![]() |
Re: Uncut Hair
We're just as riddled with the traditions and doctrines of man as any other Christian church.
And we wonder why we are not seeing revival fires and expansion of the Kingdom. And those who would prophetically call us to repent of this error and return to the Scriptures are regarded as rebellious trouble makers, renegades, and undesirables. Hmmm... weren't the real prophets of the Bible disliked by earthly institutions who were fully invested keeping their traditions alive??? The more things change... the more they stay the same. What they don't realize is, rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
See if there is a local Apostolic church you can attend if you want to see revival. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
I'm starting to think women had uncut hair and were veiled
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
So only uncut hair is actively having growing long hair? Wouldn't that mean a man with trimmed hair to his buttocks would not have long hair? |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Since there are no exact measurements for what is long vs. what is short given, we must move from thinking in such paradigms. Long hair being shameful on a man, but a glorious crown of beauty upon a woman is drawing a comparison. Long hair in this context is considered an effeminate thing. Therefore, long effeminate hair is shameful on a man. A woman who has had her hair shorn (having her locks hacked short), or shaven, is a humiliation. The long, curly, effeminate hairstyles of Hellenist men were obviously shameful.
It's more about men looking like men, and women looking like women. |
Re: Uncut Hair
I'm not disputing uncut hair, but I thought it interested that the early church promoted veiling.
Christian head covering was unanimously practiced by the women of the Early Church. This was attested by multiple writers throughout the first centuries of Christianity. The early Christian writer Tertullian (150–220) explains that in his day, the Corinthian church was still practicing head covering. This is only 150 years after the Apostle Paul wrote 1 Corinthians. He said, “So, too, did the Corinthians themselves understand [Paul]. In fact, at this day the Corinthians do veil their virgins. What the apostles taught, their disciples approve.”[6] Clement of Alexandria (150–215), an early theologian, wrote, “Woman and man are to go to church decently attired...for this is the wish of the Word, since it is becoming for her to pray veiled.”[7] Another theologian, Hippolytus of Rome (170–236) while giving instructions for church gatherings said "...let all the women have their heads covered with an opaque cloth..."[8] “Early church history bears witness that in Rome, Antioch, and Africa the custom [of wearing the head covering] became the norm [for the Church].”[9] Later, in the 4th century, the church leader John Chrysostom (347–407) stated, “…the business of whether to cover one’s head was legislated by nature (see 1 Cor 11:14–15). When I say “nature,” I mean “God.” For he is the one who created nature. Take note, therefore, what great harm comes from overturning these boundaries! And don’t tell me that this is a small sin.”[10] Jerome (347–420) noted that Christian women in Egypt and Syria do not “go about with heads uncovered in defiance of the apostle’s command, for they wear a close-fitting cap and a veil.”[11] Augustine of Hippo (354–430) writes, "It is not becoming, even in married women, to uncover their hair, since the apostle commands women to keep their heads covered."[12] Early Christian art also confirms that women wore headcoverings during this time period.[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_headcovering |
Re: Uncut Hair
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.