Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Will we need a Murrell Ewing at Conference this year? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=7079)

Steadfast 08-17-2007 01:00 AM

Will we need a Murrell Ewing at Conference this year?
 
I was blessed beyond measure to have Bro. Murrell Ewing come over last night to preach for us. The man is simply incredible and the anointing on his life is almost breathtaking when he 'locks in'. He did so much good for our Church last night and I'll love him forever because of it. He's one of those 'icons' that we need to cherish while we can.

Sitting around the table after Church we began to talk 'preaching' (naturally! :poloroid) and I mentioned to him a message that he preached which remains one of my 'favorites' to this day. I think the year was 1977 and he was preaching our General Conference and wonderfullly delivered an incredible message called "If Love Ever Speaks".

Ironically, when I mentioned it to him he said, "I tried so hard to preach something else but I had been given a word I knew was from God!" He went on to tell me several supernatural confirmations that he was, indeed, to preach that message. But, towards the end of the conversation his wife said, "I was stopped several times by weeping preachers on our way out telling me that my husband had singlehandedly just stopped the organization from splitting."

On further explaination they told me that this was the year that Hanby and Phillips brought the television issue up and there was such friction going back and forth. Suddenly, remembering the message, I could see the absolute value of that message at that moment. It spoke about Solomon taking the baby up ready to divide it with a sword and how love spoke through the real Mother and said, "NO! Don't destroy the baby! I still know what I know but I don't want my baby to die because of someone I don't agree with!"

Perhaps we need another 'Murrell Ewing' moment at this upcoming General Conference. I would suggest that if you don't have the message try to find a copy... it's an incredible message.

OP_Carl 08-17-2007 04:31 AM

This would imply that one side of the TV debate knows that they are in the wrong (or that their position has less merit) and yet continues to push for what they want out of pure hard-headedness and a nasty self-justified spirit of spreading the suffering and loss.

Either way you look at it, this analogy is an oversimplification.

This is not to say that Brother Ewing couldn't have the right words to say to touch hearts and change minds again this year.

StillStanding 08-17-2007 07:29 AM

I love Bro. Ewing too! Some of his sermons have impacted my life greatly!

That being said, I wonder which side is more willing to 'split the baby' if they don't get their way? Which side is threatening to leave if the vote doesn't go their way?

If the TV measure passes, is the preservation of the baby more important than retaining control of fellow ministers? Is the life of the baby more important than your own comfort level?

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 08:16 AM

The man stood quaking and trembling in his emotions as tears flowed down his cheek, looking over the vast congregation that he had addressed so many times before under such a great annoiting. His service and giving had been unselfish which has blessed the body of Christ world-wide. Many times before had he stood in the GC pulpit but this was to be the last time. His licenses were denied renewal by an intolerant fellowship that refused to allow the man of God to go in the direction that he felt that God was leading his ministry and his church.

I will never forget the Lord's humble servant's last words before a fellowship that he dearly cherished, chosing rather to be obedient to the voice of the Lord that was leading him...

"It is better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all." With those final words ringing in my ears, Kenneth Phillips walked away deeply feeling the pain of rejection. As a fellowship, we are so much poorer today.

I too love bro. Ewing. I've known him since the 1st grade when we both attended the same class room. His was indeed a great message. Too bad so many others are not as loving and kind as both him and he who chose to follow the Lord in the way of rejection.

CC1 08-17-2007 08:19 AM

Steadfast,

I was at that GC and had forogtten that message until you mentioned it. The first 45 minutes of any Murrell Ewing sermon has always been some of my favorites. It is that last hour or hour and a half that get tough!!

CC1 08-17-2007 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218396)
The man stood quaking and trembling in his emotions as tears flowed down his cheek, looking over the vast congregation that he had addressed so many times before under such a great anoiting. His service and giving had been unselfish which has blessed the body of Christ world-wide. Many times before had he stood in the GC pulpit but this was to be the last time. His licenses were denied renewal by an intolerant fellowship that refused to allow the man of God to go in the direction that he felt that God was leading his ministry and his church.

I will never forget the Lord's humble servant's last words before a fellowship that he dearly cherished, chosing rather to be obedient to the voice of the Lord that was leading him...

"It is better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all." With those final words ringing in my ears, Kenneth Phillips walked away deeply feeling the pain of rejection. As a fellowship, we are so much poorer today.

I too love bro. Ewing. I've known him since the 1st grade when we both attended the same class room. His was indeed a great message. Too bad so many others are not as loving and kind as both him and he who chose to follow the Lord in the way of rejection.

