Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Political Talk (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=38776)

darrmad 03-02-2012 01:01 PM

Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Electio...y-gone-too-far

Radio host Rush Limbaugh created a furor for labeling a woman a 'slut' after she testified in favor of mandatory employer health coverage of contraception – and that was just the beginning. He may have hurt the Republican cause this time.


By Peter Grier, Staff writer / March 2, 2012


In this January 2010 file photo, radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh speaks during a news conference at Planet Hollywood, in Las Vegas. Has he finally gone too far for labeling a woman a 'slut' after she testified in favor of mandatory employer health coverage of contraception.

Brian Jones/Las Vegas News Bureau/AP/File

Enlarge

176 and 4

Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far? Has he said something so outrageous that it is actually damaging the conservative principles he espouses?

Recent posts

03.02.12
Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
02.29.12
Ron Paul's new ad: Is he attacking his 'wingman'? (+video)
02.24.12
Social media age shocker? On politics, newspapers get more respect.
02.24.12
Maher gives pro-Obama super PAC $1 million. Is that a good career move?
02.23.12
Stephen Colbert hosts Nancy Pelosi. Is he a Democrat?
Related stories

In Pictures: Birth Rates Across the World

The five most dangerous countries for women
Health care law's future: four scenarios
Topics
Political Parties U.S. Conservative Politics U.S. Republican Party Politics Talk Radio Radio Media Personal Finance
Those are relevant questions in the wake of the radio host/gadfly/provocateur’s labeling Georgetown University law school student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute,” while urging her to make public video tapes of her intimate acts. Mr. Limbaugh made the comments after Ms. Fluke testified in support of mandatory employer health coverage of contraception in front of a nonofficial congressional committee.

“If we are going to have to pay for this then we want something in return, Ms. Fluke,” Limbaugh said on his radio show earlier this week. “And that would be the videos of all this sex posted online so we can see what we’re getting for our money.”

Fluke herself has said she was “stunned” by these remarks. In an appearance on MSNBC’s "The Ed Show" on Thursday night, she said, “All [Limbaugh] needs to know is this is really inappropriate. This is outside the bounds of civil discourse.”

IN PICTURES: Birth Rates Across the World

Democrats and their political allies have rushed to her defense. Some 75 House Democrats have signed a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R) asking him to condemn Limbaugh’s words. The Women’s Media Center posted a Web story titled “Rush Limbaugh’s Sexism: Finally Too Much to Bear?”

Meanwhile, some Republicans have noted that while they don’t support his rhetoric, they support the point about health insurance Limbaugh was trying to make.

“A law student is now a hardship case? She needs the rest of us to provide her with free contraceptives?” said conservative columnist Mona Charen in a piece posted Friday morning on National Review Online.

Few commentators predict that Limbaugh will back down. He makes his living saying outrageous things: that’s how he attracts 20 million listeners a day, many pointed out. Even a nascent boycott of Limbaugh’s advertisers organized by opponents probably won’t faze him. (So far one advertiser, Sleep Train Mattresses, has pulled ads from Limbaugh’s show in reaction to the controversy.)

The problem, say some in the GOP, is that Limbaugh’s personal goals can conflict with the political goals he says he supports, and this may be one of those times. In pouring gasoline on a subject that was already a propane fire, he may have drawn attention to himself, but it’s possible he’s singeing Republicans who are standing close to the action.

“It doesn’t help,” said Carly Fiorina, National Republican Senatorial Committee vice chairman, Friday on "CBS This Morning." “That language is insulting, in my opinion. It’s incendiary and most of all, it’s a distraction.”

Ms. Fiorina noted that the Limbaugh uproar had taken some attention away from Thursday’s vote in the Senate on the Blunt amendment, legislation that would have exempted religiously affiliated employers from providing employees with contraception.

“It’s a distraction from what are very real and important issues,” said Fiorina.

