Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Shaw on Emergent Church (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=25073)

Hoovie 07-15-2009 07:56 AM

Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Shaw addresses both sides in the article. He ends the first of the series by saying, "I think we need to talk. Is anyone interested?".


Where Do We Stand?

Postmodernism, the Emergent Church, and Apostolics
July 13, 2009
by Rodney Shaw
http://www.ninetyandnine.com/Archive...0713/cover.htm

KWSS1976 07-15-2009 08:02 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Did he put it nicely that the apostolic people don't even understand there own roots correctely did I read that correctly..

Pragmatist 07-15-2009 08:13 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
I just can't believe that people are so concerned about style. I don't think the Bible mentions Hammonds vs. guitar so I fail to see the issue.

Hoovie 07-15-2009 08:17 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pragmatist (Post 772668)
I just can't believe that people are so concerned about style. I don't think the Bible mentions Hammonds vs. guitar so I fail to see the issue.

But I think he addresses that. The concern should really be limited to whether it is or will effect core doctrine.

Pragmatist 07-15-2009 08:19 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 772671)
But I think he addresses that. The concern should really be limited to whether it is or will effect core doctrine.

But I can't believe it needs to be addressed. :bigbaby

n david 07-15-2009 08:20 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Good article

:thumbsup

*AQuietPlace* 07-15-2009 08:20 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Going by his definition here, you could say that Jesus was postmodern:


In a religious context, postmodernism challenges propositional truth, traditional expressions and institutions, and anything that is perceived to be too rigid. Postmoderns value dialogue, interaction, diversity, experience, transparency, and authenticity. We could spend a lot of time defining postmodernism, but we will leave it at that.

Hoovie 07-15-2009 08:27 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* (Post 772676)
Going by his definition here, you could say that Jesus was postmodern:


In a religious context, postmodernism challenges propositional truth, traditional expressions and institutions, and anything that is perceived to be too rigid. Postmoderns value dialogue, interaction, diversity, experience, transparency, and authenticity. We could spend a lot of time defining postmodernism, but we will leave it at that.

Agreed.


The article is far from an attack on postmodernism itself or the "Emergent Church".

*AQuietPlace* 07-15-2009 08:31 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Yes, it's an interesting, pretty balanced article.

*AQuietPlace* 07-15-2009 08:42 AM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
This is an interesting portion. I think it's also why many are being drawn to 'emergent' type fellowships. Traditional church has, in most places, lost it's outward focus. We mostly focus inwards, on the church building and what happens there. That can leave us feeling empty and without a purpose.



The vocabulary in postmodern churches includes words like incarnational, missional, community, journey, ancient, authentic, real. These words often originate in protest of a dysfunctional church or system. For example, missional emerged a few years ago in response to churches that do not live out their faith or witness. (See The Missional Church, Darrell Guder, editor.) Missional was conceived as a model for doing church over against the traditional attractional model. Protestant churches of all stripes have used the attractional model for years. The seeker-sensitive megachurches of the 1980s and 1990s revamped their formats but also had an attractional model. In both cases, people were attracted to what was happening on stage on Sundays. Faith was defined by attending church and believing a set of propositions.

Missional theory says that instead of constructing a building and expecting sinners to come to that building, Christians should take their faith to the streets. Christians should live out their faith every day. Christians should be light and salt in the world, i.e., Christians should be missional.

Although we could debate what exactly it is Christians ought to be doing between Sundays, the idea of being missional is inherent in Pentecostal theology. Our strong sense of evangelism as well as holiness allow for the theological framework to be missional. As pointed out above, early Pentecostals were involved in social outreach primarily for theological reasons. First, they believed it was an opportunity to share the gospel. Second, they believed this was part of holiness. They believed they were empowered to go and do good works. Holiness was not merely personal piety or outward appearance; it included doing good works.

Accordingly, Pentecostals have a theological basis to be both missional and incarnational. But since we typically do not use this language, and because we have largely abandoned social outreach, it is easy for young Apostolics to feel an attraction to these ideas when they are articulated elsewhere.

James Griffin 07-15-2009 04:22 PM

Re: Shaw on Emergent Church
 
Excellent.

Shaw just keeps getting better and better.

I still have to wonder if it is not too little too late.

But he mirrors what I would want to say if I were still on the inside.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.