Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Political Talk (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=39502)

Pressing-On 05-04-2012 09:36 AM

Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Very well laid out! Nice! :thumbsup

Reality Check: Bound Delegates In The Republican Primary May Not Be Bound After All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDPK4...&feature=share

Pressing-On 05-04-2012 09:56 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Reality Check: Infighting at More GOP Caucuses and What the MSM Won't Tell You About Iowa and Minnesota

http://www.fox19.com/story/17768724/...-and-minnesota

Pressing-On 05-04-2012 10:54 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
We stand shoulder to shoulder
You can't erase us
You'll just have to face us

We are the ones that will never be broken
With our last breath
We will fight to the death
We are soldiers

#StopMitt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkqNz...layer_embedded

:cheer :cheer

Pressing-On 05-04-2012 10:55 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
We stand shoulder to shoulder
You can't erase us
You'll just have to face us

We are the ones that will never be broken
With our last breath
We will fight to the death
We are soldiers

#StopMitt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkqNz...layer_embedded

:cheer :cheer

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 08:21 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1159739)
Very well laid out! Nice! :thumbsup

Reality Check: Bound Delegates In The Republican Primary May Not Be Bound After All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDPK4...&feature=share

Please watch - RNC is violating rules of the party!!!! :thumbsdown

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 08:28 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1159742)
Reality Check: Infighting at More GOP Caucuses and What the MSM Won't Tell You About Iowa and Minnesota

http://www.fox19.com/story/17768724/...-and-minnesota

Doesn't Mitt Romney pretty much have the nomination? The short answer is no.

Watch the report and Find out why!!!

crakjak 05-05-2012 08:39 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Still dreaming, I see, PO.

So, if Ron Paul were to win the nomination, what would that look like in the general election, and if he were to miraculously win the White House what would that look like in the world?? I say, be careful what you wish for??? Anyone but Mitt could be a curse.

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 08:58 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 1159946)
Still dreaming, I see, PO.

So, if Ron Paul were to win the nomination, what would that look like in the general election, and if he were to miraculously win the White House what would that look like in the world?? I say, be careful what you wish for??? Anyone but Mitt could be a curse.

I was going to bow out of the discussion until the delegate issue kept coming up. I just want people to be informed. The media is not telling us the truth.

And it is not that Ron Paul will win - it's that he can bring us a Brokered Convention.

We just want a Brokered Convention to allow even those with suspended campaigns to speak and loose the delegates to vote their conscience. The RNC has driven this election and we are not happy with that. And I think a Brokered Convention would be good for us and clear the air.

Quote:

Why the ‘Strategists’ Are Wrong About a Brokered Convention

Today’s Republican establishment is, for all practical purposes, a mirror (or converse) image of the Democrat Party; an organization structured from the top-down. This power-hoarding of the hierarchy is evidenced by the ridiculous move to award convention delegates proportionately, a move more in line with the abolition of the Electoral College than with the preservation of the Republic.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...red-convention

bbyrd009 05-05-2012 10:24 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Ha, you make it so hard for a believer
(who honestly tries to stay out of this; politics)
not to comment, @ "reality check..." lol.
Nevermind.

crakjak 05-05-2012 11:12 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1159949)
I was going to bow out of the discussion until the delegate issue kept coming up. I just want people to be informed. The media is not telling us the truth.

And it is not that Ron Paul will win - it's that he can bring us a Brokered Convention.

We just want a Brokered Convention to allow even those with suspended campaigns to speak and loose the delegates to vote their conscience. The RNC has driven this election and we are not happy with that. And I think a Brokered Convention would be good for us and clear the air.

Okay, lets get it on, sounds like fun!!! :)

jfrog 05-05-2012 11:44 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1159739)
Very well laid out! Nice! :thumbsup

Reality Check: Bound Delegates In The Republican Primary May Not Be Bound After All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDPK4...&feature=share

I hate right leaning news networks and this is a perfect example of why. His whole talking point is about The "Unit Rule" which the RNC outlawed. The "Unit Rule" is a rule that requires EVERY delegate of a state to be bound to vote for the candidate the majority of the state wanted. Banning the "Unit Rule" doesn't stop delegates from being bound. It stops them from being bound in such a manner that they all must vote the same.

Despite this misinformation those delegates are still bound to vote Romney. Try again PO.

Dedicated Mind 05-05-2012 02:37 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
po, even real clear politics isn't reflecting the same delegate count that this website mentioned by ben swan is

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/

why the discrepancy?

