| TRFrance |
02-06-2009 05:51 PM |
Re: **Herald Begins Apostolic Identity Campaign **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innocuous
(Post 700874)
On the first statement above, if I take it face value then I'm left confused because he doesn't define what is being taught in terms of what is 'apostolic'.
As for your second statement, I doubt that only 'some' would include standards as being inclusive in 'apostolic' teaching and it's not forcing anything to assume or at least wonder about what they mean.
For most holiness oriented OP's the standards are inseperable from the other distinctive doctrines. They go together in their minds just as much as cheese goes with a cheeseburger. If you don't have cheese, then you don't have a cheeseburger. In the minds of most holiness folks if you don't have standards then you aren't apostolic. "The Truth" is another code word for this.
Since holiness is a part of the AOF of the UPCI and this appears in the official organ of the UPCI and I know the context swirling around the UPCI in regards to re-affirming "holiness" that's going on currently then I can only assume that this author is including holiness standards in his view of 'apostolic teachings'. To assume otherwise seems a stretch to me.
|
OK. Let me bring it back to square one for a sec, because I think we're getting a bit sidetracked for a sec.
I know you jumped in late to this part of the convo... but you're drifting from the central issue I was referring to here.
If you follow the flow of the conversation above you'll see : Edward asked why do we say Apostolic rather than Pentecostal. Mizpeh answered that Apostolic referred to the doctrinal distinction, while Ed stated that Apostolic actually means holiness standards. My point was that (1) Apostolic refers to the distinctions in doctrine (Oneness/Jesus name baptism) that separate us from Trinitarians who also might be considered Pentecostals... and (2) there are many non-UPC folks who also consider themselves Apostolic, based on Godhead/Baptism doctrines, NOT based on "holiness standards". So clearly "Apostolic" does not mean "holiness standards" because their are groups that refer to themselves as "Apostolic" and do not have UPC-type standards.
That is what started that part of the conversation (what "Apostolic" means vs "Pentecostal"), including my response to what was being said. Wheter this author is talking about standards as part of what "Apostolic Identity" means is actualy a digression from what my post was referring to.
|