Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
 

Oh will it ???

Snippet from Article:

"If we're spreading out across the world from centers like Europe and America that evolution is nonsense and science is nonsense, how do you combat new pathogens, how do you combat new strains of disease that are evolving in the environment?" he asked.
______________________

Does this atheist think we are stupid?

It is in the papers and new scientific journals all over the world that many pathogens are created through genetically modifying and engineering techniques. Who does he think he is kidding?

It wasn't that long ago that the news media reported that they were digging up bones from the 1918 Spanish flu victims to gather information from the virus that killed millions of people. They said that they would look for "cures". But...within a few years we got this swine flu that started on the wrong hemisphere during the wrong season.

Know why I have a problem with that? Because never before has a natural illness from animals ever "jumped species" from a living animal to a human.

The scientific community has been manipulating and studying microbes and viruses and genetically altering them for a long long time.
_________________
Snippet:
"If you don't like the word evolution, I don't care what you call it, but life has changed. You can lay out all the fossils that have been collected and establish lineages that even a fool could work up. So the question is why, how does this happen? It's not covered by Genesis. There's no explanation for this change going back 500 million years in any book I've read from the lips of any God."


Leakey insists he has no animosity toward religion.

_________________

How does he know that there is any "change"?

How does he know or not know that maybe some life forms died out in the flood?

The scientific community cannot prove that mankind has "evolved" from animals or even from a single life form. They admit that they have been looking for the "missing link" for hundreds of years.

Science did not start with Darwin. Science was existent during the Old Testament. Man has been trying to prove the Bible wrong for hundreds of years. They still cannot.




http://news.yahoo.com/scientist-evol...155252505.html

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

i did a small blog on this, cause here in tenneessee they passed a bill that during the study of evolution, if some one brings up creation it must be discussed and the possibilty must be taught on.

I did the blog wondering why evolution is still being taught, when current science has disproved this theory over and over.

anyway here is a link to the blog plus inside it has more links to support my argument.

http://luke5-4.blogspot.com/2012/03/in-beginning.html

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

:thumbsup

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

Um, you guys see evolution as opposing creation
or something? I have never felt this, I wonder why not?
I see a perfect image of God in everything having literally
evolved from nothing; to hydrogen (which
mirrors our perfecting relationship with God; one center,
one orbiter) to everything else.

I still haven't put this on an Fkey, lol, but what happens
if (when) you find yourself in the position of the RCC
v Galileo, Copernicus, et al? Ty

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

My (admittedly general) understanding
of evolution in man has it that it is no longer
a Q of "Are we evolving," but
"Why are we evolving so quickly?"

You might explore the evolution of blood types;
fascinating, to me anyway, and insightful,
on more than one level.

It might (will) change your dietary habits
for the better, when matched with the
knowledge of your blood type, which you
are most likely unaware of right now, and
which is being purposely obscured
from you (1975, blood typing pee strip, $6;
1990, lab test required--dates made up, but not the info)
T2W could surely verify that. Peace.

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

I believe that God has designed micro evolution (adaptation) in His creation....but there is no evidence that I have seen of Macro evolution.

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

He must have because it exists. It is observable in nature and the lab and makes the initial story at the start of this thread sort of nonsensical. It neither proves nor DIS-proves evolution in any sense.

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

yes evolution and creation cannot exist together. one is a liar. either God formed man from the dust or we came from a single celled bacteria that some out survived the mass effects of space with out protection to produce life.

nah it was just a dream of a man is all it was..

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

well science did a study over 35 years with fruit flies, cause they go from egg to full life span in 20 days.

they tried to force natural selection, however even though the flies had some adaptations, not mutations it was a big failure.

they still ended up with fruit flies. and the problem with some of these adaptations ended up with the subject becomming sterile and not able to produce offspring.

really there isnt nothing to support darwinism, expecially when those living fossiles they discovered really shoots a hole in their theory

Re: Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be histo
 

I guess maybe this depends upon ones
perspective; I'm sure the deniers will be
as forgiven as the RCC has :heeheehee