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 09:17 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog (Post 1159964)
I hate right leaning news networks and this is a perfect example of why. His whole talking point is about The "Unit Rule" which the RNC outlawed. The "Unit Rule" is a rule that requires EVERY delegate of a state to be bound to vote for the candidate the majority of the state wanted. Banning the "Unit Rule" doesn't stop delegates from being bound. It stops them from being bound in such a manner that they all must vote the same.

I don't know where you got that information (in bold). This pdf. file (The Rules of the Republican Party) was written and adopted in 2008, amended in 2010, and has no updates. Rule 15 is clearly included.
http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf

More information concerning Rule 38 and Rule 15:
Quote:

To explain our case, we look to the language of Rule 38, which was adopted in its current form in 1964. The rule states: “no delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the unit rule.”

The unit rule does not prohibit a state from using a winner-take-all primary in the same way that Rule 15(b) prohibits most states from using a winner-take-all primary when holding a contest earlier than April 1st. However, the unit rule does prohibit binding delegates to vote according to how a majority of delegates from their state vote – again, a scenario most likely to occur in a state using the winner-take-all rule.

As set out in the Rules of the Republican Party, delegates have the ability to vote according to the delegates’ preference, even if that is contrary to the outcome of each state’s primary. According to one source, the legal counsel for the Republican National Convention in 2008 stated: “[The] RNC does not recognize a state’s binding of national delegates, but considers each delegate a free agent who can vote for whoever they choose.” Thus, if a delegate were to challenge his or her ability to vote as a free agent, he or she would have grounds under Rule 38.

http://www.fairvote.org/response-to-...1#.T6Xo2FIw-q2

Quote:

Despite this misinformation those delegates are still bound to vote Romney. Try again PO.
The point, in the video, is that rules were voided when the RNC violated their own rules when they announced they will finance Romney before the convention. A Republican Primary is underway - seems Romney and the RNC don't realize that.

The real reality is that without media coverage, they will get what they want. Another indication that Romney runs a campaign and aligns himself with the actions of Obama. I have never seen a Republican campaign that mirrored so much the actions of the Democrats.

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 09:19 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind (Post 1159996)
po, even real clear politics isn't reflecting the same delegate count that this website mentioned by ben swan is

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/

why the discrepancy?

This is the website that we follow. Go halfway down the page and you will find - 2012 Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and Conventions. It lines out the soft and hard delegate count.

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/

Dedicated Mind 05-05-2012 10:14 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
po, according to green papers, mitt only needs about 380 and there are still 897 available. looks like he is going to make it. wouldn't a brokered convention overturn the will of the people? the rnc didn't force all those primary voters to vote for mitt.

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 10:28 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind (Post 1160045)
po, according to green papers, mitt only needs about 380 and there are still 897 available. looks like he is going to make it. wouldn't a brokered convention overturn the will of the people? the rnc didn't force all those primary voters to vote for mitt.

Paul could still get enough delegates to stop him. I can't recall the exact number, but it is somewhere in the low 300s. My husband is voting for Ron Paul in our primary and I'm deciding whether I want to go with Paul or Newt. Even though Newt has suspended, he can still receive delegates. Santorum could still make his case at Convention. He's won at least 5 states.

And it was the media driving the narrative. That is something that both Santorum and Gingrich acknowledged. You can claim they were whining, but we saw it happening. I'm truly disappointed in the negativity that Romney brought toward his other opponents. The worst I've seen in the Republican Party. It may just seem worse because it was a long drawn out process,

I don't think a moderate Republican can beat an incumbent because, people view them as being closely aligned.

I was talking to someone today who has no interest in politics. They said, "I think the American people are comfortable with Obama and aren't interested in Romney." I thought that was an interesting comment. I tended to agree after I listened to Michelle speaking at a campaign rally today.

What I think is that they have fear mongered us into believing that we must get rid of Obama and that may be true, BUT the way Romney comes across, it doesn't make you feel the change would be that urgent or that big of a change.

My question would be - If we have a Constitution, a Supreme Court and a military that pledges they will "uphold the Constitution of the United States", how is Obama going to become a dictator and how will he change us without legal challenge?

Because, if all of this is fear mongering, I would rather muddle through 4 more years of Obama than to have 8 years of Rhino status quo. They are killing our country as well. We need a committed conservative and that will only happen like it did with the rise of the Tea Party. That group was destined to fall apart because they refused to have a leader and some co-opted factions and ruined a good thing. Nonetheless, it showed what Americans will do if the fighting gets tough, the tough get fighting.

