![]() |
Joshua: NOT a liar
Joshua proclaims to all Israel that God has faithfully done everything he said he would do (in relation to conquering all of Canaan for the Jews). Yet, even a superficial reading of the Book of Joshua clearly shows areas unconquered. One prominent example is the Jebusite stronghold, which was only conquered much later, by David, then to gain fame as great Zion.
Taking everything Joshua said literally, makes Joshua look like a liar he wasn't. Instead of calling Joshua a liar, it should be considered that the culture of the Middle East used hyperbole to a large extent. Those today who've lived there say this usage is still common, a feature. Thus, Joshua's words should be understood in the context of the language usage of that time. Anything else would be inaccurate. No one of that time would have taken his words literally. They would have read between the lines, ignoring a literal interpretation. Joshua was doing his very best speaking (in line with language usage of that day) to magnify (make larger than real) the Lord. Everyone then understood he was not attempting to be literally accurate. Anyone reading the Bible today should take hyperbole into consideration, to understand the Bible as accurately as possible. I'm a Canadian. If God would ever speak to my physical ears, my guess is he would use the English of Canada and not an Aussie bent. I might not perceive an Australian version of English. When he spoke to those in Bible lands, did he use the language they understood? If so, did he use the language as they used it, ie. with hyperbole, or was it modified? |
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Joshua spoke truth and God is true. The example you are using, ie deliverance from the inhabitants, was conditional upon the people obeying. Not sure what you are meaning about hyperbole. It kinda appears that you are misunderstanding the context.
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Quote:
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Joshua isn't a liar. The issue is the biblical narrative presents a complex fulfillment: Joshua declared God fulfilled His promise by giving Israel all the land Joshua 21:43-45, meaning it was legally theirs and they had rest. However, they didn't fully remove all inhabitants due to their own incomplete obedience and military shortcomings. Therefore leaving some Canaanites in the land, with the understanding that full, continuous possession depended on their ongoing faithfulness. It was all their land, through their disobedience they failed to claim it. Joshua records the tribes, particularly Manasseh, Joshua 17:12-13 and Ephraim, Judges 1:27-28, couldn't fully remove the Canaanites, who remained in their cities, leading to forced labor and covenant compromise. This is the situation Joshua warned them about, emphasizing the need for full conquest and obedience to God's commands to avoid idolatry and sin.
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Quote:
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Casual reading of the Book of Joshua may lead some to think that Jos contradicts himself, as demonstrated earlier. None should think so.
Any explanations given as to why are viable, until shown wrong. The Bible does not itself give a reason why. The fact that those of the Middle East used hyperbole extensively, has not yet been shown to be a fable. An example: The kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar was said to be over all the earth. No one ever should suggest that it extended anywhere other than just the Middle East. Either people should ignore what the Word plainly says or they should say they believe the writer used hyperbole. All the earth definitely should not be taken literally. Hyperbole is a good explanation of a seeming contradiction. We have two examples of hyperbole. Are there others? Of course, because the writers used the language styles they grew up in - hyperbole - which exists to this day. God's word faithfully portrayed reality of that day. |
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
You are correct, the Bible uses hyperbole as in all the world or all the earth statements. Yet, in the case of Joshua, God gave them all the land. Joshua affirms that fact. Yet, with a little bit of reading we understand that while the parent may have given their children their house in their will. The children not claiming ownership of the house does not negate the fact the house was legally owned by the children.
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Quote:
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
If anyone were to call Joshua a liar, they would also have to call Solomon a liar. Because in 1 Kings 8:56 Solomon confirms the words of Joshua; "Blessed be the LORD, that hath given rest unto his people Israel, according to all that he promised: there hath not failed one word of all his good promise, which he promised by the hand of Moses his servant."
|
Re: Joshua: NOT a liar
Also the Prophet Nehemiah makes the same claims in Nehemiah 9:8.
"And foundest his heart faithful before thee, and madest a covenant with him to give the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Jebusites, and the Girgashites, to give it, I say, to his seed, and hast performed thy words; for thou art righteous:" The Bible testifies that Joshua was telling the truth. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.