Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   The D.A.'s Office (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65)
-   -   ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine *** (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=29110)

DAII 03-09-2010 04:49 PM

***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine ***
 
In foreign affairs, Presidents have announced their policy in dealing with foreign nations very early in their administrations. Monroe had the Monroe Doctrine. Theodore Roosevelt had his Big Stick Policy. And after 9/11 George W. governed by what is known as the Bush Doctrine.

In dealing with the growing numbers of ministers that are not lockstep with "Apostolic Identity" ... DKB, since his tenure as DS in STX, has implemented what I term the "Bernard Doctrine" to deal with the wayward.

When dealing with wayward ministers, it plays out like this:

1. Point to policy, the Bible and the AOF
2. Politely show the door to those who don't line up by saying if you don't agree you should withdraw or leave.
3. State "We will not be able to use you, if you don't comply fully"
4. If you need clarity, we'll teach you.
5. Repeat.

For a prima facie example of how DKB words this .... examine his last update in September 2009 to the STX district, here:

Quote:

Apostolic Identity. We are thankful for the tremendous revival and growth that we are experiencing. At the same time, we must acknowledge that a few ministers have begun to question some of our Apostolic distinctives, particularly some aspects of holiness in outward appearance and possibly some aspects of the doctrine of salvation. The District Board unanimously and firmly believes that we must maintain our Apostolic identity on these biblical doctrines of the new birth and holiness, while continuing to press for revival and growth. As a District Board, we take seriously our responsibility to ensure that all our ministers adhere to these scriptural teachings. The District Board has adopted a plan of action and has asked me as district superintendent to follow up on these matters. We understand that the local church is self-governing, that the pastor has authority and responsibility to lead the local church, and that there is room for diversity of opinion and application in many areas. We also understand the need for wisdom, patience, and tolerance in both evangelism and discipleship, proclaiming the life of faith and not legalism. However, we expect that those who are used in public leadership, such as preaching, teaching, and leading in worship, will reflect the values of the New Testament church as understood and proclaimed by the UPCI. If some ministers are seeking direction on these issues, we are available for personal discussion and guidance, and we will provide tools and forums for further study. We don’t want anyone to leave our fellowship, but if some have made a definite decision that they do not believe and will not implement these teachings, then they are no longer in harmony with the UPCI, and the most consistent decision is for them to withdraw.
There is considerable chatter among the fellowship's ministerial ranks that DKB has given the greenlight to other District Superintendents to follow suit.

The following is a letter from one DS, recently sent out to constituents, that follows the Bernard Doctrine template:

Quote:

Christian Greetings:

1. The UPCI stands for certain biblical principles regarding the outward appearance, such as modesty, women having long hair, distinction between male and female in dress and not wearing ornamental jewelry or makeup. We believe these are scriptural teachings and apostolic doctrine; thus we cannot abandon them. With regard to UPCI governance, the Articles of Faith specifically address women cutting their hair, makeup and immodest dress. It is our district’s responsibility to uphold this teaching as a matter of integrity and consistency. We are not dealing with cultural issues that are not specifically addressed in the Bible or the Articles of Faith, such as men’s facial hair, wearing of suits, or music styles (although some things like this can become indicators of where a church is heading).

2. We affirm that the local church is self-governing and that the pastor has authority and responsibility to deal with these issues as he is led of God. We understand the need for wisdom in this area regarding both evangelism and discipleship. However, we expect that those used in public leadership, such as preaching, teaching and leading in worship, will reflect the values of the UPCI.

3. If you are seeking direction on these issues, there is plenty of time and space for consideration. We don’t want to push anyone away. For instance, if you agree with principles of modesty, distinction and avoiding ornamentation, but you are prayerfully considering how to implement them and where to draw the line, we understand and we want to help in whatever way we can. We can provide study materials, personal theological discussions, and advice from experienced elder how to face contemporary challenged. A church can effectively evangelize its community and have great revival and growth while still upholding these teachings.

4. If, however, you have made a definite decision that these issues are not important and that you never plan to implement them, then you are not longer in harmony with the UPCI. We don’t want to lose you, and we think it would be a mistake for you to leave the teaching and fellowship of the UPCI, but if you have already made this theological decision and are not open for reconsideration, then the most consistent decision would be for you to withdraw from the UPCI.

