Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

why isn't socialism compatible with christianity? the apostle's were socialists.

44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Nowhere did the Apostles command socialism. Nowhere do we find it past Acts 8 when the church was dispersed by persecution. Furthermore, nowhere does the Bible support the idea of God's kingdom being propagated by secular governments using the police power of the State to seize wealth from one person and give it to another.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,


nowhere past acts 8????? what kind of argument is that???? i suppose we can throw out the gospels and the entire old testament also. what a farce and a phony. is socialism in the bible or not? yes or no?


individuals in a secular government could be agents in the kingdom of god bringing justice, salvation and wholeness in the here and now, not the afterlife.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Not to me it isn't.
Don't understand why you
would want to use an avi of
this or the last you used?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

both avis are fighting for justice for the poor, isn't that what the bible teaches?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Again, I don't understand that type of
comparison thinking at all.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

this might help you understand if you are interested in learning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

That was a temporary condition trying to accommodate the multitudes who had gathered in Jerusalem for the feast day and had remained. Synagogues in that day did help the poor and that attitude was carried on over into the church. We don't read that when Philip went to Samarai, or Peter to Cornelius, or Paul went to the many places he went that they established Christian communes in those places where the believers all live together.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

You avoided my point completely. Nowhere were the people commanded by the Apostles to do it. And we don't see it mentioned as such after the dispersal of the Jerusalem church. Nowhere does the Bible condone socialism? BTW, what commune do you live with? What group do you submit your paycheck to for re-distribution. And again I say...nowhere does the Bible support the idea of God's kingdom being propagated by secular governments using the police power of the State to seize wealth from one person and give it to another.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

if the bible doesn't condone socialism, where in the bible does god condone capitalism? if niether is advocated then socialism is a viable option for christians to support. why do christians have to be capitalists?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

the bible does say that we are agents of the kingdom of god and to preach the good news of the kingdom of god. the kingdom of god is egalitarian, all are equal. all are not equal under capitalism. where do you find that the kingdom of god is capitalistic? if not how do you describe the kingdom of god in the here and now?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

You can voluntarily support whatever you want. In fact, we're kind of tight right now. Would you mind paying my power bill?

The problem is when Christians or anyone else condone a system where the government , through its police powers, seizes wealth from one person and re-distributes it to another. You obviously support that, making you an enemy of freedom and liberty. Give your money to whomever you choose, but don't try to steal ours because you think you know better than us who to give it to.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

no one is seizing wealth, it's called nationalization of natural resources. why should certain individuals prosper from god given resources and others not?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

The government will still have to hire private contractors to go after those resources. The government does not own oil wells. Therefore, someone will benefit more than others. Furthermore, if I find oil on my land, why should I not be able to sell it and become wealthy?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

The Apostles were missionaries, not politicians or political revolutionaries. DM you are really confused.

What you have above is a willingness to give. What YOU have in Socialism is robbing the rich to give to the poor unwillingly controlled by politicians who think they know how to give better than we do.

BTW when you do that there is less charitable giving.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

of course the apostles were missionaries, i'm just making a point that one of their chief concerns was the welfare of the poor. just as christ said, when we serve the poor, we serve him.

no one is robbing the rich. chavez is making the workers be part owners of the means of production so that all benefit equally.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Lots of people with money are concerned about the poor. But they'd rather give their money than have politicians and revolutionaries TAKE it by force and tell us they know better how to give it away

Higher taxes. Nationalization of businesses. Taking land from land owners. Stealing from the Rich

You don't want the Church. You want government

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

what about when the church becomes the government or fights for changes in the government. what is that government supposed to look like?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Most of the States would not ratify the Constitution until there was a guarantee that the church would not become the government. And what is the government supposed to look like? It's supposed to look like what is laid out in the Constitution.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

What about my avatar???? I am making a political statement. :happydance

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Whose church? Church is church. Government is government.

One is a religion and the other is not. You're confused as to what "The church" is.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

BTW you are mistaken about Socialism being about helping the poor. It's really about making EVERYONE equally poor except for a very few powerful people.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Praxeas!!!!:highfive

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

That's why I say that those who push it must have aspirations to become one of the elite.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

the point i'm trying to make is, if the church should be concerned for the welfare of the poor and seek to change the structures of society that keep the poor oppressed, what kind of social change would you seek to implement?

it is hard to imagine the need for change in an affluent society but if you lived in a poor area or in africa or latin america where the context is different. i think you would have a different point of view.

examples of church programs like nursery, preschool, tutoring, drug rehab, voter registration, demonstrating for worker rights to unionize etc these are things the church should be doing to better the life of the kingdom and if the church should come to power it should advocate for those policies which most help the poor.

if you were in charge of a poor country, what policies would you advocate?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

First of all let me blow this silly argument out of the water real quickly.