What was interesting was that at the 1975 GC in Ft. Worth when the TV subject was really building toward a confrontation Kenneth Phillips was the official speaker at the "Evangelists Banquet". I found that very interesting at the time based on the politics.

Joseph 08-17-2007 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OP_Carl (Post 218345)
This would imply that one side of the TV debate knows that they are in the wrong (or that their position has less merit) and yet continues to push for what they want out of pure hard-headedness and a nasty self-justified spirit of spreading the suffering and loss.

Either way you look at it, this analogy is an oversimplification.

This is not to say that Brother Ewing couldn't have the right words to say to touch hearts and change minds again this year.

I think Bro Ewing probably was not trying to make the analogy fit to a "t". He probably was oversimplifying. True Love will cause you to do what is best for the object you are aiming your love at. LOVE seeketh not its own.

Sarah 08-17-2007 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CC1 (Post 218398)
Steadfast,

I was at that GC and had forogtten that message until you mentioned it. The first 45 minutes of any Murrell Ewing sermon has always been some of my favorites. It is that last hour or hour and a half that get tough!!



I was there, too, and well remember the message. I believe it was in Louisville.

revrandy 08-17-2007 08:27 AM

I often thought Bro. Ewing was a Moderate... is this true?

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CC1 (Post 218398)
Steadfast,

I was at that GC and had forogtten that message until you mentioned it. The first 45 minutes of any Murrell Ewing sermon has always been some of my favorites. It is that last hour or hour and a half that get tough!!

LOL.... :killinme

But even that is always good... :D

Ferd 08-17-2007 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy (Post 218407)
I often thought Bro. Ewing was a Moderate... is this true?

Brother Ewing is a pretty conservitive guy. I wonder about the direction the church will go now that his son is firmly ensconced as the next pastor.

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CC1 (Post 218403)
What was interesting was that at the 1975 GC in Ft. Worth when the TV subject was really building toward a confrontation Kenneth Phillips was the official speaker at the "Evangelists Banquet". I found that very interesting at the time based on the politics.

That is interesting. I did not know that.

BoredOutOfMyMind 08-17-2007 09:01 AM

It would be nice to have a copy of this sermon.

:hmmm

Ferd 08-17-2007 09:04 AM

has anyone heard "When John Mark Comes"?

I think that is it.

NLYP 08-17-2007 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steadfast (Post 218333)
I was blessed beyond measure to have Bro. Murrell Ewing come over last night to preach for us. The man is simply incredible and the anointing on his life is almost breathtaking when he 'locks in'. He did so much good for our Church last night and I'll love him forever because of it. He's one of those 'icons' that we need to cherish while we can.

Sitting around the table after Church we began to talk 'preaching' (naturally! :poloroid) and I mentioned to him a message that he preached which remains one of my 'favorites' to this day. I think the year was 1977 and he was preaching our General Conference and wonderfullly delivered an incredible message called "If Love Ever Speaks".

Ironically, when I mentioned it to him he said, "I tried so hard to preach something else but I had been given a word I knew was from God!" He went on to tell me several supernatural confirmations that he was, indeed, to preach that message. But, towards the end of the conversation his wife said, "I was stopped several times by weeping preachers on our way out telling me that my husband had singlehandedly just stopped the organization from splitting."

On further explaination they told me that this was the year that Hanby and Phillips brought the television issue up and there was such friction going back and forth. Suddenly, remembering the message, I could see the absolute value of that message at that moment. It spoke about Solomon taking the baby up ready to divide it with a sword and how love spoke through the real Mother and said, "NO! Don't destroy the baby! I still know what I know but I don't want my baby to die because of someone I don't agree with!"

Perhaps we need another 'Murrell Ewing' moment at this upcoming General Conference. I would suggest that if you don't have the message try to find a copy... it's an incredible message.

I have a question for you Steaddy.....

Are you under the impression that ME is NOT in favor of the TV res??

revrandy 08-17-2007 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd (Post 218428)
Brother Ewing is a pretty conservitive guy. I wonder about the direction the church will go now that his son is firmly ensconced as the next pastor.

Is that Landy? and is he different from Dad?

Elizabeth 08-17-2007 09:11 AM

I remeber the message about "the sop" regarding Judas' betrayal, he spoke that at landmark in the 90's.

BHILL 08-17-2007 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy (Post 218453)
Is that Landy? and is he different from Dad?

