My final post for a while....

[NLYP]

I have come to the realization that while I do appreciate you guys and have had a GREAT time with you...it is time to say farewell for a while..Not some temper fit...just a feeling.

I started a thread that simply was a light hearted way to say that You guys would not have to hear me preacher Bash anymore.....so the only preacher bash I would be a part of would simly preachers having fun..

Once again...it was talken wrong...

And I got an infraction...

Yet Lanny Wolfe has been SHREDDED on here...how about bashing in general...I think it all is against the sprirt of Christ...and yea I am guilty of it too..

What I said about Jack DeHart...for those that offended I am soory I was out of line.

Amazing that when an admin asked me to stop...I did. Yet the thread continued to the point that it was deleted. Yet...I was infracted.

Im not mad...just need a break.

Those of you that i consider close friends...DONT TAKE THIS WRONG!
Its not you its me!


Love yall,

Unitl later...

Bro. Dan

PS I am also Contender and I wount be lurking ...this is a goodbye until I feel differently

[Thad]

welcome to the doghouse dan !:killinme

[Steve Epley]

I whupped you bad and your running!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!

[HeavenlyOne]

Promises, promises.........

[CC1]

NYLP,

Don't be gone long! I thought your JD post was over the line but certainly not anything to leave over. Lord knows we have all crossed that line from time to time when we felt passionate about something.

[IAintMovin]

Post or I will call Tito and the cruise is off............

[IAintMovin]

Oh and when you are lurking .... you need to go invisable.... :D :D :D :D :D

[Scott Hutchinson]

Don't leave my LA. friend,or I'll have to call your number.

[MrRight]

Awwwww dont be gone long! Sombody likes you.

[SoCaliUPC]

Sorry to see you leave Dan but I understand.

You are allowed to get "bashed" if you are not UPC. Interesting.

[Garfield]

Bub Bye

[CC1]

Is he gone yet so we can talk about him with impunity? LOL!!!!

[rrford]

Is he gone yet so we can talk about him with impunity? LOL!!!!

Puny? I thought tht was Epley?

[stmatthew]

Sorry to see you leave Dan but I understand.

You are allowed to get "bashed" if you are not UPC. Interesting.

Could you explain what you mean here Socal? To my understanding, the preacher that Dan started a thread on was NOT UPC, and Dans thread was closed. So how can you say that someone is allowed to get bashed if they are not UPC?

[Steve Epley]

:beatdeadhorse Could you explain what you mean here Socal? To my understanding, the preacher that Dan started a thread on was NOT UPC, and Dans thread was closed. So how can you say that someone is allowed to get bashed if they are not UPC?

Forget the facts they are not important.:beatdeadhorse

[Neck]

I have come to the realization that while I do appreciate you guys and have had a GREAT time with you...it is time to say farewell for a while..Not some temper fit...just a feeling.

I started a thread that simply was a light hearted way to say that You guys would not have to hear me preacher Bash anymore.....so the only preacher bash I would be a part of would simly preachers having fun..

Once again...it was talken wrong...

And I got an infraction...

Yet Lanny Wolfe has been SHREDDED on here...how about bashing in general...I think it all is against the sprirt of Christ...and yea I am guilty of it too..

What I said about Jack DeHart...for those that offended I am soory I was out of line.

Amazing that when an admin asked me to stop...I did. Yet the thread continued to the point that it was deleted. Yet...I was infracted.

Im not mad...just need a break.

Those of you that i consider close friends...DONT TAKE THIS WRONG!
Its not you its me!


Love yall,

Unitl later...

Bro. Dan

PS I am also Contender and I wount be lurking ...this is a goodbye until I feel differently

Get over it, continue to post. Find ways to encourange folks for a change. It is fine to be critical once in a while.

You know I have been on this and the old forum for 2 months now.

I rarely have had an encouraging word said to me.

Get yourself out of the Dog house by being positive for a short while...

It works.

[SDG]

Get over it, continue to post. Find ways to encourange folks for a change. It is fine to be critical once in a while.

You know I have been on this and the old forum for 2 months now.

I rarely have had an encouraging word said to me.

