Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Hate Of Reformed Theology (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=33378)

UnTraditional 01-27-2011 03:27 AM

Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Why do some Apostolics have such an extreme hatred for Reformed Theology? I read where one member of this forum used the term Reformed as almost a slander? Cannot an Apostolic be one God and still hold to the beliefs of Reformed Theology without being cast out?

Socialite 01-27-2011 10:34 AM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UnTraditional (Post 1019138)
Why do some Apostolics have such an extreme hatred for Reformed Theology? I read where one member of this forum used the term Reformed as almost a slander? Cannot an Apostolic be one God and still hold to the beliefs of Reformed Theology without being cast out?

Because RCC and Apostolica have much more in common.

mizpeh 01-27-2011 10:37 AM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Reformed theology especially that of Calvinists makes God out to be hateful and unjust. It's totally contrary to God's character.

Socialite 01-27-2011 10:39 AM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 1019265)
Reformed theology especially that of Calvinists makes God out to be hateful and unjust. It's totally contrary to God's character.

Seriously, Mizpeh? Shocking statement.

The portrayal they have of God (reformed) is that of a loving, gracious pursuer who loves us when we don't deserve it. Hateful?

Perhaps our own hatred and idol worship and over-emphasis of free will has been projected here?

mizpeh 01-27-2011 10:42 AM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019267)
Seriously, Mizpeh? Shocking statement.

The portrayal they have of God (reformed) is that of a loving, gracious pursuer who loves us when we don't deserve it. Hateful?

Their portrayal of God as a loving, gracious pursuer toward the underserving is only for a few not for all.

A God who arbitrarily chooses people to go to hell based on a whim? What kind of love is that? Not the kind we find in 1 Cor 13. What kind of justice is that? If it's unjust by our standards then it must be wrong since God's standards of justice are much higher and purer than ours.

crakjak 01-27-2011 11:05 AM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 1019273)
Their portrayal of God as a loving, gracious pursuer toward the underserving is only for a few not for all.

A God who arbitrarily chooses people to go to hell based on a whim? What kind of love is that? Not the kind we find in 1 Cor 13. What kind of justice is that? If it's unjust by our standards then it must be wrong since God's standards of justice are much higher and purer than ours.

AMEN. Calvin may have lived in a difficult time, yet he condoned murder, even encouraged it. If you believe God "hates" sinners, as REFORMED teaches, why not join him in murdering them sooner rather than later? Burn 'em at the stake, since they are to burn anyway?

God has not created billions of His image, as fuel for a torture chamber or for kindling, expand REFORMED to cover all of those that Jesus came to save, then we have starting point.

LUKE2447 01-27-2011 12:03 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 1019265)
Reformed theology especially that of Calvinists makes God out to be hateful and unjust. It's totally contrary to God's character.

:thumbsup

mfblume 01-27-2011 12:09 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
I cannot see how reformed thoughts of Calvinism make God out to be loving when they claim He ordained that some people will go to hell and not be able to go to glory, thereby disallowing their own decision and choice due to predestination.

pelathais 01-27-2011 03:15 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1019327)
I cannot see how reformed thoughts of Calvinism make God out to be loving when they claim He ordained that some people will go to hell and not be able to go to glory, thereby disallowing their own decision and choice due to predestination.

The Reformed tradition does have its advocates who seem to take the whole Predestination thing too far. Since we are dealing with a fundamental paradox here, we need to approach the issue with a sense of balance.

For me, the thing that most OPs seem to "hate" about Reformed theology seems to be the issue that God is Sovereign. God chooses His saints, not your dress code check lists. That puts a lot of OP pastors out of work.

Jermyn Davidson 01-27-2011 03:18 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 1019417)
The Reformed tradition does have its advocates who seem to take the whole Predestination thing too far. Since we are dealing with a fundamental paradox here, we need to approach the issue with a sense of balance.

For me, the thing that most OPs seem to "hate" about Reformed theology seems to be the issue that God is Sovereign. God chooses His saints, not your dress code check lists. That puts a lot of OP pastors out of work.

The Sovereignty of God is a testimony to the Grace of God!

My friends whom the Lord has used in helping me to overcome the most were people who attend churches with a strong emphasis on "Reformed Theology."