KeptByTheWord 03-02-2012 01:07 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Ya well, Obama has quickly picked up on this misnomer, and called the girl himself personally....

Dordrecht 03-02-2012 01:15 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Maybe Rush did not go far enough.

bbyrd009 03-02-2012 01:48 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Maybe Rush should see that when he calls anyone names like that, he reveals what a complete he is? The saddest thing about Rush is that he even has an audience, and gets quoted, imo.

“It’s a distraction from what are very real and important issues,” said Fiorina.

Most likely his raison d' etre? Although I disagree with the mando contraception thing myself...but that is irrelevant.

crakjak 03-02-2012 01:53 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Rush being Rush!!! And Pelosie being Pelosie, dragging a catholic law student before congress as the poster child for birth control entitlement!!! Her action is really a lower low than Rush's low!! We must look like fools to the rest of the world.

Twisp 03-02-2012 01:56 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1143638)
Rush being Rush!!! And Pelosie being Pelosie, dragging a catholic law student before congress as the poster child for birth control entitlement!!! Her action is really a lower low that Rush's low!! We must look like fools to the rest of the world.

You got one part of your post right, lol.

Jared Hanley 03-02-2012 02:02 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
I'm not a big fan of Limbaugh or any talk radio host for that matter. I stopped listening to talk radio about three a half years ago because I felt like it was influencing my vote. I would rather think for myself.

However, I completely agree with Limbaugh here. The woman said she is having so much sex she can't pay for it. He simply suggested that she back off of some of the sex.

She brought this on herself. I don't think Limbaugh would call someone a 'slut' unless they publicly announced that they were having plenty of illicit sex, so much in fact that they can't pay for it all.

It's just as bad as the woman in Florida who had more than 12 kids and couldn't afford to provide for them so she told reporters that someone needed to pay for it.

That's entitlement if I've ever seen it.

This woman has her own personal interests in mind. I don't know how much more black and white it could be.

Timmy 03-02-2012 02:14 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Did he say anything that a real conservative wasn't thinking anyway? Is he too honest?

Twisp 03-02-2012 02:16 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy (Post 1143646)
Did he say anything that a real conservative wasn't thinking anyway? Is he too honest?

Santorum has that problem also. It's great for voters, not so much for the GOP.

Twisp 03-02-2012 02:18 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Hanley (Post 1143643)
I'm not a big fan of Limbaugh or any talk radio host for that matter. I stopped listening to talk radio about three a half years ago because I felt like it was influencing my vote. I would rather think for myself.

However, I completely agree with Limbaugh here. The woman said she is having so much sex she can't pay for it. He simply suggested that she back off of some of the sex.

She brought this on herself. I don't think Limbaugh would call someone a 'slut' unless they publicly announced that they were having plenty of illicit sex, so much in fact that they can't pay for it all.

It's just as bad as the woman in Florida who had more than 12 kids and couldn't afford to provide for them so she told reporters that someone needed to pay for it.

That's entitlement if I've ever seen it.

This woman has her own personal interests in mind. I don't know how much more black and white it could be.

I don't remember her saying that in her testimony. Care to provide a link to her saying that? lol

Twisp 03-02-2012 02:28 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Nice to finally see a Republican condemning Rush:

http://www.wfsb.com/story/17065315/b...-slut-comments

Flutecrafter 03-02-2012 02:57 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy (Post 1143646)
Is he too honest?

To honest for some folks, looks like.

Jared Hanley 03-02-2012 04:30 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1143650)
I don't remember her saying that in her testimony. Care to provide a link to her saying that? lol

Here is the full story from ABC:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/...ry?id=15834374

The Matt 03-02-2012 04:38 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Her testimony is a joke, but her comments were taken waaaaay out of context.

Jared Hanley 03-02-2012 04:47 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
I have to admit though that I have pretty strong opinions about this because I am fairly radical in my views on this particular issue. My wife and I don't use contraceptives. That wasn't just my idea. We made that decision together.

