Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Water baptism is not vital for salvation? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=51896)

mfblume 01-06-2018 09:04 PM

Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Baptism is so vital that the jailer, who was willing to kill himself due to the prisoners like Paul and Silas being out of the prison, was willing the LEAVE that prison and risk his neck to get baptized.

Now, how in the world is that making baptismal unnecessary for the actual salvation if this guy who wanted to kill himself rather than be caught letting prisoners out actually goes out WITH THEM, further risking his neck, to get baptized? He would have been baptized later when it was safer!!!

Those who think water baptism is not absolutely vital cannot answer that!

(Mic drop)

Barb 01-06-2018 09:27 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515063)
Baptism is so vital that the jailer, who was willing to kill himself due to the prisoners like Paul and Silas being out of the prison, was willing the LEAVE that prison and risk his neck to get baptized.

Now, how in the world is that making baptismal unnecessary for the actual salvation if this guy who wanted to kill himself rather than be caught letting prisoners out actually goes out WITH THEM, further risking his neck, to get baptized? He would have been baptized later when it was safer!!!

Those who think water baptism is not absolutely vital cannot answer that!

(Mic drop)

Yes, sir!!!

houston 01-06-2018 10:04 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
It’s essential.

houston 01-06-2018 10:05 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
How did that go? It’s essential but not salvific?

mfblume 01-06-2018 10:06 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515077)
How did that go? It’s essential but not salvific?

Risking someone's life for something not "salvific" when it could be done later, is a little offkey to me. (exggaerating - it's huge!) lol

houston 01-06-2018 10:09 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515078)
Risking someone's life for something not "salvific" when it could be done later, is a little offkey to me. (exggaerating - it's huge!) lol

IDK. I recall sitting in an A of G some 9 1/2 years ago. The teaching pastor encouraged people to get baptized. He stressed that there were so many benefits to baptism. Didn’t seem that he could really explain the benefits. Lol.

mfblume 01-06-2018 10:30 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515079)
IDK. I recall sitting in an A of G some 9 1/2 years ago. The teaching pastor encouraged people to get baptized. He stressed that there were so many benefits to baptism. Didn’t seem that he could really explain the benefits. Lol.

:thumbsup

I can. SALVATION! :D

houston 01-06-2018 10:55 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515090)
:thumbsup

I can. SALVATION! :D

Forgiveness of sins. Circumcision of the heart. Identifying with His burial and resurrection.

thephnxman 01-06-2018 10:56 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
His NAME is Jesus!

Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515079)
IDK. I recall sitting in an A of G some 9 1/2 years ago. The teaching pastor encouraged people to get baptized. He
stressed that there were so many benefits to baptism. Didn’t seem that he could really explain the benefits. Lol.

Look no further than the "Great Commission"

"Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations, BAPTIZING them..."
"He that believes and IS BAPTIZED..."

And there is, of course, this other great benefit: the REMISSION of sins!

Some folks, even pastors now, refuse to read the scriptures.

Brother Villa

mfblume 01-06-2018 11:33 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515095)
Forgiveness of sins. Circumcision of the heart. Identifying with His burial and resurrection.

Baptism into his death! :D

.. so that we're dead and therefore freed from sin. This means sin shall not have dominion over us any more. And it's what Peter said about baptism in 1 Peter 3 through 4, where we put on the mind of Christ and realize that if we died with Him we need not live to sin any more.

houston 01-06-2018 11:38 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
That, too. I knew I was missing something. Kinda rusty. I was PCI for a few years.. then went Reformed Baptist, and made full circle. Quite the experience.

navygoat1998 01-07-2018 08:50 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515108)
That, too. I knew I was missing something. Kinda rusty. I was PCI for a few years.. then went Reformed Baptist, and made full circle. Quite the experience.

Sooooo you have come back to the "truth"?......:whistle

Buy the truth and sell it not!

Sean 01-07-2018 08:50 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
You all better watch it, Originalist will stop talking to you.

houston 01-07-2018 12:42 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by navygoat1998 (Post 1515140)
Sooooo you have come back to the "truth"?......:whistle

Buy the truth and sell it not!

Critic, be gone.

navygoat1998 01-08-2018 04:25 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1515147)
Critic, be gone.

:happydance

returnman 01-08-2018 07:45 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
I don't have an exact belief concerning baptism along apostolic lines neither is the following an exact of what I believe but:

Without knowing the jailers knowledge of salvation, in his mind in order to obtain the same he might have been fully persuaded to be baptized. How many converts do the same today because their heart has been made right with God that they are too persuaded to be baptized with little or no knowledge of the scripture.

