Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

[Nahum]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

[stmatthew]

Attention Freaky-Cons! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

Nice. Why not insult them?

[Michael The Disciple]

I am an old time Jesus Freak. Does this include me?

[Carpenter]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

I don't think they felt the lack of freedom to move about the building, they just go sick of dealing with someone who has absolutely no respect.

So instead of telling them they are now free, perhaps you can simply invite them back.

[Nahum]

I don't think they felt the lack of freedom to move about the building, they just go sick of dealing with someone who has absolutely no respect.

So instead of telling them they are now free, perhaps you can simply invite them back.

Why ruin a good thing?

[Carpenter]

Why ruin a good thing?

I think we differ in what constitutes a "good thing". This fourm is not the same without the likes of Brother Groce, Old Paths, Coonskinner, Brother Epley, RRford and even that Rutlidge character.

Strength can never be attained by decreasing resistence.

[Nahum]

I think we differ in what constitutes a "good thing". This forum is not the same without the likes of Brother Groce, Old Paths, Coonskinner, Brother Epley, RRford and even that Rutlidge character.

Strength can never be attained by decreasing resistence.

They took their toys and ran away.

Nobody made them do it.

I love every one of them, but they have moved on to greener pastures where everyone worships their every word - as if it fell straight from the pearly gates.

[Carpenter]

They took their toys and ran away.

Nobody made them do it.

I love every one of them, but they have moved on to greener pastures where everyone worships their every word - as if it fell straight from the pearly gates.

Maybe so, but that aspect doesn't intimidate me or keep me from challenging them. It CAN be done with love and respect. That is why when they come to town they all want to meet me, and they call and send messages telling me they care. I think knowing I am on the reprobate side of the conservative fence and they still want to break bread is a little counterintuitive??

[holinesspk]

ER..........there something wrong with conservatives on here? I am very conservative. We go to a strict holiness independent church. I have many friends in the WPF.................I am getting bad vibes here bretheren. :D

[Carpenter]

ER..........there something wrong with conservatives on here? I am very conservative. We go to a strict holiness independent church. I have many friends in the WPF.................I am getting bad vibes here bretheren. :D

I have asked like 10 other times, what on earth is WPF?

[Carpenter]

ER..........there something wrong with conservatives on here? I am very conservative. We go to a strict holiness independent church. I have many friends in the WPF.................I am getting bad vibes here bretheren. :D

Don't let the wiggly wishy washy liberals scare you away my friend...and please don't let them offend you. Like I said earlier, strenghth will never be attained by removing resistance.

[1Corinth2v4]

ER..........there something wrong with conservatives on here? I am very conservative. We go to a strict holiness independent church. I have many friends in the WPF.................I am getting bad vibes here bretheren. :D

Probably all the evil spirits here! :D

[mizpeh]

WPF is the World Pentecostal Fellowship which was started by some UPC ministers after the vote on TV advertising passed at the last UPC GC.

[Amos]

I don't think they felt the lack of freedom to move about the building, they just go sick of dealing with someone who has absolutely no respect.

So instead of telling them they are now free, perhaps you can simply invite them back.

Ding ding ding!

We have a winner. :)

[rgcraig]

Come back!

[COOPER]

I am an old time Jesus Freak. Does this include me?

Just means you're old

[Cindy]

I'm a conservative. BTW Coop good to see YOU posting again.

[timlan2057]

I don't think they felt the lack of freedom to move about the building, they just go sick of dealing with someone who has absolutely no respect.

So instead of telling them they are now free, perhaps you can simply invite them back.

Carpenter, I've known you since old FCF days and you know I think highly of you.

But I do declare, you have become a caricature of yourself. You are OBSESSED with Dan Alicea.

Dan's a prominent poster who posts a lot, but you've almost become a stalker of his - quite unlike your normal matter-of-fact, sensible self.

PP's post was obviously tongue-in-cheek, yet you pop in as serious as a heart attack to get after DA.

Next, some of you people are going to be blaming DA for 4 bucks a gallon gasoline.

And quit making martyrs out of these come-and-go pack-posting "conservatives."

Most of them left this board when they found out it would not work propagating the illusion that "ole time pentecost" was winning the war of ideas by admin and ownership strong-arming and censorship.

Again Carpenter ... it's sad to see a once-great poster reduced to just a caricature.

[COOPER]

I'm a conservative. BTW Coop good to see YOU posting again.

Morn'n !

[LUKE2447]

I am very conservative but Dan does not bother me a bit! He studies which is more than most and he firmly believes what he believes and loves God from what I can tell. His walk does not hurt me and I pray when all is said and done we can both rejoice and call heaven our home.

[rgcraig]

I am very conservative but Dan does not bother me a bit! He studies which is more than most and he firmly believes what he believes and loves God from what I can tell. His walk does not hurt me and I pray when all is said and done we can both rejoice and call heaven our home.

Wow - how easy is that!

There is the ignore feature that people can use too.

[Cindy]

Most posters don't bother me, but those Admin people.:aaa

[LUKE2447]

Wow - how easy is that!

There is the ignore feature that people can use too.

Oh and by the way your daughter is beautiful, and I pray she got someone who meshes with her perfectly.

[rgcraig]

Oh and by the way your daughter is beautiful, and I pray she got someone who meshes with her perfectly.

Thank you and I believe she did - - he's a handsome young man that loves God and my daughter!

[LUKE2447]

Wow - how easy is that!

There is the ignore feature that people can use too.

I firmly believe in "who am I to judge another mans servant"!!!!! Does not mean I won't stand up for what I believe but also at the same time, I have no problem worshipping, seeking God with that person or fellowship.

[BrotherEastman]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease
I like Dan, but make no mistake PP, I fear no one here on AFF. I'm not afraid to voice my thoughts, even to DA.;):snapout

[GraceAmazing]

So, Dan's gone??? for a whole month???

and Epley's gone too? What happened???

Dear Lord, be gone a whole week and all's gone when you return! LOL!

[Kutless]

I like Dan, but make no mistake PP, I fear no one here on AFF. I'm not afraid to voice my thoughts, even to DA.;):snapoutthe godfather has spoken......so fagetaboutit!

[deltaguitar]

I think I might turn conservative for a while.

[Kutless]

I think I might turn conservative for a while.the end must be near

[Sister Alvear]

I like Dan...we do not agree on everything but that is a part of life. I can be friends with about just anybody. We don´t ave to dwell on how we disagree and become bitter enemies.
Why does being hard always seem to mean conservative to some people?