Also, I am of the opinion that abortion will never be banned completely until people change their views on contraceptives. I think the recent vote in Mississippi proves that.

Pressing-On 03-02-2012 05:04 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
I don't see anything wrong with how Rush handled this after listening to the girl's stupid reason for supporting contraception at law school.

Quote:

Now, here's the story that started all this. It's by a guy name Craig Bannister at Cybercast News Service: "A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control. Speaking at a hearing held by Pelosi to tout Pres. Obama’s mandate that virtually every health insurance plan cover the full cost of contraception and abortion-inducing products, Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke said that it’s too expensive to have sex in law school without mandated insurance coverage. Apparently, four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception, Fluke's research shows." And of course what's sex if the ends aren't meeting?

But Fluke presented research to the committee: four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception. Have you heard of anything more ridiculous? This is flat-out thievery. It's outright ridiculous that taxpayers should pay for the personal sexual desires and habits of everybody, including women, at Georgetown Law. Fluke reported: "Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception)." The poor babes have to buy their own pills. What has gone wrong with our country? What has happened to our country where law students have to buy their own contraceptives? What has happened to us, folks? What have we done with our hearts? How did we become so cruel?

How did we become so heartless? Require each other to pay for the contraceptives of the women law students at Georgetown? Sandra Fluke reported to Pelosi: "It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations. 'Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,' Fluke told the hearing. ... That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex -- and, she wants us to pay for it." Now, what does that make her? She wants us to buy her sex. She wants us to pay for her sex, and she went to a congressional committee to close the sale.

It's the right place to do that. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20..._fluke_remarks

Cindy 03-02-2012 05:37 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
No personal responsibility, everything should be free. These are our future lawmakers, scary isn't it?

Pressing-On 03-02-2012 05:39 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cindy (Post 1143717)
No personal responsibility, everything should be free. These are our future lawmakers, scary isn't it?

Exactly and they are making out that Rush is the one that is wrong.

trialedbyfire 03-02-2012 06:25 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
He said what I thought, I was just too Christian to say it out loud. Meanwhile this ideology of entitlement is about to destroy this nation.

I don't listen to Rush either by the way.

Jay 03-02-2012 10:39 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
I did listen to Rush that day. I happen to know that he was going after her for attempting to put tax payers on the hook for contreception. Further, she is a slut. I do not care if she likes the label or not, but when a woman is willing to sleep with a man outside of marriage and without pay, she is an incredibly easy slut. He simply called her what she is. She is immoral, wicked, and attempting to force us to finance her harlotry. Those who support her are like her and will receive the same judgment that she does.


If you do not like that, read the judgments pronounced against Israel for licentious immorality. I am not nearly in the same league as the prophets when it comes to calling out sin. If any here do not like it, that is between you and God, but He has not changed His oppinions of this abomination.

AmericanAngel 03-03-2012 08:57 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Matthew 15

What Pollutes Your Life
1-2 After that, Pharisees and religion scholars came to Jesus all the way from Jerusalem, criticizing, "Why do your disciples play fast and loose with the rules?"
3-9But Jesus put it right back on them. "Why do you use your rules to play fast and loose with God's commands? God clearly says, 'Respect your father and mother,' and, 'Anyone denouncing father or mother should be killed.' But you weasel around that by saying, 'Whoever wants to, can say to father and mother, What I owed to you I've given to God.' That can hardly be called respecting a parent. You cancel God's command by your rules. Frauds! Isaiah's prophecy of you hit the bull's-eye:

These people make a big show of saying the right thing,
but their heart isn't in it.
They act like they're worshiping me,
but they don't mean it.
They just use me as a cover
for teaching whatever suits their fancy."

10-11He then called the crowd together and said, "Listen, and take this to heart. It's not what you swallow that pollutes your life, but what you vomit up."

12Later his disciples came and told him, "Did you know how upset the Pharisees were when they heard what you said?"

