Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   The Newsroom (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Could you Vote for Mayor Giulioni ? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=1229)

Thad 03-13-2007 10:43 AM

Could you Vote for Mayor Giulioni ?
 
Political Experts believe he is the only one that can Beat Hillary.
and they believe Hillary will overcome Obama.

as it stands now, Giulioni will be the republican Nominee.

I've been called everything but a child of hell for being a Democrat.
But my Question is, what is the difference between voting for Hillary and Giulioni? They both believe in Gays and abortion. are you aware of that?
the only real difference is fiscal and perhaps their stance on the war?

i sense some hypocricy on the part of republicans

SDG 03-13-2007 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38159)
Political Experts believe he is the only one that can Beat Hillary.
and they believe Hillary will overcome Obama.

as it stands now, Giulioni will be the republican Nominee.

I've been called everything but a child of hell for being a Democrat.
But my Question is, what is the difference between voting for Hillary and Giulioni? They both believe in Gays and abortion. are you aware of that?
the only real difference is fiscal and perhaps their stance on the war?

i sense some hypocricy on the part of republicans

She's a Clinton ... that's why.

Eliseus 03-13-2007 10:48 AM

Good heavens NO!!!!!

If the choices we get are "Billary Reloaded" or Rudy "Get the Gold, Forget the Bodies" Giuliani then we are really in trouble....

Thad 03-13-2007 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38161)
She's a Clinton ... that's why.

I'm not getting your point Dan

Kutless 03-13-2007 10:51 AM

I think the fact that G. has been married 3 times will lose a lot support for him.

The extreme left would have a field day with that.

SDG 03-13-2007 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutless (Post 38177)
I think the fact that G. has been married 3 times will lose a lot support for him.

The extreme left would have a field day with that.

I think the fact that Hillary is married but really isn't doesn't help her.

Thad 03-13-2007 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliseus (Post 38170)
Good heavens NO!!!!!

If the choices we get are "Billary Reloaded" or Rudy "Get the Gold, Forget the Bodies" Giuliani then we are really in trouble....



the experts are predicting this will be the ticket :


DEMOCRAT TICKET
Hillary for President
Obama for vice


REPUBLICAN
Giulioni for President
Condi rice for vice


By the way, ALL of the above (including both repubs) are Pro abortion.


AND did you hear that Hillary is comparing herself to the JFK of her time ?

Thad 03-13-2007 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutless (Post 38177)
I think the fact that G. has been married 3 times will lose a lot support for him.

The extreme left would have a field day with that.


kutless
the world doesn't care about that anymore. they are all corupt.

SDG 03-13-2007 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38182)

AND did you hear that Hillary is comparing herself to the JFK of her time ?

Both were married but not really ...

Eliseus 03-13-2007 10:54 AM

I'm voting for Ron Paul, if I vote at all.

Thad 03-13-2007 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38178)
I think the fact that Hillary is married but really isn't doesn't help her.



UH ???? exaplin that one please

Thad 03-13-2007 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliseus (Post 38186)
I'm voting for Ron Paul, if I vote at all.

Ron Paul ?

who is that ?

Kutless 03-13-2007 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38178)
I think the fact that Hillary is married but really isn't doesn't help her.

Only disagreement here is that from what I hear Mr. Clinton is quite the fund raiser.

tbpew 03-13-2007 10:56 AM

in your hypothetical, only two choice exist; Hillary or Rudy, I would choose Rudy.

I have more confidence that between these two, he would be more mindful of how all the issues affect a nation rather than just his own political future and ambitions.

SDG 03-13-2007 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutless (Post 38193)
Only disagreement here is that from what I hear Mr. Clinton is quite the fund raiser.

This is true ...:heeheehee

rgcraig 03-13-2007 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliseus (Post 38186)
I'm voting for Ron Paul, if I vote at all.

By not voting you are voting.

Thad 03-13-2007 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbpew (Post 38198)
in your hypothetical, only two choice exist; Hillary or Rudy, I would choose Rudy.

I have more confidence that between these two, he would be more mindful of how all the issues affect a nation rather than just his own political future and ambitions.

This means you are voting for a Pro gay and Pro abortion rights president

don't forget that

Kutless 03-13-2007 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38184)
kutless
the world doesn't care about that anymore. they are all corupt.

Thad I agree with you there but its all a game. The analyst I watched last night was making point about Gully and Newt concerning their marriage capabilities.

He said we gave the Clinton people a hard time with his whole extra-marital activities. If G. gets in ther they will slam him.

tbpew 03-13-2007 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38204)
This means you are voting for a Pro gay and Pro abortion rights president

don't forget that

You are the one who established a condition that has no means to escape the criticism your reply proposes!

Thad 03-13-2007 11:01 AM

Dan, are you ignoring my Questions ?

renda, who would you vote for ?

