Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Rebecca Tourbiaire goes into the proto-Aramaic in the discussion here:

THE ARK AND THE BLOOD – The discovery of the Ark of the Covenant
https://arkfiles.net/the-ark-and-the...-the-covenant/

Ron knew some about ancient languages and properly additional consulted with others and researched into it after he saw them. For many years before he started looking for the Ark, he studied ancient cultures in the Middle East. When I traveled with him several times in Egypt, he even read hieroglyphs for me and he also knew a lot about proto-Aramaic. Even though he did not have his education in archeology he was very learned. I remember being amazed at everything he actually knew.

He did claim it said the same as Exodus 20 written in the old paleo-Hebrew alphabet.
Ron Wyatt did not mention the size and so the CGI is not correct on either size or the look of the stone. It is just an example.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

And I asked for your basis for this claim.

If your answer is ... "I made it up", then be honest enough to say so.

Or, you can say that you believe the virgin birth is impossible.

However, this tells us nothing.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Well…

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Above, I simply pointed out that two of the major Ron Wyatt research areas are now largely accepted, or at least considered as prime candidates, in the Biblical Archaeology world. Sinai and Noah's Ark. This should, to anyone reasonably fair and objective, add to the overall credibility of Ron Wyatt. (As opposed to your viewpoint, simply liar, liar, pants on fire.)

To avoid that conclusion, you go through the rambling blah-blah above.

And we get again all your feigned horror over the word "feelings" :) !
Amazing.

========================

btw, I may stop at the Biblical Archaeology conference in Boston in late November. There are three conferences, the other two are ETS and SBL (woke alert!) and my Baptist pastor study partner, with Greek skills, is in that region as well. Maybe I can catch Nehemia Gordon and others.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Why questions are always a bit tricky.

Why did Jesus have to be born of the virgin in order to be sinless, the acceptable atoning sacrifice?

Anyway, before I knew anything about Ron Wyatt, or the Ark of the Covenant, my hasidic friend threw out the challenge,

"guffaw, guffaw, how could Jesus be the Messiah. Did his blood land on the mercy seat?"

It surely makes sense that the blood of bulls and goats no longer atone for sin, and we have the one time atonement of the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Similarly placed on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

I'm not the one making things up. Just like Esaias commented. For Jesus to have just 24 chromosomes alone would make Him another species. I say, it wouldn't just make Him another species, but Jesus wouldn't of been able to grow to childhood, let alone an adult. That is scientific fact. Another thing, where do you get that if we don't accept 24 chromosome Jesus we don't believe in a Virgin birth? That's a strawman if ever I seen one. :lol

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Brother Steven, you didn't read my post? Concerning the Biblical Archeological Review? Biblical Archeological Review has never said that Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark, where the Israelites crossed the red sea, definitely not the Ark of the Covenant. Also NO WHERE are we told that any laboratory has the actual blood of Jesus Christ. No DNA test exists for the actual blood of Jesus Christ.

Brother Steven, what's this above? Are you looking to get into a fight with me? So we can get into a nice hair pulling contest? Look, you are supposed to have undeniable proof that Ron Wyatt wasn't a ecclesiastical grifter. No call to start trading blows. Just prove either with book, chapter, and verse. Or hard undeniable evidence that Ron Wyatt was credible.

What is the purpose of you telling me your vacation plans for the future? I'm asking for you to proof your case, teach what you can prove. In English. :thumbsup

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

Wait a minute.

What Hasid would say that? Could you tell me what he actually said? With all due respect Brother Steven. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Could you tell us what exactly was said between the both of you? Because what you posted is unbelievable. That someone from the hasidim would make such a comment.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

That's not what is being discussed though.

I have a rule, that I do not make any decisions based solely on what some antichrist says as a taunt.

There is no evidence I have seen from Scripture that Jesus' blood was placed on the mercy seat of the ark of the covenant. There's also no evidence I have seen from extra-biblical sources to support such an assertion. All we have is Ron Wyatt's claim, which was not and apparently can not be verified. So there we are.

Meanwhile Epstein's best friends are all evangelically religious today making a national saint out of a podcaster's extremely suspicious death in order to beat the war drums for antichrist's next war. Oh, and apparently being anti-antichrist is now "hate speech", or so I've heard.

Re: John MacArthur Didn't like to speak in tongues
 

The angels told Ron Wyatt that the the tablets of the 10 commandments will be on display AFTER the National Sunday Law is enforced?

The angels in the cave are Seventh Day Adventists?

Please forgive me but I'm not trying to be facetious. This pretty much makes Ron Wyatt's whole story a bit shaky. Wouldn't you agree?