![]() |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
How many of the folks who "speak in tongues" in Pentecostal churches actually speak in a "language" and how many have had their chins wiggled and how many have been shaken so their words come out garbled, and how many have been told to keep repeating certain words or sounds until they get their tongue tangled up and gibberish comes out? How honest are we in facing this? There was a recent post about Bro. Joe Duke and how many received the Holy Ghost Baptism in his ministry but some who were there were honest enough to admit he had folks repeat "nonsense syllables" until they came out jumbled enough to be called "tongues."
|
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
But I think you and Keith are talking about 2 different things. Keith said: "Regarding Op's Vinson Synan, the leading Scholar who studies all Pentecostal Denominiations, Movements and Streams currently reports that Oneness Pentecostals have the highest percentage of people who claim the Baptism of the Holy Ghost with the intial evidence doctrine.Upwards of 90%. So there is some credible scholarship and stats for this percentage."He was talking about OP's who've received the initial baptism of the Spirit with accompanying tongues, not necessarily those who speak with tongues on a regular basis. I think many/most of us have witnessed people clearly speaking in tongues when they got filled with the Holy Ghost... and some of them have rarely spoken in tongues afterward, while some others pray in tongues daily. |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
|
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
|
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
|
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
But we cant come up with a figure that 24% of them received the Holy Ghost, because we dont know if/when the other 380 received it. We know that many thousands received it shortly after the first group did, not just on the day of Pentecost , but afterward also. |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
1 Attachment(s)
The emphasis on only going to the Book of Acts and avoiding the Gospels and/or Epistles is based on teaching which is illustrated by this chart which is similar to what Bro. S.G. Norris used at the Apostolic Bible Institute
http://home.att.net/~jrd/gospelsactsepistles.gif |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
I know you like to study, so I thought that you might have read it also. |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Quote:
I'll take that as a compliment, but I actually don't think study as much as I should. |
Re: Pitfalls in Solely Relying on Acts for doctrin
Dan is back with his same ole anti-Pentecostal junk. He never stops.
How is this The Church was born is Acts thus the history of the Original Church? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.