Rhymis
05-08-2007, 07:34 PM
I have been reading a very interesting book, The Lucifer Effect by Phillip Zimbardo. It attempts to answer the actions of the soliders at Abu Ghraib and the prisoner abuses in Iraq.
Here are a few statements he makes concerning being influenced, see what you think about these statements:
The slogan for understanding persuasive communications is: “Who Says What to Whom, With What Effect?” That means we need to focus on the nature of the Communicator (Who), the nature of the Message (What), the intended Audience (Whom, including You), and the desired outcome of the process (What Effect).
Social Proof [Context: Consensus]
The Basics
A means to determine what is correct by finding out what other people think is correct
View behavior as more correct in a given context to the degree we see others performing it
Principle can be used to stimulate a person’s compliance by informing the individual that many other individuals have been complying (unanimous compliance and compliance by famous or authoritative people is most effective)
Provides us with a shortcut for determining how to behave – while at the same time, makes one vulnerable to persuasion experts
Most influential under two conditions:
Uncertainty – situation is ambiguous; become more likely to attend to the actions of others and accept those actions as more correct
Similarity – people are inclined to follow the lead of similar others
How It's Exploited
The Bandwagon effect – everyone who is anyone is doing it, why not YOU?
The "In Crowd" has it right, do you want them to accept you or not? So act like them
As described by C. S. Lewis in “The Inner Ring” (Chp. 12 Lucifer Effect), the power of social proof flows from a combination of our desire to be part of the special inner circle and the social manipulators who recognize this need and try to lure us into false inner circles that exploit us.
Best Defense
Reduce susceptibility to this principle by developing counterarguments for what similar people are doing, and recognizing that their actions should not form the sole basis of your own
Be aware that the others may have a biased reason for the action they are advocating
Be aware that the others may be misinformed
Remember the entire group might be wrong-headed because the leader has biased their opinions – “group think.”
....
Well?
Here are a few statements he makes concerning being influenced, see what you think about these statements:
The slogan for understanding persuasive communications is: “Who Says What to Whom, With What Effect?” That means we need to focus on the nature of the Communicator (Who), the nature of the Message (What), the intended Audience (Whom, including You), and the desired outcome of the process (What Effect).
Social Proof [Context: Consensus]
The Basics
A means to determine what is correct by finding out what other people think is correct
View behavior as more correct in a given context to the degree we see others performing it
Principle can be used to stimulate a person’s compliance by informing the individual that many other individuals have been complying (unanimous compliance and compliance by famous or authoritative people is most effective)
Provides us with a shortcut for determining how to behave – while at the same time, makes one vulnerable to persuasion experts
Most influential under two conditions:
Uncertainty – situation is ambiguous; become more likely to attend to the actions of others and accept those actions as more correct
Similarity – people are inclined to follow the lead of similar others
How It's Exploited
The Bandwagon effect – everyone who is anyone is doing it, why not YOU?
The "In Crowd" has it right, do you want them to accept you or not? So act like them
As described by C. S. Lewis in “The Inner Ring” (Chp. 12 Lucifer Effect), the power of social proof flows from a combination of our desire to be part of the special inner circle and the social manipulators who recognize this need and try to lure us into false inner circles that exploit us.
Best Defense
Reduce susceptibility to this principle by developing counterarguments for what similar people are doing, and recognizing that their actions should not form the sole basis of your own
Be aware that the others may have a biased reason for the action they are advocating
Be aware that the others may be misinformed
Remember the entire group might be wrong-headed because the leader has biased their opinions – “group think.”
....
Well?