If not for the Grace of God, I don't know where I'd be. Definitely not saved and that is for sure!

Socialite 01-27-2011 04:15 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 1019417)
The Reformed tradition does have its advocates who seem to take the whole Predestination thing too far. Since we are dealing with a fundamental paradox here, we need to approach the issue with a sense of balance.

For me, the thing that most OPs seem to "hate" about Reformed theology seems to be the issue that God is Sovereign. God chooses His saints, not your dress code check lists. That puts a lot of OP pastors out of work.

:thumbsup

Socialite 01-27-2011 04:16 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1019292)
AMEN. Calvin may have lived in a difficult time, yet he condoned murder, even encouraged it. If you believe God "hates" sinners, as REFORMED teaches, why not join him in murdering them sooner rather than later? Burn 'em at the stake, since they are to burn anyway?

God has not created billions of His image, as fuel for a torture chamber or for kindling, expand REFORMED to cover all of those that Jesus came to save, then we have starting point.

Oh please. When people say "Calvinism" they aren't staking their record for Calvin's. It represents ideas that expand even beyond John Calvin.

There are ugly skeletons in all theological movements. Study up on your Church History -- including Modern Pentecostalism.

Socialite 01-27-2011 04:19 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 1019273)
Their portrayal of God as a loving, gracious pursuer toward the underserving is only for a few not for all.

A God who arbitrarily chooses people to go to hell based on a whim? What kind of love is that? Not the kind we find in 1 Cor 13. What kind of justice is that? If it's unjust by our standards then it must be wrong since God's standards of justice are much higher and purer than ours.

I get the portrayal of God as a loving, gracious pursuer from the Story.

How do I reconcile that "he shows mercy on whom He will show mercy?" I can't pretend to understand God's sense of justice. Nor do I fully prescribe to the length of five-point TULIP Calvinists. I lean more on their understanding of God's sovereignty though -- and that does seem cruel or mean. And who am I to judge God's ways anyway?

I did recently listen to an incredible sermon ("Is God In Control?") by Tim Keller that took probably what was theologically Calvinism, but preached it on a faith/heart level into a message that broke through my heart and gave me great peace.

As far as this statement:
If it's unjust by our standards then it must be wrong since God's

Really think about what you're saying. Do you really believe that? Because we find something unjust, God must find it MORE unjust? That's not even a logical statement, let alone one considered by a God with divine prerogative.

pelathais 01-27-2011 05:52 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019463)
Oh please. When people say "Calvinism" they aren't staking their record for Calvin's. It represents ideas that expand even beyond John Calvin.

There are ugly skeletons in all theological movements. Study up on your Church History -- including Modern Pentecostalism.

It's often been said that what Luther and Calvin did was to "return the Church to Augustine..."

Most of the debates surrounding Reformed Theology - both in the 16th Century and the 21st Century - can also be found in Augustine's debates with Pelagius.

It all really comes down to that age old debate between Free Will and Determinism. Even the pre-Christian pagan philosophers of Greece and Rome disputed these points.

Socialite 01-27-2011 06:02 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 1019517)
It's often been said that what Luther and Calvin did was to "return the Church to Augustine..."

Most of the debates surrounding Reformed Theology - both in the 16th Century and the 21st Century - can also be found in Augustine's debates with Pelagius.

It all really comes down to that age old debate between Free Will and Determinism. Even the pre-Christian pagan philosophers of Greece and Rome disputed these points.

Pel, I too struggle with the more 'orthodox' view of Calvinism (TULIP), at least on all points. But I look back and realize we've done just what Calvin predicted, which is point the issue of salvation back on us, and the story less about God and more about us.

The issue of free-will and predestination is an interesting one to me, and one easy to dismiss. But after taking a few history, humanities and philosophy courses -- it became apparent to me that what sends us to shivers in the 21st Century West, was not that shocking of a message to the rest of the world for the majority of time. The issue of election, for example, would not have bothered the far majority of antiquity. The form of free-will we have today is sort of nuanced, reflective of humanism, capitalism, selfishness even. The more I thought about this, the more I realized my immediate shirking away from the idea of God "working all things for my good" may be a contemporary sensibility instead of heresy.

mfblume 01-27-2011 06:04 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 1019417)
The Reformed tradition does have its advocates who seem to take the whole Predestination thing too far. Since we are dealing with a fundamental paradox here, we need to approach the issue with a sense of balance.

