![]() |
Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Papabear said:
Quote:
Yet, from my experience I have seen some of the fiercest, pugnacious female defenders of holiness standards not have a clue theologically about why they do what they do yet can mercilessly tear down anyone who does not as much look the way they do. Often, these women will remark that they are submissive to their husbands - and that's why they do what they do. And often times I find their husbands to be extremely domineering and because they are concerned what their peers will think they argue incessantly, and maybe even abusively, with their wives if they as much as wear blush or have a slit in their skirt. Or perhaps it can be a spiritually abusive pastor who takes this role? Or maybe the result of repetitious, dogmatic teaching that seeks to cause unhealthy amounts of guilt and shame? Or maybe it's theological illiteracy coupled with the innate human desire to belong? And so maybe, Papabear, what we often mistake as willing submission is what some describe as Stockholm Syndrome. SS is described by Wiki as follows: Quote:
You know - the millionaire heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army. After two months in captivity, she actively took part in a robbery they were orchestrating. Her unsuccessful legal defense was that she suffered from Stockholm syndrome and was coerced into aiding the SLA. She was convicted and imprisoned for her actions in the robbery, though her sentence was commuted in February 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, and she received a Presidential pardon from Bill Clinton. You see Papabear, group dynamics can be very powerful and often when a person cannot beat them, they join them. It's a defense mechanism called identification. The defense mechanism identification is described as: Quote:
According to the psychoanalytic view of the syndrome, the tendency might well be the result of employing the strategy evolved by newborn babies to form an emotional attachment to the nearest powerful adult in order to maximize the probability that this adult will enable — at the very least — the survival of the child, if not also prove to be a good parental figure. This syndrome is considered a prime example for the defense mechanism of identification (Wiki) http://www.geocities.com/spootnek/Ei...attyHearst.jpg |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Is Patty Hurst wearing a skirt?
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
But where is the joy of the Lord?
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
:shockamoo |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
I have much I could say... but I will not.
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
Ladies - did you check with your husbands before you posted here tonight??? :gotcha |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
By the way, Scott -
My name is KIM KOMANDO and I approve of this message. :kiss |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Reading this and thinking about my own wife... I have not been domineering as a husband regarding her dress (she is more conservative than I) Pastor has not dictated anything beyond her custom - she is perhaps a bit more conservative than pastor and others...
However, the identification thing is likely true. Everyone wants to belong, no matter who you are and what you are a part of. I would suggest one reason ladies and some men are drawn to a conservative lifestyle which includes dress, is the lack of fruit they see in other groups. Placing restraint on ones life can be very rewarding if not done by a hierarchy, or done to gain favor with God. Quite often if one "frees" themselves from various disciplines they go further then they expected. This is true for many EXers. Also the UPC identity and family kinship is very strong. I know a number that have left conservative circles to embrace what they saw as less restrictive - yet they speak openly of missing the social aspect of a fellowship such as the UPC. |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
I agree Stephen. Again my post stated that this may be a reason for some - especially those in oppressive situations and even among those who are simply "followers" by nature. The element of group dynamics is very strong wherever people gather and want to be a part of the "in crowd"- whatever the flavor. A lot of this happens on a subconscious level, while some of it learned through conditioning, and it's always interesting to see how our defense mechanisms are put into action when we feel we are being "attacked".
The point is that often what we see as fervor, zeal and genuine heart-felt desire, or "being of fire for Jesus" may not necessarily 100% personal choice or self-generated, or the Spirit of God. We are very much social beings. |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Group dynamics are indeed very, very strong.
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
:ursofunny |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
LOL! I only asked her to bake some pies... It was not my choice to keep her in the dark about visitors until the last minute - It was my choice to ask her to bake pies (Kristin would have done the same without me asking) two hrs before they got there. Hey, they were pretty good!
What a deal. All my friends at church said, "Hey! Whats the deal? We know you cook!" The editors cut the part where I said I actually love cooking - but because of time constraints I rarely do anymore - us now being a one income family. Well, sort of. My wife is employed part-time in our home-based office. BTW Hoover/Meeks Wife Swap aired again at the same time as MJ memorial service. |
Re: Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome, Papabear?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.