13-14Jesus shrugged it off. "Every tree that wasn't planted by my Father in heaven will be pulled up by its roots. Forget them. They are blind men leading blind men. When a blind man leads a blind man, they both end up in the ditch."

15Peter said, "I don't get it. Put it in plain language."

16-20Jesus replied, "You, too? Are you being willfully stupid? Don't you know that anything that is swallowed works its way through the intestines and is finally defecated? But what comes out of the mouth gets its start in the heart. It's from the heart that we vomit up evil arguments, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, lies, and cussing. That's what pollutes. Eating or not eating certain foods, washing or not washing your hands—that's neither here nor there."
--------------
I don't agree with tax payers paying for birth control, there are plenty of places to get that free of charge. And further more, its called "responsibility".Ther's a sayin, "If u wanna play, ya gotta pay".
The other thing, I don't like Rush. I don't listen to Rush. He does not represent my thoughts. Someone on here said, he spoke what I was thinking, but I'm too "Christian to say it out loud"....Oh Good Grief! Jesus also said , "what u think in your heart, so r u".
Maybe I'm more liberal than I thought, but, we r living in the 21st century people! This is what the majority of society does! Its what they've always done. Heathens or saints, have had pre marital sex, fornicated all througout history. There is no way that's gonna turn around or change, just because we want it to. Only Jesus can change the heart and mind set and lifestyle of a person, if that person wants them to.
We can voice our opinions in the media all day long. But the minute we agree with someone like Rush, who "thinks" he is above the law of love, spews his garbage, which BTW, is no different that the garbage that was spewed agains, Laura and Sarah, or when Lettermen did the same. Rush lowered himself to their level of behavior.
Our bible tells us not to judge, less we be judged with same manner.
Now look, we r being judged once again in the media as contemptable! Thanks Rush!

bbyrd009 03-03-2012 09:50 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1143650)
I don't remember her saying that in her testimony. Care to provide a link to her saying that? lol

I missed that, too? That would tend to bolster the Rush rant...

Jared Hanley 03-03-2012 11:27 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bbyrd009 (Post 1143923)
I missed that, too? That would tend to bolster the Rush rant...

After looking into this more carefully, it seems that she didn't come right out and say that she has so much sex she can't afford it. Rush was inferring that from some of the things she did say however.

An article from the Huffington post said the following:

Quote:

He said that her speech at a press conference served to show that "she's having so much sex she can't pay for it, and we should."

Fluke had testified about the reproductive and broader medical reasons for birth control, and cited the cost. Limbaugh said she was having "$3000 worth of birth control pills worth of sex."


He described her testimony from his perspective. "So the woman comes forth with this frankly hilarious claim that she's having so much sex -- and her buddies with her-- that she can't afford it," Limbaugh continued. "And not one person says, did you ever think about maybe backing off the amount of sex that you have?"
Here's the link to the whole article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1316625.html

So, it seems that Sandra Fluke said she needed $3,000 dollars worth of contraceptives and was complaining about the cost so Rush was simply inferring from this that she was having so much sex she couldn't afford it.

Here is an article also from the Huffington Post concerning Bill O'Reilly and his take on it (he sides with Limbaugh):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1318249.html

Jack Shephard 03-03-2012 12:04 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
I think Rush went too far, though he apologized and all that I think that using that term is just too rude.

AmericanAngel 03-03-2012 02:29 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK (Post 1143959)
I think Rush went too far, though he apologized and all that I think that using that term is just too rude.

:iagree

The Matt 03-03-2012 03:35 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
If you are calling someone something rude like that, you are judging them IMHO.

bbyrd009 03-03-2012 04:17 PM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Well, hmm, one tunes in to Rush to get judgements, tho God how i hate to defend him--but, what is the nice word for someone who likes to have lots of extra-marital, I assume, sex? So it would seem to me that if this characterization above is correct, I might still think he is a heel, but I'm not sure how much more delicately he could state that he isn't interested in providing unlimited contraception for sluts?