This letter comes to you after much prayer and discussion by your District Board. It is strongly endorsed by all with a concern that we the XXXXX District continue to walk in the spirit of Jude vs. 3: “Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.”

Your friend,
While some cons are forming party crazed conga lines thinking that this means the battle over "holiness" has been won ... few have been able to read in between the lines.

The Bernard Doctrine is a cordial invitation to leave, not a directive to leave.

If it was, guys like Rex Johnson (STX) would have been shown the door and kicked out years ago.

What usually happens in these cases, is that the wayward pastor is called in ... grilled but never is charged or put on trial. Nine times out ten, the ordeal/inquistion usually results in a pastor turning in his license even if he may not have "left holiness".

What will be noteworthy and interesting is how some overzealous DS will step beyond the bounds of the Bernard Doctrine.

I'd like to know why this other district DS has not called the TV and Hollywood film watchers to the carpet? Or where he thinks the AOF Holiness article deals with gender distinction?

deltaguitar 03-09-2010 04:51 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Is this the beginning of the end?

freeatlast 03-09-2010 04:57 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a letter that is supposed to be being received in an un named district.

ManOfWord 03-09-2010 05:05 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
This is so sad...so really sad. This is a much more far right "swing" with the bat than the AS ever was! My question is how much further "right" do they think they need to swing? Obviously, not much room for tolerance here. Also, the only way they can really get someone to leave is to bring charges. That is not an easy process and there are NO winners when that happens.

This is a shot across the bow and flexing of the "holiness" muscle that I predict will backfire like a Three Stooges exploding cigar. Someone needs to photoshop a pic of DB to depict that!

I fully understand that the Supt. needs to lead in the direction he thinks the ship should go.......but I can't state it enough times how glad I'm not a part of this Org any longer. SOMEDAY they may even try to reach the lost as zealously as clinging to an "Apostolic Distinctive!" But I'm not holding my breath! :D

pelathais 03-09-2010 05:05 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Still no word about Jesus Christ and Calvary.

1 Corinthians 2:2

They can't be real Apostolics if they refuse to preach what the apostles preached.

ManOfWord 03-09-2010 05:12 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 885169)
Still no word about Jesus Christ and Calvary.

1 Corinthians 2:2

They can't be real Apostolics if they refuse to preach what the apostles preached.

That's "Christianity Without the Cross" for ya! Case in point! :D

Charnock 03-09-2010 05:20 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
DAII, where did you get those letters?

Sam 03-09-2010 05:26 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
I notice he spoke about "ornamental jewelry." Some say "functional jewelry" such as watches, wedding rings, etc are OK but "ornamental jewelry is not."

I notice he says that "...We are not dealing with cultural issues that are not specifically addressed in the Bible or the Articles of Faith, such as men’s facial hair, ... Thus, he can be interpreted as saying facial hair is cultural and not a salvation issue.

rgcraig 03-09-2010 05:30 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Seems this is making the way narrower.....that's Biblical, isn't it?

"a few ministers have begun to question some of our Apostolic distinctives" - - - the wording here just boggles my mind.

rgcraig 03-09-2010 05:31 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
While they are composing letters to be sent out to the Districts - - why don't they include something about the "power in the hair" issue.

DAII 03-09-2010 05:33 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
The first Bernard blurb I got from the STX site.

The second letter, from my understanding, was originally digitized and made web available by Pastor Doug White, Texas and owner of the former JP ... now the APF.

Thanks Dougy for your tireless efforts to inform the constituency!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock (Post 885175)
DAII, where did you get those letters?


DAII 03-09-2010 05:53 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast (Post 885165)
Here's a letter that is supposed to be being received in an un named district.

The letter which I painstakingly transcribed ... is reportedly from east of the Mississippi.

My money is on Maryland?

Sounds like it would come from Wright ... but just an "educated" guess.

DAII 03-09-2010 05:57 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Here's the deal-pickle ... the Bernard Doctrine amounts to all bark, no bite.

Posturing with parsing words but no BOOM-BOOM POW paddle.

Although troubling and potentially threatening.

If you want to stay ... no one is going to force you out.

