![]() |
DWTS - Objective Viewership
So last night former Pop Star, Brandy was voted off the show. Brandy, whose dancing many thought would be a finalist and possible winner (between her and Jennifer Gray) lost, while Bristol Palin remained on the show.
Anyone that has watched this show is beside themselves. Palin has consistently gotten the lowest dancing marks on the show yet is being kept on the show by viewers. But why? My take is that DWTS needs to come up with a rule similar to American Idol, where they can bring back someone they feel should still be dancing. America is getting this one wrong. It's a dancing show. |
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Brandy's attitude got her voted off.
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
It was her partner that had the tude, if anyone. What judge complained about Brandy's attitude? It's a dancing competition... she was consistently getting better and outperforming everyone. She had a will to win. |
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
we are beside ourselves over a dance contest? really? we are?
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
Beside themselves = surprised = shocked = stunned. Sheesh... can't win to lose with you. |
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Fact is, they get the viewers no matter what. Stars are dancing. That attracts viewers. Artists playing on elimination nights, that attracts viewers.
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
|
Re: DWTS - Objective Viewership
Quote:
:reaction :scoregood The palins have to work for their prizes. This ain't like the Noble peace prize. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.