Pressing-On 05-05-2012 11:10 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
A little more on the Brokered Convention

Quote:

The "magic number" this year is 1,144 delegates -- half of the total who will attend the Convention. Romney's pattern is to win, but not quite get to the 50% mark -- after Maine, he has about 47% of the delegates. When delegates go to the convention, they are committed to vote for the nominee for whom they were elected on the FIRST ballot. If the current pattern continues, Romney will get 47% on the first ballot -- not enough to win -- so the delegates are then free to vote for whomever they prefer on the second ballot and subsequent ballots. That is a "brokered convention" -- anyone can win, even someone who did not run in the primaries, because the delegates can vote for anyone they like.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2012_Brokered_Convention.htm

canam 05-06-2012 03:30 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
I cant support a nut case like Paul who suggested we cut off the troops AC in the tents to save money and when asked how he would deal with the world said how about do unto others..... ,total idiot statement sounded like it came from Barck.

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 09:58 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by canam (Post 1160055)
I cant support a nut case like Paul who suggested we cut off the troops AC in the tents to save money and when asked how he would deal with the world said how about do unto others..... ,total idiot statement sounded like it came from Barck.

Quote:

Politics 2012: Ron Paul raining on Romney's parade

Mitt Romney may be getting all the splashy headlines in his march toward the August Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., but fellow Republican Ron Paul has been steadily fundraising, visiting primary states, picking up delegates and gaining control of state party organizations.

While Paul is given virtually no chance of claiming the nomination in Tampa, he sure can try to jam up things and possibly deny Romney the nomination on the first ballot, insiders said. A candidate needs 1,144 delegates to win the party nod.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/...#ixzz1u6YftSmv
This is what we want to happen and I am hoping that Ron Paul can bring it! :thumbsup

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 10:22 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Reading this article paragraph below, would this be the point in the video, that Rule 38 does not conflict with Rule 11?

Recap:

RNC Rule 38: No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or congressional district to impose the Unit Rule.

RNC Rule 11:
All delegates from one state or congressional district are required and bound to vote as a unit.

Quote:

RNC to NV GOP: Don’t let Ron Paul delegates take over national convention slots or don’t bother coming to Tampa

Clearly, the RNC fears that mischief at the Sparks convention this weekend could result in Ron Paul delegates taking Mitt Romney slots and then not abiding by GOP rules to vote for the presumptive nominee on the first ballot in Tampa. So they are trying to force McDonald to ensure that actual Romney delegates fill 20 of the 28 national convention slots, thus removing any mystery of who they will vote for.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/ral...s-take-over-n/

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 10:30 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
The RNC had no problem when Florida and Arizona violated party rules by holding winner-take-all primaries prior to the date the rules said such contests could happen.

The RNC didn't step in when the Iowa Republican party screwed up the counting of votes and lost the results from several precincts.

The RNC sat idly by while the Maine Republican leadership declared Romney the winner despite the fact that many votes hadn't yet been counted.

The RNC didn't care when the state of Michigan changed their rules at the last minute to hand all the at-large delegates to Romney instead of splitting them with Santorum.

The RNC had nothing to say when hundreds of people were illegally turned away from party caucus sites in Washington State,

The RNC didn't care when police had to be called to caucuses in Missouri, where local party leaders gamed the system to benefit their chosen candidates.

The RNC had no problem when Nevada Republicans attempted to hold a special caucus only for religiously-observant people and then took two full days to count the results.

Time after time throughout this campaign, the RNC has been willing to ignore their own rules and blatant attempts to manipulate the delegate selection process. But now they say they will not seat Nevada if too many Paul supporters end up getting elected as delegates by following the rules and showing up and voting?

canam 05-06-2012 10:53 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1160073)
This is what we want to happen and I am hoping that Ron Paul can bring it! :thumbsup

What can that accomplish? i dont get it

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 11:31 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by canam (Post 1160077)
What can that accomplish? i dont get it

Quote:

Paul takes 22 Nevada GOP delegates; Romney gets three

GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul on Sunday nearly swept all of Nevada’s delegates to the national convention as his supporters swamped Mitt Romney backers at the state Republican convention.

Paul won 22 Nevada delegates to three for Romney, according to official vote tallies released early Sunday as the overtime convention extended into a second day to finish business.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/paul-takes-...150345275.html
Where in the world is Digging4Truth!!!!

