![]() |
Uncut Hair
Is it wrong for a lady to cut her hair?
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Long hair is scriptural. Not "uncut".
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
Gotcha. Whatever. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
https://youtu.be/NrCtdhTYvxc |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
But if your wife (or my wife or daughters) cuts their hair, one thing is for sure. It will not be as long. Right? I personally prefer my wife and daughters to have uncut hair (and they do). |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
The covering prescribed in the Bible for a woman is something other than her hair-- else all men with hair on their head would dishonor God every time they prayed.
|
Re: Uncut Hair
In amending my bye, I think what is interesting about this discussion is that early continuationists most definitely did have standards about hair length. One of the complaints against AS McPherson was her bobbing her hair after her infamous adultery with a former employee Ken Orminston. Her big 300-strong quire ultimately resigned ab ovo for what they saw in McPherson as capitulation to worldilness and specifically unbiblical per Dr DW Cloud's The Pentecostal & Charismatic Movements: The History & The Error, page 76 of the 2014 edition. I cannot speak to what period Oneness Pentecostals believed. Nonetheless, short hair on a woman was seen shameful per Saul's legislation a man ought not to have long hair. I see no reason a woman sins by cutting her hair if her hair still maintains the modesty required of a Christian. I see short-haired strumpets almost dialy, some even shaved nearly bald, in this university city, finding it a revolting practice in this rakehelly last season. What was once rejected is highly fashionable (Isa. 1, 5; Luke 16.16-20). It is totally unattractive.
Some early pioneer standards were rather nomist, such as abstaining from pork mandated by JA Dowie and AJ Tomlinson, which in the latter case wws thought to be the dining of the unsaved. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
Being a brother if my hair is to my behind but trimmed, is it long? |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
What we are discovering is that it is at least a shame if not a sin for women to pray or prophesy in the meeting without a veil/covering. Likewise for a many to pray or prophesy in the meeting with one on.
Long hair being used as nature pointing to this truth. |
Re: Uncut Hair
First the text:
I Corinthians 11:1-16 (NLT)Here is my understanding of the issue: 1. The head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man. (Proper headship)Modesty is always a Christian spiritual practice, regardless of culture. So is submission to one's husband. The fact that the issue surrounded the veil is immaterial. It could have involved low necklines, plaited hair, or inappropriate dancing during worship. Such immodesty and disregard for the will of a woman's husband dishonors a woman's head, meaning her husband. We often fixate upon the material topic at hand, establish some outward legalistic "standard", and in the process we miss the underlying eternal principles that are at work. Today, in our culture, a husband might ask that his wife not wear tight clothing, short skirts, low cut blouses, ostentatious jewelry or clothing, excessive makeup, a "bedroom-look" hair-style, etc. Should she disregard his will by professing some form of "Christian liberty" and appears immodest in the congregation (especially during worship) she insults the angels and dishonors her husband (her head)... just like the Corinthian women did when refusing to wear the veil in Paul's day. In short, a woman can take up the practice of wearing a "head covering", but if her skirt is so tight she "duck-walks" into the gathering place for worship she is just as much in violation of the principles in I Corinthians 11 as the women in ancient Corinth were. Why? Because the underlying principles being taught by Paul weren't strictly about the "veil". A head covering is no "magic token" or "sacramental garb". Nor is it commanded anywhere in Scripture. What Paul was illustrating was the need for submission and modesty. I'd also like to say that submission and modesty are not two different things as it relates to women. In fact, submission is a necessary element of modesty for Christian women. A Christian woman can be dressed as conservatively modest by all cultural standards... but if she isn't in loving submission to her husband... she's being brazen, prideful, and rebellious. Such attitudes, or dispositions of spirit, are brazenly immodest. I believe that the issue Paul was addressing in I Corinthians 11:1-16 was that their women were becoming overzealous in their Christian liberty and choosing not to wear their veils in gatherings. They were even praying and prophesying without their veils. Culturally, only women of loose heathen morals and prostitutes (who shaved their heads) paraded around unveiled. This greatly disturbed the men in the congregation, because their wives were appearing too "loose". Their immodesty was insulting and only served to bring shame to their husbands. The men felt that the women should be made to wear their veils. The women felt their new found liberty in Christ should be exercised. The women were being immodest and not submitting to the headship of their husbands. The issue was therefore not hair, not a head covering requirement, but rather an issue of immodesty and lack of submission. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
The issue about hair is that you guys read in English. :heeheehee
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
1 Corintios 11:15
15 Por el contrario, a la mujer dejarse crecer el cabello le es honroso; porque en lugar de velo le es dado el cabello. Doesn't say long here. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
1 Corinthians 11:15
mentre è una gloria per la donna lasciarseli crescere? La chioma le è stata data a guisa di velo. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
I recently heard someone just preach that our long uncut hair is a covenant. Of course, that would then mean it isn't a suggestion. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
1 Corinthians 11:16 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? It is pretty obvious that the long in long hair is going to be subjective, as it is for women. Long as compared to what? What I would like to focus on is the word nature. To me nature is what happens if there is no outside interference. So what is nature teaching us? This is the way I understand it. If we take a look around in any congregation, we will see many times more bald men than we will see bald women. It is indeed unusual to see a bald woman. A bald man? Not so much! So there's that. The other verse I would like to look at is verse 16 . . . 16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God. If any man be contentious . . . Is there any contentiousness from any man? I think it is obvious that there is. Some are contending for long hair, some are contending for hair that is uncut, some are contending that it really doesn't matter that much. There is much contending on the subject of long hair for women! So we have qualified in the contention category. So what does the remainder of the verse say? . . . we have no such custom, neither the churches of God. If there is contention, we have no such custom. It is not there. It is interesting that Paul refers to it as a custom and not a commandment as well. That's my thoughts. As I have said earlier in the thread, my preference for my house is uncut hair for the ladies, however if you want to contend with me about it, I refuse to do so. According to the scripture. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
"On the contrary, the woman is allowed to grow her hair; because instead of veil is given the hair." |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
What's your angle? I'm curious. Quote:
I Corinthians 11:3-6 (ESV)Paul's opening statement on the issue is why I believe that the issue was about headship and how women were dishonoring their husbands by not wearing their head coverings. This was an immodest act, and so this is why it was the same as if she were shaven like a prostitute (an immodest and loose woman). Clearly the women were disregarding their husband's admonitions to be covered. For this reason, they were not only being immodest, but they were challenging the headship of their husbands. And so, Paul addresses both issues as they relate to one another. The ladies were getting all excited and going too far in their Christian liberty. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
1 Corinthians 11:16 New Living Translation (NLT) |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
Well I checked my 8 version New Testament and not one version uses the phrase "instead of ". Neither does any of them use "is allowed to grow her hair". However if it did say she is allowed to grow her hair thats good. But it would certainly not mean she is never allowed to cut it. Just that she is allowed to grow it. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
Because when we end up in the hospital we won't be working at the job. Then we have the hospital keeping us up. |
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
Re: Uncut Hair
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.