For me, the thing that most OPs seem to "hate" about Reformed theology seems to be the issue that God is Sovereign. God chooses His saints, not your dress code check lists. That puts a lot of OP pastors out of work.

As much as I detest legalistic dictatorship, saying God simply ordains some for hell is just as wrong, if not beyond that, to me. I never said I hate reformed theology, either. lol.

Socialite 01-27-2011 06:08 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1019521)
As much as I detest legalistic dictatorship, saying God simply ordains some for hell is just as wrong, if not beyond that, to me. I never said I hate reformed theology, either. lol.

Blume, not all who "buy into" the Sovereignty of God understand the "double predestination" idea of God damning people to hell. But if it were true, nor do I feel in a place to judge the Almighty. Who am I?

I too have a philosophical discomfort with the notion that God would select some for hell. But I take great comfort in that he elected me, he called to me, he showed grace to me.

I'd flirt more with "New Calvinism" but even then, not really caring about fitting either label. I've learned much from my Calvinist brothers in the last year. Much. They've taught me a great deal about our gracious father. The idea of a mean tyrant is ironic, because it's a sharp contrast to how I saw God before. His work and act is that much more gracious.

Acoustic 01-27-2011 07:57 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1019521)
As much as I detest legalistic dictatorship, saying God simply ordains some for hell is just as wrong, if not beyond that, to me. I never said I hate reformed theology, either. lol.

That God "ordains" some to Hell is a common misunderstanding of Reformed/Calvinist theology. God does not need to ordain any go to Hell as we are all already going to Hell.

It also does not say that God "arbitrarily" picks some to save. Anyone can see from a basic reading of God's Word that he is not arbitrary in any way.

I don't expect anyone who is not Reformed to become Reformed as it is really offense to our western way of thinking - to say that we have no choice in our salvation tears at everything we believe.

This was my reaction and the reaction of my wife and is the reaction of my non-reformed friends, yet after several years of fighting it I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ.

I better stop now or I will keep on going.

SDG

UnTraditional 01-27-2011 08:10 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Great discussion. Thanks to all who are taking part. Please keep it coming.

mizpeh 01-27-2011 08:41 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019465)
I get the portrayal of God as a loving, gracious pursuer from the Story.

God is not a respecter of persons. So then why would he chose one over the other to save?

Quote:

How do I reconcile that "he shows mercy on whom He will show mercy?" I can't pretend to understand God's sense of justice. Nor do I fully prescribe to the length of five-point TULIP Calvinists. I lean more on their understanding of God's sovereignty though -- and that does seem cruel or mean. And who am I to judge God's ways anyway?
I believe that God is sovereign. I believe in predestination according to foreknowledge.

God gave us a conscience to know the difference between good and evil. We understand when something is not right. We can judge whether a doctrine portrays God the way He portrays himself in his word.


Quote:

I did recently listen to an incredible sermon ("Is God In Control?") by Tim Keller that took probably what was theologically Calvinism, but preached it on a faith/heart level into a message that broke through my heart and gave me great peace.
I've been blessed by some things that Piper has preached but that doesn't really justify TULIP. I firmly believe that God is in control. But I also believe that he allows us to choose to obey him or disobey him. I don't find this to be in conflict whatsoever.

Quote:

As far as this statement:
If it's unjust by our standards then it must be wrong since God's standards of justice are much higher and purer than ours.
,
Really think about what you're saying. Do you really believe that? Because we find something unjust, God must find it MORE unjust? That's not even a logical statement, let alone one considered by a God with divine prerogative.
All of God's prerogatives are dictated by his nature. He cannot go against his own nature. He is just, therefore he cannot be unjust. What I meant by the if something is unjust by our standard, then it must be wrong to God as well since he set the standards of right and wrong and placed that knowledge within us.

pelathais 01-27-2011 08:43 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoustic (Post 1019580)
That God "ordains" some to Hell is a common misunderstanding of Reformed/Calvinist theology. God does not need to ordain any go to Hell as we are all already going to Hell.

It also does not say that God "arbitrarily" picks some to save. Anyone can see from a basic reading of God's Word that he is not arbitrary in any way.