SDG 03-13-2007 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38204)
This means you are voting for a Pro gay and Pro abortion rights president

don't forget that

Since when do we know what a politician really believes in??? ... as a former resident of New York ... I saw a man that did the job .... he literally slept 4 hours a day and is responsible for the renaissance of the city ... Hillary for the most part has pranced around doing very little for the state.

rgcraig 03-13-2007 11:02 AM

Thad,

If those WERE the two choices, what choice do you have? Move to Mexico? It's probably pretty vacant now days.

Chan 03-13-2007 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38159)
Political Experts believe he is the only one that can Beat Hillary.
and they believe Hillary will overcome Obama.

as it stands now, Giulioni will be the republican Nominee.

I've been called everything but a child of hell for being a Democrat.
But my Question is, what is the difference between voting for Hillary and Giulioni? They both believe in Gays and abortion. are you aware of that?
the only real difference is fiscal and perhaps their stance on the war?

i sense some hypocricy on the part of republicans

People who vote based on who they think is going to win are committing the sin of gambling.

I will not vote for either a Democrat or a Republican since they're really two sides of the same unconstitutional big government coin.

rgcraig 03-13-2007 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38208)
Dan, are you ignoring my Questions ?

renda, who would you vote for ?

Whoever is running against Hillary. Might not like them, but I want to keep her out of office.

Kutless 03-13-2007 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chan (Post 38212)
People who vote based on who they think is going to win are committing the sin of gambling.

I will not vote for either a Democrat or a Republican since they're really two sides of the same unconstitutional big government coin.

Chan who are our other choices?

LaVonne 03-13-2007 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 38213)
Whoever is running against Hillary. Might not like them, but I want to keep her out of office.

That's how I feel, Renda! I would never vote for Hillary.

SDG 03-13-2007 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38188)
UH ???? exaplin that one please

C'mon Thad ... everyone knows this marriage is one of political convenience ... and shows little fruit of being real ....

Chan 03-13-2007 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbpew (Post 38198)
in your hypothetical, only two choice exist; Hillary or Rudy, I would choose Rudy.

I have more confidence that between these two, he would be more mindful of how all the issues affect a nation rather than just his own political future and ambitions.

There are other choices. People need to stop believing the lie of the two-party system. Political parties become "viable" when people vote for them.

Kutless 03-13-2007 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38217)
C'mon Thad ... everyone knows this marriage is one of political convenience ... and shows little fruit of being real ....

You mean like that Jackson/Presley marriage?

Chan 03-13-2007 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutless (Post 38215)
Chan who are our other choices?

Any of the several other political parties in this country.

SDG 03-13-2007 11:06 AM

For Thad ...

Since when do we know what a politician really believes in??? ... as a former resident of New York ... I saw a man that did the job .... he literally slept 4 hours a day and is responsible for the renaissance of the city ... Hillary for the most part has pranced around doing very little for the state.

Kutless 03-13-2007 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chan (Post 38221)
Any of the several other political parties in this country.

It was a serious question. Can you name them and maybe who they have running?

The Green Party? Is there one called the Constitution Party? I reqally don't know.

I'm one of them.

Thad 03-13-2007 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbpew (Post 38207)
You are the one who established a condition that has no means to escape the criticism your reply proposes!

not criticizing you just stating as it stands.
I guess we could vote some 3rd party unknown
but that's a waste of time

Thad 03-13-2007 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 38210)
Thad,

If those WERE the two choices, what choice do you have? Move to Mexico? It's probably pretty vacant now days.


I'm voting for Hillary.


I told you that a long time ago renda

SDG 03-13-2007 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38228)
I'm voting for Hillary.


I told you that a long time ago renda

I dont think she will be the candidate, Thad ...

Thad 03-13-2007 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38217)
C'mon Thad ... everyone knows this marriage is one of political convenience ... and shows little fruit of being real ....

It could be. wouldn't be too surprising. there are even some of those in the ministry :bliss

what title will Billy take on " first lady "? :heeheehee

Chan 03-13-2007 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutless (Post 38225)
It was a serious question. Can you name them and maybe who they have running?

The Green Party? Is there one called the Constitution Party? I reqally don't know.

I'm one of them.

Yes, I know it was a serious question. I gave you a serious answer. Now, here's one source that has a list but please note that not every party on the list is a national party: some of the parties are state parties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._United_States

Here's another source:

http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of...-united-states

Thad 03-13-2007 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 38230)
I dont think she will be the candidate, Thad ...

O yea, she is determined

I believe she will

rgcraig 03-13-2007 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38228)
I'm voting for Hillary.


I told you that a long time ago renda

YOU ARE NUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LaVonne 03-13-2007 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad (Post 38228)
I'm voting for Hillary.


I told you that a long time ago renda

You're crazy Thad! Get your head checked!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.