I really know no real conservatives in every sense of the word...

[CC1]

I think we differ in what constitutes a "good thing". This fourm is not the same without the likes of Brother Groce, Old Paths, Coonskinner, Brother Epley, RRford and even that Rutlidge character.

Strength can never be attained by decreasing resistence.

Let the church say amen!

[Sister Alvear]

ditto!

[Brett Prince]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

I wasn't avoiding Dan.

[CC1]

I wasn't avoiding Dan.

You are also not all that conservative. You just think you are!

[Brett Prince]

Let the church say amen!

Although Carpenter, who I have always liked doesn't seem to mention me--he hit the nail on the head. When you find yourself one of the few voices for a persuasion left--and not NEARLY as able as they--it tends to make for an atmosphere that is not too pleasant. So, I am only here for a brief moment due to the SG situation. This place ain't the same without the conservative folks. PERIOD.

[rrford]

Hey! What about that? Another misguided, ill-informed, rather asinine thread about why some folks no longer post here. Enjoy your deliusion. :tease

[Brett Prince]

You are also not all that conservative. You just think you are!


Okay. As if you really know me. But, furthermore, without the influence of some of the, er, "enlightened" on here, I find myself more conservative all the time. Oh, sorry! I THINK I am more conservative all the time.

Nonetheless, conservative or not, I am certainly not on the same wavelength as the many liberals and so-called "moderates" on here.

But, then, again--maybe I am and I just don't "think" I am.

[1Corinth2v4]

I think I might turn conservative for a while.

That ought to be different for ya! A wolf in sheep's clothing instead of just a plain wolf! :tease :ursofunny

[Sister Alvear]

I enjoy reading different opinions if posted in a good spirit.

[1Corinth2v4]

Hey! What about that? Another misguided, ill-informed, rather asinine thread about why some folks no longer post here. Enjoy your deliusion. :tease

I heard RRFORD is an author?
What book has he written?
I'm interested reading it.

[rgcraig]

1Corth,

Could you please delete those quotes in your sig line - takes up way too much room.

[1Corinth2v4]

1Corth,

Could you please delete those quotes in your sig line - takes up way too much room.

How many can I leave for a signature?

[1Corinth2v4]

Is that better?

[rgcraig]

Is that better?

A bit - thanks!

[1Corinth2v4]

A bit - thanks!

No problem....You're welcome.

[tstew]

I think that for a lot of people (myself included), there was an over-obsession with specific attacks on beliefs, so much that it permeated nearly every thread in spirit and in content.

True to the name of this forum, I come seeking and expecting Apostolic friendship, and in the "Fellowship Hall", Apostolic fellowship even if I don't agree with every detail that someone else agrees with.

I do recognize that there is a time and place to discuss disagreements (after all there is an entire room dedicated to Debates), and at times it is interesting to watch and participate.

I just pray that the entire nature and culture of the entire forum does not become liberal vs. conservative, ex-UPC or other org vs. current members because that does become very old and in my humble opinion flies in the face of the stated purpose of the forum.

[DividedThigh]

danny will come back and whos afraid of that harmless little fuzz ball anyway, he should get married and spend time with her, that would be more productive, lol

[Hoovie]

A thread like this is so revealing.....

Carpenter the oft thought liberal is born again (again) embracing the ultra cons and slamming Dan.

Pastor Poster the oft thought conservative-teetering-moderate says those conservatives deserve what they get.

rrford - the brainy wordsmith from Apostolic academia yet again conjures images with words like "asinine".

[Nahum]

A thread like this is so revealing.....

Carpenter the oft thought liberal is born again (again) embracing the ultra cons and slamming Dan.

Pastor Poster the oft thought conservative-teetering-moderate says those conservatives deserve what they get.

rrford - the brainy wordsmith from Apostolic academia yet again conjures images with words like "asinine".

Brett Prince and rrford can deny it all they want, but the truth is they hate it when Daniel floods us with posts.

And "asinine" is rrford's favorite word when he is flustered (which is often).

[Nahum]

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

[mizpeh]

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

You should organize a Welcome Back celebration! :bdayparty

[Brett Prince]

Brett Prince and rrford can deny it all they want, but the truth is they hate it when Daniel floods us with posts.

And "asinine" is rrford's favorite word when he is flustered (which is often).

Uh, PP, I haven't been here enough to know if DA floods "us" with posts. I don't know how I can hate it.

I didn't leave because of DA. He didn't even figure in on the list. Think back to some threads regarding LB and "What a Difference a Line Can Make" and you will recall a number of individuals, their positions, and their attitudes who were hard for me to take. DA was a liberal who didn't agree with LB. That was no big whoop. It was the ones that I felt should have known better, and BELIEVED better that made holding my lunch down tough.

[Brett Prince]

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

Sorry, PP. This is no homecoming. This is only a temporary stay, a visit, and the reception is not making this visitor desire to stay too long.

[Nahum]

Uh, PP, I haven't been here enough to know if DA floods "us" with posts. I don't know how I can hate it.

I didn't leave because of DA. He didn't even figure in on the list. Think back to some threads regarding LB and "What a Difference a Line Can Make" and you will recall a number of individuals, their positions, and their attitudes who were hard for me to take. DA was a liberal who didn't agree with LB. That was no big whoop. It was the ones that I felt should have known better, and BELIEVED better that made holding my lunch down tough.

Hmm, maybe I should bump those threads?

Who cares what you think about "ones that should know better?":crazy

As if your opinion means anything more than the rest of us.

Dude, you are so self-absorbed.

[Nahum]

Sorry, PP. This is no homecoming. This is only a temporary stay, a visit, and the reception is not making this visitor desire to stay too long.

Great.

[1Corinth2v4]

Uh, PP, I haven't been here enough to know if DA floods "us" with posts. I don't know how I can hate it.

I didn't leave because of DA. He didn't even figure in on the list. Think back to some threads regarding LB and "What a Difference a Line Can Make" and you will recall a number of individuals, their positions, and their attitudes who were hard for me to take. DA was a liberal who didn't agree with LB. That was no big whoop. It was the ones that I felt should have known better, and BELIEVED better that made holding my lunch down tough.


Brett,


I hear you opened your own forum?

[Nahum]

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

I see Straightline has checked in this morning.

[Brad Murphy]

The aftershave and shoe polish smells were getting a little strong anyway...

[Hoovie]

Hmm, maybe I should bump those threads?

Who cares what you think about "ones that should know better?":crazy

As if your opinion means anything more than the rest of us.

