Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agree~ (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=24088)

Pastor Keith 05-04-2009 08:39 AM

~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agree~
 
I am reading Alister McGrath's, newest book "Christianity's Dangerous Idea".

On page 32, he is describing the formation of Jerome's Latin Vulgate, he points out that up to the point of his translation certain passages in the Catholic translation were assumed to be scripture, when in fact they weren't.

One such passage was 1 John 5:7-8

7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one.

He discovered in doing his Greek Translation that this passage was added after the 8th Century, most likely a commentary on the previous verses that a scribe took to be a passage of scripture.

I think for some this is old news, but I enjoyed discovering it and having a notable scholar point out this undermines a traditional cardinal doctrine of traditional Evangelicalism, the Trinity.

Anyway, while I am starting the book, I will report any other notable items.

Jermyn Davidson 05-04-2009 08:41 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745425)
I am reading Alister McGrath's, newest book "Christianity's Dangerous Idea".

On page 32, he is describing the formation of Jerome's Latin Vulgate, he points out that up to the point of his translation certain passages in the Catholic translation were assumed to be scripture, when in fact they weren't.

One such passage was 1 John 5:7-8

7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one.

He discovered in doing his Greek Translation that this passage was added after the 8th Century, most likely a commentary on the previous verses that a scribe took to be a passage of scripture.

I think for some this is old news, but I enjoyed discovering it and having a notable scholar point out this undermines a traditional cardinal doctrine of traditional Evangelicalism, the Trinity.

Anyway, while I am starting the book, I will report any other notable items.

Funny thing, that scripture always pointed to the Oneness of God whenever I read it.

Pastor Keith 05-04-2009 08:44 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson (Post 745428)
Funny thing, that scripture always pointed to the Oneness of God whenever I read it.

Nope, should have never been in there.

Digging4Truth 05-04-2009 08:50 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745432)
Nope, should have never been in there.

I have heard something similar about Matthew 28:19 as well.

Sam 05-04-2009 08:52 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745425)
as one.
...
I think for some this is old news, but I enjoyed discovering it and having a notable scholar point out this undermines a traditional cardinal doctrine of traditional Evangelicalism, the Trinity.
...


I don't know that 1 John 5:7 supports the doctrine of the trinity.
It could be taken as a support of the doctrine of oneness.

Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept 1 John 5:7 because it supports the deity of Christ. Modernists would also leave 1 John 5:7 out because it supports the deity of Christ. The late Gordon Magee believed that 1 John 5:7 was not really "Scripture" because, in his mind, it supported the doctrine of the trinity. He also believed Matthew 28:19 as it currently appears in our Bibles was a corruption of an earlier text.

It always bothers me to see folks "delete" something out of what we have accepted as "Scripture" for years. I think of King Jehoiakim and his pen knife and fire.

I think even most Oneness folks will admit that the word "one" in English can mean a numerical one as in we each have only "one" stomach or heaart, or it can mean "united" as in husband and wife being "one." We would say there is only "one" true church but we would also say that all the members are "one." We say that there is only "one" true God but we also say that our God is "one."

KWSS1976 05-04-2009 08:52 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
So cannot use that portion of scripture anymore to proof oneness..LOL

shawndell 05-04-2009 08:58 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745425)
I am reading Alister McGrath's, newest book "Christianity's Dangerous Idea".

On page 32, he is describing the formation of Jerome's Latin Vulgate, he points out that up to the point of his translation certain passages in the Catholic translation were assumed to be scripture, when in fact they weren't.

One such passage was 1 John 5:7-8

7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one.

He discovered in doing his Greek Translation that this passage was added after the 8th Century, most likely a commentary on the previous verses that a scribe took to be a passage of scripture.

I think for some this is old news, but I enjoyed discovering it and having a notable scholar point out this undermines a traditional cardinal doctrine of traditional Evangelicalism, the Trinity.

Anyway, while I am starting the book, I will report any other notable items.