Well..... I don't know how he is now,but he used to be a whole lot different from his father.

crakjak 08-17-2007 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218396)
The man stood quaking and trembling in his emotions as tears flowed down his cheek, looking over the vast congregation that he had addressed so many times before under such a great anointing. His service and giving had been unselfish which has blessed the body of Christ world-wide. Many times before had he stood in the CG pulpit but this was to be the last time. His licenses were denied renewal by an intolerant fellowship that refused to allow the man of God to go in the direction that he felt that God was leading his ministry and his church.

I will never forget the Lord's humble servant's last words before a fellowship that he dearly cherished, choosing rather to be obedient to the voice of the Lord that was leading him...

"It is better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all." With those final words ringing in my ears, Kenneth Phillips walked away deeply feeling the pain of rejection. As a fellowship, we are so much poorer today.

I too love bro. Ewing. I've known him since the ST grade when we both attended the same class room. His was indeed a great message. Too bad so many others are not as loving and kind as both him and he who chose to follow the Lord in the way of rejection.

We'll never know what would have been the outcome had Hanby and Phillips been allowed to test the waters and do a pilot into TV with the blessing of the org. The rejection of their belief that God was directing their paths, no doubt produced incredible conflict into their ministries. And though there was not a huge walkout the org split back then none the less. I and many other young hungry and committed men and women left in the pursuing months and years. If the org had been mature enough P&H would have seen the problems and difficulties with TV broadcasting and there might have been opportunity for redirection and redefining into a workable media outreach. Instead when they did not succeed in their early attempts, it was as if they were wrong and failed. Phillips as survived in some manner, Han by seems to be a major train wreck. So, in my opinion the org failed miserably, and lost thousands of its children which is even now proving to be disastrous, with the continuing exit of it future generations.

It is easy just to cast them away as rebellious and carnal. Yet now the org faces the same issues again with some of its most dynamic leaders, will it may the same mistakes again? If it passes now it proves even more glaringly the failure of the earlier decisions. My advise to the UPC, grow up and mature or pass on to irrelevance. Of, course no one is listening to my input.:nah

StillStanding 08-17-2007 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 218490)
We'll never know what would have been the outcome had Hanby and Phillips been allowed to test the waters and do a pilot into TV with the blessing of the org. The rejection of their belief that God was directing their paths, no doubt produced incredible conflict into their ministries. And though there was not a huge walkout the org split back then none the less. I and many other young hungry and committed men and women left in the pursuing months and years. If the org had been mature enough P&H would have seen the problems and difficulties with TV broadcasting and there might have been opportunity for redirection and redefining into a workable media outreach. Instead when they did not succeed in their early attempts, it was as if they were wrong and failed. Phillips as survived in some manner, Han by seems to be a major train wreck. So, in my opinion the org failed miserably, and lost thousands of its children which is even now proving to be disastrous, with the continuing exit of it future generations.

It is easy just to cast them away as rebellious and carnal. Yet now the org faces the same issues again with some of its most dynamic leaders, will it may the same mistakes again? If it passes now it proves even more glaringly the failure of the earlier decisions. My advise to the UPC, grow up and mature or pass on to irrelevance. Of, course no one is listening to my input.:nah

I'm listening! :) GOOD THOUGHTS!

freeatlast 08-17-2007 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman (Post 218502)
I'm listening! :) GOOD THOUGHTS!

Good thoughts..Yes!!

Those that need to to "hear" unfortunley still have their ears full of sand and will not hear.

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 218490)
We'll never know what would have been the outcome had Hanby and Phillips been allowed to test the waters and do a pilot into TV with the blessing of the org. The rejection of their belief that God was directing their paths, no doubt produced incredible conflict into their ministries. And though there was not a huge walkout the org split back then none the less. I and many other young hungry and committed men and women left in the pursuing months and years. If the org had been mature enough P&H would have seen the problems and difficulties with TV broadcasting and there might have been opportunity for redirection and redefining into a workable media outreach. Instead when they did not succeed in their early attempts, it was as if they were wrong and failed. Phillips as survived in some manner, Han by seems to be a major train wreck. So, in my opinion the org failed miserably, and lost thousands of its children which is even now proving to be disastrous, with the continuing exit of it future generations.

It is easy just to cast them away as rebellious and carnal. Yet now the org faces the same issues again with some of its most dynamic leaders, will it may the same mistakes again? If it passes now it proves even more glaringly the failure of the earlier decisions. My advise to the UPC, grow up and mature or pass on to irrelevance. Of, course no one is listening to my input.:nah

Good words.

