Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 801777)

I kind of wanted a fresh thread. That other one got off on repentance.

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 801781)

And you are delusional enough to think this one will stay on topic - :ursofunny

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind (Post 801892)

no one on here wants to argue about salvation. join paltalk.com if you are looking for discussions.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 801905)

I know a couple of guys who do. Besides, I don't want to argue salvation. I just want to know what the arguments are with scriptural support.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 801753)

I want to have a thread that plainly spells out the salvation doctrine of the three-steppers. I want to keep this simple and as easy to follow as possible, so for this thread lets just assume that we all believe the same thing about repentance.

We seem to have issues because people seem to not understand what each group believes.

So, for all you guys who want scripture and believe in the Bible only as our source for doctrine then this is the chance to show what you believe and why.

I tried this once before and it didn't really work. I just want a simple thread that deals with the basic doctrine and then support for that doctrine.

I will not argue yet but will help the three-steppers and try to understand what they believe.

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 801995)

Its hard to believe anyone honestly pretends 3 steppers have never given their argument with scriptural support.....in fact there is an online book on the subject by Bernard.

I think its the kinda of "three steppers need help, they never use scriptura...Ill get my popcorn because I know they won't answer" attitude they tend to avoid now. It's gotten old. They have defended their doctrines but they feel it's pointless to be told they have not and face the same ad nauseum accusations over and over and over and I don't blame them

You want a real discussion on scriptures Delta? Challenge Jason or someone to a debate in the moderated section

Originally Posted by notofworks (Post 801992)

Personally, I'm a zero-stepper. I think it's insane to think we can take any steps. Jesus has taken all the steps!!!

Originally Posted by Jason (Post 802046)

Yes, that's what I'm talking about. Amen to everything Prax posted, but this last line is what we really need. :thumbsup

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 801777)

I kind of wanted a fresh thread. That other one got off on repentance.

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 801995)

Its hard to believe anyone honestly pretends 3 steppers have never given their argument with scriptural support.....in fact there is an online book on the subject by Bernard.

I think its the kinda of "three steppers need help, they never use scriptura...Ill get my popcorn because I know they won't answer" attitude they tend to avoid now. It's gotten old. They have defended their doctrines but they feel it's pointless to be told they have not and face the same ad nauseum accusations over and over and over and I don't blame them

You want a real discussion on scriptures Delta? Challenge Jason or someone to a debate in the moderated section

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

No, I am not a debater. I don't care about winning or losing. I really care about truth and once people start having to take a side then all they do is stick to that side no matter what. I have always been one to concede a point if I am wrong.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

I read almost all of Bernard's books. My dad is a great teacher of the word and I knew Bernard before I knew anything else. I was raised in a very good balanced UPC home with wonderful parents who did everything right concerning teaching me the doctrine.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

My change came because I saw things in the bible that didn't line up. The first time I read Romans I actually put my bible up and didn't read it again for probably two years because it shook me so much and I loved the UPC and being pentecostal.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

I have been advised that I am doing the wrong thing on this forum by engaging with Apostolic because I am not apostolic anymore.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

For at least a year I haven't even considered myself Pentecostal and I don't speak in tongues and I don't seek for it anymore. When I first came to this forum I was desperate for a move of God in my life. I tried every Pentecostal trick to get it but I just couldn't do it.

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

I have been delivered from it so why bother you people who love it and maybe even are supposed to be this way. I just don't have the patience for that doctrine anymore.

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 801995)

Its hard to believe anyone honestly pretends 3 steppers have never given their argument with scriptural support.....in fact there is an online book on the subject by Bernard.

I think its the kinda of "three steppers need help, they never use scriptura...Ill get my popcorn because I know they won't answer" attitude they tend to avoid now. It's gotten old. They have defended their doctrines but they feel it's pointless to be told they have not and face the same ad nauseum accusations over and over and over and I don't blame them

You want a real discussion on scriptures Delta? Challenge Jason or someone to a debate in the moderated section

Originally Posted by Jason (Post 802199)

Neither am I, the only debate I've ever participated in was here on AFF. However in a debate both point of views are presented in a way that the observers can judge for themselves. True the ones involved in the debate rarely change tier posistion during the debate (though some do after time), but again, it is for the benefit of the hearers/readers.

If your not up to this, perhaps a more seasoned poster of your persuasion would be interested. I am convinced that we are being charged with alot of things that we do not believe here lately.

mistake one, commonly made by ex-pentecostals. Bernard is not scripture. Though I personally like alot of what He writes, I've read so many ex-pentecostals speak about or boast how their goal was to defend the doctrine.

IMO that's why many of them couldn't serve God like they ought, their focus became on their organization rather than God. For the record, I'm not necessarily accusing you, DG of such things, but have seen statements similar to what you made many times. In the first place amongst whom Gregory Boyd comes immediately to mind.

DG, do you think you were the first pentecostal to read Romans? This statement is a big red flag to me. It tells me that your mind set was very skewed somehow, if Romans was that a big a shock to you. No wonder you harp on grace so much, because you apperently, truly did not understand grace.

Romans is one of the greatest books in the New Testament, but it in no way tears down the importance of repentance, water baptism and Spirit baptism, in fact a large portion of Romans is devoted to salvation, chapters 6-8.
I mean how can you see baptism as a "work" and have nothing to do with salvation when Paul (who not only shared the importance of baptism in his testimony-Acts 22:16) writes:

What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also [in the likeness] of [his] resurrection:
Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with [him], that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
ROMANS 6:1-6


DG, I'm glad you here. I don't always appreciate what your promoting (Calvinism), but you seem like a nice, sincere guy, and I do honestly believe you love God.


Just seek to serve God, pray, study, and walk with God. If He wants you to speak in tongues, you will. I think your doing the right thing by NOT seeking tongues. Just serve God, and if it so happens that you speak in tongues, quench not the Spirit. I do believe tongues (at least in our current day) are over-rated. Yes I believe and speak in tongues, but also believe the act of seeking tongues more than God has done people more harm than good.

Because of tongues, you threw the baby out with the bath water. DG, you come on here talking about how your going to "set us free" and such, but can't even answer the scriptures we bring. Just say, well "your interpretation is wrong."

What makes our interpretaion wrong? Do you deny that Paul is speaking of baptism in Romans 6:3-4 or Colossians 2:11-13. Baptism is our circumcision. Not an outward circumcision, but inward, circumcision of the heart. And circumcision wasn't optional in the old covenant, and isn't optional in the New.

Baptism is the completion of repentace and our initiation into the New Covenant...................ok, it's late and I'll stop there. I'm tired too.

Perhaps someone will take up the offer to debate the topic.:thumbsup

That is unless I'm busy in a tithing debate, still waiting on someone to answer that open challenge:ursofunny

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 802182)

For at least a year I haven't even considered myself Pentecostal and I don't speak in tongues and I don't seek for it anymore.

Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4 (Post 802273)

wow......I don't know how you do it.......Perhaps you're all fine and dandy because Satan doesn't bother you anymore. After-all, why bother someone you've already conquered?