
06-05-2008, 08:03 PM
Times like these I reeeaaallly feel like an outsider.

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t209/deannamullings/001.jpg

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:03 PM
It should be pay-per-view! Have the money go to "Sheaves For Christ"! :happydance



LOL! that's a good one !!


Better yet, i think WWOD might want to donate that money to support "The Pentecostal Herald " :bliss:bliss:bliss

just teasing !:happydance

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:03 PM
As one who went at it with WWOD.

Let's just say, he doesn't suffer fools gladly!

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:03 PM
Hahaha the dude got banned from JP too! My Lord! Dan.. seriously it would be entertaining but it wouldnt do no good and would just make you angry. Some people just arent worth the breath ya know!?

I don't think that's the reason.

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:04 PM
Renda,

If CAF wont host it, please allow it here! It'll be like Old Times again!!
Don't spoil the fun this time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:05 PM
Times like these I reeeaaallly feel like an outsider.

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t209/deannamullings/001.jpg

It's okay Dizzy - we'll hold your hand.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:05 PM
I don't think that's the reason.

Me either.

I just think it's a really, really dumb idea.

Great hypothetically. Horrible reality.

What motive does WWOD have in extending the offer? Does he hope to convert you? Does he need something to chew on now that he's been banned from every forum available?

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:05 PM
Renda,

If CAF wont host it, please allow it here! It'll be like Old Times again!!
Don't spoil the fun this time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't believe it needs to happen and it will NOT be held here should it come that.

The Mrs
06-05-2008, 08:06 PM
Hmmm. I really don't know who would win. I think both of you can talk in circles for hours, the clincher would probably be who lost their temper first. :drama

Dan would win.

He can outlast WWOD's temper tantrums and not fly off the handle as Dubya would.

:nod

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:06 PM
Renda,

If CAF wont host it, please allow it here! It'll be like Old Times again!!
Don't spoil the fun this time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mark,

What would it accomplish?

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:07 PM
If this is pay per view then the money should go to the WWPF.

The Mrs
06-05-2008, 08:07 PM
Mark,

What would it accomplish?

Why, entertainment of course! :gaga

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:07 PM
OMG HOW in the world did you find that out????????????????????? :bliss

Duh, PP just told it.

SDG
06-05-2008, 08:07 PM
Don't tell me Alter Ego voted.

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:08 PM
Me either.

I just think it's a really, really dumb idea.

Great hypothetically. Horrible reality.

What motive does WWOD have in extending the offer? Does he hope to convert you? Does he need something to chew on now that he's been banned from every forum available?

I don't see debates as profitable, generally, for anything other than entertainment.

They would end up hurting one another, most likely, because both have tempers, and both can be vicious when need be. I can see a lot of below-the-belt stuff coming up.

But. It WOULD be Entertainment Extraordinaire!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:08 PM
OMG HOW in the world did you find that out????????????????????? :bliss

Ummm it was in an above post????

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:08 PM
Mark,

What would it accomplish?



FUN ~ ~ FUN ~ ~ FUN ~ ~ FUN ~ ~ FUN ~ ~FUN

StillStanding
06-05-2008, 08:08 PM
Hahaha the dude got banned from JP too! My Lord! Dan.. seriously it would be entertaining but it wouldnt do no good and would just make you angry. Some people just arent worth the breath ya know!?

It would be a battle for the ages! You would have to put a time limit on it. I think Dan would have met his match! TimLan then could take on the declared winner! :boxing

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:09 PM
Dan would win.

He can outlast WWOD's temper tantrums and not fly off the handle as Dubya would.

:nod

That would be my thoughts too.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:09 PM
Why, entertainment of course! :gaga

Yeah until feelings got hurt, offenses take place, and possible legal action take place.
No I am not talking about WWOD or Daniel either.

Not worth it.

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:09 PM
Duh, PP just told it.

ROFL I know huh... I am sitting here thinking and we have a smart one ey??? ROFL!

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:09 PM
It would be a battle for the ages! You would have to put a time limit on it. I think Dan would have met his match! TimLan then could take on the declared winner! :boxing

Timlan would make a good moderator. :D

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:10 PM
I don't believe it needs to happen and it will NOT be held here should it come that.


I should have known it!! Some folks are liking a wrecking Ball at a party.


I feel sorry for people that don't know how to have any fun

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:10 PM
AW you west coast guys live in a fun state.Yall can have all the fun you want in Bakersfield.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:10 PM
I don't see debates as profitable, generally, for anything other than entertainment.

They would end up hurting one another, most likely, because both have tempers, and both can be vicious when need be. I can see a lot of below-the-belt stuff coming up.

But. It WOULD be Entertainment Extraordinaire!

Amen!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:10 PM
It would be a battle for the ages! You would have to put a time limit on it. I think Dan would have met his match! TimLan then could take on the declared winner! :boxing

ROFL!!!! But anyone other than WWOD Please?!?!?!

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:10 PM
Don't tell me Alter Ego voted.

Yep, as did Sham!:bliss

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:11 PM
ROFL!!!! But anyone other than WWOD Please?!?!?!

WHY??????

SDG
06-05-2008, 08:11 PM
Yep, as did Sham!:bliss
:crazywalls

dizzyde
06-05-2008, 08:12 PM
It's okay Dizzy - we'll hold your hand.

Thanks friend! :friend

:toofunny

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:13 PM
I should have known it!! Some folks are liking a wrecking Ball at a party.


