| AreYouReady? |
06-18-2012 04:57 PM |
Re: Vigilantism or a Father protecting his child?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
(Post 1168081)
It's not too much to ask for proof and/or witnesses for such an ugly accusation-- especially given the father's JUSTIFIED response, if the father is telling the truth.
I think the burden of proof needs to be on the father in this case because he KILLED a man.
I really, really, really hope this young man is telling the truth. Apparently, he killed his daughter's attacker with his bare hands. He is also said to be remorseful as he never intended to kill the man, but was only trying to save his daughter.
|
Jermyn, while I understand what you are trying to say, I am asking you how the man can prove his innocence when there were no witnesses around? The fact that he killed the man when he hit him in the head with his bare hands shows that a lot of adrenaline was flowing through his veins at the time trying to get him off his little girl. Adrenaline is your flight or fight hormone that only kicks in when you are scared or angry in a rush.
Wouldn't you be angered if you heard your little girl cry out and saw a man on top of her with her panties off? Wouldn't you think that you have got to get him off her?
He was very remorseful and said that he did not mean to kill him.
The law enforcement had no reason to think this to be premeditated and they know by emotions and the look on people's faces and react. Apparently, the father was a model citizen and never been in trouble to give law enforcement any cause for concern.
|