![]() |
Theology
do you follow on the these systems of theology, and if so why?
is there another system of theology besides what is depicted in this chart? http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...7&d=1506344468 http://www.christinyou.net/pages/dthcthchth.html |
Re: Theology
Amanah, I have modified Dispensational Theology to fit the proper scriptural method of explaining time periods.....
I like to use the term "time periods" as a disp. point of view. These time periods are legitimate eras' of time, in which God dealt with mankind with a dispensing of certain rule or rules to live by. Each time period ends up judging man for his failure and a new time period is built upon the existing ones.(with a few exceptions). God had dispensed His rule over mankind within these periods of time. dis·pense dəˈspens/ verb 1. distribute or provide (a service or information) to a number of people. Dispensation #1...Innocence, ends in judgement. All future mankind still in its' effect. #2....Conscience, ends in judgement, yet God still uses the conscience to condemn man of sin. #3....Human govt.,, ends in judgement via dispersion of languages, yet still in effect today. #4...Promise, Israel judged by God in bondage for about 400 years, yet it is still in effect today by an ongoing promise to Abraham. #5....Law, ends in judgement for sin at Calvary for SAINTS only, yet sinners are still under the curse of the Law(and its' condemnation) #6.....Grace, an extension of Promise and same covenant as future Millennial reign(BOTH SAINTS AND NATIONAL ISRAEL INCLUDED), will end in judgement to those that do not accept Christ(Tribulation). #7....1000 year Millennial reign, A time period of the reign of Jesus Christ over all mankind from Jerusalem, to end in judgement at the loosing of satan in Rev. 20. THAT WILL WRAP UP TIME AND HISTORY. |
Re: Theology
thank you Bro Sean
|
Re: Theology
Your welcome. Today, many folks are rethinking their methods of explaining the Bible.
|
Re: Theology
Sean, you have 6 dispensations that are overlapping.
|
Re: Theology
All time periods are based on Laws of God. And these Laws are added because of transgression, never subtracted as old dispy teaching suggests.
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
Dispensational Theology ......Dispensational theology is probably the most popular theological understanding in America at this time, even though it has a more recent origin than Covenant theology. The development of Dispensational theology dates back to the nineteenth century in Britain. J.N. Darby (1800-1882), an Irish lawyer, sought to explain the uniqueness of the Christians' spiritual condition "in Christ." To explain the radical different in Christian "benefits" from that afforded to peoples in all prior times, Mr. Darby employed the division of time into distinct "dispensations." Harry Ironside, a later proponent of Dispensational theology, noted that "until Mr. J.N. Darby...it (the dispensational idea of a postponed kingdom) is scarcely to be found in a single book or sermon through a period of sixteen hundred years."4 Darby's novel idea of distinguishing "dispensations" of time became the basis of a new theological system known as "Dispensationalism." |
Re: Theology
These Laws definitely never die, they more than overlap, they are set in stone to create a situation of wrath.
|
Re: Theology
Loren, Darbyism is on life support these days.
|
Re: Theology
I can wipe it out with one verse.
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
Same thing with Dispensationalism. Notice the use of Sean's modified Dispensational Theology. That says it all. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
When Paul uses the word dispensation it means to preach the Gospel of God's grace. When never read where he preaches about Moses preaching a dispensation of law? We don't have John introducing us to him preaching that he is dispensing the Gospel of a Millennium?
|
Re: Theology
None of the above.
Sorta. The Bible mentions dispensations. I see Law and grace. I have not thought about covenant theology since my college days. I have never heard of the Christocentric theology. But it is fun to spell. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Someday someone will write a book about the impact the Scofield and the Thompson study Bibles have had on American Pentecostal theology.
The companion book would be the impact of Dispensational Truth (Clarence Larkin) on American Pentecostal eschatology. But I will not write it. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Folks commonly bash something they found broken, to prove their broken doctrines are right.
2 wrongs never make a right. Get your own doctrine right, instead of bashing your(false teaching) cousin's wrong doctrine. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
Sean fixed Dispensationalism. Sean, could you show us what exactly you fixed? |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Sean fixed dispensationalism. That takes real talent. "About time" :)
|
Re: Theology
:largehalo
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
All theological systems are to be judged by how accurately or inaccurately they represent the teachings of the Bible. This then proves there is a true "Biblical Theology" which serves as the standard. We would be better served attempting to find that theology rather than trying to create a brand-name system of our own. All theological "systems" are man-made, in that the Bible does not present a "systematic presentation of doctrine" similar to a systematic theology. Hence, all systematic theologies and systems of theology are nothing more than TEACHING, a body of doctrines, a syllabus and curriculum of presenting Biblical data. Every system of theology is a particular teacher's presentation of doctrine. Keeping that in mind keeps us from swearing allegiance to a particular, formulaic system invented by men. Unfortunately, men seem to always want to do just that. Hence, they do not study the Bible so much as they study theological systems. And so orthodoxy gets determined by how accurately a belief represents a particular theological system, rather than by how accurately a belief conforms to Scripture. Systematic theologies can be more or less useful, but one must avoid the trap of using them as a replacement of the Bible standard. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
:thumbsup |
Re: Theology
Quote:
No dispensation ENDED, only judgement came. More Laws of God were added because of transgression. You can't see the modification? How can you criticize Dipies if you dont read their ideas? |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
Spot on! |
Re: Theology
Quote:
Sean, please show us HOW you changed the Classical Dispensationalism to your MODIFIED dispensationalism? Please do it with scripture, book, chapter, and verse. Your posted "list" means nothing, you need to EXPLAIN your position with the Bible. So, after you watch Sponge Bob, please come back and post this so all may learn. Truther? LOL LOL LOL LOL :laffatu |
Re: Theology
DB, you are so silly.
I love your posts, they are all like MAD magazine mixed with National Enquirer. Thanks for the endless non substance but comic relief. |
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
Re: Theology
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.