The Detroit crowd knows this ... and I think guys like Tenney and Johnson have been able to exemplify this to the "emergents" in the movement.

The guys that stay because of family and networking reasons ... don't care if they are not "used" and prefer to stay under the radar ... although receiving such a letter
makes them squirm and swallow hard.

Unless, some wayward DS and board gets overly aggressive ... this is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING and more of the status quo.

It amounts to a gun-less English bobby firmly stating: "Stop! Or I will say 'Stop' again."

NotforSale 03-09-2010 06:09 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ManOfWord (Post 885168)
This is so sad...so really sad. This is a much more far right "swing" with the bat than the AS ever was! My question is how much further "right" do they think they need to swing? Obviously, not much room for tolerance here. Also, the only way they can really get someone to leave is to bring charges. That is not an easy process and there are NO winners when that happens.

This is a shot across the bow and flexing of the "holiness" muscle that I predict will backfire like a Three Stooges exploding cigar. Someone needs to photoshop a pic of DB to depict that!

I fully understand that the Supt. needs to lead in the direction he thinks the ship should go.......but I can't state it enough times how glad I'm not a part of this Org any longer. SOMEDAY they may even try to reach the lost as zealously as clinging to an "Apostolic Distinctive!" But I'm not holding my breath! :D

Amen

Justin 03-09-2010 06:23 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast (Post 885165)
Here's a letter that is supposed to be being received in an un named district.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII (Post 885189)
The letter which I painstakingly transcribed ... is reportedly from east of the Mississippi.

My money is on Maryland?

Sounds like it would come from Wright ... but just an "educated" guess.

Possibly, looking at the size of the font in the letter, and the size of the censor bar, one could amass that this is from Maryland.

U376977 03-09-2010 06:24 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII (Post 885190)
Here's the deal-pickle ... the Bernard Doctrine amounts to all bark, no bite.

Posturing with parsing words but no BOOM-BOOM POW paddle.

Although troubling and potentially threatening.

If you want to stay ... no one is going to force you out.
The Detroit crowd knows this ... and I think guys like Tenney and Johnson have been able to exemplify this to the "emergents" in the movement.

The guys that stay because of family and networking reasons ... don't care if they are not "used" and prefer to stay under the radar ... although receiving such a letter
makes them squirm and swallow hard.

Unless, some wayward DS and board gets overly aggressive ... this is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING and more of the status quo.

It amounts to a gun-less English bobby firmly stating: "Stop! Or I will say 'Stop' again."

.....however, though we won't force you out you will feel the ever shrinking noose of legalism around your neck.

MissBrattified 03-09-2010 06:31 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII (Post 885190)
Here's the deal-pickle ...

Aw...I'm so disappointed. I thought my husband was the one who made that up. :( (Here's the deal, Pickle.)

Michael The Disciple 03-09-2010 06:34 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
If they are not going to attack over beards I see this as a shift to the left.

DAII 03-09-2010 06:38 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Nah! My wife says that to me every time she is going to lay down the law!
Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 885204)
Aw...I'm so disappointed. I thought my husband was the one who made that up. :( (Here's the deal, Pickle.)


MissBrattified 03-09-2010 06:42 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII (Post 885210)
Nah! My wife says that to me every time she is going to lay down the law!

Haha! That's great. :toofunny

Baron1710 03-09-2010 07:26 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
"1. The UPCI stands for certain biblical principles regarding the outward appearance, such as modesty, women having long hair, distinction between male and female in dress and not wearing ornamental jewelry or makeup. We believe these are scriptural teachings and apostolic doctrine; thus we cannot abandon them. With regard to UPCI governance, the Articles of Faith specifically address women cutting their hair, makeup and immodest dress. It is our district’s responsibility to uphold this teaching as a matter of integrity and consistency. We are not dealing with cultural issues that are not specifically addressed in the Bible or the Articles of Faith, such as men’s facial hair, wearing of suits, or music styles (although some things like this can become indicators of where a church is heading)."

So if you have facial hair and don't wear a suit or play the wrong kind of music it is an indication of which way your headed?

freeatlast 03-09-2010 07:44 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII (Post 885189)
The letter which I painstakingly transcribed ... is reportedly from east of the Mississippi.

My money is on Maryland?

