Express Yourself!!

[Dedicated Mind]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.

con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.

[triumphant1]

LOL....this is a stupid thread....

How's that expression of myself?

[triumphant1]

UH...with one more expression...

The thread is stupid (IMHO) because the categories are jumbled!

[J-Roc]

Lib - Occassional pants? Huh????

[triumphant1]

Oh..one more expression....

For those with the "you just offended the cons button"....the word "stupid" should be substitued with one of the following words "nonsensical, crazy, or rediculous"...

[Dedicated Mind]

UH...with one more expression...

The thread is stupid (IMHO) because the categories are jumbled!

I was hoping, posters would clarify the definitions. You have expressed yourself (partially).

[triumphant1]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.

con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.

OK...more expressions...

It would be impossible to clarify your definitions without totally erasing them....are you really that clueless?

Secondary expression on this post:

I see no way that anyone could vote here...the categories are jumbled and many fit portions of more than one....this is the rediculous part.

[revrandy]

According to your calcs.. I am more ultra con.. then conservative..

Btw.. Your Values concerning definition are somewhat amiss..

[triumphant1]

I was hoping, posters would clarify the definitions. You have expressed yourself (partially).

I don't see how there can be clarification of the definitions without erasing them and starting over...but that doesn't satisfy that in no camp is there a "cookie cutter" standard for the most part.

There are some on here that would call themselves "mod" that have NO movies...ehile some on here that call themselves "con" that allow educational and "Andy Griffith"...

There are some on here that would consider themselves con that allow elbows why other do not....in the same group...

Do you see what i mean?

[triumphant1]

I do not know of a "con" that allows trimmed hair or make-up...am I right?

[triumphant1]

According to your calcs.. I am more ultra con.. then conservative..

Btw.. Your Values concerning definition are somewhat amiss..

Even the lib values are out of wack....

Social value cop shooting rap...that is the stupid part....I am a lib, but not that definition of one...

[triumphant1]

On the poll there is a category for "confused"....

It would appear that the author of this poll should vote there!

[Ferd]

LOL! I voted before seeing what a MOD was. according to this, i am somewhere between CON and UC.

bogus.

[COOPER]

Ultra con I am................

If you aint holy then your full of the Devil!

:winkgrin

[Brett Prince]

The definitions here are about as misquided as can be. From ultra con to liberal, the definitions are messed up.

[Dedicated Mind]

Even the lib values are out of wack....

Social value cop shooting rap...that is the stupid part....I am a lib, but not that definition of one...

wouldn't a liberal see some social relevance in hip hop music? I was using an extreme example w/tupac to get a knee jerk reaction from enlightened individuals such as yourself. (what if Jesus was a black Jew?)

[Jesuswins]

Ultra con I am................

If you aint holy then your full of the Devil!

:winkgrin

Dare I ask........what is your definition of "Holy"?:dancing

[COOPER]

Dare I ask........what is your definition of "Holy"?:dancing

To be honest, I am not exactly sure.

It seems that there is the Holiness of God himself. A perfect, pure and clean God who is just, loving, kind, merciful etc....not able to sin.

But then there is the Holiness of Man and things.

There was the Holy Mount.

The Holy Day sabbath.

Holy Ground.

The Children of Israel were a Holy nation. Set apart and dedicated to God.

Then the Holiness that applies to man.

Is it the love for God and one another? Is it the dedication to God and his Spirit in us that makes us holy and not we our selves?

Our flesh is not holy. No matter how your dress and clean a pig, it's still a pig.

Our righteousness is but filthy rags. So how can we in our selves by deed or apparel be holy?

Our Holiness and righteousness comes from Jesus, his blood and Holy Ghost.

No one can be holy; except it be the Holiness of Jesus living in us that clothes our naked souls.

I am not holy, you are not holy.
But we have a Holy God that is our covering and Holiness.

[LadyRev]

Culottes is the correct spelling for the word you were wondering about...at least, I think this is what you were trying to say. :D

Otherwise, I can't vote either. Too jumbled up.