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 12:11 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by canam (Post 1160077)
What can that accomplish? i dont get it

Quote:

The "magic number" this year is 1,144 delegates -- half of the total who will attend the Convention. Romney's pattern is to win, but not quite get to the 50% mark -- after Maine, he has about 47% of the delegates. When delegates go to the convention, they are committed to vote for the nominee for whom they were elected on the FIRST ballot. If the current pattern continues, Romney will get 47% on the first ballot -- not enough to win -- so the delegates are then free to vote for whomever they prefer on the second ballot and subsequent ballots. That is a "brokered convention" -- anyone can win, even someone who did not run in the primaries, because the delegates can vote for anyone they like.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2012_Brokered_Convention.htm
And at a Brokered Convention, a favored candidate can be drafted in. This is what we are pushing for.

Today, I heard Greta saying that Romney's campaign is in trouble if people like Gingrich, Bachmann, Perry, etc. are saying, "Well, Romney would be better than Obama." Her point is that these statements are showing "unenthusiastic support" for the presumed nominee. We need a Brokered Convention.

And we may not get it, but at least you can be guaranteed there are people in this country, like myself, who are not afraid to stand up and fight for the American people. At least give us that if you don't agree or quite understand what we are about.

Pressing-On 05-06-2012 12:15 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
I imagine the RNC is mad as you know what double toothpicks! :toofunny

Quote:

With Romney all but the nominee, Ron Paul snags delegate majority at Maine’s GOP convention

With Romney’s nomination all but decided, Ron Paul supporters wrested control of the Maine Republican Convention and elected a majority slate supporting the Texas congressman to the GOP national convention, party officials said as the two-day convention neared its end Sunday. The results gave the Texas congressman a late state victory.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation...05T_story.html

Dedicated Mind 05-06-2012 04:54 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
go ron paul! great news po.

Pressing-On 05-07-2012 06:37 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Breaking news: Ron Paul wins Iowa! (Yes, Iowa)

http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2012...iowa-yes-iowa/
:heeheehee :thumbsup

jfrog 05-07-2012 07:11 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1160075)
Reading this article paragraph below, would this be the point in the video, that Rule 38 does not conflict with Rule 11?

Recap:

RNC Rule 38: No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or congressional district to impose the Unit Rule.

RNC Rule 11:
All delegates from one state or congressional district are required and bound to vote as a unit.

More misinformation.

RNC Rule 11:

Quote:

(a) The Republican National Committee shall
not, without the prior written and filed approval of all
members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to
any candidate for any public or party office except the
nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is
unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing
deadline for that office. In those states where state law
establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican
candidates could participate, but in which the general
election may not include a Republican candidate, the
candidate endorsed by a convention held under the
authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as
the Republican nominee.
(b) No state Republican Party rule or state
law shall be observed that allows persons who have
participated or are participating in the selection of any
nominee of a party other than the Republican Party,
including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the
selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that
general election. No person nominated in violation of
this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National
Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party
from that state.
http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf

Pressing-On 05-07-2012 07:20 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog (Post 1160155)

Thanks!

I was checking the information and received this:

Ok, I need to clarify this. Rule 38 does not apply to the situation in NV.

Clearly the guy reporting doesn't understand what the Unit rule is. The Unit rule is like "Winner take all," the winner gets all the votes.

It does not override the state plans put in place under rule 15B. In fact, the
state plan under 15 B that was winner take all.... was changed. All the primaries are proportional. All the states are proportional.... unless they had a NON BINDING PPP and caucus (like MO) or a blind primary (PA).

According to NV's state plan, the delegate assignments go based on the results of the vote in late January (just after Florida?). Mitt Romney received a huge portion, that is why he has most of the delegates.

Therefore Rule 38 does not apply.

Now, here is the question we SHOULD be asking...

IF there was no voter fraud, then how is it that delegates for Romney have not materialized? I mean, if he HONESTLY won the state, then how is it he is having a tough time getting delegates elected? HUM??? How is it that a guy who was a distant second is getting his peeps voted in? Did Romney win the election honestly? Was there some kind of chicanery?

Pressing-On 05-07-2012 07:22 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Interesting article.

Quote:

Ron Paul Could Still Win Enough Delegates To Deny Mitt Romney The Republican Nomination

Despite what you may have heard from the mainstream media, Mitt Romney does not have the Republican nomination locked up.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/arc...can-nomination

jfrog 05-07-2012 07:30 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1160157)
Thanks!

