PDA

View Full Version : Al Gore wants you to help the environment


Praxeas
07-24-2008, 01:03 AM
For him. Of course he is exempt being the rich elite globalist that he is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESxvY1tQHTo

MissBrattified
07-24-2008, 02:38 AM
Is there any middle ground between totally irresponsible polluting, dumping and littering, and Al Gore hypocrisy/extremism?

We teach our children that they are to take care of the land God created. We don't allow them to kill animals, or harmless/helpful insects unnecessarily. We don't allow them to litter. We try to purchase produce locally to support local farmers. I don't mind the new trend of using tote bags for groceries instead of endless supplies of plastic bags. We try to use non-toxic cleaning supplies, as much as possible. Although bleach is still my friend in the laundry room...

Great video, though. Effectively illustrates a shameful sham.

the raven
07-24-2008, 02:43 AM
Is there any middle ground between totally irresponsible polluting, dumping and littering, and Al Gore hypocrisy/extremism?

We teach our children that they are to take care of the land God created. We don't allow them to kill animals, or harmless/helpful insects unnecessarily. We don't allow them to litter. We try to purchase produce locally to support local farmers. I don't mind the new trend of using tote bags for groceries instead of endless supplies of plastic bags. We try to use non-toxic cleaning supplies, as much as possible. Although bleach is still my friend in the laundry room...

Great video, though. Effectively illustrates a shameful sham.


My personal opinion is that during the AnteDeluvian Age mankind was vegetarian in regards to environmental textualization. That being said, I feel there is a significant difference between responsible conservation and the religious fanaticism and extreme hypocrisy promulgated by Gore and his ilk.

MissBrattified
07-24-2008, 02:50 AM
My personal opinion is that during the antediluvian Age mankind was vegetarian in regards to environmental textualization. That being said, I feel there is a significant difference between responsible conservation and the religious fanaticism and extreme hypocrisy promulgated by Gore and his ilk.

Good grief. I have had to use dictionary.com three times so far tonight. :rolleyes2

Although "perspicacity" IS a very good word--one I have never heard or used before. I will now try to find a place to insert it into daily conversation and patiently explain the definition to my friends when met with blank stares. :D (For some reason this is an endless source of amusement for me. Is making me use the dictionary amusing you?)

:aaa

the raven
07-24-2008, 02:56 AM
Good grief. I have had to use dictionary.com three times so far tonight. :rolleyes2

Although "perspicacity" IS a very good word--one I have never heard or used before. I will now try to find a place to insert it into daily conversation and patiently explain the definition to my friends when met with blank stares. :D (For some reason this is an endless source of amusement for me. Is making me use the dictionary amusing you?)

:aaa

In regards to your educational endevours, I am unqualified to comment; however, if you would so desire to stay on the topic of the thread I would be interested in your opinion(s)

MissBrattified
07-24-2008, 03:08 AM
The thread topic? Al Gore? There can't be anything more boring. (Not your fault, Prax...just the nature of The Beast.) And I've already offered everything my brain has to offer--at least for the time being. What else can you expect at 4 am? I Am Now Going Back To Bed.

the raven
07-24-2008, 03:12 AM
The thread topic? Al Gore? There can't be anything more boring. (Not your fault, Prax...just the nature of The Beast.) And I've already offered everything my brain has to offer--at least for the time being. What else can you expect at 4 am? I Am Now Going Back To Bed.



Gore as a subject is enough to stultify the hardiest of conversationalists and yet, the subject of environmentalism and its ensuing ramifications with regards to specificity make the dullness of the author a parsamonious footnote in the pathos of earths declension in totality and demise in eventuality.

LUKE2447
07-24-2008, 06:31 AM
The point is yes use technology to develop GOOD ALTERNATIVE FUELS etc... Not government sponsored idiotic, wasteful, unsound, uneconomic fuels! Can anyone say CORN(ethanol)! Talk about typical government stupidity!

Don't worry they will find away to screw the average person with Hydrogen and make it cost money vs using simple water and the car producing it. Trust me they will find a way of getting there money and manipulating the system(technology).