[Margies3]

Let's try this:

Ultra Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies and usually worn piled up on the head so as to look short, dresses only for women and they must be well below the knee, always hose on the women, no open toed shoes, long sleeves on everyone, no jewelry except watches (and sometimes not even that), no make-up for women, no worldly sporting events, Christian music only

Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies, dresses only for women, no need for hose, open toed shoes are ok and any color, sleeves need to be at or below the elbow, no jewelry except watches, wedding rings and an occasion pin/broach on a woman's dress, no make-up for women, no sporting events, Christian music and worldly music as long as it is not rock or country.

Mods: tv is ok, G, PG and occasionally PG-13 rated movies are ok, long hair but trimming it is ok as are bangs, shorts on men are ok as long as they are long, women are ok in culottes when working at the church and occasionally wear slacks as long as they are not going to be inside the church or with church people whom they might offend, jewelry is ok except for earrings, light make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine, any music

Libs: tv is fine, movies are fine altho you still need to guard your heart and mind against filth, cutting hair is ok, shorts are fine on men and on women, slacks for women are fine, jewelry is not a problem, make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine and any music is ok.

Ok, is that a little better? Feel free to edit if you see things you'd like to change.

Based on this, I would easily know how I'd vote. In fact, my vote is going to be based entirely upon this. :)

[LadyRev]

Let's try this:

Ultra Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies and usually worn piled up on the head so as to look short, dresses only for women and they must be well below the knee, always hose on the women, no open toed shoes, long sleeves on everyone, no jewelry except watches (and sometimes not even that), no make-up for women, no worldly sporting events, Christian music only

Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies, dresses only for women, no need for hose, open toed shoes are ok and any color, sleeves need to be at or below the elbow, no jewelry except watches, wedding rings and an occasion pin/broach on a woman's dress, no make-up for women, no sporting events, Christian music and worldly music as long as it is not rock or country.

Mods: tv is ok, G, PG and occasionally PG-13 rated movies are ok, long hair but trimming it is ok as are bangs, shorts on men are ok as long as they are long, women are ok in culottes when working at the church and occasionally wear slacks as long as they are not going to be inside the church or with church people whom they might offend, jewelry is ok except for earrings, light make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine, any music

Libs: tv is fine, movies are fine altho you still need to guard your heart and mind against filth, cutting hair is ok, shorts are fine on men and on women, slacks for women are fine, jewelry is not a problem, make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine and any music is ok.

Ok, is that a little better? Feel free to edit if you see things you'd like to change.

Based on this, I would easily know how I'd vote. In fact, my vote is going to be based entirely upon this. :)

I STILL can't vote. But it is an improvement. ~L~

[JOYoftheLord]

What label do I identify with?

C H R I S T I A N

Jesus knows who truly is and who truly ain't.....all those other labels mean nothing to me.

Easy to fool others and even ourselves about how we live for God......but....the day soon approaches.....ya better be right or ya gonna get left! :)

[chaotic_resolve]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.

con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.
The definitions are a little wrong.

I consider myself a moderate.

I'm staunchly pro local churches being autonomous and able to conduct their business without HQ or District interference. This includes the use of television for evangelism - through both ads and programs.

While I have serious reservations about it, I believe the UPC is one of the best Oneness organizations around. This is not at all an endorsement, nor is it a rebuke. I haven't been to a PAW conference, nor to an ALJC conference . . . so I don't know how big those are. I was not impressed with the AWCF conference held in the Motel 6 conference room. Sorry, JMO.

I'm moderate in dress standards.

I don't believe women trimming their hair is bad, though hair should be long and not cut short like a man.

I personally don't like a lot of make-up on ladies, though I'm not going to condemn someone to hell over it.

I like platform standards. If employers can set them, why can't we? It just looks better.

I wear shorts often, believe in rings, watches, cuff links, etc.

I'm not against jewelry . . . though it should be in classy moderation.

I'm completely against the dumb, stupid, insane, damnable, twisted, unBiblical "Magic Hair" doctrine.

I guess I'm a 3-stepper. I believe you must repent, be baptized in Jesus name and receive the Holy Ghost in order to receive salvation in the end.

I'm Oneness.