Dude, you are so self-absorbed.

BAM!

who needs DA?

[Brett Prince]

Brett,


I hear you opened your own forum?

No. I don't know how that got started. I had a forum several years ago that went nowhere. I am a nobody, and it got no participation. I haven't had it for probably 2-3 years.

[Parkbench]

There isn't a desire for some former (posse) members to return recently over recent threads or developments on AFF as for the fact that the cons are beginning to eat their own on the other forum and some are returning/visiting for respite.

I think PP is onto something though. It just has to be much easier for them to roam or move around the building without DA here. They will soon scatter when he returns. Hurry back Dan.

[Rico]

There isn't a desire for some former (posse) members to return recently over recent threads or developments on AFF as for the fact that the cons are beginning to eat their own on the other forum and some are returning/visiting for respite.

I think PP is onto something though. It just has to be much easier for them to roam or move around the building without DA here. They will soon scatter when he returns. Hurry back Dan.

That's what happens with a thirst for blood. Eventually you don't care where you get it from as long as you satisfy that thirst.

[Cindy]

Wow, could y'all just be more rude?

[Rico]

Wow, could y'all just be more rude?

Sister, I think it's ironic that they leave here, supposedly for greener pastures, and then find themselves turning on each other when they get there, instead of patting each other on the back, like you'd think they'd be doing.

[Cindy]

Sister, I think it's ironic that they leave here, supposedly for greener pastures, and then find themselves turning on each other when they get there, instead of patting each other on the back, like you'd think they'd be doing.

Yeah, yeah, whatever. People are what they are. No reason for us to be rude to each other though. Know what I'm saying?

[Brett Prince]

Sister, I think it's ironic that they leave here, supposedly for greener pastures, and then find themselves turning on each other when they get there, instead of patting each other on the back, like you'd think they'd be doing.

On the contrary, this is not the case. Those at CAF have very interesting debates, that do get heated, of course, at times. But, there is no "turning on each other." The reason some have come here is to make a point regarding unethical behavior on the part of someone who has either copied and pasted from a closed forum--in violation of the agreement to be a member--or allowed someone else access to the forum via their userid and password. Whichever, it is unethical. That is the reason, and SOLELY the reason. There is no need for respite. Certainly, when you get back here and see some old friends posting--it has a pull. That is it.

[StillStanding]

Sister, I think it's ironic that they leave here, supposedly for greener pastures, and then find themselves turning on each other when they get there, instead of patting each other on the back, like you'd think they'd be doing.

The enemy of our enemy is our friend. They all had a common enemy (liberals) while here at AFF. Apparently, when they left, it was back to usual for them!:)

[tstew]

I for one welcome variety and pray that we are all Christ-like enough to have civil fellowship.

[AbundantGrace]

Praise The Lord!!! I just came back today and found this thread and now that the coast is here, I and my fellow conservatives no longer have to hide. LOL...

[Cindy]

I for one welcome variety and pray that we are all Christ-like enough to have civil fellowship.

You do fine as long as you leave certain people alone here apparently.

[rrford]

Brett Prince and rrford can deny it all they want, but the truth is they hate it when Daniel floods us with posts.

And "asinine" is rrford's favorite word when he is flustered (which is often).

I never denied being irritated with such antics. But those antics alone are not why I started posting less.

Flustered? Dude, leave the psychoanalisys to folks who actually know what they are doing as I assure you that you come across more flustered in your posting than I ever will. :whistle

[1Corinth2v4]

I never denied being irritated with such antics. But those antics alone are not why I started posting less.

Flustered? Dude, leave the psychoanalisys to folks who actually know what they are doing as I assure you that you come across more flustered in your posting than I ever will. :whistle

RRFORD,


Are you an author? What book have you written? I'd be interested reading it.

[rrford]

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

F-o-l-l-o-w t-h-e b-a-l-l. I-'-l-l- t-a-l-k r-e-a-l s-l-o-w h-e-r-e f-o-r y-o-u-r s-a-k-e....

rrford checked back in over a week ago. I have told you that before and you seem to be a little slow on the uptake. Your petty little misinformed thread did not draw anyone back. Like I have been saying, enjoy your delusion cause it looks like you are stuck with it. :ursofunny

[Rico]

On the contrary, this is not the case. Those at CAF have very interesting debates, that do get heated, of course, at times. But, there is no "turning on each other." The reason some have come here is to make a point regarding unethical behavior on the part of someone who has either copied and pasted from a closed forum--in violation of the agreement to be a member--or allowed someone else access to the forum via their userid and password. Whichever, it is unethical. That is the reason, and SOLELY the reason. There is no need for respite. Certainly, when you get back here and see some old friends posting--it has a pull. That is it.

Ok. So what I read on that blog is completely made up, right? No one said all those awful things against this SG fella. Is that what I hear you saying? I don't agree with what the person who started the blog did, but it doesn't compare to what those who were quoted did.

[Nahum]

I never denied being irritated with such antics. But those antics alone are not why I started posting less.

Flustered? Dude, leave the psychoanalisys to folks who actually know what they are doing as I assure you that you come across more flustered in your posting than I ever will. :whistle

F-o-l-l-o-w t-h-e b-a-l-l. I-'-l-l- t-a-l-k r-e-a-l s-l-o-w h-e-r-e f-o-r y-o-u-r s-a-k-e....

rrford checked back in over a week ago. I have told you that before and you seem to be a little slow on the uptake. Your petty little misinformed thread did not draw anyone back. Like I have been saying, enjoy your delusion cause it looks like you are stuck with it. :ursofunny


I LOVE YOU MAN!

And I knew this would get you to post!

I'm glad you're here!

You are one of the good guys.:friend

[Rico]

Oooops. Gang, I just realized this isn't the thread about what was posted on that blog. I thought it was. Sorry for not seeing that. This thread is about Dan taking a break from posting and all the conservatives being happy about that. My bad. I will try to pay more attention in the future. :)

[rrford]

There isn't a desire for some former (posse) members to return recently over recent threads or developments on AFF as for the fact that the cons are beginning to eat their own on the other forum and some are returning/visiting for respite.

I think PP is onto something though. It just has to be much easier for them to roam or move around the building without DA here. They will soon scatter when he returns. Hurry back Dan.

Sorry. Some of us are not even members of the other Forum you are referencing.