No, socialism is not in the Bible, at all.

There are two primary aspects to the verse I want YOU yes YOU to notice, because I can't stand this verse being RIPPED out of context to fit political agendas.

Firstly, and most importantly, this was NOT the formation of a socialist government. This was a CHRISTIAN SECT deciding to give up their goods and live together giving themselves up totally to the ministry of God and the Apostles Doctrine. They shared everything in common simply because their life was now totally dedicated to Christ and to his work. These were the FIRST 3,000 who were saved and added to the church in scripture. And YES here it is there is no other group of individuals in scripture who we see doing this outside of these original 3,000. Paul even solicited offerings from individuals in the church of Corinth. In order to give offering you have to have something to offer, the Corinthian church was not operating this way in 1 Corinthians 16.

Secondly if you want to do what the 3,000 did go right ahead. Start a church sell all of your property and live in a commune. Don't pretend these were political activists for communist living because that is not what they were. They did not propagate sharing things in common with thieves, murderers, robbers, people who don't pay taxes, people who rape, etc. They were saints, every one of them were saved and worked to build the ministry. True saints give their all for the benefit and well-being of the church and the building of the ministry. You cannot run a government the way 3,000 Holy Ghost filled blood washed saints ran ONE church thousands of years ago. That would be insane.

You have again torn the scriptures out of context to support your agenda.


You have absolutely NO scripture to back that up.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

The church, or Christians, should help the poor, not engage in revolutions. The church should not be in charge of governments

The church changes through spiritual means not political activism. Vote your conscious but don't confuse what the church is

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

We were NEVER told to change the structure of society. We were given the charge the Apostles were given

"And He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they[b] will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.”" Mark 16:15-18

The christian charge is to the salvation of souls. It has been and always will be. Also, you are as much "oppressed" in the United States as you want to think you are. Giving an "oppressive" government more money out of people's taxes does not solve "oppression". Government spending doesn't solve "oppression". I heard a story a couple days ago that absolutely blew my mind but barely surprised me. In California, the state that just voted in all those new state taxes, the San Francisco legislature passes a bill approving state funded sex change procedures for San Francisco transsexuals. My point? You can take who ever's money you want and lead a "war against the evil rich untaxed upper class" but it will mean nothing. Government doesn't need money to work, it needs people who aren't hooked on radical agendas who will keep their grubby little hands off public life and stick to enforcing the law and ensuring civil liberties are protected.

WE are involved in these things ALL the time as THE church. And we do so volunteering OUR money that WE worked for. I can't GIVE my MONEY to the POOR if the GOVERNMENT is TAKING it and USING it to RUN their own failed godless public schools, planned parenting, bailouts, TARP, transsexual sex changes, etc. Am I making any sense?

And no liberal policies do not benefit the poor, I know this first hand. The Democratic Party cares as much about poor people as I care about funding sex changes ... none.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

First of all, I would slash corporate taxes to ZERO in order to attract businesses. This would create jobs. Secondly, I would begin phasing out taxes on income, adopting instead an excise tax, and modest tariffs. Thirdly, I'd phase out socialism which always creates poverty.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

the question is how do you define the salvation that christ brings. is it only spiritual salvation or both spiritual and physical. god liberated the children of israel from physical oppression. has god changed and is now only concerned with spiritual salvation? where in the bible says we should not advocate for social justice? there are plenty of examples in the prophets about the poor and oppressed.

Psalm 12:5
For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the LORD; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him.

1 Samuel 2:8
He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD's, and he hath set the world upon them.

Psalm 146:7
Which executeth judgment for the oppressed: which giveth food to the hungry. The LORD looseth the prisoners:

is this spiritual salvation only?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

No the issue was socialism. You confuse Politics and Religion

Salvation is about man being sinners and already condemned but being free from that condemnation and forgiven of sins by faith in Christ.

See above.

No. God separated them so they can go worship God. But again that has nothing to do with the issue of Politics

What does that have to do with POLITICS and SOCIALISM and REVOLUTIONS and TAKING MONEY from People to give to others till we are all equally poor but a few powerful Elite?

Nobody said we should not advocate social justice. Did you not read what I said earlier?

What does that have to do with my post?

See above

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

See in bold

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

What about Christians who are poor because they are oppressed by evil socialists like Che?

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

Or the thousands of Christians in China persecuted daily. Or those killed off by Pol Pot, Stalin, etc.

Re: Is This Avatar More Agreeable?
 

NG....I liked your other avatar much better.

The natives around here knew how Elvis really grew up and they do tell.

Gossipers! :heeheehee