So what passage was suposed to be in its place or what was the passage suposed to say?:heart

crakjak 05-04-2009 08:58 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745425)
I am reading Alister McGrath's, newest book "Christianity's Dangerous Idea".

On page 32, he is describing the formation of Jerome's Latin Vulgate, he points out that up to the point of his translation certain passages in the Catholic translation were assumed to be scripture, when in fact they weren't.

One such passage was 1 John 5:7-8

7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one.

He discovered in doing his Greek Translation that this passage was added after the 8th Century, most likely a commentary on the previous verses that a scribe took to be a passage of scripture.

I think for some this is old news, but I enjoyed discovering it and having a notable scholar point out this undermines a traditional cardinal doctrine of traditional Evangelicalism, the Trinity.

Anyway, while I am starting the book, I will report any other notable items.


You are correct Erasmus did not find it in his Greek manuscripts, which simply read: "There are three that bear witness; the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and these three are one." He was then accused of tampering with the text in an attempt to eliminate the doctrine of the Trinity and to devalue it corollary, the doctrine of the full divinity of Christ. Under pressure he added it back in his next edition, after a Greek manuscript was produced with the verse in it, it of course was a fraud, but it gave Erasmus and out and he caved.

Sam 05-04-2009 08:58 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
The argument about different Bible versions is not new.

Below are three versions of the same verse of Scripture.

The first is from the King James Version. The second is from a quote by Justin Martyr. The third is from a prayer which quotes the psalm on a Coptic Church website. This prayer is still in use today by Coptic Christians.

The quote from the writings of Justin Martyr was probably written from Ephesus shortly after the Bar-Kochba rebellion of 132-135 A.D. He is addressing a Jew named Trypho and he accuses the Jews who did not accept Jesus as Messiah of deleting something in their version of the Scriptures that they were using. Justin Martyr, a Christian writer, quotes from the Septuagint Bible, sometimes called the LXX. The LXX was a translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek begun around 282 B.C. by 70 or 72 Jewish translators. The reason for the translation was because the old Hebrew language was not in popular use but had been replaced by Aramaic and Greek. Jews who had been disbursed all over the Roman Empire could more easily read the Greek translation. The LXX was used by the early Church quite often. This is one reason why Old Testament quotes in our New Testament are some times different than they currently read if you check them out in our Old Testament. Our Old Testament is based on the Hebrew (Masoretic) version but the early Christian writers used the Greek (LXX) version.

This Psalm, which is number 95 in the LXX but number 96 in the King James Bible, exalts our God above the heathen gods. Our God is called Lord (Greek Kurios) in the LXX and is called LORD (Hebrew Jehovah or YHWH) in the KJV. Note that verse 10 states that God (the Lord or Jehovah) reigns "from the tree." The tree is seen as a reference to the cross. This was used as a proof text by early Christians to prove that the God of the Hebrews, the LORD Jehovah Himself, had come to earth as Jesus and even though He had been crucified was reigning triumphantly.

The Coptic Church denomination has its headquarters in Egypt. History/tradition says that the Church is the result of St. Mark (author of the Gospel) evangelization in Egypt. The Church organization or denomination that still exists there today traces its history back to the first century.

Here are the different versions of the verse.

10 Say among the heathen that the LORD reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously.(KJV)

10 Say among the Gentiles, the Lord has reigned from the tree. For he has established the world, which will not be moved; He will judge the people with justice. (LXX as quoted by Justin Martyr)

10 Say among the nations, “The Lord reigned on a wood: for He has established the world that it shall not be moved: He will judge the peoples in righteousness.”
(from the Coptic Church site)

Pastor Keith 05-04-2009 08:59 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam (Post 745435)
I don't know that 1 John 5:7 supports the doctrine of the trinity.
It could be taken as a support of the doctrine of oneness.

Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept 1 John 5:7 because it supports the deity of Christ. Modernists would also leave 1 John 5:7 out because it supports the deity of Christ. The late Gordon Magee believed that 1 John 5:7 was not really "Scripture" because, in his mind, it supported the doctrine of the trinity. He also believed Matthew 28:19 as it currently appears in our Bibles was a corruption of an earlier text.

It always bothers me to see folks "delete" something out of what we have accepted as "Scripture" for years. I think of King Jehoiakim and his pen knife and fire.

I think even most Oneness folks will admit that the word "one" in English can mean a numerical one as in we each have only "one" stomach or heaart, or it can mean "united" as in husband and wife being "one." We would say there is only "one" true church but we would also say that all the members are "one." We say that there is only "one" true God but we also say that our God is "one."

I have always felt scripture doesn't need help, let it stand alone. This goes very every doctrine.

McGrath felt it to be undermining and damaging to those of the Trinitarian Persuasion.

crakjak 05-04-2009 09:03 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith (Post 745442)
I have always felt scripture doesn't need help, let it stand alone. This goes very every doctrine.

McGrath felt it to be undermining and damaging to those of the Trinitarian Persuasion.

Exactly, and the divinity of Jesus.

Praxeas 05-04-2009 12:19 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 745440)
You are correct Erasmus did not find it in his Greek manuscripts, which simply read: "There are three that bear witness; the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and these three are one." He was then accused of tampering with the text in an attempt to eliminate the doctrine of the Trinity and to devalue it corollary, the doctrine of the full divinity of Christ. Under pressure he added it back in his next edition, after a Greek manuscript was produced with the verse in it, it of course was a fraud, but it gave Erasmus and out and he caved.

I know Erasmus added it, but for this story you posted do you know where I can find an online source for it?

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 12:23 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Is this controversial enough ?
http://www.bible.ca/b-kjv-only.htm

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 12:28 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
The war is on.
http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/erasmus.asp

Pastor Keith 05-04-2009 01:24 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
This is troubling in 2 ways,

This verse is a proof text for some on a view of God, that shouldn't be there.

Secondly, in our Bible we have 2 verses that are distinctly added to the written word, many have embraced them used them, having no clue that they are added, etc. This is very concerning.

KWSS1976 05-04-2009 01:32 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Or they know and just keep it hidden...LOL

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 01:36 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
http://www.scionofzion.com/1_john_5_78.htm

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 01:38 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
http://www.bibletexts.com/versecom/1jo05v07.htm

Pastor Keith 05-04-2009 01:38 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KWSS1976 (Post 745567)
Or they know and just keep it hidden...LOL

Most disturbing of all if true.

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 01:41 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
http://www.wrestedscriptures.com/b08.../1john5v7.html

Cindy 05-04-2009 01:44 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Seems to me, y'all are just taking one man's word over another. How do we know for sure which is true?

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 01:44 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
http://openscriptures.org/prototypes...llel&strongs=1

Scott Hutchinson 05-04-2009 01:47 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-en...y/erasmus.html

LUKE2447 05-04-2009 02:42 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
My personal belief is that Matt 28:19 is a added interpolation. If it was original you would have seen much more of that type of phrasing used but nowhere is it used again.

LUKE2447 05-04-2009 02:44 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Gail Riplinger..... LOL! Oh please!

*AQuietPlace* 05-04-2009 03:16 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447 (Post 745601)
My personal belief is that Matt 28:19 is a added interpolation. If it was original you would have seen much more of that type of phrasing used but nowhere is it used again.

So is God going to send people to hell for obeying a verse that is in their Bible?

Sarah 05-04-2009 05:22 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447 (Post 745601)
My personal belief is that Matt 28:19 is a added interpolation. If it was original you would have seen much more of that type of phrasing used but nowhere is it used again.

I don't think it was added on. I believe the apostles knew what the name is, and acted accordingly.

Praxeas 05-04-2009 07:30 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cindy (Post 745576)
Seems to me, y'all are just taking one man's word over another. How do we know for sure which is true?