I love my UC and UL friends, though we don't always agree.

I like all kinds of music, both religious and secular. Though I don't listen to music with explicit lyrics.

I have a television, though I don't have cable or an antennae at the moment . . . I do plan on getting cable soon. (College & NFL Football begins soon!)

I watch movies at home and at the theater.

I've attended NCAA football and MLB baseball games.

There you have it . . . moderate, though some would think liberal.

[LaVonne]

According to your calcs.. I am more ultra con.. then conservative..

Btw.. Your Values concerning definition are somewhat amiss..

My thoughts exactly!

[triumphant1]

Let's try this:

Ultra Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies and usually worn piled up on the head so as to look short, dresses only for women and they must be well below the knee, always hose on the women, no open toed shoes, long sleeves on everyone, no jewelry except watches (and sometimes not even that), no make-up for women, no worldly sporting events, Christian music only

Con: no tv, no movies, uncut hair for ladies, dresses only for women, no need for hose, open toed shoes are ok and any color, sleeves need to be at or below the elbow, no jewelry except watches, wedding rings and an occasion pin/broach on a woman's dress, no make-up for women, no sporting events, Christian music and worldly music as long as it is not rock or country.

Mods: tv is ok, G, PG and occasionally PG-13 rated movies are ok, long hair but trimming it is ok as are bangs, shorts on men are ok as long as they are long, women are ok in culottes when working at the church and occasionally wear slacks as long as they are not going to be inside the church or with church people whom they might offend, jewelry is ok except for earrings, light make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine, any music

Libs: tv is fine, movies are fine altho you still need to guard your heart and mind against filth, cutting hair is ok, shorts are fine on men and on women, slacks for women are fine, jewelry is not a problem, make-up is acceptable, sporting events are fine and any music is ok.

Ok, is that a little better? Feel free to edit if you see things you'd like to change.

Based on this, I would easily know how I'd vote. In fact, my vote is going to be based entirely upon this. :)

I'm sorry but I still couldn't vote under these definitions...although I confess froman Apostolic point of view I am lib...

The issue of this whole thread is rediculous because I do not think you can cookie cutter any of the categories to this extent...I know trinitarian charismatics that would be libs because they do not adhere to the dress, adornment, and make-up rules...but they DO NOT go to movies, own a DVD player, nor do they have a TV.....so where would they fit in the definitions?...con/lib....absurd...

[COOPER]

The definitions are a little wrong.

I consider myself a moderate.

I'm staunchly pro local churches being autonomous and able to conduct their business without HQ or District interference. This includes the use of television for evangelism - through both ads and programs.

While I have serious reservations about it, I believe the UPC is one of the best Oneness organizations around. This is not at all an endorsement, nor is it a rebuke. I haven't been to a PAW conference, nor to an ALJC conference . . . so I don't know how big those are. I was not impressed with the AWCF conference held in the Motel 6 conference room. Sorry, JMO.

I'm moderate in dress standards.

I don't believe women trimming their hair is bad, though hair should be long and not cut short like a man.

I personally don't like a lot of make-up on ladies, though I'm not going to condemn someone to hell over it.

I like platform standards. If employers can set them, why can't we? It just looks better.

I wear shorts often, believe in rings, watches, cuff links, etc.

I'm not against jewelry . . . though it should be in classy moderation.

I'm completely against the dumb, stupid, insane, damnable, twisted, unBiblical "Magic Hair" doctrine.

I guess I'm a 3-stepper. I believe you must repent, be baptized in Jesus name and receive the Holy Ghost in order to receive salvation in the end.

I'm Oneness.

I love my UC and UL friends, though we don't always agree.

I like all kinds of music, both religious and secular. Though I don't listen to music with explicit lyrics.

I have a television, though I don't have cable or an antennae at the moment . . . I do plan on getting cable soon. (College & NFL Football begins soon!)

I watch movies at home and at the theater.

I've attended NCAA football and MLB baseball games.

There you have it . . . moderate, though some would think liberal.
I like it.

What is your take on pants and women?

[Jack Shephard]

The definitions are a little wrong.

