Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Deep Waters (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   True and uncompromising SEPARATION??? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=2668)

Carpenter 04-18-2007 10:49 PM

True and uncompromising SEPARATION???
 
I was reading today about how folks in the bible put on sackloth when they were of a repentant state or when they were mourning.

It occurred to me, why on earth wouldn't the A-church adopt a separation policy for ALL A-saints with regard to true separation to wear clothing made of sackloth? Instead we are allowed to wear worldly clothing like Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Versace, DK, etc.

At least you wouldn't have to worry about the homosexuals and whoremongers designing and making every aspect of the garments you are allowed to wear under the current rules...ooops, strike that...conditions of separation vis-a-vis the A-church definition of standards/holiness.

Like I said before, I invite someone to prove that I am wrong, folks in the church will and can never be as physically separated from the world as they purport to be or as separated as they would like...even Billy Price has that problem much to his chagrin...

Felicity 04-18-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpenter (Post 80663)
I was reading today about how folks in the bible put on sackloth when they were of a repentant state or when they were mourning.

It occurred to me, why on earth wouldn't the A-church adopt a separation policy for ALL A-saints with regard to true separation to wear clothing made of sackloth? Instead we are allowed to wear worldly clothing like Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Versace, DK, etc.

At least you wouldn't have to worry about the homosexuals and whoremongers designing and making every aspect of the garments you are allowed to wear under the current rules...ooops, strike that...conditions of separation vis-a-vis the A-church definition of standards/holiness.

Like I said before, I invite someone to prove that I am wrong, folks in the church will and can never be as physically separated from the world as they purport to be or as separated as they would like...even Billy Price has that problem much to his chagrin...

Carp .....

How separated in dress do you think the Jewish & Gentile Christians were from the unsaved crowd around them?

Carpenter 04-18-2007 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity (Post 80667)
Carp .....

How separated in dress do you think the Jewish & Gentile Christians were from the unsaved crowd around them?

Well, I do know that one of the more popular Jewish fellas had to be identified by a kiss...because of the social uniformity of appearance and all...

rgcraig 04-18-2007 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpenter (Post 80679)
Well, I do know that one of the more popular Jewish fellas had to be identified by a kiss...because of the social uniformity of appearance and all...

So, in three posts you made your point - :tiphat

Pressing-On 04-18-2007 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpenter (Post 80663)
I was reading today about how folks in the bible put on sackloth when they were of a repentant state or when they were mourning.

It occurred to me, why on earth wouldn't the A-church adopt a separation policy for ALL A-saints with regard to true separation to wear clothing made of sackloth? Instead we are allowed to wear worldly clothing like Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Versace, DK, etc.

At least you wouldn't have to worry about the homosexuals and whoremongers designing and making every aspect of the garments you are allowed to wear under the current rules...ooops, strike that...conditions of separation vis-a-vis the A-church definition of standards/holiness.

Like I said before, I invite someone to prove that I am wrong, folks in the church will and can never be as physically separated from the world as they purport to be or as separated as they would like...even Billy Price has that problem much to his chagrin...

You forgot South Pole. :toofunny :toofunny

rrford 04-19-2007 06:56 AM

Carp,

This one really isn't worth the time since it is fraught with a weak foundation. But enjoy the responses. They will probably be what you expected and wanted.

Jekyll 04-19-2007 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford (Post 80778)
Carp,

This one really isn't worth the time since it is fraught with a weak foundation. But enjoy the responses. They will probably be what you expected and wanted.

No comment :ignore

Ron 04-19-2007 07:04 AM

I don't wear name brand & if I had em they are second hand or were given to me.:winkgrin

Coonskinner 04-19-2007 07:07 AM

Carp is capable of coming up with some deep and intriguing thoughts, and has often rendered me amazed with some of his insights.

However, this hasn't beem ome of those times.

ROFL!

rrford 04-19-2007 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jekyll (Post 80783)
No comment :ignore

To me? Or to Carp?

freeatlast 04-19-2007 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron (Post 80787)
I don't wear name brand & if I had em they are second hand or were given to me.:winkgrin


Hmmmmm..so you wear only home made then?

Every peice of clothing is a "name brand" Tommy Hilfiger to Walmrt.

Ron 04-19-2007 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast (Post 80791)
Hmmmmm..so you wear only home made then?

Every peice of clothing is a "name brand" Tommy Hilfiger to Walmrt.

Hokay smartey pants!
The expensive ones then!:winkgrin

Steve Epley 04-19-2007 08:13 AM

I heard a preacher preaching against designer clothes I am sitting there thinking are there any clothes that a designer was not involved? JUst a thought?
Speaking of sackcloth I had a preacher friend his wife had cancer he put on sackcloth and filled a bath tub full of ashes and sought for her healing. It was quite touching.

crakjak 04-19-2007 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpenter (Post 80663)
I was reading today about how folks in the bible put on sackloth when they were of a repentant state or when they were mourning.

It occurred to me, why on earth wouldn't the A-church adopt a separation policy for ALL A-saints with regard to true separation to wear clothing made of sackloth? Instead we are allowed to wear worldly clothing like Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Versace, DK, etc.

At least you wouldn't have to worry about the homosexuals and whoremongers designing and making every aspect of the garments you are allowed to wear under the current rules...ooops, strike that...conditions of separation vis-a-vis the A-church definition of standards/holiness.

Like I said before, I invite someone to prove that I am wrong, folks in the church will and can never be as physically separated from the world as they purport to be or as separated as they would like...even Billy Price has that problem much to his chagrin...

If you want this type of separation, you can go to Heritage Homestead near Waco, TX and join this "apostolic" version of the Mennonites. Only they don't mind mingling with the "unwashed" for their money.:winkgrin

Carpenter 04-19-2007 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner (Post 80788)
Carp is capable of coming up with some deep and intriguing thoughts, and has often rendered me amazed with some of his insights.

However, this hasn't beem ome of those times.

ROFL!

I have given up deep thinking, it has cost me too much...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.