Get yourself out of the Dog house by being positive for a short while...

It works.

Dr. Laura would be proud of you NECK. :heeheehee

[Scott Hutchinson]

Puny? I thought tht was Epley?

Puny the Elder wasn't he like Philo or Origen?

[SoCaliUPC]

Could you explain what you mean here Socal? To my understanding, the preacher that Dan started a thread on was NOT UPC, and Dans thread was closed. So how can you say that someone is allowed to get bashed if they are not UPC?


Certainly.

I will just state that this forum was started under the notion that there would be no bashing of preachers or individuals.

Now, before I move on...I will state that I do not approve of LW lifestyle or decisions that he made years ago.

Saying that, NLYP posted something that I long have been wanting to say but have thus far remained silent on. That is if there is going to be a statement of no bashing of preachers and individuals it needs to be enforced across the board. There have been attacks on LW and BH in just the last couple of days. In the case of BH, it is one thing to attack his doctrine and that issue...and another thing to attack him personally. Do I endorse BH? No. Do I agree with his doctrine? No.

There was a complaint about bashing preachers and individuals over at the other forum. It was stated several times in the beginning that this would not happen here. Is it?

[SDG]

Certainly.

I will just state that this forum was started under the notion that there would be no bashing of preachers or individuals.

Now, before I move on...I will state that I do not approve of LW lifestyle or decisions that he made years ago.

Saying that, NLYP posted something that I long have been wanting to say but have thus far remained silent on. That is if there is going to be a statement of no bashing of preachers and individuals it needs to be enforced across the board. There have been attacks on LW and BH in just the last couple of days. In the case of BH, it is one thing to attack his doctrine and that issue...and another thing to attack him personally. Do I endorse BH? No. Do I agree with his doctrine? No.

There was a complaint about bashing preachers and individuals over at the other forum. It was stated several times in the beginning that this would not happen here. Is it?

Sounds reasonable ... there's nothing like consistency.

[stmatthew]

Certainly.

I will just state that this forum was started under the notion that there would be no bashing of preachers or individuals.

Now, before I move on...I will state that I do not approve of LW lifestyle or decisions that he made years ago.

Saying that, NLYP posted something that I long have been wanting to say but have thus far remained silent on. That is if there is going to be a statement of no bashing of preachers and individuals it needs to be enforced across the board. There have been attacks on LW and BH in just the last couple of days. In the case of BH, it is one thing to attack his doctrine and that issue...and another thing to attack him personally. Do I endorse BH? No. Do I agree with his doctrine? No.

There was a complaint about bashing preachers and individuals over at the other forum. It was stated several times in the beginning that this would not happen here. Is it?

Thanks for answering, Bro


I have not been here for much due to sickness, but my understanding is that we are doing our best to stop ANY Preacher Bashing.

Now you and I both know that we are not going to bust folks over the head for joking around. But we just do not want this to become a place where the ministry is disrespected and put down. I am sure we both also understand that ones mans bashing is another mans truth, so every issue we are trying to deal with individually.

And understand, we are still new here and are trying to find the proper place to set boundaries, and still allow for expression. That is a tricky thing to do.

[SoCaliUPC]

Thanks Matt.

I will further the dialogue in PM.

[NLYP]

Certainly.

I will just state that this forum was started under the notion that there would be no bashing of preachers or individuals.

Now, before I move on...I will state that I do not approve of LW lifestyle or decisions that he made years ago.

Saying that, NLYP posted something that I long have been wanting to say but have thus far remained silent on. That is if there is going to be a statement of no bashing of preachers and individuals it needs to be enforced across the board. There have been attacks on LW and BH in just the last couple of days. In the case of BH, it is one thing to attack his doctrine and that issue...and another thing to attack him personally. Do I endorse BH? No. Do I agree with his doctrine? No.

There was a complaint about bashing preachers and individuals over at the other forum. It was stated several times in the beginning that this would not happen here. Is it?

THAT KIND OF PREACHING COULD CAUSE A MAN TO COME BACK.....


OH WAIT!!!!!I am not here......

[SDG]

NLYP ... all things are made anew.