[Nahum]

F-o-l-l-o-w t-h-e b-a-l-l. I-'-l-l- t-a-l-k r-e-a-l s-l-o-w h-e-r-e f-o-r y-o-u-r s-a-k-e....

rrford checked back in over a week ago. I have told you that before and you seem to be a little slow on the uptake. Your petty little misinformed thread did not draw anyone back. Like I have been saying, enjoy your delusion cause it looks like you are stuck with it. :ursofunny


You know he's flustered when he starts referring to himself in the third person!

:ursofunny:ursofunny:ursofunny

[Nahum]

Sorry. Some of us are not even members of the other Forum you are referencing.

That's true!

rrford would not assimilate, so The Borg got rid of him.:evilglee

[RevDWW]

I LOVE YOU MAN!

And I knew this would get you to post!

I'm glad you're here!

You are one of the good guys.:friend

Are you just saying this cause RRFord wacked you upside the head? :snapout

:ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny

Seems I saw RR posting about a week ago.........:tease


I love everybody!!!!!
That's what Jesus wants.
But He did not tell us we have to like everybody.
That being said, I can't think of one person on AFF that I dislike.....all that much. :ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny

[Nahum]

Are you just saying this cause RRFord wacked you upside the head? :snapout

:ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny

Seems I saw RR posting about a week ago.........:tease


I love everybody!!!!!
That's what Jesus wants.
But He did not tell us we have to like everybody.
That being said, I can't think of one person on AFF that I dislike.....all that much. :ursofunny :ursofunny :ursofunny

:tease

No, he whacks me upside the noggin' often.

Why should this thread be any different?

[1Corinth2v4]

Thanks for avoiding my question.

The Lord bless you.

[Nahum]

Thanks for avoiding my question.

The Lord bless you.


No problem.

[CC1]

You know he's flustered when he starts referring to himself in the third person!

:ursofunny:ursofunny:ursofunny

I talked to rrford and he said to tell you that "We are not pleased at your treatment".

[1Corinth2v4]

No problem.

I don't recall asking you anything.

[Nahum]

I talked to rrford and he said to tell you that "We are not pleased at your treatment".

:ursofunny:ursofunny:ursofunny:ursofunny:ursofunny :ursofunny


Too much learning hath made him mad?

[Brett Prince]

Ok. So what I read on that blog is completely made up, right? No one said all those awful things against this SG fella. Is that what I hear you saying? I don't agree with what the person who started the blog did, but it doesn't compare to what those who were quoted did.

No. I am not saying that. SG is NOT on CAF. SG is not seen by some on CAF as a conservative. While I don't agree with their comments, it is simply not a situation where CAF members were tearing up CAF members. I am not at liberty to say more, as it is a closed forum. I was only responding to your assertion that CAF members were turning on other CAF members, and thus some were coming back here for respite. That is not the case. I am not denying, either, that some comments were made about SG that I do not agree with. I don't think Kansas Preacher made any such assertion like that, either.

[StillStanding]

No. I am not saying that. SG is NOT on CAF. SG is not seen by some on CAF as a conservative. While I don't agree with their comments, it is simply not a situation where CAF members were tearing up CAF members. I am not at liberty to say more, as it is a closed forum. I was only responding to your assertion that CAF members were turning on other CAF members, and thus some were coming back here for respite. That is not the case. I am not denying, either, that some comments were made about SG that I do not agree with. I don't think Kansas Preacher made any such assertion like that, either.
It sounds like CAF has a trailer park complex! :) It's been nice having you visit for a period of time, but isn't it time to get on your bike and head back home?

[rgcraig]

No. I am not saying that. SG is NOT on CAF. SG is not seen by some on CAF as a conservative. While I don't agree with their comments, it is simply not a situation where CAF members were tearing up CAF members. I am not at liberty to say more, as it is a closed forum. I was only responding to your assertion that CAF members were turning on other CAF members, and thus some were coming back here for respite. That is not the case. I am not denying, either, that some comments were made about SG that I do not agree with. I don't think Kansas Preacher made any such assertion like that, either.

Guess it's okay for them to turn on a minister that's not in "their" circle. Really sad anyway you look at it.

[1Corinth2v4]

Guess it's okay for them to turn on a minister that's not in "their" circle. Really sad anyway you look at it.

Liberals do the same.

[rgcraig]

It sounds like CAF has a trailer park complex! :) It's been nice having you visit for a period of time, but isn't it time to get on your bike and head back home?

Just checking, but you are saying that's part of the complex - not telling BP to go home - right?

[Michael Phelps]

Guess it's okay for them to turn on a minister that's not in "their" circle. Really sad anyway you look at it.

Lol, it's ALWAYS been that way, Renda!

[rgcraig]

Liberals do the same.

Humans do it, but when someone sets themselves up above others, then act that way.......it's a bit different.

[Nahum]

I agree that libs do it too.

But it doesn't seem to be a prevailing mindset.

[rgcraig]

I agree that libs do it too.

But it doesn't seem to be a prevailing mindset.

Liberals don't think they are the only ones going to heaven.

[Nahum]

Liberals don't think they are the only ones going to heaven.

Perhaps, but they believe tolerance is in order for everyone but the intolerant, which equals conservatives.

[Cindy]

Here we go again. Sheesh.

[Nahum]

Here we go again. Sheesh.

Sister, all you have to do is change threads.

It really is that easy.

[Cindy]

Perhaps, but they believe tolerance is in order for everyone but the intolerant, which equals conservatives.

So ONLY conservatives are intolerant? Are you a conservative? For you seem to be very intolerant.

[StillStanding]

Just checking, but you are saying that's part of the complex - not telling BP to go home - right?

Oops! :couch

I just get tired of these guys that visit us and try to act all superior because they belong to a closed (and in their mind-better) forum. In my opinion, a closed forum is little different than a closed mind. Both can be a prison.

[Cindy]

Sister, all you have to do is change threads.

It really is that easy.

Yeah? that's the problem most of them are like this one.

[Nahum]

So ONLY conservatives are intolerant? Are you a conservative? For you seem to be very intolerant.

I am completely intolerant.

I don't pretend to be open-minded or tolerant.

[rgcraig]

So ONLY conservatives are intolerant? Are you a conservative? For you seem to be very intolerant.

No, he means liberals.

[Nahum]

Oops! :couch

I just get tired of these guys that visit us and try to act all superior because they belong to a closed (and in their mind-better) forum. In my opinion, a closed forum is little different than a closed mind. Both can be a prison.

:dance

[rrford]

Guess it's okay for them to turn on a minister that's not in "their" circle. Really sad anyway you look at it.

It is sad. And it also happens here quite often. :whistle

[Michael Phelps]

Yeah? that's the problem most of them are like this one.