I feel sorry for people that don't know how to have any fun

I feel sorry for people that think two grown men (who are pastors and should use that time for something productive) aruging would be fun.

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:13 PM
Thanks friend! :friend

:toofunny

Dizzy this is one time you should be glad to not know anything! :)

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:14 PM
I feel sorry for people that think two grown men (who are pastors and should use that time for something productive) aruging would be fun.

Bleh, Renda, then you should feel sorry for me, because I think it would be at least a little bit fun. :D

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:14 PM
Sham I remember him you know Sam the sham and the pharohs.They were a big act in the 60s.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:15 PM
Ain't there any fun to be had in OK ?

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:15 PM
Yeah until feelings got hurt, offenses take place, and possible legal action take place.
No I am not talking about WWOD or Daniel either.

Not worth it.


Oh come on Ron man up. no one says you gotta get in the middle of it.
just read and enjoy. It's 2 adults who would be doing this BY CHOICE

Blubayou
06-05-2008, 08:15 PM
It would be close- But I think WWOD would edge it out.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:16 PM
Bleh, Renda, then you should feel sorry for me, because I think it would be at least a little bit fun. :D

Oh, I agree - I think it would be a little fun, but I'm afraid the consequences would outweigh the fun.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:16 PM
How about somebody debating Pastor Tribble ?

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:16 PM
I feel sorry for people that think two grown men (who are pastors and should use that time for something productive) aruging would be fun.


It's a debate Renda. may not be YOUR thing but aren't you
one of the ones who advocates choice and freedom of expression
or is that on selective terms???????????????????

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:17 PM
How about somebody debating Pastor Tribble ?

and this would equal a debate how? :happydance

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:17 PM
It's a debate Renda. may not be YOUR thing but aren't you
one of the ones who advocates choice and freedom of expression
or is that on selective terms???????????????????
Huh? You want to think that one through a little better?

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:17 PM
Oh come on Ron man up. no one says you gotta get in the middle of it.
just read and enjoy. It's 2 adults who would be doing this BY CHOICE

If I am in favour of this & they do it, they might as well meet in person and have at with fisticuffs & we could all watch.

That is what it will be like.

Call me a wimp but I am not for it.

Though I feel WWOD would have the upper hand.

More experience.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:18 PM
I don't see debates as profitable, generally, for anything other than entertainment.

They would end up hurting one another, most likely, because both have tempers, and both can be vicious when need be. I can see a lot of below-the-belt stuff coming up.

But. It WOULD be Entertainment Extraordinaire!

Dan would win.

He can outlast WWOD's temper tantrums and not fly off the handle as Dubya would.

:nod

Look, there is a long and storied history with this man. This history includes legal action from online activities and various other incidents.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:20 PM
Let's have AG and Caston Smith debate.Talk about fire and smoke.

Bro-Larry
06-05-2008, 08:20 PM
Who is WWOD?

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:21 PM
WithoughtWrathOrDoubting

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:21 PM
I think it would be entertaining.

I also think there would be nothing edifying come from it, so why do it.

I AM WITH YOU!!

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:21 PM
Look, there is a long and storied history with this man. This history includes legal action from online activities and various other incidents.

I'm sensing some wisdom and prudence coming from PP! :bliss



He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.

Dan, don't do it, you're likely to get bit.

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:22 PM
Let's have AG and Caston Smith debate.Talk about fire and smoke.

Havent we already done this and didnt it produce not a single thing? Just as much as it would produce w these 2 doing it and the thing is well... I wont say more but... If it happens I pray to God Dan wins and I mean that with all my heart!

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:22 PM
If this event takes place I want to run a concession stand I'll mop up on peanut brittle and kool-aid.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:22 PM
For the love of all that is holy and good, please stop this madness!

Look Daniel, if you need someone to insult you, and beat you severely about the head and shoulders, there are many waiting in line that are members here on AFF already!

lol

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:22 PM
Huh? You want to think that one through a little better?


We just discussed it on the thread about Xpentecostals.
your favorite admin "Rev Phelps" and I finally agreed on
something!!! we both say that AFF allows the cons and
the libs to have a say whereas the cons have mostly all
run off to their closed cloistered forums. Please don't blow
it on this one Renda. you're not known for censorship I
hope you'll live up to it on this one!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:23 PM
I'm sensing some wisdom and prudence coming from PP! :bliss



He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.

Dan, don't do it, you're likely to get bit.

Yep and he has nothing to lose now so it wouldnt matter to him!

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:23 PM
AG I was just having a bit of fun at your expense.You can whoop CS any ole time.

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 08:24 PM
For the love of all that is holy and good, please stop this madness!

Look Daniel, if you need someone to insult you, and beat you severely about the head and shoulders, there are many waiting in line that are members here on AFF already!

lol

Oh, I agree with you, PP. It's a bad idea.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:24 PM
We just discussed it on the thread about Xpentecostals.
your favorite admin "Rev Phelps" and I finally agreed on
something!!! we both say that AFF allows the cons and
the libs to have a say whereas the cons have mostly all
run off to their closed cloistered forums. Please don't blow
it on this one Renda. you're not known for censorship I
hope you'll live up to it on this one!

Rhenda has been blessed with common sense. She'll do what is right.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:24 PM
I'm sensing some wisdom and prudence coming from PP! :bliss



He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.

Dan, don't do it, you're likely to get bit.