And before everyone jumps on what Paul and Silas told him to do unless my memory is blurred, there was no HG tongues required to be saved. Correction, it is recorded.....believe on the Lord.

mfblume 01-08-2018 08:59 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by returnman (Post 1515233)
I don't have an exact belief concerning baptism along apostolic lines neither is the following an exact of what I believe but:

Without knowing the jailers knowledge of salvation, in his mind in order to obtain the same he might have been fully persuaded to be baptized. How many converts do the same today because their heart has been made right with God that they are too persuaded to be baptized with little or no knowledge of the scripture.

And before everyone jumps on what Paul and Silas told him to do unless my memory is blurred, there was no HG tongues required to be saved. Correction, it is recorded.....believe on the Lord.

Not altogether correct.

Act 16:31-33 KJV....And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. ..(32)....And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house. ..(33)....And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

After we read of them speaking of his need to be saved by faith, we then read these vita words: "And they spake unto him the word of the Lord."

It was after this we read they baptized him the same hour of the night after he washed their stripes. Obviously the baptism was all about what they spoke to him in that session. It was then that they fully informed him of the knowledge he required for salvation.

mfblume 01-08-2018 09:00 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 1515141)
You all better watch it, Originalist will stop talking to you.

Bye Sean.

Evang.Benincasa 01-08-2018 09:40 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515249)
Not altogether correct.

Act 16:31-33 KJV....And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. ..(32)....And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house. ..(33)....And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

After we read of them speaking of his need to be saved by faith, we then read these vita words: "And they spake unto him the word of the Lord."

It was after this we read they baptized him the same hour of the night after he washed their stripes. Obviously the baptism was all about what they spoke to him in that session. It was then that they fully informed him of the knowledge he required for salvation.

Amen, exactly. They preached, they taught, they explained.

Evang.Benincasa 01-08-2018 09:41 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515250)
Bye Sean.

Amen :thumbsup

BrainWashed 01-10-2018 03:45 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
(runs and picks up mic ...tap....tap....is this thing on?)

A man walks Into a bar carrying jumper cables...so the bartender says, "Hey, buddy, don't start anything in here."




Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515063)
Baptism is so vital that the jailer, who was willing to kill himself due to the prisoners like Paul and Silas being out of the prison, was willing the LEAVE that prison and risk his neck to get baptized.

Now, how in the world is that making baptismal unnecessary for the actual salvation if this guy who wanted to kill himself rather than be caught letting prisoners out actually goes out WITH THEM, further risking his neck, to get baptized? He would have been baptized later when it was safer!!!

Those who think water baptism is not absolutely vital cannot answer that!

(Mic drop)


Aquila 01-11-2018 10:27 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515063)
Baptism is so vital that the jailer, who was willing to kill himself due to the prisoners like Paul and Silas being out of the prison, was willing the LEAVE that prison and risk his neck to get baptized.

Now, how in the world is that making baptismal unnecessary for the actual salvation if this guy who wanted to kill himself rather than be caught letting prisoners out actually goes out WITH THEM, further risking his neck, to get baptized? He would have been baptized later when it was safer!!!

Those who think water baptism is not absolutely vital cannot answer that!

(Mic drop)

:thumbsup :yourock

Jito463 01-11-2018 12:42 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1515105)
Baptism into his death! :D

.. so that we're dead and therefore freed from sin. This means sin shall not have dominion over us any more. And it's what Peter said about baptism in 1 Peter 3 through 4, where we put on the mind of Christ and realize that if we died with Him we need not live to sin any more.

Exactly. I mean, Peter couldn't get much clearer than this:
1 Peter 3:20-21

20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
I guess ol' Petey was just mistaken.

mfblume 01-13-2018 09:57 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BrainWashed (Post 1515785)
(runs and picks up mic ...tap....tap....is this thing on?)

A man walks Into a bar carrying jumper cables...so the bartender says, "Hey, buddy, don't start anything in here."

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! That is funny!!

Evang.Benincasa 01-16-2018 05:40 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Water baptism IN JESUS NAME is a must!

Amanah 01-16-2018 06:13 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa (Post 1516493)
Water baptism IN JESUS NAME is a must!

Acts 4:12
12..Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

houston 01-16-2018 02:54 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa (Post 1516493)
Water baptism IN JESUS NAME is a must!

Depends on what the meaning of EIS is.

I’d like your answer, though I think I already know the answer.

Ok. I don’t know how to ask... I’ll just type anyway. Before I was baptized I was taught the purpose for baptism. They were not going to baptize me without going over it. So, I believed (faith) that my sins would be forgiven during baptism. And I was baptized.