Maybe it's time for a breather, Sis?

[Cindy]

This is why I hate labels. I like PP usually, but he seems to be stuck in a rut today.

[Cindy]

Maybe it's time for a breather, Sis?

Nah, it ain't that bad.

[rgcraig]

It is sad. And it also happens here quite often. :whistle

Yes it does.

[Nahum]

This is why I hate labels. I like PP usually, but he seems to be stuck in a rut today.

Sorry.

The real question is this.

Can Praxeas or Renda pass Daniel in the next six weeks?

Daniel Alicea 16,567
Praxeas 12,313
rgcraig 12,222

[StillStanding]

I am completely intolerant.

I don't pretend to be open-minded or tolerant.

Transparency is a virtue! :ursofunny

[Cindy]

No, he means liberals.

It is too hot to think I guess. I am so confused by all these battles.

[Ron]

Maybe it's time for a breather, Sis?

Michael, isn't she allowed to voice her feelings & thoughts about the tone and direction of the threads recently that has affected this forum?

A breather is sometimes a good thing, but it does nothing to change cold hard facts.

[Brett Prince]

Hey PM! Sorry to see you want me to leave. You and CC1 were two of my favorite liberals. What did I ever do to you to make you want me to ride away on me little dirt bike? :D

[Ron]

It is too hot to think I guess. I am so confused by all these battles.

Are you in the area where the Hurricane will be making landfall?

[rgcraig]

Sorry.

The real question is this.

Can Praxeas or Renda pass Daniel in the next six weeks?

Daniel Alicea 16,567
Praxeas 12,313
rgcraig 12,222

I hope not and that's with half those posts in the admin area (Prax and myself)!

[Cindy]

Sorry.

The real question is this.

Can Praxeas or Renda pass Daniel in the next six weeks?

Daniel Alicea 16,567
Praxeas 12,313
rgcraig 12,222

hmmmmm, maybe Prax.

[Michael Phelps]

Michael, isn't she allowed to voice her feelings & thoughts about the tone and direction of the threads recently that has affected this forum?

A breather is sometimes a good thing, but it does nothing to change cold hard facts.

Ron, I'm not sure why you felt compelled to defend her, I merely asked if she may need a break, like we all do from time to time, just to refocus.

Please, chill out.

And, cold hard facts are in the eyes of the beholder.

[Nahum]

Perhaps, but the libs believe tolerance is in order for everyone but the intolerant, which equals conservatives.

I thought this was classic.

It shows intolerance on both sides of the issues.

Pastor Poster's News, "Fair and Balanced, but Not Open-Minded!"

[CC1]

This is why I hate labels. I like PP usually, but he seems to be stuck in a rut today.

Cindy, you are going to have to pick it up on your reading comprehension! On the prevoius page the post you were lambasting PP about thinking he was speaking about conservatives he was actually getting on to liberals!!!!!!

Go back and read it. (I have also been quilty of speed reading and getting something wrong before)

[Ron]

Ron, I'm not sure why you felt compelled to defend her, I merely asked if she may need a break, like we all do from time to time, just to refocus.

Please, chill out.

And, cold hard facts are in the eyes of the beholder.

I is, are you?:hanky


Actually for the temps being in the eighties recently, it is cloudy and about 70 degrees, a lot cooler.

[StillStanding]

Pastor Poster's News, "Fair and Balanced, but Not Open-Minded!"
Isn't this the same as, "Fair and Balanced, but Closed Minded!"? :D

[Nahum]

I hope not and that's with half those posts in the admin area (Prax and myself)!

You can do it Renda!

Knock him off his throne!:snapout

[rgcraig]

Isn't this the same as, "Fair and Balanced, but Closed Minded!"? :D

lol.....

[rgcraig]

You can do it Renda!

Knock him off his throne!:snapout

He has no throne.

[Cindy]

Cindy, you are going to have to pick it up on your reading comprehension! On the prevoius page the post you were lambasting PP about thinking he was speaking about conservatives he was actually getting on to liberals!!!!!!

Go back and read it. (I have also been quilty of speed reading and getting something wrong before)

I admit I was confused, but Renda sorted it out for me. Thanks Renda.:)

[Nahum]

Isn't this the same as, "Fair and Balanced, but Closed Minded!"? :D

Not as catchy!:tease

[Nahum]

He has no throne.

He's gone for one day and you take away his throne?

Where's the love?

[Cindy]

Are you in the area where the Hurricane will be making landfall?

No, but it is hot and humid here most of the time. I am praying for our friends in South Texas including some from here on AFF.

[rgcraig]

I admit I was confused, but Renda sorted it out for me. Thanks Renda.:)

I'm here for ya!

[rgcraig]

He's gone for one day and you take away his throne?

Where's the love?

He never had a throne.............he's just a mere poster.

























with a BUNCH of posts!

[Ron]

No, but it is hot and humid here most of the time. I am praying for our friends in South Texas including some from here on AFF.

From what I have heard the Hurricane hit Mexico & it was just bands of rain & thunderstorms that hit Texas.

The rain they said was long overdue.

[Amos]

I never denied being irritated with such antics. But those antics alone are not why I started posting less.

Flustered? Dude, leave the psychoanalisys to folks who actually know what they are doing as I assure you that you come across more flustered in your posting than I ever will. :whistle

While DA is definitely a factor in why I no longer post here much, he certainly ain't the only reason.

Well said, Brother.

[CC1]

While DA is definitely a factor in why I no longer post here much, he certainly ain't the only reason.

Well said, Brother.

C'mon and admit the reason is ME!!!!!!:tease

BTW - Where is Andy?

[Rhoni]

Transparency is a virtue! :ursofunny

That's not what I heard:tease

[jaxfam6]

No, but it is hot and humid here most of the time. I am praying for our friends in South Texas including some from here on AFF.

who on here is from south Texas? I have questions for them. Hook me up. please =)

[stmatthew]

He has no throne.

then where does he go................














:tease

:dance

:ursofunny

:aaa

[rgcraig]

then where does he go................














:tease

:dance

:ursofunny

:aaaWell, some seem to think he goes here.:whistle

[Kay B]

Cindy, you are going to have to pick it up on your reading comprehension! On the prevoius page the post you were lambasting PP about thinking he was speaking about conservatives he was actually getting on to liberals!!!!!!

