Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   About Esther (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=23787)

gloryseeker 04-14-2009 06:58 PM

About Esther
 
Anyone know who Esther is? I get this PM from her about posting pictures of naked women...what gives? Anyone else get something like this?

Tina 04-14-2009 07:02 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736555)
Anyone know who Esther is? I get this PM from her about posting pictures of naked women...what gives? Anyone else get something like this?

Esther is a member of the Admin team.

I'd take the message to heart and not post that picture again. :)

MissBrattified 04-14-2009 07:08 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736555)
Anyone know who Esther is? I get this PM from her about posting pictures of naked women...what gives? Anyone else get something like this?

Whatever picture it was--I agree with Tina--say Yes Ma'am to the nice lady, (Esther), and don't post it again. :thumbsup

Ron 04-14-2009 07:26 PM

Re: About Esther
 
I would have to agree with the above ladies, yet find it a little shameful that this needs to be addressed.
An Apostolic should know better!

pelathais 04-14-2009 08:39 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736555)
Anyone know who Esther is? I get this PM from her about posting pictures of naked women...what gives? Anyone else get something like this?

LOL! Yeah! You really should not post pictures like that - how dare you! :blush

(Thank you Esther! You made my day!) :thumbsup

gloryseeker 04-14-2009 08:40 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron (Post 736571)
I would have to agree with the above ladies, yet find it a little shameful that this needs to be addressed.
An Apostolic should know better!

Well duh!!!! It was a totally bizarre pm. Of course I'm not posting such pictures. There was no explanation, question, or anything just a statement, which I found pretty odd.

pelathais 04-14-2009 08:42 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736623)
Well duh!!!! It was a totally bizarre pm. Of course I'm not posting such pictures. There was no explanation, question, or anything just a statement, which I found pretty odd.

:spit Sorry...

Sam 04-14-2009 08:43 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736555)
Anyone know who Esther is? I get this PM from her about posting pictures of naked women...what gives? Anyone else get something like this?

Did I miss the post with pictures of naked women?
I don't remember seeing anything like that on here.

mizpeh 04-14-2009 08:43 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Something funny is going on here.....Pel?????

pelathais 04-14-2009 08:45 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam (Post 736625)
Did I miss the post with pictures of naked women?
I don't remember seeing anything like that on here.

Me neither. Just respectful pictures of family, vacations, church events and the President of the United States.

Oops! Better stay away from the President - didn't we learn anything from the last Democrat?

pelathais 04-14-2009 08:46 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 736627)
Something funny is going on here.....Pel?????

I don't know "funny."

Fiyahstarter 04-14-2009 10:29 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam (Post 736625)
Did I miss the post with pictures of naked women?
I don't remember seeing anything like that on here.

And don't sit up all night looking for them either, mister.:ursofunny

RandyWayne 04-14-2009 10:35 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam (Post 736625)
Did I miss the post with pictures of naked women?
I don't remember seeing anything like that on here.

You'll have to go to the internet "way back" machine to see it Sam where it is saved for all eternity!

MissBrattified 04-14-2009 10:51 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gloryseeker (Post 736623)
Well duh!!!! It was a totally bizarre pm. Of course I'm not posting such pictures. There was no explanation, question, or anything just a statement, which I found pretty odd.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 736624)
:spit Sorry...


Well, now THAT makes it funny. :toofunny

Maybe Esther wasn't wearing her glasses. :D

mizpeh 04-14-2009 10:58 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 736711)
Well, now THAT makes it funny. :toofunny

Maybe Esther wasn't wearing her glasses. :D

Pel is acting very suspicious....

Esther 04-15-2009 07:10 AM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 736714)
Pel is acting very suspicious....

For a very good reason. :)

Pel:foottap

iceniez 04-15-2009 09:00 AM

Re: About Esther
 
?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????

rgcraig 04-15-2009 06:54 PM

Re: About Esther
 
gloryseeker,

Esther mistakenly thought you posted the cartoon that Pel had posted, but you had only quoted him. She owes you an apology. That's why the pm warning she sent you didn't make sense to you.

Pel, you posted the cartoon, it was decided that it was inappropriate for a Christian board and was deleted. Then, you posted the same cartoon again and it was deleted also.

Whether it is or isn't appropriate to some isn't up for discussion. It was ruled by the admin as not being appropriate.

I hope this clears the situation up for all.

pelathais 04-15-2009 07:01 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 737327)
gloryseeker,

Esther mistakenly thought you posted the cartoon that Pel had posted, but you had only quoted him. She owes you an apology. That's why the pm warning she sent you didn't make sense to you.

Pel, you posted the cartoon, it was decided that it was inappropriate for a Christian board and was deleted. Then, you posted the same cartoon again and it was deleted also.

Whether it is or isn't appropriate to some isn't up for discussion. It was ruled by the admin as not being appropriate.

I hope this clears the situation up for all.

Did I defiantly post a picture of a nude woman after being told that the first nude picture was "inappropriate?"

Am I some sort of serial poster of porn on AFF? That part isn't clear to me yet.

rgcraig 04-15-2009 07:04 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737334)
Did I defiantly post a picture of a nude woman after being told that the first nude picture was "inappropriate?"

Am I some sort of serial poster of porn on AFF? That part isn't clear to me yet.

It was a semi-nude cartoon picture that clearly showed the woman's upper and hind parts. On my computer the resolution was so that it was VERY clearly seen.