Sounds like it would come from Wright ... but just an "educated" guess.

You did good DA. I wish Icould type like you ;-) I just copy and paste.

It's gonna be an interesting ride in the old UPC gospel ship the next couple of years.

She seems to be taking on water and listing hard to starboard.

notofworks 03-09-2010 08:02 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast (Post 885165)
Here's a letter that is supposed to be being received in an un named district.


How remarkably, incredibly sad. I'd make some big speech, but it's all just very sad.

Tina 03-09-2010 08:44 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks (Post 885227)
How remarkably, incredibly sad. I'd make some big speech, but it's all just very sad.

I think this may be the first time ever.... but I completely agree with you. :D

It is SAD. No speech necessary. Pretty self explanatory, huh?!

mizpeh 03-09-2010 08:49 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by deltaguitar (Post 885162)
Is this the beginning of the end?

Don't you wish! :beatdeadhorse

notofworks 03-09-2010 08:55 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tina (Post 885231)
I think this may be the first time ever.... but I completely agree with you. :D

It is SAD. No speech necessary. Pretty self explanatory, huh?!

Actually, in the old days, you used to agree with me a lot! :) You were actually the first Admin I'd go to for help. But alas, things have changed. However, we do momentarily agree just like the old days.

It's truly sad. :(

freeatlast 03-09-2010 09:01 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks (Post 885227)
How remarkably, incredibly sad. I'd make some big speech, but it's all just very sad.


Enough sad ;-(

notofworks 03-09-2010 09:14 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast (Post 885239)
Enough sad ;-(

:lol How are things in your neck of the woods?

harleypreacher 03-10-2010 08:13 AM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
If the letter indeed comes from the Maryland District, it's worthy to note that the part of the UPCI manual dealing with holiness and organized sports was not addressed, could it be that the District Superintendent loves football and has pictures of him and his family attending a Navy college football game on His FaceBook.

rgcraig 03-10-2010 10:06 AM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
The inconsistencies are what makes it all look so silly.

Pressing-On 03-10-2010 10:16 AM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Apostolic Identity. We are thankful for the tremendous revival and growth that we are experiencing. At the same time, we must acknowledge that a few ministers have begun to question some of our Apostolic distinctives, particularly some aspects of holiness in outward appearance and possibly some aspects of the doctrine of salvation. The District Board unanimously and firmly believes that we must maintain our Apostolic identity on these biblical doctrines of the new birth and holiness, while continuing to press for revival and growth. As a District Board, we take seriously our responsibility to ensure that all our ministers adhere to these scriptural teachings. The District Board has adopted a plan of action and has asked me as district superintendent to follow up on these matters. We understand that the local church is self-governing, that the pastor has authority and responsibility to lead the local church, and that there is room for diversity of opinion and application in many areas. We also understand the need for wisdom, patience, and tolerance in both evangelism and discipleship, proclaiming the life of faith and not legalism. However, we expect that those who are used in public leadership, such as preaching, teaching, and leading in worship, will reflect the values of the New Testament church as understood and proclaimed by the UPCI. If some ministers are seeking direction on these issues, we are available for personal discussion and guidance, and we will provide tools and forums for further study. We don’t want anyone to leave our fellowship, but if some have made a definite decision that they do not believe and will not implement these teachings, then they are no longer in harmony with the UPCI, and the most consistent decision is for them to withdraw.
Daniel,
I don't have a problem with this. If the majority of any group feel strongly about how they view any passage of scripture, or what they deem the Bible is demanding, they will form an organization in support of that view.

Even if we do not agree on every area, they have a right to separate themselves. Others who have left have, in essence, done the same thing - separated themselves to their view of what they believe the Bible is demanding/teaching. There is no difference, IMO.

In DKB's position paper, The Bible’s Teaching about Hair Length:
Culture or Command?
, you get a feel of where he is coming from. Gender distinction and modesty is important to him. Gender Distinction is very important to him. If others agree with that, they will join up. If some do not, they will leave. We need to follow whatever direction we feel led of God.

Philippians 1:18 "What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice."