Go back and read it. (I have also been quilty of speed reading and getting something wrong before)

Now how did you know she is a speed reader? lol
She is!
I'll share a memory from long ago.(don't tell granny) We were all out shopping one day MIL, Cindy myself and her sister. MIL and I went separate and came back to the front/cashier and the two girls were at the book section.They had read several books while we were shopping about 20 minutes. Not sure of the titles. The girls were in their teens. :aaa

[Cindy]

Now how did you know she is a speed reader? lol
She is!
I'll share a memory from long ago.(don't tell granny) We were all out shopping one day MIL, Cindy myself and her sister. MIL and I went separate and came back to the front/cashier and the two girls were at the book section.They had read several books while we were shopping about 20 minutes. Not sure of the titles. The girls were in their teens. :aaa

Ha......I read a little slower now. You know who THE reader was, though he didn't speed read. But he would read encyclopedia's and all kinds of manuals. I could read when I was 4 and, I think I also knew how to write a little and count to 100. Did that in Bogalusa at our grandmother's. She encouraged it along with our Mama.

[AbundantGrace]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

Being the ultra-conservative poster that I am, I just want to personally say that it feels good to be able to post freely without any fear of Dan! :ursofunny

[Cindy]

Being the ultra-conservative poster that I am, I just want to personally say that it feels good to be able to post freely without any fear of Dan! :ursofunny

:ursofunny

[Hoovie]

I am an ubercon myself.

[Steve Epley]

Maybe so, but that aspect doesn't intimidate me or keep me from challenging them. It CAN be done with love and respect. That is why when they come to town they all want to meet me, and they call and send messages telling me they care. I think knowing I am on the reprobate side of the conservative fence and they still want to break bread is a little counterintuitive??

Pianoman & CC1 have met and had lunch twice, Adino cameto hear me preach and when I go to Colorado Carp is going to buy me a steak. We respect each other. Some folks cannot show what they don't have.:whistle:aaa

[StMark]

Pianoman & CC1 have met and had lunch twice, Adino cameto hear me preach and when I go to Colorado Carp is going to buy me a steak. We respect each other. Some folks cannot show what they don't have.:whistle:aaa


Who are the "some folks" ????

I am asking because you've been to CA. at least twice
since FCF and refused to meet me - come clean with me Epley

[Steve Epley]

Who are the "some folks" ????

I am asking because you've been to CA. at least twice
since FCF and refused to meet me - come clean with me Epley

MarkI have never REFUSED to meet you. California is a big state I have not been even close to your area but when I do you are gonna meet me and we'll have lunch. I think maybe next year it looks like?

[Amos]

C'mon and admit the reason is ME!!!!!!:tease

BTW - Where is Andy?

CC1, you are definitely one of the bright spots here or anywhere you show up.

I am thankful that we met and consider you a friend, not just a fellow poster.

When I sort of began posting less here, it wasn't any "flouncing off in a huff" or anything, it just got to be less fun.

A dynamic changed that is hard to define. I guess everything has a shelf life to some degree?

i will admit that I did finally get tired of being "stalked" by a gaggle of hyena-like posters who didn't have even a modicum of courtesy, but knew how to rail and mock without ever quite breaking the rules.

I'm not mad at anybody and lurk some, even posting occasionally.

But except on rare occasions when the mood strikes me or a subject interests me, I tend not to get in protracted discussions here.

It has nothing to do with being "scared" of anybody or any debate.

Anyone who hung out at FCF and NFCF knows that is laughable. If I didn't dodge Newman, I sure wouldn't be afraid of most of the current local talent. :)

[Steve Epley]

CC1, you are definitely one of the bright spots here or anywhere you show up.

I am thankful that we met and consider you a friend, not just a fellow poster.

When I sort of began posting less here, it wasn't any "flouncing off in a huff" or anything, it just got to be less fun.

A dynamic changed that is hard to define. I guess everything has a shelf life to some degree?

i will admit that I did finally get tired of being "stalked" by a gaggle of hyena-like posters who didn't have even a modicum of courtesy, but knew how to rail and mock without ever quite breaking the rules.

I'm not mad at anybody and lurk some, even posting occasionally.

But except on rare occasions when the mood strikes me or a subject interests me, I tend not to get in protracted discussions here.

It has nothing to do with being "scared" of anybody or any debate.

Anyone who hung out at FCF and NFCF knows that is laughable. If I didn't dodge Newman, I sure wouldn't be afraid of most of the current local talent. :)

Very well said.

[Tyk]

Who or what was newman?

Hopefully I don't start a war :P

[rgcraig]

Who or what was newman?

Hopefully I don't start a war :P

Newman is a very well respected poster!

She's smart as a whip and we miss her posts!

[Amos]

Who or what was newman?

Hopefully I don't start a war :P


In the gunfight at the FCF Corral, Newman was the Wyatt Earp of liberals.

[Rhymis]

I ain't a'feard of no Newman. :pillowfight

[Amos]

I ain't a'feard of no Newman. :pillowfight


Me neither, but I wanted my guns loaded when I tackled her. :)

Seriosuly, Newman was always an honorable foe.

She could concede when a point had been made, and didn't resort to mockery when she ran low on material.

[Rhymis]

Me neither, but I wanted my guns loaded when I tackled her. :)

Seriosuly, Newman was always an honorable foe.

She could concede when a point had been made, and didn't resort to mockery when she ran low on material.

Hair! Hair! :whistle

[rgcraig]

Hair! Hair! :whistle

LOL!

[StMark]

MarkI have never REFUSED to meet you. California is a big state I have not been even close to your area but when I do you are gonna meet me and we'll have lunch. I think maybe next year it looks like?


O i know i was just trying to get something going....
you gotta learn to Work with me Epley :ursofunny

[Ferd]

In the gunfight at the FCF Corral, Newman was the Wyatt Earp of liberals.

I prefered to think of her as Cole Younger. Hee hee.

[StMark]

I'm going to start a thread and tell yall why the
cons REALLY left AFF

[Steve Epley]

:aaaMe neither, but I wanted my guns loaded when I tackled her. :)

Seriosuly, Newman was always an honorable foe.

She could concede when a point had been made, and didn't resort to mockery when she ran low on material.

She was a lady indeed and a scholar as smart as an attorney however mostof the times she was wrong.:aaa:aaa:tease

[StMark]

Me neither, but I wanted my guns loaded when I tackled her. :)

Seriosuly, Newman was always an honorable foe.

She could concede when a point had been made, and didn't resort to mockery when she ran low on material.


Does anyone know of persons who do this ???
If so, WHO ????

[AbundantGrace]

Does anyone know of persons who do this ???
If so, WHO ????