I find her counter argument that she meant that some insurance co would actually be paying or whatever specious; we all pay.

It seems to me, Matt, that no judgement is required until we are asked to collectively foot the bill, is Rush's position here. The whole bill? Certainly the fallout.

citizen 03-05-2012 07:11 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Rush has helped the Right lose the election.
The Right is already thought of as a bunch of meanies anyway but Rush sealed the deal.

It does seem that a woman standing up before the world screaming her need for free contraception for her 3 times a day sexual excapades and shes not even married is shameful, but then again - did she really say that?

Surely if Imus could take his whoopin - its time for Rush to take his.

The liberal talk show host called Laura Ingram a slut and apologized ON THE AIR ON HIS SHOW - not some written apololgy on his website.

David Letterman's joke he told about Sara Palin's daughter on his show was awful and he apologized ON THE AIR ON HIS SHOW - not some writting apology on his website.

With Mr. Limbaugh though, he doubled down on his bombastic language against this woman UNTIL it started hitting the advertisers started pulling their ads.

It goes to show both sides have made unfortunate and mean statements but Mr. Limbaugh MUST APOLGIZE ON THE AIR ON HIS SHOW.

Pressing-On 03-05-2012 08:20 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPYdc...layer_embedded

Newt! Newt!! :thumbsup

MissBrattified 03-05-2012 08:26 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK (Post 1143959)
I think Rush went too far, though he apologized and all that I think that using that term is just too rude.

Maybe some of these liberals will apologize for their "humorous" statements:

“But I’ve often said that if I had — I have two dogs — if I had two retarded children, I’d be a hero. And yet the dogs, which are pretty much the same thing. What? They’re sweet. They’re loving. They’re kind, but they don’t mentally advance at all. … Dogs are like retarded children.” — Bill Maher

"I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health" -- New York city councilman Charles Barron

“Did you hear this – Sarah Palin finally heard what happened in Japan and she’s demanding that we invade ‘Tsunami.’I mean she said, ‘These ‘Tsunamians’ will not get away with this.’ Oh speaking of dumb twats, did you…” --Bill Maher

“Again, (America is) a stupid country with stupid people who don’t pay attention.” — Bill Maher

"Drudge? Aw, Drudge, somebody ought to wrap a strong Republican entrail around his neck and hoist him up about six feet in the air and watch him bounce." -- Liberal radio host, Mike Malloy

crakjak 03-05-2012 08:28 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1143639)
You got one part of your post right, lol.

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

crakjak 03-05-2012 08:32 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 1144398)
Maybe some of these liberals will apologize for their "humorous" statements:

“But I’ve often said that if I had — I have two dogs — if I had two retarded children, I’d be a hero. And yet the dogs, which are pretty much the same thing. What? They’re sweet. They’re loving. They’re kind, but they don’t mentally advance at all. … Dogs are like retarded children.” — Bill Maher

"I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health" -- New York city councilman Charles Barron

“Did you hear this – Sarah Palin finally heard what happened in Japan and she’s demanding that we invade ‘Tsunami.’I mean she said, ‘These ‘Tsunamians’ will not get away with this.’ Oh speaking of dumb twats, did you…” --Bill Maher

“Again, (America is) a stupid country with stupid people who don’t pay attention.” — Bill Maher

"Drudge? Aw, Drudge, somebody ought to wrap a strong Republican entrail around his neck and hoist him up about six feet in the air and watch him bounce." -- Liberal radio host, Mike Malloy

Have you notice that the crazies congregate on the left???? Therefore, when their crazies say nutty things they all stand, laugh, and cheer, like they are so deep and insightful. Ridiculous! And Maher is the craziest of all!!

Twisp 03-05-2012 08:33 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1144399)
I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

Pressing-On 03-05-2012 08:34 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1144399)
I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring
in
a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

POTD!!!!!!