Very much so.

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:24 PM
Let's have AG and Caston Smith debate.Talk about fire and smoke.


((((( FANTASTIC!))))))


I WOULD LOVE THAT O LORD

LET IT BE LET IT BE !!!



.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:25 PM
For the love of all that is holy and good, please stop this madness!

Look Daniel, if you need someone to insult you, and beat you severely about the head and shoulders, there are many waiting in line that are members here on AFF already!

lol

Daniel, these are words of wisdom.
You would make a valiant effort but the end won't be pretty.
Ask others here.
First time I went at WWOD I went into a one month self imposed exile.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:26 PM
Daniel, these are words of wisdom.
You would make a valiant effort but the end won't be pretty.
Ask others here.
First time I went at WWOD I went into a one month self imposed exile.

I remember him becoming very irate with me on the quilting thread! LOL

He told me to get a life! I had only been on AFF for about 3 months with most of that time spent in the Dark Waters section.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:26 PM
Yep and he has nothing to lose now so it wouldnt matter to him!

Exactly.

Here's my concern.

This type of "debate" could ruin Daniel's life and ministry AND I AM NOT BEING DRAMATIC OR HYSTERICAL!

People talk about FCF and Jim Yohe's exploits to this day, several years later. FCF is a part of what defined him.

Would this debate forum with WWOD be something Daniel would want to define him 20 years from now?

I don't think so.

And it would.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:27 PM
Rhenda has been blessed with common sense. She'll do what is right.

Thank you Mizpeh!

Glad someone understands.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:28 PM
Exactly.

Here's my concern.

This type of "debate" could ruin Daniel's life and ministry AND I AM NOT BEING DRAMATIC OR HYSTERICAL!

People talk about FCF and Jim Yohe's exploits to this day, several years later. FCF is a part of what defined him.

Would this debate forum with WWOD be something Daniel would want to define him 20 years from now?

I don't think so.

And it would.I believe Daniel knows what's best, but just wanted to see what others would think of it.

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:29 PM
Hey maybe we could get Bro.Bennicasa to debate with Cohen Reckhart ?

Scott Hutchinson
06-05-2008, 08:30 PM
PP is sounding very wise.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:31 PM
I believe Daniel knows what's best, but just wanted to see what others would think of it.

Look, everybody knows I enjoy a good scrum as much as anybody, but this would not be a scrum.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:32 PM
Look, everybody knows I enjoy a good scrum as much as anybody, but this would not be a scrum.

You play rugby?

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:33 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:33 PM
You play rugby?


I have.:happydance

Rugby is football on rocket fuel.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:34 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Might increase our chances of making it in heaven!

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:34 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Does anyone have a lollipop?

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:34 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Okay, how about you and WWOD going at it!
I'll bring the popcorn!:popcorn2

Is it a go?:hypercoffee

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:35 PM
Might increase our chances of making it in heaven!


you've been in the middle of some hot debates


somethings that make you go ummmmmm........

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:35 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Oh please!! I am neither sad or sour. I DO have common sense.

dizzyde
06-05-2008, 08:35 PM
You People sure know how to spoil things don't you??
I've never seen so many sad, sour people in my life
who have no joy, everything serious. Let's go back to
talking about gardening and quilt making !

Yep, that's us!

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t209/deannamullings/001.jpg

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:36 PM
you've been in the middle of some hot debates


somethings that make you go ummmmmm........

But not self-destructive suicide.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:36 PM
Someone just pm'd me the words "utter destruction."

I agree.

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:36 PM
Might increase our chances of making it in heaven!

True that...

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:36 PM
Exactly.

Here's my concern.

This type of "debate" could ruin Daniel's life and ministry AND I AM NOT BEING DRAMATIC OR HYSTERICAL!

People talk about FCF and Jim Yohe's exploits to this day, several years later. FCF is a part of what defined him.

Would this debate forum with WWOD be something Daniel would want to define him 20 years from now?

I don't think so.

And it would.


Very true and I do consider Dan a friend and I do not want to see this!

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:37 PM
Okay, how about you and WWOD going at it!
I'll bring the popcorn!:popcorn2

Is it a go?:hypercoffee


He asked Dan not me. besides, me and WWOD never
have gotten into it. Dan and WWOD are the one who
are at total polor opposite ends thus the great debate
it would make not to mention the wonderful clash of
personalities :happydance

CC1
06-05-2008, 08:38 PM
I was contacted 48 hours ago ... about a possible online battle royale w/ WWOD ....

I am leaning towards not doing so ... but will ponder it for the next couple of weeks.

I will share my decision the week of July 22cd.

A year ago ... I would have jumped on it ... now ... ????

So who would take the crown?


I thought WWOD was before your time. How do you know him?

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:39 PM
What you people are not getting is this.
It would be a CHOICE!!! Get it ??? A choice
means you don't have to hit "click" ????
you don't have to read it , etc ?????
Hello earthlings !!!!

SDG
06-05-2008, 08:39 PM
I thought WWOD was before your time. How do you know him?

He is. We spoke briefly yesterday for the first time.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:39 PM
He asked Dan not me. besides, me and WWOD never
have gotten into it. Dan and WWOD are the one who
are at total polor opposite ends thus the great debate
it would make not to mention the wonderful clash of
personalities :happydance

I don't think that is the case of polar opposites per se.
WWOD is built or rather suited for online debates.
He thrives at it.
He is a master at it.
He will take a totally different take on a situation or cause just to flush you out
on where you stand.