I was checking the information and received this:

Ok, I need to clarify this. Rule 38 does not apply to the situation in NV.

Clearly the guy reporting doesn't understand what the Unit rule is. The Unit rule is like "Winner take all," the winner gets all the votes.

It does not override the state plans put in place under rule 15B. In fact, the
state plan under 15 B that was winner take all.... was changed. All the primaries are proportional. All the states are proportional.... unless they had a NON BINDING PPP and caucus (like MO) or a blind primary (PA).

According to NV's state plan, the delegate assignments go based on the results of the vote in late January (just after Florida?). Mitt Romney received a huge portion, that is why he has most of the delegates.

Therefore Rule 38 does not apply.

Now, here is the question we SHOULD be asking...

IF there was no voter fraud, then how is it that delegates for Romney have not materialized? I mean, if he HONESTLY won the state, then how is it he is having a tough time getting delegates elected? HUM??? How is it that a guy who was a distant second is getting his peeps voted in? Did Romney win the election honestly? Was there some kind of chicanery?

Or instead of voter fraud maybe since Paul is the only competition left then he is pulling in alot of the Newt and Santorum voters to his side. On top of that since he is the only competition to Mitt his supporters are probably very energized. Seems more likely an explanation than voter fraud.

I think all these claims of voter fraud that pop up in every election are going to do more to destroy America than anything an elected official could do... It causes a loss of faith in the whole system and thats a major problem. One day when a popular enough candidate loses then his followers are going to yell voter fraud and riots and other bad things are going to happen far and wide.

Pressing-On 05-07-2012 07:42 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog (Post 1160160)
Or instead of voter fraud maybe since Paul is the only competition left then he is pulling in alot of the Newt and Santorum voters to his side. On top of that since he is the only competition to Mitt his supporters are probably very energized. Seems more likely an explanation than voter fraud.

I think all these claims of voter fraud that pop up in every election are going to do more to destroy America than anything an elected official could do... It causes a loss of faith in the whole system and thats a major problem. One day when a popular enough candidate loses then his followers are going to yell voter fraud and riots and other bad things are going to happen far and wide.

Well, we certainly can't deny voter fraud in the NY primary with the Rockland County Republican Chair's robocall saying that ALL candidates had dropped out of the race - vote for Romney. :thumbsdown

And voter fraud is going to be a large part of the conversation being that Obama practiced it more wickedly in 2008 with Acorn, etc. The process is already tainted and mistrust grows by the day.

Ron Paul is pulling ahead with the delegate count because, he had boots on the ground and a well laid strategy in place last year. We got news of it and I've posted it here - he wasn't sweating the polling because, he had delegates in place. That information is turning out to be true. It has nothing to do with anyone dropping out. His supporters knew what they were doing and send out a memo with instructions. Wish I would have saved it. It was very well planned - way in advance - point by point, step by step.

The RNC has violated so many of it's own rules that I think they will still win this for Romney, but I would love to see Ron Paul stop the Establishment.

Our advice to voters - Vote for your candidate of choice in the upcoming primaries - Santorum, Newt and Paul are still on the ballots. Stop Mitt! :)

Pressing-On 05-07-2012 08:52 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Republican Executive Committee Member Calls for Resignation of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus

Due to an alleged violation of the national GOP's Rule # 11 (bans favoritism of one candidate while more than one candidate exists), an Executive Committee member within the GOP calls for the resignation of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.

Rule #11 states:
"Rule No. 11 Candidate Support
(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee.

(b) No state Republican Party rule or state law shall be observed that allows persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party, including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that general election. No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state."

This call for resignation is based upon statements released by the RNC on 4/25/12 that said,

“Governor Romney’s strong performance and delegate count at this stage of the primary process has made him our party’s presumptive nominee,” Mr. Priebus said. “In order to maximize our efforts I have directed my staff at the R.N.C. to open lines of communication with the Romney campaign.”

and

“It’s my intention to have a seamless and complete merger between the presumptive nominee and the Republican National Committee,” Mr. Priebus said. “That means political, communications, fund-raising, research and the chairman’s office, along with the governor’s main operational team, are completely merged.”

http://www.pr.com/press-release/410950

Pressing-On 05-10-2012 09:52 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Furthering the conversation. More information I received.

Why Reince Priebus must resign as RNC chair and why Mitt Romney may not be able to be the GOP nominee at ALL now.

RULE NO. 11

Candidate Support


(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee.