:cheer :cheer :cheer

crakjak 03-05-2012 08:34 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1143639)
You got one part of your post right, lol.

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not a clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

Pressing-On 03-05-2012 08:39 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1144402)
You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.

Quote:

More have admonished Limbaugh’s description of Sandra Fluke than admonished a 30 year-old woman embarrassing herself before congress by testifying that she simply cannot stop getting it on and her inability to control her urges constitutes infringing upon everyone else for a bailout. CNS News did the math:

But, back to this woman’s complaint that women are spending $3,000 for birth control during her time in college.

“For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary,” she complains.

So, they can earn enough money in just one summer to pay for three full years of sex. And, yes, they are full years – since that could translate into having sex nearly three times a day for three years straight, apparently.

At a dollar a condom if she shops at CVS pharmacy’s website, that $3,000 would buy her 3,000 condoms – or, 1,000 a year. (By the way, why does CVS.com list the weight of its condom products in terms of pounds?)

Assuming it’s not a leap year, that’s 1,000 divided by 365 – or having sex 2.74 times a day, every day, for three straight years. And, I thought Georgetown was a Catholic university where women might be prone to shun casual, unmarried sex. At least its health insurance doesn’t cover contraception (that which you subsidize, you get more of, you know).
Quote:

Emily at NakedDC, who went to law school, calls BS on Fluke’s calculations:

… the idea that they are paying $1000 per year for birth control is a little crazy. Condoms at CVS cost $1, so that means, if you take this cheaper option, you are actually having sex three times a day, which is kind of insane and you’re going to have a lot more medical expenses than just birth control. Like chafing. Also, you need psychological help. If its birth control pills they’re using, well,Planned Parenthood, which has plenty of offices within driving distance of the DC area, seems to think those only cost $15 – $50 per month, which is half Ms. Fluke’s estimate. A fitted diaphragm costs about $60 and can be used all year long, including special occasions. And IUDs and the Depo-Provera shot are half the estimate cost (at about $500 each).

I’ve not heard a single Republican politician stand up to the media narrative on this. Instead of projecting surrogate modesty towards Fluke, they project it towards Limbaugh, who is calling the truth for what it is.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

crakjak 03-05-2012 08:43 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1144413)
Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.




http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

Very true!!

Twisp 03-05-2012 08:50 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1144413)
Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.




http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

I'll ask you the same I have asked all of her detractors. Where did she ever say she needed birth control for "getting it on"? Everyone keeps saying that, but no one can provide a statement from her that confirms that.

crakjak 03-05-2012 08:53 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1144402)
You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

She is at Georgetown on a "public interest" scholarship! So, she wants to be protected from having children while in law school, by having the public pay for her birth control pills!!!

Because it is in the "public interest" for her not to have kids, that the public would then have to pay for the cost of her natal care, and day care for her children, and of course, room and board for them as well.

So, you see she wants the public to take responsibility for her decisions. Like she is an animal and can't control herself and must have sex!!

Oh, but the left will say that for a law student, "...birth control pills are for her health, control periods, and estrogen and etc, etc!!! What a messed up entitlement leftists mindset!!!

Pressing-On 03-05-2012 08:55 AM

Re: Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp (Post 1144421)
I'll ask you the same I have asked all of her detractors. Where did she ever say she needed birth control for "getting it on"? Everyone keeps saying that, but no one can provide a statement from her that confirms that.

Fluke's complaint is that women are spending $3,000 for birth control during their time in college.

“For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary,” she complains.

That expense calculates to 2.74 times per day she says she and her fellow students are having sex. Enrollment is going to skyrocket, I imagine. :heeheehee

"If she is, kudos! But promiscuity is not the hallmark of a virtuous woman. Is it Limbaugh’s fault for pointing it out or Fluke’s fault for the behavior? It’s a rhetorical question and the answer proved Limbaugh’s entire point." - Dana Loesch


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.