I think it is in his blood.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:41 PM
He is. We spoke briefly yesterday for the first time.

Don't let his gentle phone manner disarm you.
I don't mean that as a slam either, just a statement of fact.

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 08:41 PM
I think it would be entertaining.

I also think there would be nothing edifying come from it, so why do it.

Seriously these sorts of slugfests aren't very edifying to read.

I disagree.

It could and should be edifying. If anyone resorts to namecalling we will be sitting on the sidelines to "judge" that too.

There are some fundamental differences there.

PS The one thing that would make it more interesting is a side discussion on Divorce and Remarriage with both of them against Steve Epley.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:41 PM
What you people are not getting is this.
It would be a CHOICE!!! Get it ??? A choice
means you don't have to hit "click" ????
you don't have to read it , etc ?????
Hello earthlings !!!!

You aren't listening.

Some are more concerned for Dan's real life affects than just ignoring an argument online.

Hello alien.

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:43 PM
What you people are not getting is this.
It would be a CHOICE!!! Get it ??? A choice
means you don't have to hit "click" ????
you don't have to read it , etc ?????
Hello earthlings !!!!

Excuse me, but a poll was put up and a question asked. Everyone to their opinion...

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:44 PM
You aren't listening.

Some are more concerned for Dan's real life affects than just ignoring an argument online.

Hello alien.

Amen and this would be very detrimental to that!

Mark you are all for fun and the scoop but this isnt it!

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:44 PM
This will happen whether Renda , Barb, AG
and the other Gerital guzzling folk allow it :happydance j/k
If Dan decides it's a go. and you know what? folk like the
above mention will be right there reading every bit of it
just like they did on syna when Reverand caston was
preaching about Jezzies!!!!

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:45 PM
This will happen whether Renda , Barb, AG
and the other Gerital guzzling folk allow it :happydance j/k
If Dan decides it's a go. and you know what? folk like the
above mention will be right there reading every bit of it
just like they did on syna when Reverand caston was
preaching about Jezzies!!!!

I do not frequent that forum...

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:46 PM
I do not frequent that forum...

Yeah, I didn't read almost anything that Caston wrote anywhere.

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:47 PM
You aren't listening.

Some are more concerned for Dan's real life affects than just ignoring an argument online.

Hello alien.

someone hand grandma craig her bi-focals!!!
DAN IS NO LONGER UPC HELLO!! It's HIS
Choice. Dan, Don't listen to this !!!!

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:47 PM
I do not believe it will happen because Dan has been given wise council.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:48 PM
someone hand grandma craig her bi-focals!!!
DAN IS NO LONGER UPC HELLO!! It's HIS
Choice. Dan, Don't listen to this !!!!

And what does no longer being UPC have to do with it?

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:49 PM
I do not frequent that forum...

Lord forgive my sister~! she just broke one of
the Ten commandments. I wont say which one
Dear Lord, but you know!!!!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:49 PM
I do not frequent that forum...

And Mark no one here read that really either except for a handful. The only time they read the mess with Caston was on the 2 big threads here before he got banned and that wasnt everyone either. They wont they didnt like it then and they wont go for it now either.

And I will state for the record I was wrong going at Caston the way I did but when I got called some of the names I did I just went for it which was wrong!!!! And I see that so much now and would never even consider speaking to him in that form again! And I know I could whoop him in a heartbeat.. but its the morals of it!

CC1
06-05-2008, 08:49 PM
I know which one I think is intellectually superior! (and it is not the one I agree with the most - LOL).

I am not convinced this would be a fruitful debate. DA is not measured enough of a poster for a civil debate. I fear he would quickly resort to the quick insult. Nothing in his posting past has shown me he would be a good debater. Good insulter yes. Good infuriator, yes.

On the other hand it would depend on which WWOD showed up as to the quality of his debate! Armed with great intellect WWOD brings to the table a lot. If the good WWOD showed up it would allow for some fascinating posts. I greatly enjoyed reading 90% of his posts and wanted to strangle him for the other 10% LOL!! (the reverse percentage holds for DA's posts). If the bad WWOD showed up (and we don't have a clue as to what triggers him to appear - bad day at work?) it would quickly devolve into the kind of dialogue that would get both permanently banned forthwith!

JMHO

Barb
06-05-2008, 08:50 PM
Lord forgive my sister~! she just broke one of
the Ten commandments. I wont say which one
Dear Lord, but you know!!!!

And which one would that be, o thou which judges another?!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:51 PM
someone hand grandma craig her bi-focals!!!
DAN IS NO LONGER UPC HELLO!! It's HIS
Choice. Dan, Don't listen to this !!!!

UPC or not it does not matter! Dan has a flourishing ministry and he doesnt need it tainted by this!

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:51 PM
And Mark no one here read that really either except for a handful. The only time they read the mess with Caston was on the 2 big threads here before he got banned and that wasnt everyone either. They wont they didnt like it then and they wont go for it now either.

And I will state for the record I was wrong going at Caston the way I did but when I got called some of the names I did I just went for it which was wrong!!!! And I see that so much now and would never even consider speaking to him in that form again! And I know I could whoop him in a heartbeat.. but its the morals of it!

God bless you, AG. :happydance

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 08:52 PM
God bless you, AG. :happydance

He has and He has also given me some smarts in the last few ummmm days? ROFL

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 08:52 PM
Dubya,

We love ya, but don't think it needs to happen!

