![]() |
Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versions.
Do you prefer Literal Translations To Thought For Thought Translations ?
Which do you deem more correct and why ? Would prefer The NASB to The NIV ? |
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
NASB!
|
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
I prefer KJV. It's what I've read all my life and when I think of a scripture I think of it in that version so finding it in another version is difficult.
I also prefer to do my own study rather than reading a version that decides for me what the words meant. |
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
This is helpful. BTW I did read the NIV in my devotional time this morning.
http://www.apbrown2.net/web/Translat...risonChart.htm |
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
KJV for the scripture that plays over in my head from childhood. I prefer for study, Rotherham's Emphasized Bible and others such as Young's Literal Translation.
|
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
I enjoying listening to the KJV on CD.I love the flow of the Old English.I leans towards The NASB,ESV,and HCSB for alot of the reading I do.The Rotherham's bible sounds interesting.Also I enjoy the Complete Jewish Bible alot.
|
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
To me I seem to get more out of the Literal Translations myself.
|
Re: Literal Versions VS.Thought For Thought Versio
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.