I don't expect anyone who is not Reformed to become Reformed as it is really offense to our western way of thinking - to say that we have no choice in our salvation tears at everything we believe.

This was my reaction and the reaction of my wife and is the reaction of my non-reformed friends, yet after several years of fighting it I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ.

I better stop now or I will keep on going.

SDG

nah. That's fine. Keep going. :thumbsup

mfblume 01-27-2011 08:51 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019525)
Blume, not all who "buy into" the Sovereignty of God understand the "double predestination" idea of God damning people to hell. But if it were true, nor do I feel in a place to judge the Almighty. Who am I?

It is not whether we are judging God or not. But what the bible says about godd not willing that any should perish, and yet willing some will perish. God's word does not contradict truth. And no matter how it may be argued, God is contradicting Himself if He wills some be lost.

Quote:

I too have a philosophical discomfort with the notion that God would select some for hell. But I take great comfort in that he elected me, he called to me, he showed grace to me.
To each his own, for sure, but I see no sense at all in the idea.

Quote:

I'd flirt more with "New Calvinism" but even then, not really caring about fitting either label. I've learned much from my Calvinist brothers in the last year. Much. They've taught me a great deal about our gracious father. The idea of a mean tyrant is ironic, because it's a sharp contrast to how I saw God before. His work and act is that much more gracious.
I would say they perhaps can help us all with grace. If someone takes grace too far, they might have SOME points that are not that extreme that can help others. lol

mfblume 01-27-2011 08:55 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoustic (Post 1019580)
That God "ordains" some to Hell is a common misunderstanding of Reformed/Calvinist theology. God does not need to ordain any go to Hell as we are all already going to Hell.

According to Calvinism not really everyone was going to hell since God knew the end from the beginning and predestined some to heaven before their birth.

Quote:

It also does not say that God "arbitrarily" picks some to save. Anyone can see from a basic reading of God's Word that he is not arbitrary in any way.
I never said it was arbitrary. But to know God purposely sends some to hell is the issue, and I will not accept that. As I told Socialite, it contradicts the fact that God does not will that any should perish. I can imagine the mental gymnastics that occur over that verse to get around the obvious. lol

Quote:

I don't expect anyone who is not Reformed to become Reformed as it is really offense to our western way of thinking - to say that we have no choice in our salvation tears at everything we believe.
I see that this nothing to do with Western thought. Think of it. God is not wiling that any should perish, but he willingly predestines some to perish??? It flatly contradicts the word.

Quote:

This was my reaction and the reaction of my wife and is the reaction of my non-reformed friends, yet after several years of fighting it I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ.

I better stop now or I will keep on going.

SDG
To each his own. It is a free world. I respect your decision and belief. It's just not for me.

crakjak 01-27-2011 10:02 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoustic (Post 1019580)
That God "ordains" some to Hell is a common misunderstanding of Reformed/Calvinist theology. God does not need to ordain any go to Hell as we are all already going to Hell.

It also does not say that God "arbitrarily" picks some to save. Anyone can see from a basic reading of God's Word that he is not arbitrary in any way.

I don't expect anyone who is not Reformed to become Reformed as it is really offense to our western way of thinking - to say that we have no choice in our salvation tears at everything we believe.

This was my reaction and the reaction of my wife and is the reaction of my non-reformed friends, yet after several years of fighting it I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ.

I better stop now or I will keep on going.

SDG

How perfectly arrogant and self-centered of you and the rest of the elect!! What of the many that are destined to eternal damnation with no hope???? I don't believe Christ came just to give you that sweetness, rather to all. If He wills to choose some, He wills to choose ALL.

aegsm76 01-27-2011 10:05 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
One thing has always bothered me about Reformed theology.
If God predestined everyone, why did we need a Savior?

crakjak 01-27-2011 10:08 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UnTraditional (Post 1019138)
Why do some Apostolics have such an extreme hatred for Reformed Theology? I read where one member of this forum used the term Reformed as almost a slander? Cannot an Apostolic be one God and still hold to the beliefs of Reformed Theology without being cast out?

Like I said, expand it to all that Jesus came to save, according to 1 Tim. 4:10, and we have some agreement.

crakjak 01-27-2011 10:10 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aegsm76 (Post 1019645)
One thing has always bothered me about Reformed theology.
If God predestined everyone, why did we need a Savior?

