PDA

View Full Version : Why are there a lot of Grumpy threads started slamming the libs?


COOPER
06-15-2007, 06:55 AM
Is there a new Don't ask-Don't tell policy here at AFF if you are ex-or non-holiness.

Why are there so many threads slamming, bashing and trying to hush those that are non-traditional in standards or similar in ex- standards teaching?

This is not Anti-holiness standards bashing forum.

But there are many here that are......Apostolic in Acts2;38 and non-standards.

If you are holiness......do not get offended because someone speaks they are not.

If you are happy at your church, under your Pastor.....

Do not get offended at those that are not.


We are all 100 percent Oneness, Jesus name baptism, Acts2:38 believers.

We all do not adhere to each others standards of attire or grooming.

That is just the fact.

Subdued
06-15-2007, 07:03 AM
I don't think anyone here is non-HOLINESS. Are you meaning non-traditional standards?

QueenEsther
06-15-2007, 07:14 AM
I don't think anyone here is non-HOLINESS. Are you meaning non-traditional standards?

FOr Real!! Lol!! It is funny though because they always argue that holiness is not standards and that they have holiness and now he is saying "non-Holiness" in reference to standards.:dunno

BrotherEastman
06-15-2007, 07:18 AM
Are libs unholy now?

Subdued
06-15-2007, 07:22 AM
Are libs unholy now?

NO!

:D

Nahum
06-15-2007, 07:29 AM
Posted By Cooper:

We are all 99.9 percent Oneness, Jesus name baptism, Acts2:38 believers.

We all do not adhere to each others standards of attire or grooming.

That is just the fact.

The bolded portion is 100% incorrect. But I still love ya Coop!

Lost
06-15-2007, 07:41 AM
Is there a new Don't ask-Don't tell policy here at AFF if you are ex-or non-holiness.

Why are there so many threads slamming, bashing and trying to hush those that are non-holiness or similar in ex- standards teaching?

This is not Anti-holiness standards bashing forum.



This isn't a ex-UPC, ex-Holiness, ex-Pentecostal, or ex-anything-remotely-Christian forum either. If that's what people are looking for, perhaps they could start one of these new forums:

I-left-the-UPC-and-cant-get-over-it.com
I-want-to-be-worldly-and-still-call-myself-a-Christian.com
I-kissed-good-ole-fashioned-holiness-goodbye.com

COOPER
06-15-2007, 07:42 AM
I don't think anyone here is non-HOLINESS. Are you meaning non-traditional standards?

Thanks for the correction....we are becoming more politically correct every day.:killinme

COOPER
06-15-2007, 07:46 AM
This isn't a ex-UPC, ex-Holiness, ex-Pentecostal, or ex-anything-remotely-Christian forum either. If that's what people are looking for, perhaps they could start one of these new forums:

I-left-the-UPC-and-cant-get-over-it.com
I-want-to-be-worldly-and-still-call-myself-a-Christian.com
I-kissed-good-ole-fashioned-holiness-goodbye.com
Amen!


Or start a forums called:

I-hate-2c-ex-upcHappy.com

Holiness-or-hell.com

TheDevilhatesTV.com

shut-the-exUPC-up.com

COOPER
06-15-2007, 07:49 AM
Are libs unholy now?

:sshhhThou sayest it.

Sheltiedad
06-15-2007, 07:58 AM
This isn't a ex-UPC, ex-Holiness, ex-Pentecostal, or ex-anything-remotely-Christian forum either. If that's what people are looking for, perhaps they could start one of these new forums:

I-left-the-UPC-and-cant-get-over-it.com
I-want-to-be-worldly-and-still-call-myself-a-Christian.com
I-kissed-good-ole-fashioned-holiness-goodbye.com

How bout... I was taught that 2+2=5, now I know that 2+2=4 and it bugs me to death that I can't convince the other people who were taught that 2+2=5 that 2+2=4... they say I have been sent a delusion when I try to convince them... dot COM :D

Malvaro
06-15-2007, 08:08 AM
Is there a new Don't ask-Don't tell policy here at AFF if you are ex-or non-holiness.

Why are there so many threads slamming, bashing and trying to hush those that are non-traditional in standards or similar in ex- standards teaching?

This is not Anti-holiness standards bashing forum.

But there are many here that are......Apostolic in Acts2;38 and non-standards.

If you are holiness......do not get offended because someone speaks they are not.

If you are happy at your church, under your Pastor.....

Do not get offended at those that are not.


We are all 100 percent Oneness, Jesus name baptism, Acts2:38 believers.

We all do not adhere to each others standards of attire or grooming.

That is just the fact.

do you really think that AFF is censoring criticisms??? I think that you've taken less flack here on AFF than you ever did on FCF/NFCF....