I believe the point that you are trying to make is you WERE NOT warned about the first picture you posted, it was just edited. That was a mistake on Admin's part. They should have sent the PM warning and stated they had deleted the picture.

pelathais 04-15-2009 07:31 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Thanks. I sincerely cannot see anything in that comic that others have described. I've imported it into Photoshop and magnified... I just don't see the "body parts" described. Maybe I'm naive and and just don't connect the blurred pixels as others do.

mizpeh 04-15-2009 08:18 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737344)
Thanks. I sincerely cannot see anything in that comic that others have described. I've imported it into Photoshop and magnified... I just don't see the "body parts" described. Maybe I'm naive and and just don't connect the blurred pixels as others do.

Time to see the eye doctor?

pelathais 04-15-2009 08:35 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 737373)
Time to see the eye doctor?

I dunno... I blew the thing up in Photoshop and the "nude woman" clearly has a top on. And there are no anatomical features visible as was alleged.

I resubmitted the magnified pic to admin - not to get it posted, but to clear my name.

Honestly, some folks must spend way too much time looking at "bad stuff" to the point that their retinas are scarred with porno images.

All I saw was a comic making fun of the whole "Obama as messiah" rap.

Sherri 04-15-2009 08:54 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737392)
I dunno... I blew the thing up in Photoshop and the "nude woman" clearly has a top on. And there are no anatomical features visible as was alleged.

I resubmitted the magnified pic to admin - not to get it posted, but to clear my name.

Honestly, some folks must spend way too much time looking at "bad stuff" to the point that their retinas are scarred with porno images.

All I saw was a comic making fun of the whole "Obama as messiah" rap.

"IS YOU BLIND?" as my daughter used to say at age 2. Or maybe your mind is just so pure that it can't even fathom anything that would be unholy.:thumbsup

rgcraig 04-15-2009 08:57 PM

Re: About Esther
 
I just found it on the web and that girl FOR SHUR doesn't have a top on!

Pel....you need some better glasses!!!

MissBrattified 04-15-2009 09:00 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Well, this is probably totally out of line, but I WANT TO SEE THE CARTOON. So I can have an educated opinion, of course. :D

The mystery is KILLING me. :blink

mizpeh 04-15-2009 09:01 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 737420)
I just found it on the web and that girl FOR SHUR doesn't have a top on!

Pel....you need some better glasses!!!

:covereyes

rgcraig 04-15-2009 09:02 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 737427)
:covereyes

If that's a top - it's the first one I've seen with ONE POLKA Dot!

MissBrattified 04-15-2009 09:10 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Uhhhhhhh, TY Renda for letting me in on the viewing, and PEL!!!! For goodness' sake. LOL!!!!

If that woman IS wearing a top, it's barely covering anything. I'm not an admin, but I'll go on record and concur that it's inappropriate. I wouldn't let Jeffrey look at cartoons like that. :blink

Pasties and a loin cloth don't really count as clothed, and the depiction of the woman is obviously meant to be sensual. I call that soft-core porn. A little more racy than Victoria's Secret magazines, which I no longer subscribe to, because I have a young son--and a husband--in the house who don't need the distraction.

I don't see why you needed to blow it up...

Perhaps you're just yankin' our chains? :coffee2

rgcraig 04-15-2009 09:13 PM

Re: About Esther
 
I'm not even sure it's a pasty.....I think that's al naturale!

MissBrattified 04-15-2009 09:22 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 737443)
I'm not even sure it's a pasty.....I think that's al naturale!

It looks that way to me, too. I think Pel needs his eyes examined. :D

Pressing-On 04-15-2009 09:23 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 737429)
If that's a top - it's the first one I've seen with ONE POLKA Dot!

That's what I thought when I viewed it. I was wondering why Admin was leaving it there, but too busy to PM you. LOL!

NOW, it's very hard to believe in PEL with the twiddling fingers in his avatar! LOL!

MissBrattified 04-15-2009 09:42 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Pel, I do see a string around her back that could represent a bikini top, but she still looks naked in the drawing, especially when it's NOT blown up, and regardless, it's inappropriate for a Christian forum. JMO, of course. If that IS a bikini top, the design is rather...unfortunate. It does NOT look like a top.

mizpeh 04-15-2009 09:45 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

the "nude woman" clearly has a top on

Hmmm....that is debatable!! She's a LIL Kim wannabe

Pressing-On 04-15-2009 09:45 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737471)
A crop of the picture at the link you sent.


Now ban me for telling you the truth.

If you sent that picture to my husband, I would have to pop a knot on your head! :D

MissBrattified 04-15-2009 09:48 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737479)
A lie is a lie. I guess when you've grown so accustomed to believing lies you're perfectly happy telling them yourself and giggling over the infamy you raise.

First, if someone said she was nude because they thought she was nude, that isn't a lie. :)

Secondly, many people call scantily clad "nude." (meaning a person is immodestly exposed)

Thirdly, do you really think that cartoon is appropriate?

mizpeh 04-15-2009 09:48 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737479)
A lie is a lie. I guess when you've grown so accustomed to believing lies you're perfectly happy telling them yourself and giggling over the infamy you raise.

Wouldn't it have been easier to just take a self imposed vacation? Some of the fights you have picked are worth fighting but this is foolishness.

Seriously, I would not call what that girl is wearing a "top".

mizpeh 04-15-2009 09:52 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737481)
"Debatable" is a lie. She is "indecent" (if she weren't a comic drawing) but she is clearly not "nude."

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with "LIL Kim."

It's debatable whether she has a "top" on or not even if you want to call the top a pasty. A string tied around her back means nothing if it is attached to nothing.

Pressing-On 04-15-2009 09:53 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 737485)
Are you in touch with any of the various mental health agencies that must be available in your area?

No.... :banghead Are....:banghead you....? :banghead

:toofunny

Cindy 04-15-2009 09:55 PM

Re: About Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 737489)
No.... :banghead Are....:banghead you....? :banghead

:toofunny

:ursofunny


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.