Had He not come, nobody would be saved. Just because all will be saved from a sinking ship doesn't mean the rescuers remain on shore.

crakjak 01-27-2011 10:13 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019525)
Blume, not all who "buy into" the Sovereignty of God understand the "double predestination" idea of God damning people to hell. But if it were true, nor do I feel in a place to judge the Almighty. Who am I?

I too have a philosophical discomfort with the notion that God would select some for hell. But I take great comfort in that he elected me, he called to me, he showed grace to me.

I'd flirt more with "New Calvinism" but even then, not really caring about fitting either label. I've learned much from my Calvinist brothers in the last year. Much. They've taught me a great deal about our gracious father. The idea of a mean tyrant is ironic, because it's a sharp contrast to how I saw God before. His work and act is that much more gracious.

It is gracious to save some, when he has the power and resources to save ALL???

Acoustic 01-28-2011 01:57 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1019644)
How perfectly arrogant and self-centered of you and the rest of the elect!! What of the many that are destined to eternal damnation with no hope???? I don't believe Christ came just to give you that sweetness, rather to all. If He wills to choose some, He wills to choose ALL.

Are you a universalist? If so I can understand your problem with reformed theology.

I notice you have 1 Cor 15:22 as your tag line - do you believe all are saved? If not then how do you understand this scripture?

The very next verse says But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ. Notice that it is not ALL but those that BELONG to Christ. ie the ones he purchased with his blood. Also John 6:37 says "All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out." Indecently this was the verse I based my comment "I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ."

Regarding your accusation of arrogance and self-centredness you either have absolutely no understanding of reformed theology or you are purposefully ignoring some of the basic premises. Christ-centredness, NOT self-centredness, is at the heart of reformed theology. Any reformed who was acting arrogant regarding their salvation really has no understanding of the doctrine of justification and when examined would be exposed as not having a correct understanding or reformed theology.
How could anyone who truly believes that while they were still an enemy of God, God sent His Son to die for them, when all they deserved was God's wrath, be arrogant?? The life of Paul is a perfect example of this.

SDG

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:02 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoustic (Post 1019580)
That God "ordains" some to Hell is a common misunderstanding of Reformed/Calvinist theology. God does not need to ordain any go to Hell as we are all already going to Hell.

It also does not say that God "arbitrarily" picks some to save. Anyone can see from a basic reading of God's Word that he is not arbitrary in any way.

I don't expect anyone who is not Reformed to become Reformed as it is really offense to our western way of thinking - to say that we have no choice in our salvation tears at everything we believe.

This was my reaction and the reaction of my wife and is the reaction of my non-reformed friends, yet after several years of fighting it I have come to taste the sweetness of what it means to be justified by God's grace - to know that none who are given to Christ will be lost and be able to rest (be still and know that I am God) in the Sabbath that is Jesus Christ.

I better stop now or I will keep on going.

SDG

This is where my heart has been turned as of late as well.

I can't fully explain it, nor feel like I have to subscribe to an exhaustive, systematic Calvinism or every letter of the TULIP... but what I keep seeing in the Story is how God is working in this way. It's a comfort.

pelathais 01-28-2011 02:03 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aegsm76 (Post 1019645)
One thing has always bothered me about Reformed theology.
If God predestined everyone, why did we need a Savior?

God predestined the Savior, too (Galatians 4:4 and 1 Peter 1:11).

pelathais 01-28-2011 02:07 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite (Post 1019955)
This is where my heart has been turned as of late as well.

I can't fully explain it, nor feel like I have to subscribe to an exhaustive, systematic Calvinism or every letter of the TULIP... but what I keep seeing in the Story is how God is working in this way. It's a comfort.

I think that it is a great comfort when we place ALL of these burdens upon Him.

aegsm76 01-28-2011 02:17 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
So a reformed theology statement would be:
"Christ Jesus came into the world to save certain people who were predestined to be saved"?

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:20 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Blume, if we read that verse "he doesn't will that any should perish" just literally as we hear it, then none will perish. Period. End of story. If God wills it, that's all there is to it.

pelathais 01-28-2011 02:22 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aegsm76 (Post 1019968)
So a reformed theology statement would be:
"Christ Jesus came into the world to save certain people who were predestined to be saved"?

