![]() |
Daniel's 70th week
the book of Mathew chapter one gives a chapter long Chronology from Abraham to Christ. It states that there is 14 generations from Abraham unto David, 14 generations from David to the carrying away to Babylon, and 14 generations from the carrying away to Babylon to Christ. a generation seems to consistantly be 40years in the Bible. (14 x generations) 14 x 40=560years. There is 560 years from the babylonian captivity until Christ.
Daniel said the number of years of the captivity would be 70years and then he said that their would be 70 weeks following the decree of Cyrus to the Messiah. 70years + 70 weeks 70 years +490years =560yrs Mathew and Daniel matchup very well. I know that it gets confusing dealing with exact dates in scriptures because our calendars are not the same, but for a general view this seemed to be good. I just don't understand how people subtract the 70th week and place it in the 21st century when it fits so well right were it is at. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Getting everyone ready for their antichrist. Believe me, many Hebrew Rootists and Yah wayists have rolled out the carpet for this time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tta3mqZyb3c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8grxuBn1jM |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptoH14R_x7s |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
When the Messiah comes he will defeat the nations and rule them with an iron rod. His sin is in refusing Yeshua as the Messiah. Yes it is antichrist doctrine. One strand of it. On a world wide basis Judaism is nowhere near the terror to Christians as the Communists and Islamics who have killed millions of believers in Yeshua. I cant think right off hand IN OUR DAY where the Jewish faith has beheaded or put to death Christians at all. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
BTW, I was not aware that Muslims have killed millions of believers in Yeshua? At least not since the middle ages, when Islamic armies were stampeding across much of Europe, fighting against armies raised by the Popes (the guys who claimed to be God-On-Earth)? Dear brother, I do think you are in the dark regarding history, and therefore are not able to put yourself and the present condition into proper perspective. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
But perhaps you, or anyone, could present the case from Scripture that the 70th week of Daniel is to be separated from the other 69 weeks, by a gap of some two thousand years or so? When did the 69 weeks end, and why, and why should anyone think the 70th never started? And why did nobody recognize that key piece of information until Scofield was selling his book, financed by non Christian Zionist Jews?
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
I can present facts all day that the Communists and Muslims have and it continues to this day. And YET almost all we hear about both here and other places on the net is how horrible the Jews are. As a matter of fact I consistently got A's in history in school. It was my favorite subject. Now since the coming of the Internet where apparently much more truth has come to light I'm sure I could still learn much more about it. Problem is that long ago I decided to put my free time into studying the Bible. Other interests have been put to the side for the most part. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Nonetheless both the Partial Preterist and Historist systems contain "gaps" in their time frames. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
"Oh, but the Communists persecuted Jews in Russia!" Yeah, so? Jews get persecuted in modern Israel, BY JEWS. They present a united front to the world, but the reality is global Judaism is divided up into sects, some of whom literally have no problem killing the others if it is perceived as "good for Jews overall". You got A's in public school history class because your teachers were managed by the National Education Agency (NEA), which was and is a subversive Communist front organization (based on their OWN PUBLIC STATEMENTS over the years). You did not learn real, actual history, nobody in public school does. Jihadi Islam is almost entirely funded and recruited out of Saudi Arabia and the Wahabbi sect(s) of Islam. ISIS, AlQaeda, Daesh, etc, are all Saudi backed terrorist groups. The Royal House of Saud are converted Jews (Saudi is run by what used to be called crypto Jews, much like Spain used to be). The modern state of Israel has been caught REPEATEDLY assisting ISIS in Syria. The entire mess that is the middle east is the direct consequence of destabilization policies of the US and Israel, designed to strengthen Israel's position and provide ongoing excuses for US military involvement in constantly keeping Israel's perceived enemies divided and under threat. The Arab radical terrorist movement was essentially created by TE Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia), a British asset whose job was to create "flying columns" of Arab guerrillas to harass the Ottoman Turks during WW1. The British government has been in partnership with powerful Jewish families since the 1700s when the House of Rothschild was invited to London to take over Crown finances from the Scot banking families previously given that privilege. Oh, and the chief financier of the American side during the War of Independence? Why, that would be Chaim Salomon. What a cohencidence. The current mass immigration of mostly Muslim military aged males into Europe (resulting in social disorder, collapse of rule of law in many areas, establishing of Muslim enclaves governed by Sharia law, massive increase in rapes, child kidnappings and pedophilia, violent assaults, and even a few "terror attacks"), has been PUBLICLY ADMITTED by Jews to be a Jewish programme to "fundamentally transform" Europe and keep the European nations destabilized and focused on their newfound Muslim invasion problem. During the Crusades Jews and Muslims routinely cooperated in the attacks and massacres of Christians in the middle east. There is definite evidence Islam itself was a creation of certain Jewish groups designed specifically to serve as a bludgeon against Christendom, to keep the Christians fighting against a bogeyman, and originally supported by Vatican money and other assistance (because the papacy saw it as a means to scare Europe into submitting to papal hegemony). And who was running the papacy, by the way? The papacy has largely been run, for CENTURIES, by the so called "Black Nobility", Italian and Spanish aristocratic families who trace their ancestry TO HEROD. Now, I've presented you with claims about Communism and Islam, their origins, etc. Go do some research and find out for yourself. Might reshape your views on what's actually going on in the world. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Lenin was of Jew origin but according to Wikipedia (notice the quote is full of cites), it doesn't seem that the second generation Jewish mother had much influence on him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The same thing is happening in here the USA, but with different ideologies. It is just the humanism, trying to change human hearts by force according to their own definition of righteousness. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
But getting back to the 70th Week, I see brother Michael has opted out of demonstrating why it should be severed from the other 69 Weeks. Perhaps someone else would like to do so?