Others teach that baptism is just for (list of reasons), but forgiveness of sins is not one of them. If they do not believe that baptism is for the remission of sin, is their baptism in vain? Are their sins forgiven?

Esaias 01-16-2018 09:47 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1516536)
Depends on what the meaning of EIS is.

I’d like your answer, though I think I already know the answer.

Ok. I don’t know how to ask... I’ll just type anyway. Before I was baptized I was taught the purpose for baptism. They were not going to baptize me without going over it. So, I believed (faith) that my sins would be forgiven during baptism. And I was baptized.

Others teach that baptism is just for (list of reasons), but forgiveness of sins is not one of them. If they do not believe that baptism is for the remission of sin, is their baptism in vain? Are their sins forgiven?

Maybe I've read too many Campbellite authors but I tend to believe that a person must intend to have their sins remitted by the blood in water baptism in order for it to be a genuinely apostolic baptism. In other words, the person being baptized should understand that baptism is "when" one's sins are washed away, by calling upon the Lord in faith.

However, I suspect that a person who only thinks in terms of "Jesus said do it, I want to follow Him, so I'm doing it" is probably covered. I do think if a person believes they are getting baptized as a public statement they have already been saved (Baptist type baptism) then their baptism is highly irregular at best, and possibly invalid.

houston 01-17-2018 02:04 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Thanks for your reply

Evang.Benincasa 01-17-2018 03:07 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1516536)
Depends on what the meaning of EIS is.

I’d like your answer, though I think I already know the answer.

Ok. I don’t know how to ask... I’ll just type anyway. Before I was baptized I was taught the purpose for baptism. They were not going to baptize me without going over it. So, I believed (faith) that my sins would be forgiven during baptism. And I was baptized.

Others teach that baptism is just for (list of reasons), but forgiveness of sins is not one of them. If they do not believe that baptism is for the remission of sin, is their baptism in vain? Are their sins forgiven?

Just so the KJV Nazis don’t get upset, the best way to explain the EIS “for” is with Matthew 26:28. Jesus’ blood wasn’t shed because their sins were already remitted. His blood is for the remittance. Therefore Acts 2:38 follows this.

Sean 01-17-2018 07:18 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
KJV Nazi's?

You despise the KJV that much?

houston 01-17-2018 10:57 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa (Post 1516591)
Just so the KJV Nazis don’t get upset, the best way to explain the EIS “for” is with Matthew 26:28. Jesus’ blood wasn’t shed because their sins were already remitted. His blood is for the remittance. Therefore Acts 2:38 follows this.

Excellent!

houston 01-17-2018 10:58 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 1516601)
KJV Nazi's?

You despise the KJV that much?

Shut up already. Please. Thanks.

Amanah 01-17-2018 11:03 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa (Post 1516591)
Just so the KJV Nazis don’t get upset, the best way to explain the EIS “for” is with Matthew 26:28. Jesus’ blood wasn’t shed because their sins were already remitted. His blood is for the remittance. Therefore Acts 2:38 follows this.

awesome post, thank you!

Jito463 01-17-2018 11:56 AM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 1516601)
KJV Nazi's?

You despise the KJV that much?

By your post, I assume you believe everyone who mentions grammar nazis automatically hates grammar? :ohplease

mfblume 01-17-2018 04:53 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by houston (Post 1516628)
Shut up already. Please. Thanks.

Now, if we had more posts like these. :thumbsup

mfblume 01-17-2018 04:54 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jito463 (Post 1516633)
By your post, I assume you believe everyone who mentions grammar nazis automatically hates grammar? :ohplease

Don't respond to that guy. :)

Evang.Benincasa 01-17-2018 05:45 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jito463 (Post 1516633)
By your post, I assume you believe everyone who mentions grammar nazis automatically hates grammar? :ohplease

Ah, your Kung Fu is very good.

Evang.Benincasa 01-17-2018 05:47 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume (Post 1516649)
Don't respond to that guy. :)

I’m trying my best Elder.

It is like having a fly land on your nose.

Swat it, or let it sit there.

Sean 01-17-2018 06:34 PM

Re: Water baptism is not vital for salvation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jito463 (Post 1516633)
By your post, I assume you believe everyone who mentions grammar nazis automatically hates grammar? :ohplease

Is "Nazi" good terminology for KJV enthusiasts?

Do you know that the Nazis were responsible for despicable acts of barbarism and millions of deaths?

Is that what you guys think of us?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.