Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Michigan District Resolution (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=40867)

Timmy 09-19-2012 11:57 PM

Michigan District Resolution
 
From a resolution passed by the UPCI Michigan District ministers meeting:

"We also understand the need for wisdom, patience and tolerance in both evangelism and discipleship, proclaiming the life of faith and legalism."

http://stuffapostolicslike.blogspot....tting-dem.html

OK, discuss. (I've already "commented" enough on FB. :lol)

bbyrd009 09-20-2012 08:23 AM

Re: Quote without comment
 
Why? You don't respect them, so
why comment on them? What is
with the "legalism," btw?

Pressing-On 09-20-2012 08:29 AM

Re: Quote without comment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy (Post 1189231)
From a resolution passed by the UPCI Michigan District ministers meeting:

"We also understand the need for wisdom, patience and tolerance in both evangelism and discipleship, proclaiming the life of faith and legalism."

http://stuffapostolicslike.blogspot....tting-dem.html

OK, discuss. (I've already "commented" enough on FB. :lol)

The title of your link - "Stuff Apostolics Like" :heeheehee

My daughter changed membership from a church (very large) where she, emphatically, claimed that the women were hard on the standards. I told her, "No, they aren't. They just won't tell you that." She told me I was wrong. After she left, people in leadership talked with her on the phone telling her they follow the standards to keep their positions on the platform.

I think I just entered the bitter zone, right? :heeheehee

Timmy 09-20-2012 10:28 AM

Re: Quote without comment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bbyrd009 (Post 1189281)
Why? You don't respect them, so
why comment on them? What is
with the "legalism," btw?

I didn't comment (here). Just asked for others to discuss. And it should be obvious that that is optional. :lol

CC1 09-20-2012 11:53 AM

Re: Quote without comment
 
I used the link and went to the website and read it. I keep thinking that surely it has to be a typo on the scanned document. I cannot believe they actually used the word "legalism"!

As far as the letter itself goes I think it is probably the template that UPCI HQ / DB used in his Texas district then once he became GS urged other districts to send out.

Praxeas 11-07-2012 12:18 PM

Re: Michigan District Resolution
 
Bump

canam 11-07-2012 12:56 PM

Re: Michigan District Resolution
 
end of thread thanks

Barb 11-07-2012 01:17 PM

Re: Michigan District Resolution
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by canam (Post 1201437)
end of thread thanks

Yeah...why was this even bumped?

Michael Phelps 11-07-2012 01:33 PM

Re: Michigan District Resolution
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barb (Post 1201450)
Yeah...why was this even bumped?

I'm interested in this type of stuff, especially when it involves the Michigan District, where I grew up, was licensed, and pastored.

I was surprised by the resolution as it originally read, and Rebecca's explanation makes a bit more sense. However, she is correct - once it circulates, it's gospel.

And, it seems that this resolution could have stood a closer proofread....I'm sure there are critics who are claiming that they are making up the story about the word "not" missing just to deflect criticism.....

Justin 11-07-2012 04:52 PM

Re: Michigan District Resolution
 
Rumor has it that there was a typo in the document.... it was supposed to say "and not legalism"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.