![]() |
If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
While campaigning for change, Barack Obama said, "We need earmark reform, and when I'm President, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely." But now the President is about to sign a huge 2,697 page spending bill with over 9,000 unnecessary and wasteful earmarks. That's not the "change" we are looking for. John McCain called on the President to take a principled stand and veto the bill if it is sent to him, but unfortunately, he appears ready to sign it into law, which is nothing more than politics as usual.
|
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
I recall the excuse he applied was the writing actually was initiated before his coronation.
If that justification of his being misquoted is not enough, then he can apply the danger urgency excuse. We are desparate situation and can't afford the consequences of not moving quickly. |
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
From FoxNews.com
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/20..._obama_budget/ Obama’s Top Five Broken Promises By Phil Kerpen Director of Policy, Americans for Prosperity Promise #5: Sunlight Before Signing What he said: “Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.” (BarackObama.com campaign Web site) What he did: Obama signed the Lily Ledbetter bill, the SCHIP/cigarette tax hike, and the stimulus bill all with far less than a five-day waiting period that he promised–and continues to promise–on his campaign Web site. Promise #4: Lobbyist Revolving Door What he said: “No political appointees in an Obama-Biden administration will be permitted to work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years. And no political appointee will be able to lobby the executive branch after leaving government service during the remainder of the administration.” (BarackObama.com campaign Web site) What he did: Obama appointed Goldman Sachs lobbyists Mark Patterson chief of staff at the Treasury Department, where he directly oversees his former employer, a recipient of $10 billion of taxpayer funds from the TARP. Obama also appointed Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn to be an undersecretary of Defense. Promise #3: No Tax Hikes on the Poor What he said first: “I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” (September 12, 2008, Dover, N.H.) What he did first: By signing H.R. 2 into law, Obama happily signed onto the idea that smokers should pay for a $35 billion expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP). Cigarette taxes are going up 61 cents a pack starting April 1. Obama signed this bill knowing that the majority of smokers in the United States are working poor, and one in four lives below the federal poverty line. What he said next: “If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.” (February 24th, 2009, Address to a Joint Session of Congress) What he did next: Ignored the already-hiked cigarette tax at the time of the statement and then this restated promise was broken just two days later, when the Obama’s budget proposal was released. His new budget raises 45 percent of its revenue from energy taxes that will be paid by everyone who fills a gas tank, pays an electric bill, or buys anything that was grown, shipped, or manufactured. Promise #2: Pork Barrel Earmark Reform What he said: “The system is broken. We can no longer accept a process that doles out earmarks based on a member of Congress’ seniority, rather than the merit of the project. We can no longer accept an earmarks process that has become so complicated to navigate that a municipality or non-profit group has to hire high-priced D.C. lobbyists to do it. And we can no longer accept an earmarks process in which many of the projects being funded fail to address the real needs of our country.” (Statement on Earmarks, March 10, 2008) What he is expected to do: The White House has signaled that it intends to sign the $410 billion Omnibus Appropriations bill, which according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, contains 8,570 earmarks totaling $7.7 billion, including dozens of wasteful pork-barrel projects. These earmarks were awarded based on seniority, not on merit, and were mostly the result of high-priced lobbying, precisely the process that Obama promised to end. When the omnibus reaches his desk later this week or next week, we’ll find out if this is one more broken promise. Promise #1: Big Government OK, so this one is more of a statement than a promise, but it’s the biggest whopper of all. What he said: “Not because I believe in bigger government — I don’t.” (February 24, 2009, Joint Address to Congress) What he did: Obama proposed a budget that is breathtaking in scope, a blueprint for the biggest permanent expansion of government in history right on the heels of a sweeping trillion dollar stimulus plan. The budget lays the foundation for a government takeover of the health care and energy sectors and dramatically increasing spending across the board, other than defense weapons programs. Spending as a percentage of the economy under this budget will reach the historic level of 27.7 percent this year. The deficit as a percent of the economy, at 12.3 percent, is set to be the biggest in the entire history of the country outside of the four peak years of World War II. Anyone who offers such a budget can only fairly be described as a believer in bigger government. |
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
Soooo....one thing The One hasn't changed: he lied and all politicians have and will lie.
|
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
Supporters of Baby killers are capable of anything.
|
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Deacon, Now you don't think a fine upstanding politician from Illinois would lie????? Cmon Deacon, Who would have thought it? :nah :ursofunny:ursofunny |
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
Quote:
|
Re: If BO Signs the Spending Bill, He Lied
Quote:
I mean, With one former governor in prison,... And another one impeached and waiting for trial,... With their newest congressman just slipping out of an impeachment by the skin of his little nose,... What would ever make us think that anything illegal, immoral, or illicit would come out of that fair state? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.