I consider myself a moderate.

I'm staunchly pro local churches being autonomous and able to conduct their business without HQ or District interference. This includes the use of television for evangelism - through both ads and programs.

While I have serious reservations about it, I believe the UPC is one of the best Oneness organizations around. This is not at all an endorsement, nor is it a rebuke. I haven't been to a PAW conference, nor to an ALJC conference . . . so I don't know how big those are. I was not impressed with the AWCF conference held in the Motel 6 conference room. Sorry, JMO.

I'm moderate in dress standards.

I don't believe women trimming their hair is bad, though hair should be long and not cut short like a man.

I personally don't like a lot of make-up on ladies, though I'm not going to condemn someone to hell over it.

I like platform standards. If employers can set them, why can't we? It just looks better.

I wear shorts often, believe in rings, watches, cuff links, etc.

I'm not against jewelry . . . though it should be in classy moderation.

I'm completely against the dumb, stupid, insane, damnable, twisted, unBiblical "Magic Hair" doctrine.

I guess I'm a 3-stepper. I believe you must repent, be baptized in Jesus name and receive the Holy Ghost in order to receive salvation in the end.

I'm Oneness.

I love my UC and UL friends, though we don't always agree.

I like all kinds of music, both religious and secular. Though I don't listen to music with explicit lyrics.

I have a television, though I don't have cable or an antennae at the moment . . . I do plan on getting cable soon. (College & NFL Football begins soon!)

I watch movies at home and at the theater.

I've attended NCAA football and MLB baseball games.

There you have it . . . moderate, though some would think liberal.

Don't anyone believe him! CR is a anything-goes-liberal! Don't let him let you believe otherwise. :yourock

[Dedicated Mind]

Don't anyone believe him! CR is a anything-goes-liberal! Don't let him let you believe otherwise. :yourock

Am I seeing things? or are you married to Steve Munsey?

[The Mrs]

I'm sorry but I still couldn't vote under these definitions...although I confess froman Apostolic point of view I am lib...

The issue of this whole thread is rediculous because I do not think you can cookie cutter any of the categories to this extent...I know trinitarian charismatics that would be libs because they do not adhere to the dress, adornment, and make-up rules...but they DO NOT go to movies, own a DVD player, nor do they have a TV.....so where would they fit in the definitions?...con/lib....absurd...

All right Little Bunny FooFoo...

I gave you THREE chances to spell it right, and you haven't yet!

It's spelled RIDICULOUS

[triumphant1]

All right Little Bunny FooFoo...

I gave you THREE chances to spell it right, and you haven't yet!

It's spelled RIDICULOUS

I don't care enough today to run it through spell check...LOL...that's rediculously ridiculous.....ROTFL!!!!!!:hypercoffee

[Esther]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.

con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.

Actually, I voted before I read YOUR definitions. :)

[triumphant1]

Actually, I voted before I read YOUR definitions. :)

WOW...that's like a presidential election...people vote before they look at the candidates veiws....

[Praxeas]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.

con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.
LOL.....I don't think the UCs, Cons, Mods or Libs will agree on those definitions. Many UCs think the magic hair thing is a crock.

[Margies3]

LOL.....I don't think the UCs, Cons, Mods or Libs will agree on those definitions. Many UCs think the magic hair thing is a crock.

Actually, I think the funniest thing that is coming out of this thread is that the UC's can't agree with the other UC's as to what an UC is, and the Con's can't agree with the other Con's what a Con really is, and the same for the Mods and the Libs.

No wonder we have such lively discussions here. Nobody really knows what anybody really is. LOL!!!

[Praxeas]

wouldn't a liberal see some social relevance in hip hop music? I was using an extreme example w/tupac to get a knee jerk reaction from enlightened individuals such as yourself. (what if Jesus was a black Jew?)
You seem to be mixing Liberal Oneness Pentecostal with Liberal Social/political

[Praxeas]

To be honest, I am not exactly sure.

It seems that there is the Holiness of God himself. A perfect, pure and clean God who is just, loving, kind, merciful etc....not able to sin.

But then there is the Holiness of Man and things.