Quote:

Conservative scholar Robert Gundry: “Paul’s instructions on the head-covering of women are traditionally understood in terms of veiling (though not with the kind of veil that covers the face as well as the head). On the other hand, he never uses the specific Greek word for a veil; and he says that a woman’s long hair is given her for a covering. In either case his concern is to maintain a visible distinction between women and men with respect to long and short hair.”6

Social scientists Bruce Malina and Jerome Neyrey: “It is impossible to overestimate the importance of honor and shame in the socialization of males and females in the ancient Mediterranean world…. To know the gender of someone was already to know a whole set of norms to which they must conform if they were to be honorable in that society. Such expectations formed clear cultural norms about what clothes (Deut. 22:5), hairdos (1 Cor. 11:4-14), and sexual partners (Rom. 1:26-27) are appropriate to males and females.”7

Liberal critic Bart Ehrman: [B]“Paul maintained that there was still to be a difference between men and women in this world.To eradicate that difference, in Paul’s view, was unnatural and wrong…. It is quite clear from Paul’s arguments that women could and did participate openly in the church alongside men—but they were to do so as women, not as men.”8

Feminist Edith Castelli: “Paul is quite concerned with the careful maintenance of gender differences in appearance (justified in part by the … argument that ‘nature’ affirms the conventional practice of men wearing their hair short and women wearing their hair long) not simply because he thinks it is a good idea, but because he thinks that the created order demands it…. Like 1 Cor 11:2-16, Rom 1:18-32 interweaves its indictment of a particular human practice [homosexuality] with theological propositions. Both texts argue that the human behavior in question—whether it be abandoning conventionally gender-linked appearance and dress (in general or in certain contexts) or engaging in certain apparently non-normative sexual practices—is a violation of a worldly order that is grounded in a cosmically, divinely willed order. Gender differences, according to these texts, are not the mere fruits of social conventions, but are God given and divinely warranted.”9

6Robert Gundry, A Survey of the New Testament, 3d ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 365.

7Bruce Malina and Robert Neyrey, Portraits of Paul: An Archaeology of Ancient Personality (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox, 1996), 182.

8Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 2d ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 368.

9Edith Castelli, “Paul on Women and Gender,” in Women & Christian Origins, ed. Ross Shepard Kraemer and Mary Rose D’Angelo (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 228-29.

Justin 03-10-2010 10:41 AM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 885456)


Daniel,
I don't have a problem with this. If the majority of any group feel strongly about how they view any passage of scripture, or what they deem the Bible is demanding, they will form an organization in support of that view.

Even if we do not agree on every area, they have a right to separate themselves. Others who have left have, in essence, done the same thing - separated themselves to their view of what they believe the Bible is demanding/teaching. There is no difference, IMO.

In DKB's position paper, The Bible’s Teaching about Hair Length:
Culture or Command?
, you get a feel of where he is coming from. Gender distinction and modesty is important to him. Gender Distinction is very important to him. If others agree with that, they will join up. If some do not, they will leave. We need to follow whatever direction we feel led of God.

Philippians 1:18 "What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice."

Does Bernard teach that the "covering" which is mentioned three times in 1 Cor 11 is hair, or an actual veil?

Pressing-On 03-10-2010 10:54 AM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin (Post 885464)
Does Bernard teach that the "covering" which is mentioned three times in 1 Cor 11 is hair, or an actual veil?

He believes it is the hair. I agree with him.

Quote:

According to verse 15, long hair is the symbolic covering that God has given her.

Verse 15. A woman’s hair is given for her glory and for a covering to satisfy the requirements of the preceding verses.

Salvation is not based on hair length but on a continuing relationship of faith in Jesus Christ. “The just shall live by faith” (Romans 1:17). In this saving relationship, we will grow in grace and knowledge (II Peter 3:18), grace will teach us how to live righteously (Titus 2:11-12), and we will partake of and pursue God’s holiness (Hebrews 12:10, 14). If we deliberately and persistently disobey God’s commands, our actions call into question the reality of our relationship of faith in God. Obedience indicates faith, while disobedience indicates lack of faith. (See Romans 1:5; 10:16-17; Hebrews 11:7-8.)

Jermyn Davidson 03-10-2010 01:14 PM

Re: Districts begin to enforce the Bernard Doctrin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 885235)
Don't you wish! :beatdeadhorse

LOL!!!