(b) No state Republican Party rule or state law shall be observed that allows persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party, including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that general election. No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state.

Since Mitt Romney does not have 1,144 delegates (therefore the first condition holds) and Ron Paul is still in the race (therefore the second condition also holds), Mitt Romney is not the Republican Party Nominee.

As a result Reince Priebus and Mitt Romney have violated Rule 11 of the GOP rules (see attached screenshot from the Mitt Romney site) and check out the finer text at Mitt’s campaign site (https://www.mittromney.com/donate ): “Already hit your limit? If you’ve given the maximum of $2,500 for the primary and $2,500 for the general election to Romney for President, you can still give to the Romney Victory fund, our joint fundraising committee with the Republican National Committee by clicking here.”

And Rule 11 is very clear that no one nominated in violation of Rule 11 can be considered a nominee from a state EVEN IF “prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved” has been received.

Therefore, as long as Romney doesn’t currently have 1,144 delegates from the state that have already certified their state’s nominee, he’s not the nominee because the other states can’t certify him now.

A motion has already been entered to remove Reince Priebus from his chairmanship as a result: http://www.pr.com/press-release/410950

http://api.ning.com/files/taoKz6SSEH...ES_Adopted.pdf

http://api.ning.com/files/p2PfcInO**...RuleDebate.pdf

http://api.ning.com/files/nPhjk3CdWY...screenshot.jpg

Pressing-On 05-11-2012 04:31 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
GOP Leadership Calls for Reince Priebus to Resign! Unethical Rule Violation

Goes into more detail,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=ZA9c4O8x2Ik

Pressing-On 05-11-2012 10:46 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog (Post 1159964)
I hate right leaning news networks and this is a perfect example of why. His whole talking point is about The "Unit Rule" which the RNC outlawed. The "Unit Rule" is a rule that requires EVERY delegate of a state to be bound to vote for the candidate the majority of the state wanted. Banning the "Unit Rule" doesn't stop delegates from being bound. It stops them from being bound in such a manner that they all must vote the same.

Despite this misinformation those delegates are still bound to vote Romney. Try again PO.

Hey, jfrog, An update on the last video we discussed that you disagreed with.

Quote:

Reality Check: Why all RNC delegates are 'Free Agents' and unbound

(FOX19) - One week ago, Reality Check told you about one reason why the Republican Presidential nomination is far from locked up.

But one blogger says Ben got it wrong claiming "Urgent, Ben Swann and Matt Larson are wrong about Rule 38 and delegates being Unbound based on RNC rules."

So, was Ben wrong after all?

http://www.fox19.com/story/18305604/...ts-and-unbound

jfrog 05-12-2012 06:38 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1161288)
Hey, jfrog, An update on the last video we discussed that you disagreed with.

The first video: A conclusion reached off faulty reasoning.
This video: A conclusion reached off much better reasoning.

Pressing-On 05-12-2012 01:36 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfrog (Post 1161299)
The first video: A conclusion reached off faulty reasoning.
This video: A conclusion reached off much better reasoning.

Your point A is just silly.

His argument on both videos is the information he received from the RNC Legal Counsel: "The RNC does not recognize a state's binding of national delegates, but considers each delegate a free agent who can vote for whoever they choose. The National Convention allows delegates to vote for the individual, regardless of whether the person's name is officially placed into nomination or not." Jennifer Sheehan, Legal Counsel for the RNC.

The Bottom line is that both parties - Democrats and Republicans - are NOT government agencies - they are private organizations. Therefore, voting within a party is NOT bound by election law.

Pressing-On 05-12-2012 08:32 PM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Ron Paul has won the GOP Oklahoma convention with 34/43 delegates. That means over 2/3 of the Oklahoma delegates will go to the Republican National Convention NOT supporting Mitt Romney.

Brokered Convention here we come!!! :cheer

Pressing-On 05-13-2012 07:38 AM

Re: Reality Check on Bound and Unbound Delegates
 
Quote:

Brokered convention taking shape

With 11 states now in the books for Paul, to Romney's 18 and only 11 states left to start their primary or caucus process, Ron Paul has seemingly "stolen" enough delegates in the undecided states and will likely gain enough in states to come, virtually assuring a brokered convention at the RNC in August.

In addition to developments stating there may not actually be such thing as a “bound” delegate at the national level after all, Ron Paul may actually be truly nipping at Romney's heels, despite recent establishment media reports that state otherwise.

http://www.examiner.com/article/brok...n-taking-shape
:thumbsup


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.