![]() |
Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Union manipulation, illegal immigrant voters, and a phony Libertarian give the race to the Dems. Late GOP surge almost succeeded.
|
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
And close to 7% voted for the 3rd party. Typical!
The problem with the Libertarian movement is that they ALL see themselves as the perfect candidate and might as well write their own name in on the ballot. ANY far left lib can win now with 40% of the vote if the remaining 60% if split amongst 5-7 other candidates. |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Just a few days ago McAullife was up by 12 points. After the Obamacare lie, it closed quickly to make it tight.
Chris Christie destroyed the Democrat challenger by 20 points in NJ. |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
2016
Candidate Chris Christie: "You do not need to be afraid of a Hillary Presidency!" |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Quote:
I like Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul. I'd live with any of them against Hillary. And if someone says "not Ted Cruz, the media will kill him." Well the media is going to try to demonize anyone who runs against Hillary. I'll be interested to see if Biden runs in the Dem primaries, because I think he's going to do anything he can to beat her. I think he'll come up (way) short, but do some damage in the process. |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
The "punk" wins by a couple of points.
I will NOT hear from "libertarians" who voted for the 3rd party, that complain about 90% of their gun rights being taken away over the next 16 months. A bunch of fools and morons! |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
The important thing is that an "establishment" Republican didn't win right? I mean sure, voters gave another state to the left, but at least a non-Tea Party GOP guy didn't win. That wouldhave been horrible.
*puke* |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Quote:
1) union manipulation-- of who or what; 2) illegal immigrant voters in Virginia (because they have such a terrible problem with their border towns-- in fact a tunnel was just discovered linking Tijuana to Richmond); 3) and a phony Libertarian-- especially in light that the GOP would NEVER put up phony candidates or purposely gerrymander their state districts to ensure political domination. So the GOP takes a loss for Governor-ship, but still wants to spin it as a win for them! Meanwhile, NEWSMAX is sending me electronic flyers entitled, "EMBARASS OBAMA (IN VIRGINIA)" because that Governor's race is all about Obama and not about what's actually best for the individual citizens of that state. |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Quote:
:) |
Re: Close win for MaCauliff in Virginia
Quote:
I've long said Christie would have my support and he would-- but now I add, "as long as he's not paired with an idiot." The "average American" is politically moderate. A "Christie-Perry" ticket wouldn't make sense. A "Christie-Rand Paul" ticket MIGHT be appealing. A "Christie-West" ticket would be even more appealing, but wouldn't energize enough of "idiotic" GOP'ers, so they would lose. Troubling times for the GOP! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.