![]() |
Debunking a 9-11 myth
The myth is that the plane that hit the tower could not have caused it to collapse.
Conspiracy folks argue the metal in the tower could not have melted enough to lose integrity. I personally remember this being on the news. A tanker truck carrying fuel over turned and caught on fire. The fire burned hot long enough that the over pass collapsed Here are several videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXb5M8qKrjw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tjs5ILNkJc You can go to youtube and find other videos Then some guys tested an i beam with fuel to see if it would lose integrity This next video, at the 20 min mark gives the experiment with the I beam |
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
I also know that when someone wants to demolish a skyscraper they bring in experts that study and examine the building beforehand. The reason is they want it to collapse on itself. If not the building would tilt and spread wreckage everywhere and damage other buildings. The experts are very specific about where they place explosives, what type of explosive and how the explosion is aimed. Then they are very specific about the timing of the explosions. Everything must be perfect or the building will not collapse on itself.
The twin towers did indeed collapse on itself, miraculously. This reason alone makes me believe the government is hiding something. Anyone remember the TWA flight that was shot down on take off? Ooopppsss I mean exploded in mid air from a lightning strike or some other event but not from a missile. Even though eye witness testimony said there were vapor trails leading up to the plane. Yeah, I think the government is hiding the truth there as well. Lets not forget the Lusitania. The US government was shipping supplies to Europe using human shields. Germany told this country they would sink the ship because it was carrying military equipment. The US government didn't care. The was a civilian liner that was being used for military purposes. When it was sunk the US forgot to tell the nation that it was sunk because of the military hardware they placed on it. Instead they told the world the evil Germans sunk a civilian ship. This was the impetus for the US to join Europe in WWI. Let's not forget the placebo's that were given black men so they could chart the effects of syphilis. Back to the present, why is it we don't hear about the NSA anymore? What about the reporter that was investigating Bengahzi that was hacked by the government? http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...-video-hacking Should we talk about Fast and Furious? Where it appears Democrats wanted criminals to get guns and perpetrate crime so they could then whine about gun violence. I don't trust the government and believe they are hiding the truth. |
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
I do not believe my government would lie to me.
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Quote:
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Anyone who believes the Official Conspiracy Theory put out by the goobermint and the medianites is not really capable of rationality, imo.
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
The evidence shows that the "conspiracy" idea that a building could not collapse from burning fuel is false.
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Quote:
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Quote:
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Quote:
|
Re: Debunking a 9-11 myth
Quote:
Tell me when and where any other time a commercial jet slammed into a tower? As for the whole tower. It's a matter of mechanics...physics. The plane hit 3/4s of the way up. So 1/4 of the entire building was sitting on top of the impact area. Those I beams begin to buckle from the heat and the weight and ALL that load above the impact site comes down onto the next level..nothing can hold that much of a load and gravity. I don't see how that can be a mystery to anyone. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.