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
It is about you and what you teach becoming irrelevant. You are a Christian who likes to Yah it up, and Yeshua your way across the Internet. That's what Anti-missionary Rabbis like. They like guys who prattle about with Hebrew names while they read an English translation of a Greek Only Text. So, no beheadings. They just want to debate you in front of an audience. They want to make a world were there is no Christianity, just Rabbinical Judaism. Not through bloodshed, but through discussion, preferably a discussion peppered with a lot of Hebrew. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8grxuBn1jM |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Your main message seems to be that if one calls the Lord "Yeshua" he will automatically fall away into Judaism. Seems to me like Christians are having a far worse persecution by Communists and Islam than Jews. No one can find any modern day record of the Jews martyring a disiple of Yeshua. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, if it seems that you are the only one teaching truth on the Internet all we can do is point out the opposite. You can either disprove or ignore it entirely. That's not our problem whether you see it or not. Hebrew Roots Movement is all about subtitly anyway. It has been Judaizing Christianity since day one. Lots of sincere people have ended up denouncing Christ, and converting to Babylonian Talmudic Judaism. Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM02...=BeitHaMitzvot |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Quote:
Psalms 68:4 4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
We had someone posting a lot about Jews taking over the world enmasse, I was going back and forth against his premiss. Did you and "the others" happen to catch any of that discussion? Quote:
Why wasn't it peppered throughout the New Testament? Ἁλληλουϊάˇappears in Revelation. But no mention of the Hebrew verb in the New Testament? Why is that Mike? Where did it go? How dare you threaten anyone with blasphemy over a Hebrew verb which is NEVER mentioned in the CHRISTIAN New Testament. "Seems" to me that you are a Judaizer? :lol |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Psalms 68:4
4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him. This is English. I sing praises to his name. I extol him. I rejoice before him. This name is 4 times in Revelation. Rev. 19:1-4 1And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God: 2For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. 3And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever. 4And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia. 5And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great. 6And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth. Strongs 239....PRAISE YE JAH So yes YAH is in the New Testament. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Another thing, you might be able to wow the locals with your expertease in flipping pages of a Strong's concordance. But the facts are that within the New Testament we don't have any of the writers making a stink like you over a Hebrew verb. English is the language you used since 1974 when you first set a foot in a church? Did the preacher YAH you? Did he tell you that you needed to pray to YAH, praise YAH, sing about YAH? No, he didn't. Were you directed to Yahshua? No. Jesus was the name, Jesus is the name in your Bible that you held in your hands in 1974. Jesus was the name you were baptized in. Mike, if you were dropped in the middle of Israel you wouldn't be able to order a bottle of water and a shawarma pita in Hebrew. So, do me a favor, don't tell me or anyone else that not getting your three uppercase letters in the right order is blasphemy. YAH? If it was so important Mike, it would of been found in every book of the New Testament. Typical Yahwist pleadings to bring up Revelation's Ἁλληλουϊά. Yet, no mention of YAH as God's proper name anywhere in the New Testament library. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Rev. 19:1-6
This is English. I sing praises to his name. I extol him. I rejoice before him. This name is 4 times in Revelation. Rev. 19:1-4 1And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God: 2For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. 3And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever. 4And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia. 5And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great. 6And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth. YOUNGS CONCORDANCE PAGE 28.....PRAISE JAH. Fits nicely with Psalms 68:4 4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him. Two of the most well known Concordances in America are in agreement. Strongs and Youngs. YAH is in the New Testament. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Which is it Mike? JAH or YAH?
How about IAH? Mike if it can be misused and cause someone to blaspheme, why isn't it in the New Testament? YAH, JAH, IAH, YAHN? |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
This is the gist of the matter.
Yah wasn't put in use with Judaic tradition. Because as Mike is accusing me of blaspheming. They believed it to be sacred (like Sacred Name Groups). Therefore they would use the Hebrew word for LORD Adonai. Yet, this is the proper Judaic tradition, which "modern Christians" blow off. They believe YAH was somehow through a scribal conspiracy erased. Jehovah Witnesses advocate for Jehovah to be placed in New Testaments. It is all wrong, but they do it because they are a sacred name group. Now, the Judaic tradition was adonai, the Greek used κύριος, the Latin dominus, and the English LORD. The New Testament quotes the LXX, and other Aramaic texts, but you will not find any New Testament writers referring to God as YAH. In Judaic tradition it just wasn't what they did with YAH, meaning since their belief concerning that verb, they didn't use it much in their writings. Therefore when the Hellenized Diaspora Judeans translated the Hebrew Tanakh from Hebrew to Greek they followed suit with Judaic traditions. Using κύριος for adonai. When the Greek LXX was translated into the Latin Vulgate κύριος became domnius. When the English translated the Hebrew, LXX, and Vulgate it became LORD. Yah isn't a sacred name which we must shake and quake. There is only one name given among men, that name is Jesus. There is no salvation in any other name. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Therefore YAH becomes the Brazen Serpent for the Hebrew Roots and Sacred Namers.
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Wait... so, where LORD is placed in the OT it reads as ADONAI in the Hebrew text, NOT Jehovah? 🤯 |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
|
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Adonai is traditionally used only to refer to God. Hence the reason we have Lord used well over 2,000 years. Sacred Name and (I wish I was a Hebrew) groups constantly use something that no one else cared about. |
Re: Daniel's 70th week
Quote:
Quote:
"Seems" like the only one who is upset is YOU. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.