![]() |
Are you a Creationist?
Which are you? Young earth creationist (literal 6 days of creation, no evolution of species from other kinds, no a biogenesis (spontaneous appearance of life from non-living matter by natural processes), etc?
Old earth creationist (days of creation are aeons of time, happened millions or billions of years ago, God designed nature to evolve per evolutionary science, etc)? Evolutionist (billions of years ago, by natural processes with no Divine Intelligence guiding things, ie standard evolutionary theory)? Other (please explain)? |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
I chose other because although I believe in a literal creation week, biogenesis, no macroevolution of species, I allow for the possibility of an unspecified time between Adam's creation and his expulsion from the garden, a possible unspecified amount of time between the 6th day creation of homo sapiens and the Adam who was placed in the garden, and a possible gap of unknown duration between Gen 1:1 and 1:2.
|
Re: Are you a Creationist?
I normally lean towards a literal 6 day creation. My first pastor taught the Gap-Theory. I've read several good books on creation, each from differing positions. One is, "A New Look At An Old Earth", by Don Stoner. This book teaches the Day-Age theory, and is an excellent explanation of the view. Another excellent book is, "Genesis Unbound", by John Sailhamer. This book is like the Gap-Theory except after verse 2 the reader's attention is drawn to "the land" (the Holy Land) which God fashions in six literal days. The third book, and most provocative in my opinion, is, "Creation and Evolution", by Alan Hayward. This view is interesting because the author states that in the dateless past, before anything was, God spoke for six days. However, noting actually occurred the moment He spoke. Instead, after the Sabbath, the Big Bang took place and the entire known universe began to form. Essentially the author proposes that our entire universe is indeed 14 billion years old, but has formed according to divine fiats that took place over 6 days prior to time itself. Thus in the first chapter of Genesis we see parentheticals. For example, Genesis 1 would read like this:
Genesis 1:1-31So, if you asked Alan Hayward if the universe was created in 6 days, he'd answer, "Yes." If you asked him if it formed over 14 billion years, he'd say, "Yes. Everything we see in the known 14 billion year old universe is the result of God taking six days to speak of what would be." Ultimately, I have no idea how God did it. I find that each interpretation has its strengths and weaknesses. |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
1 Attachment(s)
Lastly, there is the notion of "Sacred Myth". This view holds that the entire Genesis narrative isn't intended to be taken literally or scientifically, but is to be taken as a "spiritual truth". This view proposes that it is a spiritual story explaining that God progressively created all things from the earth, even man (evolution?). Adam and Eve are not seen as descriptions of literal people, but representations of all of mankind. Thus, in Adam and Eve, we find ourselves. In the serpent we see the tempter that we all face. In their fall we find our individual loss of innocence. In God having clothed them, we find God's grace and desire to clothe us in His righteousness.
This view elevates the entire story into the realm of being above scientific inquiry and presents it as eternal spiritual truth about our relationship with God. It leaves science to work out the earthly "facts" while maintaining that no matter what science might find... we're all found in Adam, even the earliest human primates dating back nearly 2 million years. Imagine if God's Spirit inspired the story of, The Three Little Pigs. It would teach an important lesson about building a life out of values that endure. And it would be just as divinely inspired as any other text. However, it wouldn't be intended to be taken literally. That's how this view sees Genesis. |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
Quote:
did not begin until Genesis 1:14. |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
Quote:
did not begin until Genesis 1:14. I don't know where that would put me. |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
Quote:
That's my take. I don't believe creation occurred in 6 literal days. I believe renovation occurred in six literal days. Creation occurred in a moment in Gen 1:1. But the 6 days were literal. |
Re: Are you a Creationist?
Francis Febus is apostolic and believes the Genesis account is not about literal creation but about covenants, using spiritual language to lay out His covenants with man.
|
Re: Are you a Creationist?
The Gap Theory, Day Age Theory and Theistic Evolution are all conjecture, reading between the scriptures something that is not there in an attempt to conform the word of God with science.
|
Re: Are you a Creationist?
Quote:
Isaiah said God did not create the earth without form. So how can it be without form in gen 1:2 if God created it in 1:1 and he didn't create it without form? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.