![]() |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
The Bible OFTEN repeats the same notion using different terms in this manner. |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
Quote:
Isn't this getting redundant? :heeheehee |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
|
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
It just seems to me that if the text is speaking about a man's hair being short, he is probably not using a razor but scissors. And if he is saying a woman's long hair is her dignity, I'm thinking he doesn't want her to have a man's hair cut/style - short hair or a bald head like a man. Okay, thanks for being a sport! :thumbsup |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
Sure! :) I see it a lot in Psalms and similar books. It's almost redundant, but it is used to make emphasis. I would have to take some time and find good examples. But in the meantime check out scholars: VINE'S 1Co 11:6 Shorn or shaven (κείρασθαι ἢ ξυρᾶσθαι) To have the hair cut close, or to be entirely shaved as with a razor. ROBERTSON To be shorn or shaven (to keirasthai kai xurasthai). Articular infinitives subject of copula estin understood, keirasthai first aorist middle, xurasthai present middle. Note change in tense. GILL but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven: as it is accounted in all civilized nations: the very Heathens (a) speak of it as a thing abominable, and of which there should not be one single dreadful example: then let her be covered; with a veil, or any sort of covering in common use. CLARKE: but if it be a shame - if to be shorn or shaven would appear, as it must, a badge of infamy, then let her be covered - let her by all means wear a veil. Even in mourning it was considered disgraceful to be obliged to shear off the hair; and lest they should lose this ornament of their heads, the women contrived to evade the custom, by cutting off the ends of it only. Euripides, in Orest., ver. 128, speaking of Helen, who should have shaved her head on account of the death of her sister Clytemnestra, says: ειδετε παρ’ ακρας ὡς απεθρισεν τριχας, σωζουσα καλλος, εστι δε ἡ παλαι γυνη: “see how she cuts off only the very points of her hair, that she may preserve her beauty, and is just the same woman as before.” See the note on 1Co_11:5. In Hindostan a woman cuts off her hair at the death of her husband, as a token of widowhood; but this is never performed by a married woman, whose hair is considered an essential ornament. The veil of the Hindoo women is nothing more than the garment brought over the face, which is always very carefully done by the higher classes of women when they appear in the streets. - Ward’s Customs. BARNES But if it be a shame ... - If custom, nature, and habit; if the common and usual feelings and views among people would pronounce this to be a shame, the other would be pronounced to be a shame also by the same custom and common sense of people. |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
let her also be shorn; let her hair be cut short; let her wear it as men do theirs; and let her see how she will look, and how she will like that, and how she will be looked upon, and liked by others; everybody will laugh at her, and she will be ashamed of herself: |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
Quote:
ROBERTSON: 1Co 11:6 Let her also be shorn (kai keirasthō). Aorist middle imperative of keirō, to shear (as sheep). Let her cut her hair close. JOHNSON For if the woman be not covered. If she defies decorum by an uncovered head, let her go further, and be shaven. JFB 1Co 11:6 A woman would not like to be “shorn” or (what is worse) “shaven”; but if she chooses to be uncovered (unveiled) in front, let her be so also behind, that is, “shorn.” HENRY She might, with equal decency, cut her hair short, or cut it close, which was the custom of the man in that age. ... III. The thing he reprehends is the woman's praying or prophesying uncovered, or the man's doing either covered, 1Co_11:4, 1Co_11:5. To understand this, it must be observed that it was a signification either of shame or subjection for persons to be veiled, or covered, in the eastern countries, contrary to the custom of ours, where the being bare-headed betokens subjection, and being covered superiority and dominion. And this will help us the better to understand, |
Re: Mark Johnston Drops from UPCI, Garner Next???
LOL you guys are still contending for a point that was simply an illustration! :lol
That's not even the primary issue in Corinth (cut hair). The issue had to do with a custom during times of worship specifically. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.