There was the Holy Mount.

The Holy Day sabbath.

Holy Ground.

The Children of Israel were a Holy nation. Set apart and dedicated to God.

Then the Holiness that applies to man.

Is it the love for God and one another? Is it the dedication to God and his Spirit in us that makes us holy and not we our selves?

Our flesh is not holy. No matter how your dress and clean a pig, it's still a pig.

Our righteousness is but filthy rags. So how can we in our selves by deed or apparel be holy?

Our Holiness and righteousness comes from Jesus, his blood and Holy Ghost.

No one can be holy; except it be the Holiness of Jesus living in us that clothes our naked souls.

I am not holy, you are not holy.
But we have a Holy God that is our covering and Holiness.
You left out holy moly

We had some guy come to our church once. He was at the front saying "Praise Mary, Praaaaaaise Mary!". My pastor told him "No, Praise Jesus!" and he does "Praise Jesus. Hooooooooly Moooooooleeeeee"

[Dedicated Mind]

LOL.....I don't think the UCs, Cons, Mods or Libs will agree on those definitions. Many UCs think the magic hair thing is a crock.

can anyone provide some authoritative definitions since we use these labels so often?

[Dedicated Mind]

I'm sorry but I still couldn't vote under these definitions...although I confess froman Apostolic point of view I am lib...

The issue of this whole thread is rediculous because I do not think you can cookie cutter any of the categories to this extent...I know trinitarian charismatics that would be libs because they do not adhere to the dress, adornment, and make-up rules...but they DO NOT go to movies, own a DVD player, nor do they have a TV.....so where would they fit in the definitions?...con/lib....absurd...

confused. Btw ridiculous is spelled with an 'i'. :D

[MissBrattified]

LOL! I voted before seeing what a MOD was. according to this, i am somewhere between CON and UC.

bogus.

Ditto for me. :telephone

[The Mrs]

confused. Btw ridiculous is spelled with an 'i'. :D

:killinme :killinme :killinme

[Tina]

Actually, I think the funniest thing that is coming out of this thread is that the UC's can't agree with the other UC's as to what an UC is, and the Con's can't agree with the other Con's what a Con really is, and the same for the Mods and the Libs.

No wonder we have such lively discussions here. Nobody really knows what anybody really is. LOL!!!

:killinme

Why does everyone wants to give everyone else a label?

Sorry folks, most of the people on this forum are one of a kind-- and there is NO LABEL that will fit them perfectly. :D

[Whole Hearted]

I was wondering how many AFF'ers would be willing to identify with a position on standards.

ultracon - no tv, no movies, no worldly music (some internet).
Women's issues: Magic hair, no makeup, wedding bands & watches only, long skirts.
Actually this is the definition of a con not an ultra con. An ultra con would be no hair bows or curls for women, no Christmas or Easter, no colored shirts for men and no hairspray for men and so on.
con - educational and PG movies. Oldies & love songs.
Women's issues: Trim hair, blush only, sentimental value jewlery, kulaks(sp?).This is not the definition of a con but of a liberal.

mod - historical & artistic value movies. Any music with artistic merit.
Women's issues: Styled hair, blush, lipgloss, clear nail polish; bracelets, pants in extremely cold weather.

lib - Any movie of social relevance (unless a favorite actor is starring, ie: Antonio Banderas in 'Desperado'). Any music that is not explicit (unless it is socially relevant, ie: Tupac Shakur hip hopping about shooting racists cops).
Women's issues: Shoulder length hair, any type of makeup or jewlery that is not gawky, occasional pants, an occasional glass of wine (optional).

Don't even libs have standards? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part about definitions.

These other are the definition of a charismatic.

[philjones]

LOL! I voted before seeing what a MOD was. according to this, i am somewhere between CON and UC.

bogus.

I did the same... Oh well... now I guess I will have to live up to my declaration since I probably can't live up to my reputation!:killinme:killinme

[Defender]

Why is there "ultra-con", but no "ultra-lib'?

[The Mrs]

Why is there "ultra-con", but no "ultra-lib'?

Dunno...WH has a good point as well...we can't forget the Charismatic. We should change it.

