![]() |
DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Merger
"At the formation of the UPCI, at least 85 percent of the merged body held that the full Acts 2:38 experience was “the new birth.” (DKB, Twitter 3/03)
Where is the research to support this? Should we also examine the light doctrine views of those that did as a clearer picture as to their soteriological views? One thing for sure close to half of the executives on this first General Board did not represent this alleged super-majority demographic ... including the first General Supt., Howard Goss. https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_r...w8/genbrd1.jpg |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
I think there should be supporting documentation posted with it.
Also, I think the statement is incomplete without acknowledgement that a large number of the "85%" also believed many non-three stepper, even non -OPs, were considered "Righteous" and not hell-bound. That would change the implications of Acts 2:38 = New Birth doctrine. |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
I wonder if he knows how many believe it now?
|
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
Quote:
DA - where did DKB state this? Thanks. |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
"At the formation of the UPCI, at least 85 percent of the merged body held that the full Acts 2:38 experience was “the new birth.” (DKB, Twitter 3/03) |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
Honestly, how can he prove that?
|
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
Since I am not a twitterer, can someone tell me in what context that post is made? Is it in response to anything in particular or just a stand alone comment?
|
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
Quote:
See March 3rd ... http://twitter.com/davidkbernard |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
Quote:
There are quite a few that do .... some would surprise us ... if they "came out". |
Re: DKB: 85% believed Acts 2:38 as New Birth at Me
And whether it was 95% ... there is a gentleman's agreement not to contend to the disunity of the brethren over such things as the New Birth.
One has to wonder if this is a precursor to changing the AOF in 2012 .... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.