Originally Posted by n david (Post 836594)

Enough with threads on SP. Argh! I'm sick of seeing her name plastered on a bunch of threads in here. She's a quitter, not very intelligent in regards to policy, she has terrible family values, she's a media whore...ie does what she can to generate news (but complains about the media, go figure) and I would like to nothing else than for her to fade into oblivion.

Blast John McCain for picking her as VP and causing this mess!

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson (Post 836402)

not here.

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836597)

So instead of quitting you think she should have stayed and let the cost to Alaska drain them for all the frivolous lawsuits?

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836597)

Where exactly have you found her not intelligent in regards to policy?

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836597)

How can you say she has terrible family values? If you are referring to her daughter getting pregnant then I hate to bust your bubble but we have had many pastors daughters getting pregnant, and I'm sure they had good family values as well.

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836597)

As to calling her a media whore you are way out of line.

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836597)

She is the one that invigorated John McCain's ticket.

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY (Post 836634)

Let's parade all you SP hater's families in front of the media cameras and see how they look. Sarah is the most refreshing thing to hit the political scene since Ronald Reagan. As for me I miss George Bush more every day.

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY (Post 836634)

Let's parade all you SP hater's families in front of the media cameras and see how they look. Sarah is the most refreshing thing to hit the political scene since Ronald Reagan. As for me I miss George Bush more every day.

Originally Posted by n david (Post 836613)

If a lawsuit is deemed frivilous and tossed out, there is a way to recoup the court/lawyer fees. She will face heat in any office she holds, including (God forbit) as a VP or President.

Yes she will. But you forget who is behind the lawsuits. Not going to win frivious, even when it is. She was vindicated in all the suits, btw.

Have you watched her in an interview with anyone other than Hannity? Have you seen a speech. The only thing she's clear on is God Bless America, Libs are bad and BHO is a socialist. When it comes to the nit and grit of policy, she's as bad as BHO.

I have not seen her in any other interview. Yes I have seen her give a speech and she is great, refreshing.

It's not just her daughter getting pregnant. It's her allowing Levi to stay at their home. It's her flaunting and parading Levi and Bristol in front of the convention and cameras as though it's normal and okay. It's her running around the country and other places around the world giving speeches while having a special needs child and other children who she leaves at home.

I have not heard anything about Levi staying at their home. Although, I though Levi was her special need child. I agree with you on allowing him on the platform while not married to her daughter, but they were "engaged" at the time and I guess consider part of the family. I don't see any different her leaving her child with a childcare provider than any other woman that works outside of the home and leave their children with a childcare provider.

Here's a definition of whore for you: "compromise oneself for money or other gains." Pretty sure this nails it. SP puts herself out there, says things the media deem as controversial, and instead of addressing the issue once and letting it drop, she lives the definition ... she compromises herself (and family) for money (speeches) or other gains (book deal).

Again you are way out of line on this! That is how YOU preceive her. Some people happen to believe she believes in what she is doing. Some believe she wants to see change for America.

I'm not out of line, you just don't like and can't handle the truth.

Your wrong. I love truth and I can handle it. But what you spew out doesn't equate truth.

That may be true, but anything with a pulse would have invigorated LameMcCain's ticket.

Originally Posted by n david (Post 836613)

If a lawsuit is deemed frivilous and tossed out, there is a way to recoup the court/lawyer fees. She will face heat in any office she holds, including (God forbit) as a VP or President.


Have you watched her in an interview with anyone other than Hannity? Have you seen a speech. The only thing she's clear on is God Bless America, Libs are bad and BHO is a socialist. When it comes to the nit and grit of policy, she's as bad as BHO.


It's not just her daughter getting pregnant. It's her allowing Levi to stay at their home. It's her flaunting and parading Levi and Bristol in front of the convention and cameras as though it's normal and okay. It's her running around the country and other places around the world giving speeches while having a special needs child and other children who she leaves at home.


Here's a definition of whore for you: "compromise oneself for money or other gains." Pretty sure this nails it. SP puts herself out there, says things the media deem as controversial, and instead of addressing the issue once and letting it drop, she lives the definition ... she compromises herself (and family) for money (speeches) or other gains (book deal).

I'm not out of line, you just don't like and can't handle the truth.


That may be true, but anything with a pulse would have invigorated LameMcCain's ticket.

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 836690)

I have not heard anything about Levi staying at their home. Although, I though Levi was her special need child. I agree with you on allowing him on the platform while not married to her daughter, but they were "engaged" at the time and I guess consider part of the family. I don't see any different her leaving her child with a childcare provider than any other woman that works outside of the home and leave their children with a childcare provider.

Originally Posted by ChTatum (Post 836740)

"pawning Trig off on the husband"?

I'm sure he had nothing to do with getting the child here.

Originally Posted by ChTatum (Post 836740)

"pawning Trig off on the husband"?

I'm sure he had nothing to do with getting the child here.