It should be:

Ultra-Con
Con
Mod
Lib
Ultra-Lib
Charismatic

[philjones]

:killinme :killinme :killinme

Are you losing your touch? You failed to notice T1s spelling of view.:killinme

I have been tempted to ask T1 if he was educated in Louisiana because most of us Okies know how to spell! :D

[The Mrs]

Are you losing your touch? You failed to notice T1s spelling of view.:killinme

I have been tempted to ask T1 if he was educated in Louisiana because most of us Okies know how to spell! :D

I guess so...I almost felt like Monk there for a bit...was so blinded by the misspelling of ridiculous, was oblivious to all else! :toofunny

[Praxeas]

These other are the definition of a charismatic.
Are you an Ultra Con?

Actually this is the definition of a con not an ultra con. An ultra con would be no hair bows or curls for women, no Christmas or Easter, no colored shirts for men and no hairspray for men and so on.
BTW...the only no colored shirt is no shirt at all. All shirts have color

[Hoovie]

These catagories simply do not work for me.

I am something from Ultra-Conservative to Ultra-Liberal depending on the topic.

[Praxeas]

Dunno...WH has a good point as well...we can't forget the Charismatic. We should change it.

It should be:

Ultra-Con
Con
Mod
Lib
Ultra-Lib
Charismatic
Ultra-Con/Super Holier than Thou Pharisee not saved by faith but by works. Hates anyone that is not Ultra Con

Con/Somewhat Holier than Thou Pharisee not saved by faith but by works. Isn't sure whether they hate Ultra Cons or not but they know they hate Liberals

Mod/Fence Sitter not wanting to offend anyone but usually ends up upsetting both sides and is the only true balance of what it really means to be a Christian :-)

Lib/Backslidden sinner that wants to offend all conservatives and get away with it

Ultra-Lib/whiny reprobates that want to sin like the devil but still be called a brother in Christ

Charismatic/Devil Worshipping pagan that believes in three gods

At least if you believe the hype. I don't, but sometimes you guys are fun to watch make long eared horse like animals that go hee haw hee haw, out of yourselves

[The Mrs]

Ultra-Con/Super Holier than Thou Pharisee not saved by faith but by works. Hates anyone that is not Ultra Con

Con/Somewhat Holier than Thou Pharisee not saved by faith but by works. Isn't sure whether they hate Ultra Cons or not but they know they hate Liberals

Mod/Fence Sitter not wanting to offend anyone but usually ends up upsetting both sides and is the only true balance of what it really means to be a Christian :-)

Lib/Backslidden sinner that wants to offend all conservatives and get away with it

Ultra-Lib/whiny reprobates that want to sin like the devil but still be called a brother in Christ

Charismatic/Devil Worshipping pagan that believes in three gods

At least if you believe the hype. I don't, but sometimes you guys are fun to watch make long eared horse like animals that go hee haw hee haw, out of yourselves

:killinme :killinme :killinme :killinme :killinme

Prax...You are PRICELESS!!! :toofunny

[triumphant1]

Are you losing your touch? You failed to notice T1s spelling of view.:killinme

I have been tempted to ask T1 if he was educated in Louisiana because most of us Okies know how to spell! :D

Actually it was texas...LOL!!!

Not a bone in my body Okie and I have yet to be assimilated by the borg....except for those Sooners, I do love their football!!

I love to view them through my veiwer....ROTFL!!!

[SarahElizabeth]

These other are the definition of a charismatic.

WH is right on this. A true ultra con does not believe in hair spray for men, Christmas, Easter, Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, Ground Hog's Day, etc, colored shirts on men, bows in women's hair, teased hair and especially PERMS. I know all this for a fact!

[chaotic_resolve]

Don't anyone believe him! CR is a anything-goes-liberal! Don't let him let you believe otherwise. :yourock
:telephone :sshhh I'm not an anything-goes-liberal! :thwak I'm a things-should-be-done-in-moderation moderate. :lol

Am I seeing things? or are you married to Steve Munsey?
:lol JT . . . DM just called you a GIRL! :killinme

:yourock