![]() |
The church in history
Who says the church, the REAL church, must be visible throughout history from Pentecost till now?
The Reformed Protestant doctrine is not apostolic succession, but apostolic continuity - ie, the real church is whoever believes and practices the Bible, whenever they may be living. The Catholic/Orthodox churches claim apostolic succession - ie, one must point to a continuously visible and continuously existing 'church' to identify the 'real' church. Not saying either is correct, just pointing out to seekerman that his argument against OPs being representative of the true church is outside the pale of Reformed, Protestant, and Evangelical orthodoxy, and would be recognizable as valid only by a catholic/Eastern Orthodox person. Just saying. |
Re: The church in history
1 Attachment(s)
I'm a Restorationist. I believe in what might be best described in this chart:
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
|
Re: The church in history
Down through the ages there have always been various believers that experienced visions, unintelligible speach, dreams, angelic visitations, healings, and the casting out of devils... all described as being various forms of what was called "spiritual ecstasy". Many of the "Christian mystics" had experiences and revelatory understandings similar to modern day Pentecost. But they functioned within the church of their day.
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
But.....why the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ in 1913? What was going on before then? Was the Church of Jesus Christ dead, buried, in hiding, afraid of the enemy....what? 1913 is a pivotal year in the sudden appearance of the Church of Jesus Christ it seems. Satan was completely victorious over the Church until that year? |
Re: The church in history
Quote:
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
|
Re: The church in history
Quote:
|
Re: The church in history
I could care less about 1913. I do care about the doctrine that embodies the church. That doctrine can be found throughout the centuries in spite of a very directed attack against it. You may have heard of the Inquisition for example. The RCC had for many centuries had control of kingdoms. They not only outlawed any organized "church" outside of themselves but they actively sought to keep people in the dark. They even outlawed the Bible in an effort to stop the church. Not only did they burn any contrary writing but they murdered those who held those beliefs. Thus, to assume absence of evidence is evidence of absence is patently wrong especially in this case.
Here is a book that has documented some of this if you truly want to know. http://pentecostalpublishing.com/node/3538 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.