StMark
06-05-2008, 08:54 PM
UPC or not it does not matter! Dan has a flourishing ministry and he doesnt need it tainted by this!

AG, it would be a debate. Debates are not for everyone
but many of us enjoy them. Back in the day Bro Hicks
use to debate trinitarians at churches and pack the place.
what's the dfference? we debate doctrine and standards
all the time, no?? why not have them 2 do it if they so
choose to??

Nahum
06-05-2008, 08:56 PM
Why do I have a feeling someone is watching us?

All of this hyper-testosterone chest-thumping is similar to what I see the primates do at the St. Looie Zoo.

Ron
06-05-2008, 08:58 PM
I know which one I think is intellectually superior! (and it is not the one I agree with the most - LOL).

I am not convinced this would be a fruitful debate. DA is not measured enough of a poster for a civil debate. I fear he would quickly resort to the quick insult. Nothing in his posting past has shown me he would be a good debater. Good insulter yes. Good infuriator, yes.

On the other hand it would depend on which WWOD showed up as to the quality of his debate! Armed with great intellect WWOD brings to the table a lot. If the good WWOD showed up it would allow for some fascinating posts. I greatly enjoyed reading 90% of his posts and wanted to strangle him for the other 10% LOL!! (the reverse percentage holds for DA's posts). If the bad WWOD showed up (and we don't have a clue as to what triggers him to appear - bad day at work?) it would quickly devolve into the kind of dialogue that would get both permanently banned forthwith!

JMHO

I think we have a bingo!
Perfect perception CC1.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 08:58 PM
He has and He has also given me some smarts in the last few ummmm days? ROFL

As in wisdom or painful bruising?

StMark
06-05-2008, 09:00 PM
CC, is it suppose to be "fruitful" ??? I don't think that
would be the intent and purpose of this type of debate.

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 09:01 PM
Before I go to bed just stating again for the record - - a WWOD and DA debate will NOT be hosted by AFF.

Ron
06-05-2008, 09:02 PM
CC, is it suppose to be "fruitful" ??? I don't think that
would be the intent and purpose of this type of debate.

That is the point.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:02 PM
Before I go to bed just stating again for the record - - a WWOD and DA debate will NOT be hosted by AFF.

That's what Godchatcafe is for.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 09:02 PM
Before I go to bed just stating again for the record - - a WWOD and DA debate will NOT be hosted by AFF.


The END

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 09:03 PM
AG, it would be a debate. Debates are not for everyone
but many of us enjoy them. Back in the day Bro Hicks
use to debate trinitarians at churches and pack the place.
what's the dfference? we debate doctrine and standards
all the time, no?? why not have them 2 do it if they so
choose to??

Mark this is very different. I will not say how or why but you are a very smart man you know why we all object. And yes sometimes debates are interesting but there are times and places and certain people that yes it might be ok... this is not that!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 09:04 PM
As in wisdom or painful bruising?

How bout a lot of both! God whoopins are no fun!!!! I do like the fact that it gained me a tad bit of wisdom tho (at least they tell me thats what those gray hairs are!!!!):crazywalls

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 09:05 PM
CC, is it suppose to be "fruitful" ??? I don't think that
would be the intent and purpose of this type of debate.

That right there sir is the reason I say no! I dont think a debate should be held unless something fruitful can come of it and nothing can of this!

AmazingGrace
06-05-2008, 09:06 PM
The END

I sowwy! I didnt see this before I continued posting! I end it now... I be very very quiet!!!:tissue

RevDWW
06-05-2008, 09:08 PM
What would the crown really be worth?

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:10 PM
Dan,

God has done some amazing things in your life of late. A Spanish ministry, a beautiful new friend, Emmaneus (sp?). Consider all the advise you've been given by your friends but most important of all pray about it. Seek wise counsel before waging war.

And consider will this glorify God? Whether therefore ye eat, or ye drink, or WHATSOEVER ye do, do ALL to the glory of God.


Don't let pride lead you to do something you may regret.

tstew
06-05-2008, 09:15 PM
I am too new to know WWOD, but I am amazed...and a little confused at what seems to be a very genuine concern for Dan's emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being should he accept this challenge. Is this guy or gal like some Jedi-mind -trick Hannibal Lecter who is going to leave DA traumatized?

CC1
06-05-2008, 09:16 PM
I am too new to know WWOD, but I am amazed...and a little confused at what seems to be a very genuine concern for Dan's emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being should he accept this challenge. Is this guy or gal like some Jedi-mind -trick Hannibal Lecter who is going to leave DA traumatized?

Yes. All of the above.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 09:17 PM
I am too new to know WWOD, but I am amazed...and a little confused at what seems to be a very genuine concern for Dan's emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being should he accept this challenge. Is this guy or gal like some Jedi-mind -trick Hannibal Lecter who is going to leave DA traumatized?

Hannibal Lecter is a bit much.

Dimples
06-05-2008, 09:19 PM
I am too new to know WWOD, but I am amazed...and a little confused at what seems to be a very genuine concern for Dan's emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being should he accept this challenge. Is this guy or gal like some Jedi-mind -trick Hannibal Lecter who is going to leave DA traumatized?

Pretty much.

He probaby wouldn't actually eat DA, but he'd chew him up and spit him out.

tstew
06-05-2008, 09:19 PM
Hannibal Lecter is a bit much.

