| The Dean |
07-20-2007 10:48 AM |
Billy Boy, let me help you here today. I feel confident that you deserve much more than you’re getting. In fact, you’ve earned it. People of your impeccable repugnance are often overlooked and I don’t want to be guilty of that anymore.
First let me assure you that I, personally, have given you the benefit of the doubt on many, many occasions. I was simply under the impression that you were a novice with great zeal and little wisdom. That is why I overlooked some of your offending statements in the past. Now I realize that you are a novice in most every sense of the word and your greatest problem is that it appears that you don’t intend to be anything beyond that.
Your repeated insults to an entire forum have proven that unfortunate fact time and again. Now, again, you venture the audacity to insult the entire forum by calling an entire forum of good people “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance.” Tell me, Billy Boy, how this entire forum deserves such a audacious indictment (dictionaries aren’t that expensive if you’re having trouble here) when there are precious people on this forum that have NEVER changed their doctrine, backslidden or remotely compromised in any way? Simply put, they don’t deserve it.
And since we’re on the subject of changing doctrines, don’t you realize that most of these good people who you accuse of being “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance” realize full well that YOU are the one who has changed doctrines time and again? That’s right, friend, your inconsistency has caught up to you. You simply have no credibility with those that know your history because you’ve had more ‘flip flops’ than pancakes on the griddle at Waffle House.
What was that again? Was it “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance.” No, I don’t think they deserve that. We have some that try to push the limits but you’re obnoxious attitude is just as rank as theirs. How so you might ask? Let me help you out here. I’m also on other forums and have seen you TRASH this forum time and again as being backslidden, blah, blah, blah. You claimed to thank God there was a place besides this den of devils to go, blah, blah, blah. But, amazingly, you’re here. Yep, right here smack in the middle of this 'den of devils'. You're here. Standing right here beside us “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance.” How do you spell 'Hypocrite'?
Billy Boy, help me here; you change your doctrine more than some people change underwear and yet want everyone on this forum to agree with you? How? And if they did you will most likely just change again next week when you want to fit in with a different group. No, friend, most of us here are too solid on our doctrine AND our holiness to be remotely considered “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance.” Fortunately, we’re also too solid on our integrity to bounce from one belief to another. I’m not sure you can make that claim.
You were asked recently in a PM if you were the same Bill Price who was trashing us on other forums. I was sent the PM where you admitted it was you saying something to the effect that you were giving ‘a bunch of liberals a lesson’. Well, I’m not a liberal. Not even close. Many here are not. But you are accurate in one area: there is a lesson to be learned.
You have openly trashed us repeatedly on other forums.
You have openly called us a ‘den of devils’.
You have openly time and again changed your beliefs and, incredibly, are arrogant enough to rail on us for not believing like you.
You have now openly lied by calling an entire forum of good people “backslidden, rebellious, individuals who hates standards enough to denounce them at every chance.”
Here’s the only lesson to be learned.
You’re being openly banned.
(You’ll have plenty of time to do your homework since it’s a permanent ban.)
|