I think that they would tend to be wordier than that, but yes, that may sum it up in very simplistic terms.

Being "predestined to be saved" doesn't mean that you are "saved already." You still need to actually "be saved." The "predestination" part of the equation simply speaks of the inevitability of that salvation. It takes nothing away from the sacrifice and the reception of salvation itself when it arrives.

aegsm76 01-28-2011 02:23 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
I thought that the whole idea was that God gave us free will to choose?

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:49 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Few scattered quotes, and then I will comment. Bear with me:

Quote:

Most people who learn of Calvinism learn first of predestination, the doctrine that God chose at creation who would be saved and who damned. This seems cruel and arbitrary. But for Calvin there is no other way to think of God if we want to take sovereignty seriously. And it is crucial to note where in his theological system Calvin chooses to explain this doctrine. It does not come in Book I of the Institutes of the Christian Religion, where Calvin discusses the nature of God. Rather, it comes in Book III where Calvin discusses the benefits of faith. In other words, it ought not to be the first thing one thinks of about God. It certainly ought not to be the object of curious speculation. But for those who have been saved it comes as added relief to know the extent of control held by the God who saved them


Quote:

I am not a 5-pointer in the traditional sense, but I have many theological sympathies with Calvinists. I think most are turned off by Calvinists because 1) those who tout the Calvinist brand do so loudly and non-Cs find this offensive, and 2) we tend to prize our free will above anything. It’s offensive, then, to think that in matters salvific to think that it doesn’t all fall on my plate
.



There are three other reasons Arminians struggle with Reformed Theology:
Quote:

1) The Armenian wants to protect libertarian free will. (Pat and others mentioned this) In their view, this allows God to hold men culpable for sin. It was their free will choice.

2) The Armenian wants to protect God. If God ordains all things, and the Arminian view of libertarian free will is not biblical (as Calvinists claim) then God is unjust (The whole Rom. 9:19 argument).

3) Regardless of what is claimed, ones view of God has IMMENSE implications, especially concerning his sovereignty in salvation and suffering. A.W. Tozer said it best, “The most important thing about a person is what they believe about God because they will spend the rest of their life responding to that perception.” (paraphrase) Calvinism and Arminianism post two very different views. For Calvinist, the Armenian view of God is of one who is powerless and little. And (as WoundedEgo has submitted) the Arminian views the God of Calvinism as cruel and arrogant. Both will claim that the other side just doesn’t understand.

Arminians do not try to defend a particular view of free-will that they perceive is implicit in their understanding of “Scriptures they are trying to protect”? (…”we are not trying to protect libertarian free will…”) If so, then you would be the first Arminian I’d met that was not. With most Arminians I’ve met and read, what is at stake in their view is the freedom of choice for man to be held culpable for his actions. Let me know if I’m incorrect, and this is not a major tenet in Arminian theology (Conditional Election).

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:50 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
Blogger, Brian LePort says this:

Quote:

I want to say “yes” we are pre-destined and “yes” we must accept or deny the gospel; “yes” God initiates salvation and salvation is a work of God alone and “yes” humans are not forced to worship God or love God but to freely reject God. I like both-and scenarios better than either-or when discussing this subject.

am tempted to say that if one asked the Apostle Paul “Did God elect his beloved before the beginning of time?” he would say “yes”. If this was followed with the question, “Did God make salvation available for all people everywhere through Christ and do people have the right to accept or deny the truth of the gospel according to their own free will?” I think would again say “yes”.


When I think about the saving work of God I think it goes something like this:

(A) God foreknows what all people, in all places, at all times would choose in all possible circumstances if faced with the truth of the gospel.

(B) God has provided salvation through the work of his Son by the power of the Spirit that was sufficient for all people, in all places, at all times.

(C) God determines to place those people who will accept the gospel (or prior to Calvary the “gospel” of Israel) in a time and place where they will have the opportunity to hear and accept the gospel.

(D) Since humans are corrupted by sin the Spirit works in the lives of those who will hear the gospel prior to the event in preparation for the event in order to move them toward faith (some see this as God’s work of predestination; some speak of this as prevenient grace).