NotforSale 03-10-2010 01:49 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Was thinking about all of this. Why is the attack always towards those who question motive and reason that might bend in the direction of removing a standard implemented by "The Church", leaving alone the extreme Right, where mental and spiritual abuse is prominent?

I know Pastors who "Look the Part" to a tee, but forbid ANY divorce. In fact, if you divorce you will be asked to leave. Some even feel if you've remarried, you must divorce your current spouse and go back to the other. If you do wind up alone, you may NEVER remarry, even if the other party goes off and marries and starts another family. This Pastor even preaches, if you were in the World and got married and divorced, you still can't remarry after becomming a Christian.

My daughter went to a youth event years ago in one UPCI Church, and the young people were forbidden to ride a roller coaster that was at the Mall. They also celebrate no Christmas, no internet, no slits, no video cameras, sleeves to the wrist, men can't wear colored shirts to church, no mustaches or facial hair, no gold bands on watches, and the list goes on.

My daughter said the girls in the Church were scared to death to get married. Fear was in every move they made.

Why don't they target men like this?? The Dictators and Demanders?? I don't get it.

*AQuietPlace* 03-10-2010 01:57 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NotforSale (Post 885532)
Was thinking about all of this. Why is the attack always towards those who question motive and reason that might bend in the direction of removing a standard implemented by "The Church", leaving alone the extreme Right, where mental and spiritual abuse is prominent?

I know Pastors who "Look the Part" to a tee, but forbid ANY divorce. In fact, if you divorce you will be asked to leave. Some even feel if you've remarried, you must divorce your current spouse and go back to the other. If you do wind up alone, you may NEVER remarry, even if the other party goes off and marries and starts another family. This Pastor even preaches, if you were in the World and got married and divorced, you still can't remarry after becomming a Christian.

My daughter went to a youth event years ago in one UPCI Church, and the young people were forbidden to ride a roller coaster that was at the Mall. They also celebrate no Christmas, no internet, no slits, no video cameras, sleeves to the wrist, men can't wear colored shirts to church, no mustaches or facial hair, no gold bands on watches, and the list goes on.

My daughter said the girls in the Church were scared to death to get married. Fear was in every move they made.

Why don't they target men like this?? The Dictators and Demanders?? I don't get it.

That's an interesting question.

dizzyde 03-10-2010 02:08 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* (Post 885536)
That's an interesting question.

I've had problems with the licensing process for a long time. It is more than a little scary to me how these young men are given a ministerial license with very little training or education, and then sent off with very little follow up.

a lot of times these guys go off to small towns and pastor churches with no one really overseeing what is going on. Granted, there are presbyters to step in when there are problems or complaints, but most of the time they are pastoring largely uneducated (Biblically or otherwise) congregations, who really don't know what the proper boundaries should be.

It sets up a situation that is ripe for ministerial abuse, and I have seen it happen many times, some times in relatively harmless ways, and others that are definitely more harmful.

notofworks 03-10-2010 02:10 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde (Post 885543)
I've had problems with the licensing process for a long time. It is more than a little scary to me how these young men are given a ministerial license with very little training or education, and then sent off with very little follow up.

a lot of times these guys go off to small towns and pastor churches with no one really overseeing what is going on. Granted, there are presbyters to step in when there are problems or complaints, but most of the time they are pastoring largely uneducated (Biblically or otherwise) congregations, who really don't know what the proper boundaries should be.

It sets up a situation that is ripe for ministerial abuse, and I have seen it happen many times, some times in relatively harmless ways, and others that are definitely more harmful.


I might think that a larger issue would be the licensing of someone who does have training, is sent off to pastor a church, and despite the training is still a complete idiot.

KWSS1976 03-10-2010 02:17 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Yea we have one in our church just got his licence...He was speaking in tongues while he had his hand on someones head I guess praying for them. I guess he has not read the insturction in Coritihians on how tongues is supposed to be used....

notofworks 03-10-2010 02:37 PM

Re: ***Districts begin to enforce Bernard Doctrine
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KWSS1976 (Post 885549)
Yea we have one in our church just got his licence...He was speaking in tongues while he had his hand on someones head I guess praying for them. I guess he has not read the insturction in Coritihians on how tongues is supposed to be used....

:ursofunnyI love it when you start this!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.