Hardness of spirit and of the heart can only deal lifelessness in the generations to come, who bear fruit but not after Christ, but rather after a RELIGION.

Ferd 08-17-2007 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 218490)
We'll never know what would have been the outcome had Hanby and Phillips been allowed to test the waters and do a pilot into TV with the blessing of the org. The rejection of their belief that God was directing their paths, no doubt produced incredible conflict into their ministries. And though there was not a huge walkout the org split back then none the less. I and many other young hungry and committed men and women left in the pursuing months and years. If the org had been mature enough P&H would have seen the problems and difficulties with TV broadcasting and there might have been opportunity for redirection and redefining into a workable media outreach. Instead when they did not succeed in their early attempts, it was as if they were wrong and failed. Phillips as survived in some manner, Han by seems to be a major train wreck. So, in my opinion the org failed miserably, and lost thousands of its children which is even now proving to be disastrous, with the continuing exit of it future generations.

It is easy just to cast them away as rebellious and carnal. Yet now the org faces the same issues again with some of its most dynamic leaders, will it may the same mistakes again? If it passes now it proves even more glaringly the failure of the earlier decisions. My advise to the UPC, grow up and mature or pass on to irrelevance. Of, course no one is listening to my input.:nah


someone call 911. I agree with crackjack.
one wonders what could have been done had the UPCI worked within some solid guidelines to test these waters. there is no telling.

Pressing-On 08-17-2007 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218526)
Good words.

Hardness of spirit and of the heart can only deal lifelessness in the generations to come, who bear fruit but not after Christ, but rather after a RELIGION.

Amen, Brother Strange.

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 218556)
Amen, Brother Strange.

If everyone had a soft and tender spirit as Bro. Ewing has always had, our fellowship would be far more forgiving and less dictatorial on churches and ministers who sincerely want to do God's bidding.

Politics is an ugly family member compared to the beauty of mystery Babylon.

revrandy 08-17-2007 10:14 AM

Good Place for a re-post...

[YT="He Saw Me"]herw8B1S3do[/YT]

AGAPE 08-17-2007 10:27 AM

YEP...GOD MISSED IT BY NOT HAVING TV AROUND ON THE DAY OF PENTECOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Come on.....................the UPC was for fellowship and carrying the WHOLE GOSPEL to the WHOLE WORLD.............

If they ain't in the same ship they need to sail off.........

and most of these guys that are pro-tv don't believe the WHOLE GOSPEL enough to even believe the essentiality of the NEW BIRTH

StillStanding 08-17-2007 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218561)
If everyone had a soft and tender spirit as Bro. Ewing has always had, our fellowship would be far more forgiving and less dictatorial on churches and ministers who sincerely want to do God's bidding.

Politics is an ugly family member compared to the beauty of mystery Babylon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGAPE (Post 218584)
YEP...GOD MISSED IT BY NOT HAVING TV AROUND ON THE DAY OF PENTECOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Come on.....................the UPC was for fellowship and carrying the WHOLE GOSPEL to the WHOLE WORLD.............

If they ain't in the same ship they need to sail off.........

and most of these guys that are pro-tv don't believe the WHOLE GOSPEL enough to even believe the essentiality of the NEW BIRTH

I quoted both of these posts to see if anyone else can see the difference in the spirit that each was written!

Brother Strange 08-17-2007 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGAPE (Post 218584)
YEP...GOD MISSED IT BY NOT HAVING TV AROUND ON THE DAY OF PENTECOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Come on.....................the UPC was for fellowship and carrying the WHOLE GOSPEL to the WHOLE WORLD.............

If they ain't in the same ship they need to sail off.........

and most of these guys that are pro-tv don't believe the WHOLE GOSPEL enough to even believe the essentiality of the NEW BIRTH

That is quite a sweeping judgmental statement AGAPE. But, I'm sure that you've done a head count.

Do you think that Anthony and G.A. Mangun fit into that category?

Elizabeth 08-17-2007 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218561)
If everyone had a soft and tender spirit as Bro. Ewing has always had, our fellowship would be far more forgiving and less dictatorial on churches and ministers who sincerely want to do God's bidding.

Politics is an ugly family member compared to the beauty of mystery Babylon.

This is so true, I can say I have never been affect by a ministry Like ME before, he just has such love about him. I am so glad that I ever met him.