New to me! I've never witnessed this sort of action taking place here. :whistle

[Ron]

Does anyone know of persons who do this ???
If so, WHO ????

Ah, StMark?:hmmm

[StMark]

Ah, StMark?:hmmm


Who have I mocked Ron ??

[CC1]

CC1, you are definitely one of the bright spots here or anywhere you show up.

I am thankful that we met and consider you a friend, not just a fellow poster.

When I sort of began posting less here, it wasn't any "flouncing off in a huff" or anything, it just got to be less fun.

A dynamic changed that is hard to define. I guess everything has a shelf life to some degree?

i will admit that I did finally get tired of being "stalked" by a gaggle of hyena-like posters who didn't have even a modicum of courtesy, but knew how to rail and mock without ever quite breaking the rules.

I'm not mad at anybody and lurk some, even posting occasionally.

But except on rare occasions when the mood strikes me or a subject interests me, I tend not to get in protracted discussions here.

It has nothing to do with being "scared" of anybody or any debate.

Anyone who hung out at FCF and NFCF knows that is laughable. If I didn't dodge Newman, I sure wouldn't be afraid of most of the current local talent. :)

I understand completely. While I still enjoy AFF and posting you are correct that things are not the same. The dynamic has changed and it is hard to define. I think FCF and NFCF were special lightning captured in a bottle never to be repeated.

The sad result is that many of the brightest and creative conservatives have moved on to their ministers only forum that they feel more comfortable in and the mods and libs are having to break in a whole new generation of cons and ultra cons!

[rgcraig]

I understand completely. While I still enjoy AFF and posting you are correct that things are not the same. The dynamic has changed and it is hard to define. I think FCF and NFCF were special lightning captured in a bottle never to be repeated.

The sad result is that many of the brightest and creative conservatives have moved on to their ministers only forum that they feel more comfortable in and the mods and libs are having to break in a whole new generation of cons and ultra cons!

It's not just cons that we've lost - - there are some others that added to the mix that are missing!

[StMark]

does anyone know of persons who do this ???
If so, who ????



* * * bump * * *

[Ron]

Who have I mocked Ron ??

You, sniff, sniff, snort, mocked my sense of humour!!!!!:tissue

[CC1]

It's not just cons that we've lost - - there are some others that added to the mix that are missing!

Yup. I miss Pastor Tribble. I hope all is well with him.

I also greatly miss Newman's posts. If she doesn't show up more I am going to resign as the President ofthe Newman fan club!

[Nahum]

Attention Conservatives! The Coast is Clear!

Daniel Alicea is gone for a month and a half.

You are now free to move about the building.


:tease

Brett Prince and rrford can deny it all they want, but the truth is they hate it when Daniel floods us with posts.

And "asinine" is rrford's favorite word when he is flustered (which is often).

So far this morning, rrford, Brett Prince and Amos have checked in.

I'll keep you all posted as others come back home.

I see Straightline has checked in this morning.

Let's see...today NYLP (a lib masquerading as a con) showed up. Rhymis made his return. Old Paths and Epley are back.

It's like "Old Home Days" around here.

[CC1]

Let's see...today NYLP (a lib masquerading as a con) showed up. Rhymis made his return. Old Paths and Epley are back.

It's like "Old Home Days" around here.

I think I will start a thread about Mark Bassett just to make the Twilight Zone day complete!

[Nahum]

I think I will start a thread about Mark Bassett just to make the Twilight Zone day complete!

Why not?

Maybe he will show up too?

Wouldn't that be awesome?

[jaxfam6]

You, sniff, sniff, snort, mocked my sense of humour!!!!!:tissue

how can he mock something you don't have????

:ursofunny

[JamDat]

Why not?

Maybe he will show up too?

Wouldn't that be awesome?
Actually I think that it would be. I thought he wasn't even allowed here though?

[Nahum]

Actually I think that it would be. I thought he wasn't even allowed here though?


Really?

[JamDat]

Really?

Really to what part? It would be awesome or he's not allowed here?

[Nahum]

Really to what part? It would be awesome or he's not allowed here?

:whistle

[JamDat]

:whistle

I don't know. Somehow I just have that stuck in my noggin. I'm probably wrong though.

Maybe we could get an official ruling though??

[rgcraig]

I don't know. Somehow I just have that stuck in my noggin. I'm probably wrong though.

Maybe we could get an official ruling though??

Official ruling.

[JamDat]

Official ruling.

:groan That's as clear as mud, LOL.

[rgcraig]

:groan That's as clear as mud, LOL.

I think it's crystal clear.

[JamDat]

Gottcha, I don't know the reason nor do I care to know. I just thought there was one.

[CC1]

Actually I think that it would be. I thought he wasn't even allowed here though?

If MB wanted to be here he could. He is a computer genius (or close to it).

I think he could defeat all of the security measure for at least a time.

The question is would his ethics allow him to do that though?

Would he acknowledge it was being dishonest or would he justify it in some way?

[rrford]

Come on CC1. You ought to know better than to post anything that actually gives folks the opportunity to comment on someone elses integrity and ethics.
How about deleting that one?

[RevDWW]

If MB wanted to be here he could. He is a computer genius (or close to it).

I think he could defeat all of the security measure for at least a time.

The question is would his ethics allow him to do that though?

Would he acknowledge it was being dishonest or would he justify it in some way?

How do you measure computer genius?

[Nahum]

rrford, the man's genius is undeniable.

His theology is irrefutable.

[rrford]

rrford, the man's genius is undeniable.

His theology is irrefutable.

Those are not the two pointsI had issue with. The last two questions openly invite criticism of hos ethics and/or integrity. I see no purpose in such a post. Bit oh well, a few more ticks and a slight breeze and....until another season.

[CC1]

How do you measure computer genius?

Just trust me on this one. He is computer savvy as in not a hobby.

His business is very technical oriented. I think most of it is over the heads of us mere mortals who deal with computers at a consumer level.

[CC1]

Come on CC1. You ought to know better than to post anything that actually gives folks the opportunity to comment on someone elses integrity and ethics.
How about deleting that one?

That was not the intent. I just meant that different people view things differently.

I personally think registering at a forum under a false name and profile and posting things that are obviously lies is wrong but I know people I respect who have done that. I am not sure their justifiation but think it must have been because they considered it a joke, for fun, etc even though they never publicly acknowledged the deception to the best of my knowledge.

I just meant the same thing applies here. I personally don't see how he could sneak in here with a clear conscience but people can justify all sorts of things.