Yeah, I almost left that out, but then I figured a good old Apostolic forum...people might not know who I was talking about j/k.
Seriously, no disrespect intended since I do not know him/her. I was just struck by the concerned tone of many of the responses.

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:20 PM
Dan, for the record - I think you should do it. Perhaps it should not or could not happen here on AFF.

Who would "WIN"? Should I really care about that? It is not so important. The important thing is you both have material and it can and should be put to the test.

I would recommend a neutral venue/site and at least one moderator who has the authority to shut it down, call a time out, and redirect the line of debate as needed to stay on course.

MissBrattified
06-05-2008, 09:20 PM
DA, I really agree with the others here...I think you are smart, and can hold your own, but this probably isn't a good idea.

Winning is subjective, btw.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 09:21 PM
Yeah, I almost left that out, but then I figured a good old Apostolic forum...people might not know who I was talking about j/k.
Seriously, no disrespect intended since I do not know him/her. I was just struck by the concerned tone of many of the responses.


I like Daniel.

I hate his theology and agenda.

But my concern is very genuine.

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:21 PM
Pretty much.

He probaby wouldn't actually eat DA, but he'd chew him up and spit him out.

C'mon! You all are overreacting.

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:23 PM
I like Daniel.

I hate his theology and agenda.

But my concern is very genuine.


WWOD may force Dan to rethink his theology and agenda...

I am serious.

Nahum
06-05-2008, 09:24 PM
WWOD may force Dan to rethink his theology and agenda...

I am serious.

I doubt it.

But we can hope!

Ron
06-05-2008, 09:25 PM
]WWOD may force Dan to rethink his theology and agenda...[/B]

I am serious.

I am sorry but I believe 85-90% of this forum is made up of people with made up minds.
For better or worse, Dan is one of them.

I am serious.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:27 PM
C'mon! You all are overreacting.

You're a smart guy. Would you debate WWOD?

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:28 PM
I am sorry but I believe 85-90% of this forum is made up of people with made up minds.
For better or worse, Dan is one of them.

I am serious.

Nevermind this forum then. It can't happen here they say.

I am interested in the content of the debate.

freeatlast
06-05-2008, 09:30 PM
Pretty much.

He probaby wouldn't actually eat DA, but he'd chew him up and spit him out.

That would not make WWOD right. Usually when one has no corn in the crib (on a subject) they start throwing corn cobs.

revrandy
06-05-2008, 09:30 PM
I Changed my mind...

I would like to see the debate between Dan and WWOD...

concerning "Bats in the Belfry" I think it would be a tie....

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:31 PM
You're a smart guy. Would you debate WWOD?

No I am not "smart"... :toofunny I even "peck" instead of typing.


DA and WWOD are both brilliant they can both hold their own.

Raven
06-05-2008, 09:33 PM
((((( FANTASTIC!))))))


I WOULD LOVE THAT O LORD

LET IT BE LET IT BE !!!



.
I haven't heard such impassioned pleas since our beloved Thad used to post here. I sure do miss that fellow! He kept things lively. He would certainly vote for the debate. If St Mark could present a proposition like Thad this debate would be scheduled already.
Raven

StMark
06-05-2008, 09:33 PM
It's sad that decisions have to made out of FEAR
and that the rest of us who want this have to suffer
because of SOME.

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:33 PM
Pretty much.

He probaby wouldn't actually eat DA, but he'd chew him up and spit him out.

That would not make WWOD right. Usually when one has no corn in the crib (on a subject) they start throwing corn cobs.

Exactly. IF one reacts with personal insults while the other continues the debate with reasoning the record will speak for it'self.

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:35 PM
It's sad that decisions have to made out of FEAR
and that the rest of us who want this have to suffer
because of SOME.

Please, a lollipop, does anyone have a lollipop?

or maybe some cheese?

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:36 PM
Exactly. IF one reacts with personal insults while the other continues the debate with reasoning the record will speak for it'self.

Is Dan able to debate without using personal insults?

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:36 PM
Even better.... I will contribute to a fund to bring these gentleman to St Louis for a live debate!

RevDWW
06-05-2008, 09:37 PM
eris......Go and learn what this word Greek word meanth.....[Hint: Galations 5:19-21]




Is the crown worth obtaining?

StMark
06-05-2008, 09:38 PM
Please, a lollipop, does anyone have a lollipop?

or maybe some cheese?


Let me hand to the winner- you got your way
Please accept the prize

Hoovie
06-05-2008, 09:38 PM
Even better.... I will contribute to a fund to bring these gentleman to St Louis for a live debate!

One requirement could be having a footwashing service before AND after the debate!:happydance

freeatlast
06-05-2008, 09:40 PM
Let me hand to the winner- you got your way
Please accept the prize

Did I miss something, is "W" banned on this forum or sumpin?

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:40 PM
Let me hand to the winner- you got your way
Please accept the prize

I haven't heard Dan say "NO DEBATE" yet.

StMark
06-05-2008, 09:40 PM
Did I miss something, is "W" banned on this forum or sumpin?

Let's let Renda answer that one

rgcraig
06-05-2008, 09:44 PM
Did I miss something, is "W" banned on this forum or sumpin?

Correct.

revrandy
06-05-2008, 09:48 PM
I would like to see a debate on "WHo Flew over the KooKoo's nest First" between these two powerhouses...:)

freeatlast
06-05-2008, 09:49 PM
Correct.