(E) That being said, the Spirit works on those who will accept the gospel based on foreknowledge. While God is sovereign God is not arbitrary. This is why I can’t accept “strong” Calvinism. I don’t think God plays “duck, duck, goose” with the eternal destiny of humans.

(F) Some of those who God knew would deny the gospel are put in times and places where the gospel would not reach them. Why is this? In part God does not force himself on those who do not want him. In part it may be that their judgment is “less” because they didn’t deny the gospel (I know this brings up another long list of questions). We may even speculate that God will save some based on their willingness to accept the truth they knew and for whatever reasoned deemed it unnecessary for the gospel to reach them (though I don’t think this is plausible).

(G) Some who will not hear the gospel are blessed/cursed with the “opportunity” to hear and reject the gospel. It may be that God let’s them hear the gospel in order to provide a greater indictment upon those whom God knew deserved such an indictment for reasons beyond our knowledge or because God knew that these people would do things like blaspheme the gospel, or preach a corrupted gospel, or mock the gospel in such a way that the true gospel still spreads via their disobedience in order to reach those God knew would accept it if they heard it.

This is how I have rationalized it. It seems to me that this model would preserve both the sovereign, electing, predestinating work of God while not deny the will and choice of humans. Both seem evidence in Scripture to me and I don’t want to move too far in favor of either view. I don’t know if this makes me some form of Calvinist, some form of Arminian, or some form of adherent to “Middle Knowledge”.

I am a Calvinist. I agree that humanity is totally deprived. I think Pelagius was a heretic. I echo Martin Luther when I say that we have a free will that is in bondage to our human nature and therefore we always freely choose to do those things that are displeasing to God. I do not see salvation as being a project where God and humans synthesize. It is God from start to finish and God is not surprised by who is saved. God predestines the elect to salvation.

I am an Arminian. I do not think that God predestines arbitrarily. I do not think that God saves people who would hate being in holy presence for all of eternity. I affirm that there is some aspect of humanity–maybe the cracked imago dei–that desires to do good. I think John Calvin was wise to avoid going as far as double predestination.

It may be that I find the position of people like Alvin Plantinga, Craig Blomberg, and William Lane Craig to be my own. That would be “middle knowledge”. Blomberg defines it as this:

…middle knowledge claims that God’s perfect, infinite knowledge must be able to know not only what sentient creatures will freely choose in all situations in their lives but what everyone would do in every possible situation that they could confront. Even more magnificently, divine and unlimited knowledge must be able to discern what all possibly created beings would do in all possible situations (or, as philosophers like to say, all possible worlds).
Good post on this -- at least thought-provoking.

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:55 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
I find that if I take away the philosophical bias about modern-day free will, I can accept the idea of predestination much better. It's usually an emotional obstacle more than a scriptural one for me.

I agree with others, that it can seem cruel (I've said so previously) while also insisting that it's possible that a) I don't have the right perspective of it b) God's ways are higher than mine, and my judgement concerning what is just in God's actions are slightly ironic and inappropriate even and c) I may be wrong.

I've considered what it means to the biblical text if it's true or false. I've done a lot of viewing the Bible in a story form lately, and it's extremely difficult to shake the idea of God's electing. It's throughout the Story. And after several classes in Humanities and History, it's obvious that modern-day perspectives on free will are dramatically different than the ancients in other generations. In fact, the view of the last couple centuries is unique in the entire scheme of history. That must be taken into consideration as well! The way first century ancients understood free will and the sovereignty of God should matter greatly to us that are concerned with authorial intent.

Socialite 01-28-2011 02:57 PM

Re: Hate Of Reformed Theology
 
In the end, I'm not interested in calling myself a Calvinist or Arminianist. I can care less about signing on to theological platforms and defending them until the death. I care more about understanding God's character, receiving His grace that has found me when I was lost and abandoned.

It's interesting many get so upset with Reformed teaching, concerned about licentiousness and passivity. In me, this Story does the exact opposite. I am stirred, humbled, and want to live my life with the same grace I received. I am more spurned on to follow the ways of Jesus. True believing, reception of grace and heart regeneration should produce this IMO.



(P.S. Mizpeh, I'll try to find my notes, but I've seen strong evidence that the insistence on foreknowledge over individual election to be a contradiction of scripture, and in some cases, not even fitting the context -- I'll see if I can't find my old notes.)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.