For example, as a man, I can justify any kind of electronic equipment or car I want!!!!

[rrford]

That was not the intent. I just meant that different people view things differently.

I personally think registering at a forum under a false name and profile and posting things that are obviously lies is wrong but I know people I respect who have done that. I am not sure their justifiation but think it must have been because they considered it a joke, for fun, etc even though they never publicly acknowledged the deception to the best of my knowledge.

I just meant the same thing applies here. I personally don't see how he could sneak in here with a clear conscience but people can justify all sorts of things.

For example, as a man, I can justify any kind of electronic equipment or car I want!!!!

Perhaps. But let a few of the WWOD Haters show up and they will attack the character and integrity part. Oh well, ya'll be blessed until the wind blows this way again. Signing off.

[Nahum]

Perhaps. But let a few of the WWOD Haters show up and they will attack the character and integrity part. Oh well, ya'll be blessed until the wind blows this way again. Signing off.

Good talking to you.

Come back soon.

[MissBrattified]

If MB wanted to be here he could. He is a computer genius (or close to it).

I think he could defeat all of the security measure for at least a time.

The question is would his ethics allow him to do that though?

Would he acknowledge it was being dishonest or would he justify it in some way?

Apparently not.

[Amos]

Apparently not.


He doesn't do it.

[MissBrattified]

He doesn't do it.

Yes, that's what I said. :coffee2

[tbpew]

All this reminising has left me wondering afresh...

Q1a.Did MB aka WWOD, participate in posting here that earned him a lifetime ban from AFF?
Q1b. If not, is MB's lifetime ban at AFF established by actions/posts involved at NFCF?

Q2. Since the days of FCF has there ever been a lifetime/permanent ban that was ever permanent? or even more than a few months to maybe a year?

just wondering.

[rgcraig]

All this reminising has left me wondering afresh...

Q1a.Did MB aka WWOD, participate in posting here that earned him a lifetime ban from AFF?
Q1b. If not, is MB's lifetime ban at AFF established by actions/posts involved at NFCF?

Q2. Since the days of FCF has there ever been a lifetime/permanent ban that was ever permanent? or even more than a few months to maybe a year?

just wondering.

1a. No.

1b. No.

2. I can't speak for FCF, but for NFCF and AFF there were some perm bans and last year St. Matt had a year of jubilee and let those have a another chance.

[rgcraig]

Just a note of observation.

The past few days of posting have been more volatile than when DA was here.

[AmazingGrace]

Just a note of observation.

The past few days of posting have been more volatile than when DA was here.

Sadly I have to agree

[Nahum]

Well, I'm glad that I haven't contributed to the volatility.:heeheehee

[Rhymis]

Conservatives colour within the lines -- while liberals are still trying to peel the crayons. :balloonwave

[rgcraig]

Conservatives colour within the lines -- while liberals are still trying to peel the crayons. :balloonwave

You have to peel them?:ursofunny

[Rhymis]

You have to peel them?:ursofunny

You do if you want to find the sharp end ...... :snapout

[Rhymis]

Or to be able to see if the the colour is peach or mango.

[rgcraig]

Or to be able to see if the the colour is peach or mango.
Well, I'm glad to find out that you guys do have colors. I had always heard your crayon box only had black and white in them. :tease

[Rhymis]

Well, I'm glad to find out that you guys do have colors. I had always heard your crayon box only had black and white in them. :tease

LIES ALL LIES... (we just don't have GRAY and YELLOW) ........... :tease

[CC1]

Conservatives colour within the lines -- while liberals are still trying to peel the crayons. :balloonwave

Will either ever graduate to magic markers?

[Rhymis]

Will either ever graduate to magic markers?

Ain't they PERMANENT? :highfive

[Jekyll]

Conservatives colour within the lines -- while liberals are still trying to peel the crayons. :balloonwave
While it actually takes em 40 years to discover that they are actually holding sidwalk chalk

[Quixotic]

Conservatives colour within the lines -- while liberals are still trying to peel the crayons. :balloonwave

Or to be able to see if the the colour is peach or mango.

SuREly tHou aRT oNe Of THem: fOr THou arT a _______________, ANd THy spEEch aGReetH THeRetO.

[Dimples]

Hmmmmmm

[berkeley]

why did you bump this thread?

[Dimples]

why did you bump this thread?

Where are all these people?

[mizpeh]

Where are all these people?

They started their own exclusive forum.

[DAII]

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/mrmosiris/ReligionKillsFolks.jpg

[Baron1710]

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c52/mrmosiris/ReligionKillsFolks.jpg

Very funny. Yet very true.

[berkeley]

Where are all these people?

They're not welcome here.

[Dimples]

They're not welcome here.

Really? Think you are talking out of turn here.

[berkeley]

Really? Think you are talking out of turn here.
Is that a question or a statement?

[Cindy]

They're not welcome here.

According to whom?

[*AQuietPlace*]

Is that a question or a statement?
If you look at the punctuation, you will see that the first part was a question, the second part was a statement. ;)

[berkeley]

Really? Think you are talking out of turn here.

If you look at the punctuation, you will see that the first part was a question, the second part was a statement. ;)

Think you are talking out of turn could be a question or a statement. "I think you are talking out of turn here." Is a statement.

[berkeley]

Really? Think you are talking out of turn here.

No, not really. They've moved on to a place where they can have discussions without being accused of sacramentalism, to a land flowing with milk and honey.

[*AQuietPlace*]

Think you are talking out of turn could be a question or a statement. "I think you are talking out of turn here." Is a statement.
This is what it would look like as a question:

"Think you are talking out of turn here?" :D

[Dimples]

This is what it would look like as a question:

"Think you are talking out of turn here?" :D

You are correct.

[Dimples]

Carpenter was a great poster.

[Hoovie]

Carpenter was a great poster.

Well, hello there Carp! Nice to see you posting! Lol

[Cindy]

I don't think Dimples is a Carpenter.

[DAII]

I don't think Dimples is a Carpenter.
Not at all ... Carp went the way of bitterness along with Jekyll.

[Hoovie]

I don't think Dimples is a Carpenter.

:thumbsup cantcha all play my game - even for one hour?

[Cindy]

:thumbsup cantcha all play my game - even for one hour?

Sorry, go get Dimples the golf ball to play with you.:razz

[rgcraig]

My word, that's an old thread!

Some funny posts in it too.

[berkeley]

This is what it would look like as a question:

"Think you are talking out of turn here?" :D

Not on AFF.