RevDWW 08-17-2007 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGAPE (Post 218584)
YEP...GOD MISSED IT BY NOT HAVING TV AROUND ON THE DAY OF PENTECOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Come on.....................the UPC was for fellowship and carrying the WHOLE GOSPEL to the WHOLE WORLD.............

If they ain't in the same ship they need to sail off.........

Sounds a lot like something Jesus would say doesn't it???? Or maybe not!

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGAPE (Post 218584)
and most of these guys that are pro-tv don't believe the WHOLE GOSPEL enough to even believe the essentiality of the NEW BIRTH

What happened to the UPCs stance against Radio? Do you suppose that the slippery slope of broadcasting on Radio led us to this TV issue?

Pressing-On 08-17-2007 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Strange (Post 218561)
If everyone had a soft and tender spirit as Bro. Ewing has always had, our fellowship would be far more forgiving and less dictatorial on churches and ministers who sincerely want to do God's bidding.

Politics is an ugly family member compared to the beauty of mystery Babylon.

This is so true and can bring tears of frustration. It's what our youth see. Sometimes the lure of Babylon feels much happier and peaceful than the fight.

In a way it reminds me of the words of Kenneth Levin, a clinical instructor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and a commentator on Israeli politics,

"...in the words of Prime Minister Olmert, "tired of fighting... tired of being courageous... tired of winning... tired of defeating our enemies..." This dangerous mind-set, the desperate wish for an end to the hostility of surrounding states, and the concomitant embrace of delusions of peace, are as great a threat to Israel as the strategic challenges posed by its enemies."

All the political stuff can just make you tired.....

If, like Brother Ewing, we could bring down walls with love we would really see an awesome move of God and would rejoice......

Elizabeth 08-17-2007 11:44 AM

I will say that this thread help clearify something.

I have been to conferences in years past and have heard preachers either say or yell out (during the preaching)

"don't divide the baby!"

Now I know where it came from, it must have been influenced by this message in 1977 from ME.

Ferd 08-17-2007 11:47 AM

I sure hate to see this good thread about a great man devolve.

revrandy 08-17-2007 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd (Post 218666)
I sure hate to see this good thread about a great man devolve.

Me too... take it to another...

Starbucks 08-17-2007 11:51 AM

I will NEVER forget the times growing up in the 70's when my mother would put on an LP and play it over and over of Bro. Ewing singing with his deep and smooth voice. God Bless Bro. Ewing!

:sing

SoCaliUPC 08-17-2007 11:52 AM

ME used to be a fixture at the Home Missions Services over the past few years at General Conference. Shame he has been "phased out." There was nothing like his voice at General Conferences.

RevDWW 08-17-2007 11:53 AM

My apologies.


Bro. Ewing has as sweet a spirt as he has a smooth voice.

I love to hear him sing!

BoredOutOfMyMind 08-17-2007 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevDWW (Post 218646)
What happened to the UPCs stance against Radio? Do you suppose that the slippery slope of broadcasting on Radio led us to this TV issue?

My Uncle had occasion to broadcast Harvestime on a 50000 watt superstation back about 25 or 30 yrs ago. As I recall his story- was a very good price, but turned down for this was a "rock station." He declined offers to advertise for free on the local cable stations 5 yrs ago.

I dislike the way this resolution was written last year, and do think it needs to be rejected for the same reasons. I see the "Keyboard Quarterbacking" is a moot point to those who do not have a vote (sorry Ferd). The technology amendment is dated and the real task is to update what is there, not remove something from 1950/1977/1992/2000/2006/2007.

I am curious if we are really prepared for TV Ads when we cannot get Overhead at GC, or Internet ads in place yet.

:poloroid

RevDWW 08-17-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind (Post 218682)
My Uncle had occasion to broadcast Harvestime on a 50000 watt superstation back about 25 or 30 yrs ago. As I recall his story- was a very good price, but turned down for this was a "rock station." He declined offers to advertise for free on the local cable stations 5 yrs ago.

I dislike the way this resolution was written last year, and do think it needs to be rejected for the same reasons. I see the "Keyboard Quarterbacking" is a moot point to those who do not have a vote (sorry Ferd). The technology amendment is dated and the real task is to update what is there, not remove something from 1950/1977/1992/2000/2006/2007.

I am curious if we are really prepared for TV Ads when we cannot get Overhead at GC, or Internet ads in place yet.

:poloroid


I would imagine that very few Church's/Ministries of the UPC have the fiances to broadcast ads on TV for any lenght of time, let alone pay for air time of a 30 to 60 minute service.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.