OIC seems i remeber his leaving the forum....but the memory is getting foggy as I pass north of 50 ;-)

StMark
06-05-2008, 09:50 PM
Lord I Thank You that I'm not Fearful like someone
on this thread whose initials are RC

CC1
06-05-2008, 09:54 PM
Lord I Thank You that I'm not Fearful like someone
on this thread whose initials are RC

LOL!!!! Your post sounds like one you would find on a Jr. High School forum!

revrandy
06-05-2008, 09:55 PM
LOL!!!! Your post sounds like one you would find on a Jr. High School forum!

Doesn't this represent the majority of this thread and the originater too?

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 09:56 PM
I haven't heard such impassioned pleas since our beloved Thad used to post here. I sure do miss that fellow! He kept things lively. He would certainly vote for the debate. If St Mark could present a proposition like Thad this debate would be scheduled already.
Raven

Thad and StMark bear an uncanny resemblance. :toofunny

revrandy
06-05-2008, 09:57 PM
Thad and StMark bear an uncanny resemblance. :toofunny

They are like Brothers or something???

mizpeh
06-05-2008, 10:04 PM
They are like Brothers or something???

More like identical twins or something.

Raven
06-05-2008, 10:12 PM
More like identical twins or something.
Well, I knew that Mark had twin brothers but he has a twin? Unbelievable! His Mom will certainly receive a great reward. Which one plays the organ and which one posts?

SDG
06-06-2008, 05:26 AM
I appreciate all of the feedback and input in this thread.

timlan2057
06-06-2008, 06:27 AM
Dan, you've heard my advice.

Frankly, and this from someone who has always enjoyed message board brawls, were I you, I KNOW what I'd be doing: spending all my free time, wining, dining and smooching on that beautiful little girlfriend of yours.

I do feel that PP has spoken for me regarding the advisability of this, though I don't quite share the magnitude of his dire predictions concerning your whole life and ministry.

But if George Foreman introduced me at ringside and asked for my prognostication, here it is:

Well George, as someone who has bloodied up both of them I think my opinion is credible.

What makes this matchup intriguing is that BOTH of these guys are the best ever on pentecostal message boards at using the old tactic called "the heap" ... heck, if they don't have an argument, they just pile up thousands of posts to make you THINK they know what they're talking about.

It could be a matchup for the ages and this matchup COULD finally use up all the rest of the bandwidth on the internet.

My prediction?

I don't think it will be a ten-count knockout but I don't think it will be all that close to the perceptive reader.

Dan is younger and more unflappable.

Both fighters use a stiletto so subtly when they are in good form, but I know from experience that WWOD can be jabbed silly and then he comes roaring in with a butcher's cudgel, which is easy to dodge.

Get WWOD flustered and he starts with the boorish insults. Believe me, the Alicea kid has the ability to get him flustered and way off his game.

I do respect WWOD as an internet fighter but "Samurai" may be a bit much. What others have called "brilliance" I see mixed with a lot of wordiness and verbosity and frankly, gobbledygook that means nothing.

CC1 had a point when he said 90 percent of WWOD's post mean something and the other 10 percent are gobbledygook.

I agree with CC1 in principle, but just reverse the percentages.

Alicea is unflappable and will be standing long after WWOD self-destructs.

WWOD's reputation as an unassailable internet genius and all-time-champion fighter mainly come from his small but fanatically devoted group of sycophants who would rave if a piano fell on him that he beat the piano because the keyboard got broken in the fall.

When you peruse his posts and arguments with any degree of objectivity and intelligence .... you plainly see he AIN'T all that.

Alicea is younger and more unflappable. In 12 rounds of internet boxing, what was thought by the unobservant to be a titanic struggle gets stopped in the 7th round with WWOD battered and bloodied on the ropes.

Alicea in a 7th round technical knockout.

Thanks George ... give my regards to the wife and kids and keep selling those grills ...

Rhoni
06-06-2008, 06:40 AM
I was contacted 48 hours ago ... about a possible online battle royale w/ WWOD ....

I am leaning towards not doing so ... but will ponder it for the next couple of weeks.

I will share my decision the week of July 22cd.

A year ago ... I would have jumped on it ... now ... ????

So who would take the crown?

I think the crown is for the court jester. There are things I have stated before but will remind you...Dan, you are a sweetie but WWOD is much more intelligent and dangerous.

If you are talking about the most posts...it is a draw. If you are talking about the most contentious...it is also a draw, but there is no comparison in meat of the posts or substantive quality.

Just my opinion. Please do not set yourself up like this. I love and respect you.

Blessings, Rhoni

Rhoni
06-06-2008, 06:42 AM
Lord I Thank You that I'm not Fearful like someone
on this thread whose initials are RC

Thou shalt not take my initials in vain:):gaga:toofunny

Rhoni
06-06-2008, 06:43 AM
For the love of all that is holy and good, please stop this madness!

Look Daniel, if you need someone to insult you, and beat you severely about the head and shoulders, there are many waiting in line that are members here on AFF already!

lol

:boxing Listen to wisdom my son!

Rhoni
06-06-2008, 06:45 AM
Dan, you've heard my advice.

Frankly, and this from someone who has always enjoyed message board brawls, were I you, I KNOW what I'd be doing: spending all my free time, wining, dining and smooching on that beautiful little girlfriend of yours.