It's a historical fact that is only disputed by the fringe elements of the KJVO...

Even KJVOs will admit this was an interpolation by Erasmus

Praxeas 05-04-2009 07:31 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447 (Post 745601)
My personal belief is that Matt 28:19 is a added interpolation. If it was original you would have seen much more of that type of phrasing used but nowhere is it used again.

Unfortunately there is zero hard evidence that it is an interpolation

crakjak 05-04-2009 08:20 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 745514)
I know Erasmus added it, but for this story you posted do you know where I can find an online source for it?

Sure, "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart D. Ehrman, chapter three "Texts of the New Testament".

It is some interesting reading, though I disagree with his conclusions. Bart chairs the Dept. of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It is ironic that he is agnostic at best, atheist at worst.

Don't know if it is on line or not.

LUKE2447 05-04-2009 09:03 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 745680)
Unfortunately there is zero hard evidence that it is an interpolation

Hard evidence as in manuscripts of Matt besides the one later than the 4th century... yes you are correct. Direct quotations of the verse by Erasmus that support that it was not the same .... Yes! We have direct comments from Erasmus that do not support the current ending, let alone the Catholic Church admitting it was changed.

LUKE2447 05-04-2009 09:07 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* (Post 745616)
So is God going to send people to hell for obeying a verse that is in their Bible?

Like Col 3:17 And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.

Not sure but I would not want to find out!

Steve Epley 05-04-2009 10:57 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
I believe God had the will and ability to keep the Bible free from error.

Shawn 05-04-2009 11:14 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley (Post 745750)
I believe God had the will and ability to keep the Bible free from error.

I hope your right. But with which translation?

Praxeas 05-04-2009 11:55 PM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 745703)
Sure, "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart D. Ehrman, chapter three "Texts of the New Testament".

It is some interesting reading, though I disagree with his conclusions. Bart chairs the Dept. of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It is ironic that he is agnostic at best, atheist at worst.

Don't know if it is on line or not.

Thanks, I hope I can find it.

Praxeas 05-05-2009 12:07 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447 (Post 745724)
Hard evidence as in manuscripts of Matt besides the one later than the 4th century... yes you are correct. Direct quotations of the verse by Erasmus that support that it was not the same .... Yes! We have direct comments from Erasmus that do not support the current ending, let alone the Catholic Church admitting it was changed.

Erasmus...Im not sure of his credibility at this point considering the comma. What is Erasmus quoting? An earlier MS that no longer exists? An early church father? An extra biblical document like the Didache?

Do you have a link where I can read about Erasmus quoted this reading?

Pastor DTSalaz 05-05-2009 01:19 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth (Post 745433)
I have heard something similar about Matthew 28:19 as well.

It is the end of the gospel of Mark 16th chapter.

Understanding textual criticism will do wonders for your faith in the veracity and inerrancy of the Bible. For both higher and lower criticisms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism

LUKE2447 05-05-2009 06:21 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 745757)
Erasmus...Im not sure of his credibility at this point considering the comma. What is Erasmus quoting? An earlier MS that no longer exists? An early church father? An extra biblical document like the Didache?

Do you have a link where I can read about Erasmus quoted this reading?

No Erasmus the historian in the 4th century!

Steve Epley 05-05-2009 08:31 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
The Bible is the anvil that wears the hammers of the critics out.

Pastor Keith 05-05-2009 10:03 AM

Re: ~Oh, My, The Father, Word and Spirit don't agr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley (Post 745870)
The Bible is the anvil that wears the hammers of the critics out.

Steve,

I am not a critic of scripture, I believe in the inerrancy/inspiration of scripture. God has preserved his word, but man has a role to. Just as God has preserved His Church, man messes it up.

The other point being I do not put my head in the sand when it comes to an obvious discrepancy. Plus the text being a proof text for trinitarians to prove their doctrine.

It doesn't change my view or use of scripture, just pointing out a historical tidbit.

keith


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.