Malvaro
06-15-2007, 08:10 AM
How bout... I was taught that 2+2=5, now I know that 2+2=4 and it bugs me to death that I can't convince the other people who were taught that 2+2=5 that 2+2=4... they say I have been sent a delusion when I try to convince them... dot COM :D

Sheltiedad, you're funny :D thats why I like you as a poster.... hehehehe

Sheltiedad
06-15-2007, 08:14 AM
Sheltiedad, you're funny :D thats why I like you as a poster.... hehehehe

Seriously? Because I get the feeling sometimes that some people would just rather I not post here. lol.

Here are my made-up statistics...

20% really like what I have to say
20% tolerate it
60% think I should just leave and I have no right to comment on anything since I don't claim to be part of the culture anymore... Maybe I should ask Berkelely and Rico? lol.

Evang.Benincasa
06-15-2007, 08:14 AM
How bout... I was taught that 2+2=5, now I know that 2+2=4 and it bugs me to death that I can't convince the other people who were taught that 2+2=5 that 2+2=4... they say I have been sent a delusion when I try to convince them... dot COM :D

That's what every religion has taught for over 4,000 years.

31 flavors or 2000 channels and nothings on.

Chan
06-15-2007, 08:40 AM
We are all 100 percent Oneness, Jesus name baptism, Acts2:38 believers.

That is just the fact.There are some here who are not.

Whole Hearted
06-15-2007, 08:44 AM
I haven't seen any thread slamming Libs. just the opposite.

SDG
06-15-2007, 08:46 AM
Unfortunately some here believe in the "Fairness Doctrine" which supposedly came to an end in the late 1980's ....

Wiki:
The Fairness Doctrine was a regulation of the United States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States)' Federal Communications Commission (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Communications_Commission) (FCC) which required broadcast (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcasting) licensees to present controversial issues of public importance, and to present such issues in what was deemed an honest, equal and balanced manner. It has since been repealed by the FCC and aspects of it have been questioned by courts

Whenever any one side seems to be dominating the discussions .... some get all bent out of shape and make an effort to rally the other side to retaliate ... rather than just let discussions flow naturally.

COOPER
06-15-2007, 08:47 AM
do you really think that AFF is censoring criticisms??? I think that you've taken less flack here on AFF than you ever did on FCF/NFCF....


Oh, sorry. You mis-understood me......Not AFF.


This was a general question for whom ever it may concern.


I am very thanksful for the posting freedoms and fun I have here at AFF.

Malvaro
06-15-2007, 08:51 AM
Oh, sorry. You mis-understood me......Not AFF.


This was a general question for whom ever it may concern.


I am very thanksful for the posting freedoms and fun I have here at AFF.

This statement threw me off :D

Is there a new Don't ask-Don't tell policy here at AFF if you are ex-or non-holiness.

COOPER
06-15-2007, 08:54 AM
This statement threw me off :D

Soooooorry, my bad.

If that was the case..

I would have said BY-AFF, but I wrote AT-AFF.

I should have said, BY -AFF members.

ARE we having fun or what!:ernie

BoredOutOfMyMind
06-15-2007, 08:55 AM
Unfortunately some here believe in the "Fairness Doctrine" which supposedly came to an end in the late 1980's ....


This is not radio or TV. No FCC rules apply here.

SDG
06-15-2007, 08:57 AM
This is not radio or TV. No FCC rules apply here.

You're right ... but I think there is an effort BY SOME to apply it here ... :poloroid

Malvaro
06-15-2007, 08:57 AM
Soooooorry, my bad.

If that was the case..

I would have said BY-AFF, but I wrote AT-AFF.

I should have said, BY -AFF members.

ARE we having fun or what!:ernie

you could update the wording of your original post.... :D

COOPER
06-15-2007, 09:00 AM
Is there a new Don't ask-Don't tell policy imposed by some members here at AFF if you are ex-or non-holiness.

Why are there so many threads slamming, bashing and trying to hush those that are non-traditional in standards or similar in ex- standards teaching?

This is not Anti-holiness standards bashing forum.

But there are many here that are......Apostolic in Acts2;38 and non-standards.

If you are holiness......do not get offended because someone speaks they are not.

If you are happy at your church, under your Pastor.....

Do not get offended at those that are not.


We are all 100 percent Oneness, Jesus name baptism, Acts2:38 believers.

We all do not adhere to each others standards of attire or grooming.

That is just the fact.

I can not edit Marvin!!! Help!!

BoredOutOfMyMind
06-15-2007, 09:01 AM
Great. I thought 2+2=7 and now ShetieDad has ruined my perception.:ranting

COOPER
06-15-2007, 09:01 AM
You're right ... but I think there is an effort BY SOME to apply it here ... :poloroid

The Danali Ali-Bobby has spoken!