I do feel that PP has spoken for me regarding the advisability of this, though I don't quite share the magnitude of his dire predictions concerning your whole life and ministry.

But if George Foreman introduced me at ringside and asked for my prognostication, here it is:

Well George, as someone who has bloodied up both of them I think my opinion is credible.

What makes this matchup intriguing is that BOTH of these guys are the best ever on pentecostal message boards at using the old tactic called "the heap" ... heck, if they don't have an argument, they just pile up thousands of posts to make you THINK they know what they're talking about.

It could be a matchup for the ages and this matchup COULD finally use up all the rest of the bandwidth on the internet.

My prediction?

I don't think it will be a ten-count knockout but I don't think it will be all that close to the perceptive reader.

Dan is younger and more unflappable.

Both fighters use a stiletto so subtly when they are in good form, but I know from experience that WWOD can be jabbed silly and then he comes roaring in with a butcher's cudgel, which is easy to dodge.

Get WWOD flustered and he starts with the boorish insults. Believe me, the Alicea kid has the ability to get him flustered and way off his game.

I do respect WWOD as an internet fighter but "Samurai" may be a bit much. What others have called "brilliance" I see mixed with a lot of wordiness and verbosity and frankly, gobbledygook that means nothing.

CC1 had a point when he said 90 percent of WWOD's post mean something and the other 10 percent are gobbledygook.

I agree with CC1 in principle, but just reverse the percentages.

Alicea is unflappable and will be standing long after WWOD self-destructs.

WWOD's reputation as an unassailable internet genius and all-time-champion fighter mainly come from his small but fanatically devoted group of sycophants who would rave if a piano fell on him that he beat the piano because the keyboard got broken in the fall.

When you peruse his posts and arguments with any degree of objectivity and intelligence .... you plainly see he AIN'T all that.

Alicea is younger and more unflappable. In 12 rounds of internet boxing, what was thought by the unobservant to be a titanic struggle gets stopped in the 7th round with WWOD battered and bloodied on the ropes.

Alicea in a 7th round technical knockout.

Thanks George ... give my regards to the wife and kids and keep selling those grills ...

A more even dual would be between Timlan and WWOD. I would back Timlan:happydance

Hoovie
06-06-2008, 06:54 AM
If DA does not fair well, he will at least be known as the kid who went down in a blaze of glory!

:)

CC1
06-06-2008, 07:50 AM
Hmmm.....I never thought I would see the term "unflappable" applied to DA.

Rico
06-06-2008, 08:00 AM
This will happen whether Renda , Barb, AG
and the other Gerital guzzling folk allow it :happydance j/k
If Dan decides it's a go. and you know what? folk like the
above mention will be right there reading every bit of it
just like they did on syna when Reverand caston was
preaching about Jezzies!!!!

Then let them go somewhere else for this slugfest.

DividedThigh
06-06-2008, 08:01 AM
ready fight, sounds like a video game my kids play, whatever, dt

Rico
06-06-2008, 08:05 AM
I am too new to know WWOD, but I am amazed...and a little confused at what seems to be a very genuine concern for Dan's emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being should he accept this challenge. Is this guy or gal like some Jedi-mind -trick Hannibal Lecter who is going to leave DA traumatized?

If I gave you my true opinion of WWOD I'd get banned, probly for life.

Rico
06-06-2008, 08:08 AM
It's sad that decisions have to made out of FEAR
and that the rest of us who want this have to suffer
because of SOME.

What part of no did you not understand?


http://www.medgadget.com/archives/img/pacifier.jpg

COOPER
06-06-2008, 08:09 AM
I was contacted 48 hours ago ... about a possible online battle royale w/ WWOD ....

I am leaning towards not doing so ... but will ponder it for the next couple of weeks.

I will share my decision the week of July 22cd.

A year ago ... I would have jumped on it ... now ... ????

So who would take the crown?

Pride goes before a fall:drama

Rico
06-06-2008, 08:16 AM
Pride goes before a fall:drama

Where ya been hidin the last few days? Your thread got deleted and you didn't come back, Bro. Whazzup?

Obispo Matador
06-06-2008, 08:16 AM
Hmmm.....I never thought I would see the term "unflappable" applied to DA.

DA is unflappable.



Paz de Cristo,
Bishop M

Rhoni
06-06-2008, 08:20 AM
DA is unflappable.



Paz de Cristo,
Bishop M

Or just a glutton for punishment:boxing

Rico
06-06-2008, 08:21 AM
I have read all the posts in this thread, Sister, and have been against AFF hosting this debate from the start. Personally, I don't want WWOD representing anything I believe anywhere on the web, but that's just my opinion. I am glad RGCraig has taken a firm stand on not hosting this sort of debate.

Barb
06-06-2008, 08:22 AM
I have read all the posts in this thread, Sister, and have been against AFF hosting this debate from the start. Personally, I don't want WWOD representing anything I believe anywhere on the web, but that's just my opinion. I am glad RGCraig has taken a firm stand on not hosting this sort of debate.

I deleted my post because when I read it again, I realize I misread yours...sorry...

COOPER
06-06-2008, 08:22 AM
Where ya been hidin the last few days? Your thread got deleted and you didn't come back, Bro. Whazzup?

We were on vacation.

Why did my thread get deleted any way?

I am just an English speaking, Native American mixed Irish white man.:toofunny

Admin
06-06-2008, 08:24 AM
This is a closed subject - so is the thread!

AFF will not be hosting this.